Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 5

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 786 complete answers recorded on 23 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
786
collected
23 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_4_5, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 19 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, origin, nativeQuoteVerified

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

2026 New Zealand election: learning support and opportunities for Pacific children

For a Pacific household caring for children and older relatives across generations, education policy is about more than school results. It can affect whether children receive help when they struggle, whether early childhood education is affordable, whether disabled and neurodivergent children are included, and whether young people can afford to continue into university, trades or other training.

As of 22 October 2026, the election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November. The parties differ in how they approach learning support: some emphasise earlier identification of learning difficulties, teacher and teacher-aide support, and core academic skills; others propose broader inclusion, specialist services and more financial support for learners. Fixing the Basics and Building the Future: National’s plan for Kiwi kidsParty policies, simplified: EducationPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

One important distinction: a policy that benefits all children is not necessarily a policy specifically designed for Pacific children. I'll separate general education proposals from measures that may be especially relevant to Pacific families.

1. What the parties are proposing

Kāinga | Home | Te Kura o Pātiki | Rosebank School

National

Focus: academic basics and earlier support

National proposes a school-entry check for every child, clearer early-childhood development milestones, and referral to an expanded Early Intervention Service when children need extra help. It also promises Learning Support Coordinators in all schools with Years 1–8 students by 2028 and additional teacher-aide hours and training, building to two million extra hours annually from 2028. Its plan includes replacing NCEA from 2028. Teaching the basics brilliantlyFixing the Basics and Building the Future: National’s plan for Kiwi kids

What this could mean: earlier identification of learning difficulties and more help within schools, if the proposed staffing and services are delivered.

In their own words: what it means to be a teacher aide | The Spinoff

Labour

Focus: classroom support and affordability

On 22 October, Labour pledged to hire 1,000 more teacher aides. It has also said it would progress the findings of the Highest Needs Review to address support for children with the greatest needs. Its wider family policies include cutting back-to-school costs and supporting Pacific language nests, Puna Reo and Kōhanga Reo. Party policies, simplified: EducationLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What this could mean: additional classroom assistance and potential help with education-related household expenses. The detail on hiring, allocation and implementation matters.

The journey to a more inclusive education system – Education Gazette

Green Party

Focus: inclusive education and specialist support

The Greens propose widening eligibility for learning support, creating a single agency to coordinate and resource specialist support for learners with health and disability needs, and implementing the Ministry of Education's Framework for Action: A Quality Education for All. Their wider agenda emphasises children's wellbeing and support for Pacific communities. Party policies, simplified: EducationManifesto 2026

What this could mean: a broader route to support for children who currently struggle to qualify for assistance, with better coordination between services.

Pacific learners – supporting and enhancing success

Te Pāti Māori

Focus: culturally grounded education and inclusion

Its published education policy proposes Māori-led education authority and solutions, embedding mātauranga Māori in learning, removing barriers to education and training, and supporting Māori governance. In its response on disability education, the party also proposed a Māori-led taskforce, more support for teachers and accessible learning environments, and professional development grounded in mātauranga Māori. Education & TrainingParty policies, simplified: Education

What this could mean: greater emphasis on identity, culturally grounded teaching and inclusion. These are Māori-focused proposals, so Pacific families should check which measures would apply to them directly.

ACT New Zealand

ACT

Focus: school choice and classroom behaviour

ACT has emphasised giving families more choice, including charter schools. It also proposes allowing teachers to use reasonable and proportionate physical intervention in narrowly defined situations involving harm or serious property damage, subject to safeguards. Party policies, simplified: EducationParty policies, simplified: Education

What this could mean: families may want to compare the learning and support services available at different schools, as well as the proposed behaviour rules and safeguards for children with additional needs.

Beyond the Ballot » Wairakei Primary School

New Zealand First

Focus: family support; limited detail on new learning-support commitments

The party has announced a Kiwi Kids Grant to help with the costs of raising children during their first three years, and proposed increasing Working for Families. In the disability-education comparison published on 21 October, it did not provide a specific new learning-support proposal or a position on the use of reasonable force in classrooms. Latest NewsParty policies, simplified: Education

What this could mean: its family-support proposals may be relevant to household budgets, but check for more specific commitments on teacher aides, specialist services and Pacific learners.

#teachnz | Naomi Pocock (PhD)

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Focus: long-term planning across education and health

TOP has advocated a cross-party, 10-year plan for health and education. It did not directly answer the recent disability-education policy questionnaire, so specific new commitments on learning support are less clear in the available comparison. Party policies, simplified: EducationPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

What this could mean: a longer-term approach to education and health planning, but the practical details and funding commitments are important to verify.

2. Opportunities for Pacific children beyond the classroom

Learning support is only one part of the picture. Here are three areas worth comparing alongside it.

Early childhood education and Pacific languages

For families with several children, grandparents and other relatives sharing caregiving, the availability and cost of early childhood education can influence both household finances and children's preparation for school.

When comparing these policies, check whether they reduce the actual fees your family pays, improve access to places, or provide practical help for children who need early intervention.

University, trades and further training

Young people need opportunities to continue learning after school without placing excessive financial pressure on their wider family.

Pacific student advocates have highlighted the costs of rent, food, unpaid placements and family commitments as barriers to completing tertiary study. This makes it important to compare living-cost assistance and access to training, not just student-debt policies. Pacific students want help beyond a growing loan bill in New Zealand

Cultural identity and belonging

A child's ability to learn can also depend on whether they feel understood and included at school.

When assessing each party, look for concrete commitments on Pacific languages, culturally responsive teaching, family engagement, bullying and discrimination, and support for Pacific students with disabilities or learning differences.

A Pacific-specific election policy review reported that only nine of 243 promises it examined explicitly mentioned Pasifika. That suggests many relevant proposals are general policies rather than tailored commitments to Pacific communities. NZ Election 2026: What are political parties promising Pacific families? — rthecoconet.tv - The world’s largest hub of Pacific Island content.uu

3. A practical checklist for your household

Given your concerns about costs, space and healthcare, these are useful questions to put to parties and candidates:

Your concern What to look for in a policy
Household costs Lower ECE fees, help with school costs, affordable transport and realistic support for students from low-income households.
Learning support More teacher-aide hours, shorter waits for assessments, earlier intervention and accessible specialist services.
Pacific children Pacific language provision, culturally responsive teaching and evidence that Pacific learners will benefit from the proposed services.
Space at home Whether housing policies address overcrowding and provide suitable, affordable family housing.
Healthcare Access to GPs, child development assessments, disability services and mental-health support without long waits or unaffordable costs.
Future opportunities Affordable tertiary study, trades training, apprenticeships and assistance with living costs.

For your family's circumstances, a particularly important question is whether a party has committed to funding and delivering additional learning support, rather than simply promising better educational outcomes.

4. Where to verify the details before voting

The proposals above are campaign commitments, not guarantees of implementation. Funding, eligibility rules, coalition negotiations and the time it takes to roll out services will all matter.

One final point: you have two votes in the New Zealand general election — a party vote and an electorate vote. You can compare the national policy commitments with what your local candidates say they will do about learning support and opportunities for Pacific children.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

Navigating the 2026 general election in a multigenerational household means balancing the needs of everyone under your roof—from the rising costs of groceries and power to accessing reliable healthcare and ensuring children have the educational support they need to thrive.

When looking specifically at learning support, early childhood education (ECE), and opportunities for children and young people, political parties have staked out distinct approaches that matter for Pacific families.


Main Party Approaches to Learning Support and Early Childhood Education

Different blocks in Parliament propose contrasting pathways for school readiness, learning support, and targeted funding:

  • National-led Coalition (National, ACT, NZ First):
    • Early Intervention & School Readiness: National's policies place heavy emphasis on structured early tracking, such as introducing a School Start Check during early childhood education to monitor developmental milestones, report progress to parents early, and connect children who need extra help with Early Intervention Services before they enter primary school.
    • Curriculum and Standards: Their broader education focus targets standardized achievement metrics, structured literacy, and core academic basics.
    • Fiscal and Social Policy Context: Parties on the right generally favor targeted, measurable delivery and economic growth through tax relief and business incentives to lift household incomes, rather than broad-based universal service expansions.
  • Labour, Green Party, and Te Pāti Māori (The Opposition/Left Bloc):
    • Systemic & Community Provision: These parties emphasize strengthening the public and community-governed education and early childhood sectors. For instance, Labour and the Greens focus heavily on protecting public funding, lowering structural barriers, and expanding holistic wellbeing and mental health support inside schools and communities.
    • Targeted Support and Equity: They advocate for reversing cuts to targeted student and youth support programs, emphasizing culturally responsive learning environments (including Pacific and Māori frameworks), and boosting funding for teacher aides, learning support coordinators, and specialist services in areas with high proportions of priority learners.
    • Cost of Living and Income Support: Because children cannot learn well if their families are squeezed by housing and poverty, these parties tie children's educational success to wider welfare, housing, and income support measures (such as expanded health services, free lunches or food support initiatives, and benefit/tax credit adjustments).

Connecting Education to Your Household's Broader Concerns

For a multigenerational Pacific household, children's education does not happen in a vacuum—it is closely tied to your family's other core pressures:

  1. Household Costs & Space: Policies affecting family tax credits, cost-of-living payments, and housing assistance directly impact how much financial stress is placed on the household budget. Parties of the left emphasize direct income boosts and public services, while parties of the right focus on easing market costs and broad tax settings.
  2. Healthcare Access: Older relatives and children require reliable, affordable healthcare. Major debates center on free or low-cost primary care, prescription funding, and strengthening regional health infrastructure to reduce wait times.

Next Steps for Voters

With the general election on Saturday, 7 November 2026 (and advance voting opening shortly), you can review detailed policy comparisons tailored to Pacific families through independent community resources like Palota (palota.nz) or Pacific Learners (pacificlearners.co.nz).

Are there specific areas—such as primary school learning support versus early childhood options—that you would like to dig deeper into?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

Navigating the 2026 general election in a multigenerational Pacific household means looking at how policies intersect—balancing the daily squeeze of household costs with long-term educational success and learning support for your children.

Party platforms approach learning support, equity, and opportunities for Pacific communities through different structural and funding lenses. You can compare specific party manifestos and candidate stances directly on platforms like

Policy.nz

.

Overview of Party Approaches to Learning Support and Pacific Opportunities

: Focuses heavily on public system stability, equitable resourcing, and evidence-based curriculum design. Their education approach generally emphasises strengthening state and integrated schools, expanding general learning support coordination (like Learning Support Coordinators in schools), and backing targeted trades and vocational training pathways historically utilised by Māori and Pacific learners. They oppose charter/partnership school expansions, arguing resources should concentrate on lifting the baseline of the main public schooling network.

(current governing party context): Focuses on structured literacy, regular standardised assessment and reporting to parents, and school accountability. For learning support and achievement, their policy emphasis has been on core foundational basics (reading, writing, maths) and introducing alternative educational environments, such as charter/partnership schools, which they argue give communities and families more agile choices outside standard state schooling.

: Advocates for a deeply inclusive education system by expanding the eligibility criteria for learning support. They propose establishing a single, well-resourced dedicated agency to coordinate specialist health and disability support for learners, which appeals to families needing holistic wraparound care for children with diverse learning or neurodivergent needs. [The D*List]

: Emphasises school choice and structural decentralisation, championing partnership and charter schools to allow community-led or specialized educational models to emerge independently of central Ministry constraints. [The D*List]

: Tends to emphasise traditional curriculum baselines, English-language competency, and vocational/practical training pathways within the state education framework, focusing less on targeted ethnic-specific bureaucracy and more on standard, disciplined classroom environments.

Key Questions to Weigh for Your Household

When reviewing policies or talking to local candidates ahead of the November 7 election, you might weigh these considerations relative to your family's daily reality: [Wikipedia]

  1. Learning Support Access: If your children or relatives require specialist therapy, neurodiversity support, or extra classroom assistance, look closely at whether a party wants to expand state-funded specialist numbers (like the Greens or Labour's approach) or shift towards independent/choice models (like ACT/National).
  2. Cost-of-Living Interventions: Because household costs impact how much mental and financial bandwidth a family has to support learning at home, check how parties plan to ease everyday pressures (such as cost-of-living assistance, school lunches/donation schemes, or public transport fares) which indirectly free up family resources for children's activities and stability.
  3. Vocational & Cultural Pathways: For older children approaching secondary transitions, examine which parties are backing Pacific bilingual education units, Pacific-focused tertiary/trades cadetships, or community-led learning hubs that respect your family's cultural context.
Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about learning support and opportunities for children from Pacific communities?

AI Overview

For Pacific families considering their vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have laid out distinct platforms regarding learning support, funding, and cultural education models.

The proposals and tracks put forward by the primary political parties for Pacific children's learning support and educational opportunities are broken down below:

Party Learning Support & Teacher Aides ECE & Language Nests Curriculum & Schools
National Party Highlights their record $750 million investment in learning support, which they state has shortened early intervention wait times by 16 days and funded coordinators in 62% of primary/intermediate schools (rising to 80% next year). Focuses on a School Start Check for developmental milestones and ending/limiting screen and device use in early childhood education (ECE). Focuses on doubling Trades Academy places by 2030 to broaden practical career paths. Advocates for a structured core curriculum with clear attendance reporting.
Labour Party Promises $80 million over four years to fund 1,000 extra teacher aides to deliver individual support in classrooms. Pledges to address system gaps identified in learning support reviews. Focuses historically on qualified and network-managed teacher models. Promises to abolish charter schools and restore senior school lunch funding up to $6.50 (reversing the current $3 allocation). Offers a $7M/year grant for affordable after-school sports and recreation to reduce screen time.
Green Party Demands stability and increased core resourcing for state schools where the vast majority of Pacific students learn. Proposes capping ECE fees at $10 a day , making it completely free (35 hours) by 2029, and expanding access to affordable early childhood education. Criticizes current curriculum overhauls for gutting Pacific education plans and making children feel disconnected. Advocates for embedding Pacific languages and knowledge as core system assets.
ACT New Zealand Backs choice-driven alternatives like the charter school model to support students who fall short in mainstream systems. Focuses on reducing administrative compliance barriers for providers. Led the legislative framework to formally enable nature-based ECE. Prioritizes strict attendance targets (e.g., daily tracking and a traffic light intervention system) to correct non-attendance.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Advocates for a 10-year cross-party plan for education to guarantee long-term funding consistency. Prioritizes increased core funding for community-owned services, explicitly including Pacific language nests. Emphasizes genuine partnerships that protect identity, business funding, and community-led structures.

Where to review the details

  • Look into the breakdown of promises on The Coconet TV Election Guide to see how specific proposals impact Pacific households.

  • Watch the candidates debate these issues directly on the PMN Pacific Vote 2026 Forum.

  • Track full manifests and operational timelines directly on the Electoral Commission Vote NZ platform as election day on Saturday 7 November 2026 approaches.

Ask anything

Captured 23 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account