Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

New Zealand 2026 election: healthcare and income support

When you're living with a long-term health condition and relying on income support, healthcare policy affects more than your medical treatment. It can determine how much you pay to see a GP, how long you wait for a specialist, whether you can afford your prescriptions, and how much of your benefit remains for rent, food and transport.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to compare parties across three areas:

  • Affordable GP care: consultation fees, low-cost access and eligibility for subsidies.
  • Specialist access: public waiting lists, referral pathways, diagnostic tests and access to treatment.
  • Medicines: Pharmac funding, prescription charges and access to new or unfunded treatments.

I'll distinguish between policies that parties have actually announced, measures already in place, and areas where a party's position still needs confirmation. An important distinction is that a policy promise is not the same as a funded, implemented change.

1. Compare the main parties

The following reflects policies and reporting available as of 16 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026
Party GP care and affordability Medicines and specialist access
Labour Three free GP visits a year through a proposed Medicard, for people eligible for publicly funded healthcare. Proposes scrapping the $5 prescription charge from July 2027. Its GP proposal is specific; further details on long-term specialist waiting times need separate scrutiny. Labour's Cost of Living PlanElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
Green Party Proposes moving towards fully publicly funded primary care, rather than limiting free GP visits to a small annual allowance. Supports increased Pharmac funding and wider publicly funded care, including dental and community services. Check the funding timetable and implementation details. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
National Emphasises expanding GP capacity, urgent and after-hours care, online services and workforce supply, rather than Labour's three-free-visits proposal. Emphasises funding more medicines and increasing planned treatments through public and private providers. National is delivering quality healthcare2026 Election PolicyElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
ACT Emphasises more choice of providers and expanding the role of pharmacists, including in managing long-term conditions. Proposes increasing medicines spending as a share of the health budget towards 12% by 2033, alongside greater use of private providers to help reduce waiting lists. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy Summaries
New Zealand First Its 2026 health announcement emphasises prevention, supporting general practice and reducing administrative burdens. Focuses on prevention and reconsidering barriers to recognised safe nutrients. Its 2026 announcement should be distinguished from older election promises about Pharmac and waiting-list funding. The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”NZFirst Campaign Announcement: The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”2023 Election Policies
Te Pāti Māori Supports free primary care, with an emphasis on equitable access and whānau wellbeing. Its wider health approach prioritises Māori health outcomes and access to services. Check the party's current detailed commitments for specific medicine and specialist funding amounts. Health Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

These are different approaches, not a ranking. Labour has made specific commitments on GP fees and prescription charges; the Greens propose a broader publicly funded model; National and ACT emphasise service capacity, treatment funding and different ways of delivering care. New Zealand First's published 2026 announcement places particular emphasis on prevention. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy SummariesThe Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

2. What the differences could mean for you

Affordable GP appointments

If you need regular appointments to monitor a chronic condition, the number of free visits matters.

  • Labour: Its proposed three free visits per year could reduce costs for routine reviews, but three visits may not cover your needs if you require monthly or frequent follow-ups. The proposal is scheduled to start in July 2028, so it would not provide immediate relief. Labour's Cost of Living PlanElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
  • Greens: Their broader free-primary-care proposal addresses the cost of repeated consultations more directly in principle, but the details of delivery and funding matter.
  • National and ACT: Their emphasis on increasing capacity or using different providers may improve access if additional appointments become available. It does not, by itself, guarantee that your usual GP visits will be free.

There is also a current measure to know about: Health New Zealand's 2026/27 primary-care funding arrangements aim to keep standard GP consultation fees at their 8 June 2026 levels through 30 June 2027. This is a temporary fee-stability measure, not a guarantee that all appointments are affordable or free. Annual primary care funding

Specialist appointments and tests

For long-term conditions, waiting for a specialist can delay diagnosis, medication changes or treatment.

For your situation, look for commitments covering the whole pathway: GP review, tests, specialist assessment, treatment and follow-up. A target for more hospital procedures may not solve a shortage of outpatient specialist appointments.

Medicines and prescription costs

This area deserves particular attention if you take several medicines or need newer treatments.

  • Labour: proposes removing the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027 for people entitled to publicly funded healthcare. This is a direct, defined change to out-of-pocket costs. 2026 Election Policy SummariesLabour's Cost of Living Plan
  • National: has announced a $604 million increase to the medicines budget, funded through savings from reduced foreign aid outside the Pacific. Its policy also includes cancer-related clinical trials and screening changes. 2026 Election Policy Summaries2026 Election Policy
  • ACT: proposes increasing medicines spending as a share of the health budget by one percentage point each year, reaching 12% by 2033. It also proposes allowing pharmacists to help manage long-term conditions within defined limits. 2026 Election Policy Summaries
  • Greens: support a wider publicly funded healthcare system, including free diagnosis, treatment and management, but the precise funding and timing for individual medicines should be checked against the party's detailed policy. 2026 Election Policy Summaries
  • New Zealand First: its current 2026 announcement focuses on prevention and changes to the treatment of recognised safe nutrients. Don't assume older proposals to substantially expand Pharmac funding remain current commitments unless the party reconfirms them. The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”2023 Election Policies

One important distinction: removing a prescription charge is not the same as funding a medicine that Pharmac does not currently subsidise. If you depend on an expensive specialist medicine, ask parties specifically about Pharmac's medicine waiting lists, funding for rare disorders, and access to treatments not currently publicly funded.

3. Your income support matters, too

Healthcare policy is only part of the financial picture when illness limits your ability to work.

When comparing parties, consider whether their wider policies address:

  • The adequacy and indexation of benefits for people who cannot work because of illness or disability.
  • Additional costs related to disability or ongoing medical needs, including eligibility for the Disability Allowance.
  • Transport to regular appointments, prescription collection and other unavoidable health-related expenses.
  • Whether employment and benefit rules recognise fluctuating conditions and limited work capacity.

These issues are not interchangeable with health-service policies. A party might propose cheaper GP visits without changing benefit rates, or expand medicine funding without improving support for transport costs.

For current entitlements, you can check Work and Income's Disability Allowance information. Your existing eligibility and assistance should be assessed separately from promises about future policy.

4. Questions to ask before deciding how to vote

Here is a practical checklist you can use with any party's published policy or when contacting a candidate.

My healthcare election checklist

0 of 6

Will I pay less for the number of GP visits I actually need each year?

How will the policy help me get a specialist appointment and necessary tests sooner?

Will it fund my specific medicines if they are not currently subsidised?

Will it reduce my out-of-pocket medical expenses, including travel and follow-up care?

Are the changes fully funded, and when would they take effect?

Will my income support and health-related assistance keep pace with essential costs?

Copy checklist

For an independent overview, the New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association's 2026 election policy guide summarises published health commitments across seven parties. The Policy.nz health comparison also lets you explore individual policy areas. 2026 Election Policy SummariesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The key distinction for your circumstances

There are three separate things to weigh up: what you pay now, whether you can get care when you need it, and whether you can access the treatment that manages your condition. No single promise necessarily addresses all three.

A useful next step is to compare parties against your most frequent or costly healthcare need, rather than relying only on their overall health-spending announcements. Also check whether a proposal is an election promise, has a published funding plan, and has a realistic implementation date. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

When considering how political parties approach healthcare in the 2026 New Zealand general election, parties have distinct philosophies and policy toolkits. For someone managing a long-term health condition who relies on income support and needs consistent medical care, GP affordability, specialist access, and the cost and availability of medicines are critical issues.

The major parties approach these areas through sharply differing models of public funding, private sector integration, and targeted support:

1. Affordable GP and Primary Care

Primary care is the frontline for long-term condition management. Parties differ on whether to make care universally free or target it based on income or age:

  • Labour Party: Places primary care affordability at the centre of its platform. Their flagship 2026 policy is the "Medicard," which provides three free GP visits per year for every person entitled to publicly funded healthcare. They also propose a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to encourage more doctors into practice ownership to build capacity.
  • Green Party: Advocates for a major expansion of universal care, proposing unlimited free GP visits for everyone, alongside free dental care, funded through a wealth tax. They prioritize community care clinics in high-need areas first.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care and dental for all whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a Māori Health Card that directly links funding to the patient to reduce barriers.
  • National-led Government (Incumbent): Focuses on system continuity, workforce expansion, and targeted capability funding through budgets (such as primary care investments) rather than broad-scale universal free GP models. National critics have argued that broad policies like Labour's Medicard risk subsidizing care for higher-income earners rather than targeting those most in need.
  • ACT Party: Opposes universal free GP policies. ACT favors a model where the government acts as a purchaser rather than a provider, proposing alternative mechanisms like health savings accounts or incentives for private cover.

2. Specialist Access and Waitlist Reduction

Managing a long-term condition often requires secondary care and specialist referrals, where wait times are a major concern:

  • National / Coalition Government: Emphasizes clinical targets and expanded capacity. Through initiatives like the "Elective Boost" programme, the current government has utilized partnerships and contracts with private healthcare providers to outsource surgeries and reduce public waitlists.
  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy focus on a dedicated waitlist reduction fund and rapid diagnostics to clear backlogs within the public system.
  • Labour and the Green Party: Strongly oppose extensive reliance on outsourcing to private hospitals. They argue that government funds directed toward private contractors siphon vital resources away from the public system, and advocate instead for heavily resourcing public hospitals and workforce training to handle specialist demand internally.
  • ACT Party: Strongly supports expanding private sector involvement to relieve public waitlists, viewing the government's role primarily as purchasing services from the most efficient provider (public or private).

3. Medicines and Prescriptions

For people with chronic illnesses, the cost and Pharmac-funding of regular medicines are vital to everyday survival and budgeting:

  • Labour Party: Has committed to restoring universally free prescriptions (removing the standard prescription co-payment charge).
  • National and Coalition Parties: Focus on continuous funding streams and targeted management through Pharmac to evaluate and fund new medicines, balancing these actions against broader fiscal restraint and economic targets.
  • Parties focused on equity (Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Generally push for expanded Pharmac budgets to ensure that life-saving and modern medicines are funded without regional or financial disparities, emphasizing that medication access must be equitable for lower-income households and Māori/Pasifika communities who face higher burdens of chronic illness.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When reviewing party manifestos ahead of the election, you may want to weigh:

  1. Direct financial relief: Do you benefit more from universal policies (like free GP visits or free prescriptions) versus targeted income-support adjustments?
  2. Public vs. Private delivery: Do you prefer parties that contract private providers to clear specialist waitlists quickly, or those that invest exclusively in rebuilding public hospital capacity?

Would you like to explore the specific policy details of a particular party regarding income support or disability assistance alongside these health policies?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , health is a central issue, with parties offering distinct approaches to primary care affordability, specialist wait times, and Pharmac funding for medicines. For individuals managing long-term conditions while relying on income support, the key policy differences center on universal versus targeted subsidies, public-versus-private capacity building, and direct prescription cost-reductions.

1. Affordable GP Care

  • Labour Party: Proposes a major universal primary care policy via a new Medicard system , which would provide three free GP (doctor or nurse) visits per year for every New Zealander entitled to publicly funded healthcare. To handle the expected increase in demand, Labour has also floated the Family Doctor Loan Scheme to assist practitioners with practice ownership and boost capacity.

  • National Party: Focuses on continuing and expanding current frontline funding models and targeted enrolments rather than universal free visits. National’s approach relies on funding boosts via recent budgets (such as Budget 2026 targets for additional general practice enrolments), alongside expanding online general practice care and after-hours urgent services to manage primary load.

2. Specialist Access & Hospital Care

  • National Party: Emphasizes measurable health targets and utilizing both public and private sector capacity. They point to programs like the Elective Boost and multi-million-dollar budget allocations to deliver planned-care treatments, inpatient episodes, and emergency department events through mixed public-private contracting.

  • Labour & Other Parties / Sector Critique: Opposition parties and health commentators highlight that relying on private-sector contracting without shoring up public workforce retention risks deepening regional and equity disparities. Critics and opposition frameworks argue that waitlists for specialist assessments point to a deeper public capacity crisis requiring direct structural resourcing of public hospitals rather than outsourced delivery. [The Conversation]

3. Medicines and Pharmac Funding

  • National Party: Campaigns heavily on its track record of funding additional medicines during its term (including cancer treatments) and pledges a further $604 million uplift to Pharmac’s budget if re-elected. They also support pathways for clinical trials and specialized localized therapies (such as CAR-T cell therapy).

  • Labour Party: Proposes the full removal of the $5 prescription fee for every New Zealander entitled to free public healthcare starting 1 July 2027 (broadening current targeted exemptions that apply mainly to CSC holders, children, and seniors). This sits alongside their Medicard and preventative health initiatives.

You can review comprehensive and side-by-side party manifestos on health via the Policy.nz 2026 Health Guide or read an independent breakdown of delivery and fiscal plans in the New Zealand Medical Journal Election 2026 Editorial.

Would you like to explore how these party policies match up with other areas affecting income support, or look into specific local advocacy groups for long-term health conditions in New Zealand?

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable GP care, specialist access and medicines for people with long-term conditions?

AI Overview

For voters managing long-term health conditions in the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties offer vastly different priorities: Labour and the Green Party lean heavily on reducing direct patient costs via free doctor visits and removing prescription fees, while the National Party and ACT focus on system capacity, private sector integration, and targeted medicine funding.

Party Comparison on Key Healthcare Priorities

Party Affordable GP Care Specialist Access & Waiting Lists Medicines & Pharmac
National Party Rejects universal free visits. Focuses on general funding for health cost pressures ($14.57b over four years) and online GP care options. Restores explicit health targets and funds 45,000 elective procedures using both public and private hospital capacity. Focuses on funding a specific list of 66 new medicines and expanding earlier cancer care access.
Labour Party Flagship Medicard policy provides three free GP visits per year for everyone. Introduces a loan scheme to help doctors set up practices. Aims to reduce wait times by guaranteeing public health jobs for all domestic graduate nurses to fix staffing shortages. Promises to restore universally free prescriptions by completely removing the $5 co-payment from July 2027.
Green Party Advocates for unlimited free GP visits and fully funded public dental care for all New Zealanders, funded via a wealth tax. Focuses heavily on universal public system expansion and building community care clinics in high-need areas first. Supports fully subsidizing necessary treatments and expanding public pharmaceutical accessibility.
ACT Party Proposes a "government-as-purchaser" model with a $6,000 incentive to opt out into private care. Expands pharmacist treatment powers to ease GP loads. Plans to build a new National Cancer Centre via public-private partnerships and philanthropic investment. Pledges to raise the medicine budget by 1% each year to reach parity with Australia’s spending levels by 2033.
NZ First Has historically supported free GP visits but prioritizes funding specialist access for the 2026 election cycle. Establishes a $925 million annual GP-controlled "Waitlist Reduction Fund" to let GPs buy private specialist care directly. Proposes replacing Pharmac entirely with a new medicines agency backed by an extra $1.3 billion in funding.
Te Pāti Māori Promises free primary care and dental for all whānau earning under $60,000 via a patient-linked Māori Health Card. Focuses on direct, culturally integrated funding models to eliminate structural equity gaps for Māori patients. Supports equitable distribution and funding structures for life-saving pharmaceuticals.

Detailed breakdowns of these health platforms can be tracked through the comprehensive Policy.nz Health Guide and the comparative summaries on WhichParty NZ Health Stand.

If you want to narrow down your choice, let me know:

  • Which specific long-term condition or types of medication you rely on most?
  • Whether income support changes (welfare/benefit adjustments) are a factor in your voting decision?
  • If you want to see a direct comparison of how these parties plan to change Supported Living Payments or jobseeker requirements?
Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account