Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

For your situation, the most useful comparison is not simply which party promises to build more roads. It is which parties are most likely to make life easier for people in small New Zealand towns who commute long distances, need to travel for healthcare and other services, and want more opportunities to work locally.

For the 2026 general election, I'd compare parties across four areas:

  • Roads and transport: rural road maintenance, safety, resilience after storms, and reliable connections to larger service centres.
  • Broadband and mobile coverage: affordable, reliable internet for working remotely, accessing health services and supporting local businesses.
  • Local infrastructure: water, wastewater, public facilities and the ability of small councils to fund essential upgrades.
  • Jobs and healthcare: regional employment, training, access to primary care and hospital services, and whether infrastructure investment helps keep people and businesses in smaller communities.

One important distinction: a party's national infrastructure spending does not automatically mean better roads or services in your town. Funding rules, project selection, local council finances and delivery times all matter.

How the main parties compare

The following is a practical comparison of the major parties' policy direction and the choices they offer. It is not a prediction of which party will deliver the most for small towns; several policies need closer checking for funding, geographic coverage and delivery dates.

Sources: party policy statements and the independent election comparison site Policy.nz. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Labour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election PolicyManifesto 2026Compare NZ Political Parties Side by Side

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Emphasis: roads, economic growth and fiscal restraint

National prioritises road construction and road-focused transport investment, alongside private-sector growth, keeping taxes down and making it easier to build commercial developments. Its published 2026 policies also include specific road projects and investment in state-highway resilience. 2026 Election PolicyBudget 2026: transport initiativesCompare NZ Political Parties Side by Side

For your situation: Worth examining if better highway connections, road reliability and attracting businesses are your main priorities. Check whether your local roads and connections to services are included, rather than assuming large highway projects will benefit your town directly.

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Emphasis: affordable services, public investment and regional opportunity

Labour's 2026 platform includes three free GP visits a year, free prescriptions and a $20 weekly public-transport fare cap. Its broader approach places more emphasis on affordable services and public investment than a roads-first strategy. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesCompare NZ Political Parties Side by SideThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For your situation: Especially relevant if healthcare costs and access to essential services are as important as roads. The key question is whether its infrastructure and regional-development proposals will improve access for people who still have to drive long distances.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Emphasis: regional connectivity and infrastructure beyond cities

New Zealand First's published policy material supports regional road and rail connections, rural public transport, continued ultrafast-broadband rollout, and funding smaller internet providers to fill remote coverage gaps. Its October 2026 announcement also says fast-tracked housing should have adequate roads, water and wastewater infrastructure in place. 2023 Election PoliciesNZFirst Policy Announcement: Changes to Fast-Track Residential Approvals

For your situation: A particularly relevant party to scrutinise for rural connectivity and the infrastructure needs of smaller communities. Verify which of these earlier published commitments remain in its final 2026 platform, and how much funding is attached.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT New Zealand

Emphasis: road investment, user-pays funding and lower government costs

ACT supports road investment funded through road-user charges and opposes government subsidisation of public transport. Its approach puts more weight on transport-user funding and market-led choices. Transport Policy NZ — All Parties ComparedCompare NZ Political Parties Side by Side

For your situation: Consider how its funding approach would affect you as someone who needs a car to reach services. Ask whether it commits to maintaining low-volume local roads, where the cost per user can be high.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Emphasis: public transport, rail, climate resilience and social services

The Greens favour better public transport and rail, walking and cycling infrastructure, and broader social investment rather than prioritising new roads. Their 2026 manifesto frames infrastructure and community wellbeing within environmental and social goals. Manifesto 2026Compare NZ Political Parties Side by Side

For your situation: Look for practical proposals on rural bus links, regional rail, mobile and broadband access, and resilient roads. The availability of alternatives to driving matters much more if a public-transport service actually connects your town to hospitals and larger centres.

These five parties are a useful starting point, but not the entire ballot. Te Pāti Māori and the Opportunity Party are also standing in 2026 and may have relevant proposals on local services, health, infrastructure funding and regional development. You can compare their published positions through Policy.nz's 2026 election comparison. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Candidate and party lists released

What matters most for your town?

Here is how I would test the parties against your everyday needs, rather than their headline promises.

Issue What to look for in a party's policy
Road maintenance Funding for local roads, bridges, potholes and road safety—not just new motorways.
Long-distance travel Reliable routes to hospitals, specialist appointments, education and major service centres.
Broadband Actual fibre or wireless coverage, affordable connections and support for remote areas.
Mobile coverage Dead-zone improvements, particularly on roads used for work and medical travel.
Water and local infrastructure Funded upgrades to water, wastewater and community facilities, with realistic costs for small councils.
Local employment Support for small businesses, vocational training, regional employers and jobs that do not depend on farming.
Healthcare GP availability, rural health workers, urgent care, telehealth and access to hospital services.

Broadband deserves particular attention. New Zealand First has explicitly supported helping smaller internet providers reach remote areas in its published policy material. For other parties, check their current commitments for coverage gaps, upgrade funding and delivery dates rather than assuming that general digital-economy promises will improve your connection. 2023 Election PoliciesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Three questions to ask before deciding

  1. Will the money reach smaller towns? Ask how much funding is allocated to local roads, rural broadband and essential infrastructure, and how it will be distributed.
  2. Will it reduce the burden on households? Consider whether better services, reliable internet or local healthcare could save your family travel time and fuel costs.
  3. Will it create jobs locally? Look for specific commitments to regional businesses, training and employment—not just national economic growth targets.

Also consider coalition politics: under New Zealand's MMP system, a party's ability to implement its programme depends partly on its parliamentary support and coalition agreements.

For a more detailed side-by-side check, these are useful starting points:

My recommendation: Give the greatest weight to concrete commitments on local road maintenance, rural connectivity, access to healthcare and the funding of small-town infrastructure. For your circumstances, a promise to build a major highway may be less valuable than a funded programme that improves the roads you use every week or brings essential services closer to home.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

For voters living outside major cities—where long driving distances, limited local employment, and constrained access to healthcare are daily realities—transport, connectivity, and regional investment are critical issues in the 2026 New Zealand General Election.

The political parties approach regional infrastructure, roads, and connectivity with distinct philosophies, balancing priorities such as private capital, user-pays models, state-led investment, and public transport expansion.

1. Roads and Transport Resilience

Road networks are the economic lifelines for small towns and rural areas, particularly for freight, commuting, and reaching regional hospitals.

  • National (Incumbent / Centre-Right): Focuses heavily on expanding and maintaining highway networks. Its current programme features major state highway improvements, including designated "Roads of National Significance" and regional road projects aimed at freight and transport resilience. National supports funding these through a mix of government investment, electronic road-user charges (RUC), tolling, and public-private partnerships (PPPs).
  • ACT (Centre-Right / Libertarian): Emphasizes a "user-pays" approach and fiscal discipline. ACT argues that infrastructure should respond directly to demand and that those who benefit most from specific roads should contribute more clearly to their costs through mechanisms like electronic RUC and tolling, while leveraging private capital to drive efficiency.
  • New Zealand First (Centrist / Nationalist): Places regional and provincial infrastructure at the core of its political identity. NZ First historically champions direct government investment in regional roading, supply-chain resilience, and local transport assets to ensure provincial towns are not left behind major urban centres.
  • Labour (Centre-Left): Prioritizes a mix of regional connectivity and cost-of-living relief for motorists, though its national transport focus leans heavily toward integrated public transport networks and nationwide fare caps. Labour is generally more cautious about relying heavily on tolling or user-charges that disproportionately impact lower-income rural households.
  • Green Party (Left): Focuses primarily on reducing car dependence, expanding nationwide rail for freight and passengers, and introducing regional options like rural/interregional bus services and on-demand public transport, rather than funding new major highway extensions.

2. Broadband and Digital Connectivity

Reliable broadband is essential for small-town businesses, remote work, and accessing telehealth services when physical healthcare is limited locally.

  • While the foundational Ultra-Fast Broadband (UFB) and Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI) rollouts laid significant groundwork over previous terms, parties view the next phase of digital equity differently:
  • Centre-Right Parties (National, ACT, NZ First): Generally favor market-led solutions, public-private partnerships, and cutting red tape or regulatory bottlenecks to encourage telecommunications providers to upgrade and expand regional cell tower and fiber coverage.
  • Centre-Left and Progressive Parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Tend to push for stronger government intervention and direct public funding to ensure that remote households, marae, and underserved rural black spots receive equitable connectivity upgrades, framing digital access as a core utility akin to electricity or water.

3. Local Infrastructure and Healthcare Access

When local jobs and healthcare are limited, small-town residents rely on neighboring regional hubs, making secondary infrastructure (such as local council funding, water assets, and regional health facilities) a major flashpoint.

  • National, ACT, and NZ First emphasize economic growth through resource development, streamlining consenting processes (such as fast-tracking major regional projects), and fiscal restraint for local councils, though they differ on how local government should fund water and infrastructural assets.
  • Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori advocate for greater central government co-investment and structural funding to support local councils, arguing that smaller rural and provincial councils lack the rating base to maintain basic infrastructure and local health-adjacent assets independently.

Key Questions to Ask When Deciding Your Vote:

  1. Funding Model: Do you prefer a model that relies more on user-pays mechanisms (like tolls and electronic road-user charges) to build roads faster, or one backed by central taxation and public investment?
  2. Priorities: Are you looking for parties that prioritize building and maintaining highways for faster vehicle and freight travel, or those focusing on alternative connections like regional public transport and rail?

Which of these infrastructure areas—improving local roads, expanding digital connectivity for telehealth, or securing better regional health and council services—matters most to you and your family?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

Living in a smaller provincial town—where you face long commutes for services and notice the strain on local healthcare and infrastructure—puts the realities of regional New Zealand right on your doorstep. As the 2026 General Election approaches, the major political parties approach regional roads, connectivity, and local services through distinct ideological lenses.

1. Roads and Transport

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on upgrading freight and regional connectivity via major highway networks, promoting their Roads of National (and Regional) Significance pipeline. They have prioritized reversing blanket speed reductions on rural and regional highways to keep travel times down, arguing that reliable, faster road links are vital for connecting smaller centres to major hubs.
  • Labour Party: Emphasizes a balanced, integrated transport approach combining regional highway maintenance and resilience with public transport and rail investment. They argue that state highway funding under National skews too heavily away from local roading maintenance subsidies for councils, which often leave rural and provincial local roads underfunded.
  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy emphasis on national resilience, supply chains, and connectivity, strongly backing regional road and freight connections linking provincial production to ports. They view infrastructure spending as a core equalizer for communities outside main centers.
  • ACT New Zealand: Favors alternative funding models like public-private partnerships (PPPs) and tolling for major new transport corridors to accelerate construction without relying solely on central government debt. They lean toward localism and market-driven solutions for infrastructure delivery.
  • Green Party: Prioritizes lower-emission transport networks, advocating for increased investment in rail (both freight and passenger) and local active transport over expanding carbon-heavy highway networks. They argue that long-term regional resilience relies on diversifying away from total car dependency.

2. Broadband and Digital Connectivity

  • National & ACT: Generally support leveraging private sector investment and targeted rural blackspot funding to finish upgrading remaining remote connections, focusing on economic productivity and ensuring businesses in smaller towns aren't digitally disadvantaged.
  • Labour & Green: View high-speed digital connectivity (broadband and mobile coverage) as an essential public utility akin to electricity or water. They historically support government-backed rollout extensions (such as expansions to the Rural Broadband Initiative) to guarantee equitable access for healthcare, remote working, and education in isolated towns.
  • New Zealand First: Supports robust connectivity as a core component of keeping rural and provincial industries (like forestry, farming, and tourism) competitive and safe, advocating for government intervention where commercial telecommunications providers fail to service remote areas.

3. Local Infrastructure (Healthcare, Water, and Services)

  • National / ACT: Focus on streamlining local council regulations and refocusing councils on "core infrastructure" (roads, water, and rubbish) rather than non-essential spending. For healthcare and social services, they emphasize administrative efficiency, localized delivery models, and workforce recruitment rather than centralized state builds.
  • Labour / Green: Argue that small-town healthcare, community facilities, and water infrastructure require direct central government capital injection and public ownership. They point to regional hospital staffing shortages and localized service degradation as reasons for sustained public funding rather than relying on market models.
  • New Zealand First: Frequently uses coalition leverage to secure dedicated regional development pools (historically via mechanisms like the Provincial Growth Fund or Regional Infrastructure Fund) aimed directly at water storage, flood protection, and community resilience projects in provincial towns.

How to weigh your vote:

  • If you want faster highway speeds, private-sector-driven infrastructure, and reduced council red tape , the center-right approach (National/ACT) aligns closely with those goals.
  • If you want more central government investment in public services, regional rail, and equitable social infrastructure , the center-left approach (Labour/Greens) matches that priority.
  • If you want ring-fenced regional development funds and a strong champion for provincial economic lifelines , nationalist/populist or regional advocates (NZ First) pitch directly to your situation.
Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

AI Overview

For regional voters living outside major cities, the 2026 New Zealand general election presents distinct choices on how local infrastructure is prioritized. While there is a broad bipartisan handshake agreeing that the country faces a massive infrastructure deficit, the political parties diverge significantly on funding mechanisms and whether focus should lie on highways, telecommunications, or localized community services.

The main political parties compare as follows on your key areas of concern:

🛣️ Roads and Transport Funding

The debate over transport infrastructure centers on how to pay for road resilience and state highway upgrades that connect small towns to regional hubs.

  • National: Prioritizes a phased program of major roading networks, emphasizing economic growth, travel reliability, and critical freight corridors. Budget 2026 explicitly funnels funding back into regional roads and hospitals. However, National is also moving the country toward alternative funding, enabling time-of-use or electronic road-user charges (RUC) to replace the traditional petrol excise tax.
  • Labour: Focuses on integrated investments and has pledged to scrap National’s scheduled fuel excise increases to give immediate cost-of-living relief. Labour advocates that transport policy must extend beyond just roads, backing regional rail and connecting public transit networks so small-town residents have alternative transit options.
  • ACT: Strongly supports a "user-pays" infrastructure model. They advocate for private capital, infrastructure discipline, tolling, and electronic road-user charges to fund construction, aiming to minimize the risk carried by taxpayers.
  • New Zealand First: Explicitly places regional development and state-owned strategic assets at the core of its platform. They champion heavy rail, fuel security, and dedicated funding lines to ensure regional infrastructure is not neglected in favor of the major cities.
  • Green Party: Advocates for a shift away from highway expansions, pushing instead for safer rural roads, nationwide rail, and rapid transition toward electric transport alternatives.

🌐 Broadband and Digital Connectivity

With rural and small-town areas heavily reliant on digital connectivity to work remotely or access telehealth services, digital infrastructure remains a persistent talking point.

  • The Coalition (National / ACT / NZ First): Continues to build on regional telecommunications funding frameworks, encouraging private telecommunications providers to expand 4G/5G mobile footprints and satellite black-spot coverage in underserved smaller towns.
  • Labour & Greens: Emphasize digital equity, viewing fast internet as a public utility essential for regional health and localized job creation. They advocate for targeted government interventions to subsidize connection costs and close the remaining broadband infrastructure gaps in remote areas.

🏥 Local Infrastructure & Services (Jobs and Healthcare)

For small-town residents who drive long distances for healthcare and employment, the structural delivery of local services is a critical policy differentiator.

  • National: Focuses heavily on their RMA (Resource Management Act) planning system reforms introduced in Budget 2026. They argue that reducing planning red tape is the single fastest way to unlock private investment, fast-track local construction projects, and naturally stimulate non-farming job markets in regional areas.
  • Labour: Focuses on a "grassroots up" economic policy, aiming to expand regional employment by directly funding public services, boosting regional health access, and investing heavily in localized social housing supply.
  • Green Party: Proposes a multi-billion dollar economic plan designed to build out public homes and clean energy infrastructure, which they estimate will create thousands of localized green jobs outside major urban centers.

To dive deeper into specific regional policies, you can compare local platform metrics on the Policy.nz 2026 Transport and Infrastructure Tool.

If you would like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • Which specific region or general part of New Zealand you are living in?
  • Whether you rely more on mobile/satellite internet versus fixed-line broadband?
  • If health-travel subsidies or local job incentives matter more to your family?

I can tailor a direct comparison of the minor party policies or local electorate frameworks to help inform your vote.

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account