Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a mortgaged home in an area affected by flooding. Insurance affordability, protection works and what happens after another flood are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose for homeowners whose property becomes difficult to insure or unsafe to live in?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: what happens to flood-risk homeowners?

For a household with a mortgaged home in a flood-prone area, the key issue is not simply who pays for flood protection. It is what happens if the home becomes uninsurable, the bank will no longer lend against it, or another flood makes it unsafe to live in.

There are four practical questions to compare across parties:

  • Insurance: Would the government help keep cover available and affordable, or would more of the cost fall on homeowners?
  • Flood protection: Who would pay for stopbanks, drainage, property-level improvements and other measures to reduce risk?
  • Buyouts and relocation: If a home becomes unsafe, would owners receive financial assistance to leave, and how would compensation be calculated?
  • Mortgage and recovery support: What happens to the mortgage, temporary accommodation costs and outstanding debt if the property can no longer be lived in or sold for a reasonable price?

These issues are connected, but a promise to improve flood protection is not the same as a guarantee that you can insure your home or recover its value after another disaster.

What the parties are proposing

As of 15 October 2026, the clearest distinction is between parties that have published a specific proposal for insurance retreat and risk-sharing, and parties whose published plans provide a broader direction without a clear guarantee for an individual homeowner.

The comparison below covers the major parties and the Opportunity Party, which has published a particularly relevant insurance proposal. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentCandidate and party lists released

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Current government framework

National's government has introduced a National Adaptation Framework focused on better flood-risk information, planning in high-risk areas, investment in risk reduction and sharing the costs of climate-related disasters. A national flood map is expected in 2027, and legislation is being developed to require adaptation planning in priority areas. National Adaptation frameworkOur enduring approach to a changing climate

What this could mean for you: better information about your property's future risk and a more coordinated approach to flood protection. However, the framework does not itself promise affordable insurance or a guaranteed buyout. The details of future cost-sharing remain under development. National Adaptation frameworkResidential insurance and climate-related hazards

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Labour's published 2026 policies emphasise living costs, housing, infrastructure and public services. Its policy pages include household cost-saving measures, but I could not verify a specific published commitment to a national flood-insurance guarantee, a standard buyout entitlement for unliveable homes, or mortgage relief following a flood. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Cost of Living Plan

What this could mean for you: ask Labour directly whether it would establish a national, pre-agreed system for buying out homes that become unsafe, and how central government would share the cost with councils and insurers. Its general housing and infrastructure commitments do not settle those questions.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

The Greens' 2026 manifesto commits to comprehensive support for New Zealanders facing increasingly severe weather, alongside climate adaptation and environmental protection. The party also highlights the role of wetlands and healthy natural systems in reducing flooding. Manifesto 2026Manifesto 2026

What this could mean for you: its stated approach supports public action on climate resilience and disaster impacts. I could not verify a specific promise of guaranteed home-insurance cover, a defined buyout formula or automatic mortgage-debt relief in the published manifesto material reviewed.

Current party and logo applications | Elections NZ

Opportunity Party

Specific insurance-retreat proposal

Opportunity's September 2026 climate policy proposes a national insurance-support framework with consistent rules for identifying and managing insurance retreat, forward-looking risk assessments, and a cost-sharing model involving central government, councils, insurers and property owners. It also proposes giving the Natural Hazards Commission a broader role in identifying highly vulnerable homes and coordinating resilience work or, as a last resort, relocation. Opportunity proposes national insurance support framework as part of climate policy

What this could mean for you: your household's situation could be addressed through a nationally coordinated process rather than relying entirely on ad hoc decisions after a disaster. But the party has not established, in the proposal reported, a guaranteed level of compensation or a promise that premiums will remain affordable.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

ACT has historically argued for practical, locally decided climate adaptation rather than government insurance payouts that it says could weaken incentives to reduce risk. Its current climate messaging also emphasises limiting the economic costs of climate policy. I could not verify a detailed 2026 homeowner insurance or buyout commitment. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

What this could mean for you: seek clarification on whether ACT would support public funding for protective works, and what assistance—if any—it would offer when a property can no longer be safely occupied or insured.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

New Zealand First's current campaign includes opposition to New Zealand remaining in the Paris climate agreement. I could not verify a specific 2026 policy establishing flood-insurance support, a national managed-retreat scheme or a guaranteed buyout for homeowners. As New Zealand First pushes culture-war policies, analysts warn of limited appealThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

What this could mean for you: the key questions are whether the party would support the government's existing adaptation framework, how it would fund flood protection, and whether it would commit to a defined response for homes that become uninhabitable.

What is already established—and what remains unresolved?

The current framework matters regardless of which party you vote for. The government's earlier response to the 2023 North Island weather events provides a useful example of what a targeted programme can look like, but it is not a permanent entitlement for every flood-prone homeowner.

Protection where risk can be managed

Under the 2023 response, Category 2 properties were eligible for government support with councils for flood protection and other measures where the risk could be managed. Govt to support councils with buyout and better protection of cyclone and flood affected properties

Voluntary buyouts where risk cannot be adequately managed

The 2023 programme provided for voluntary buyouts of designated Category 3 homes, with costs shared between central government and councils. This was a targeted recovery arrangement, not a standing promise that every future uninsurable home will be bought out. Govt to support councils with buyout and better protection of cyclone and flood affected properties

Insurance and future compensation

The Treasury confirms that residential insurance and climate-related hazards remain part of the government's wider adaptation work. There is no general guarantee that private insurers will continue offering cover at an affordable price in every high-risk location. Residential insurance and climate-related hazardsFinancial Stability Report May 2026 - Reserve Bank of New Zealand

The four questions I would use to compare party policies

For your household, these are the most consequential differences to look for in a manifesto or when questioning a candidate.

Issue What a meaningful commitment would specify
Insurance affordability Whether a public insurance backstop or targeted premium support would be available, who qualifies, and how long it lasts.
Protection works Whether central government contributes to stopbanks, drainage and property improvements, and whether homeowners face higher rates or levies.
Unsafe or uninsurable homes Whether buyouts are available before or after another flood, how a home's value is calculated, and whether uninsured owners qualify.
Mortgage and relocation How mortgage shortfalls, temporary accommodation, relocation costs and the time needed to settle a claim would be handled.

One distinction is especially important: a buyout does not necessarily clear your mortgage. The amount paid, any insurance settlement and the outstanding loan all affect how much money you have left to buy another home. Do not assume the government will cover any shortfall unless a policy explicitly says so.

The Reserve Bank's May 2026 Financial Stability Report also identifies insurance affordability, underinsurance and insurers withdrawing from high-flood-risk areas as emerging concerns. It notes that home insurance is important to banks because the property is security for the mortgage. Financial Stability Report May 2026 - Reserve Bank of New Zealand

How to use this comparison before voting

I'd look for three things in each party's full policy, rather than relying on broad promises about climate action or economic relief:

  1. A defined safety net: Is there a clear commitment for owners who cannot reasonably insure, repair or sell their homes?
  2. A funding formula: Who pays—the homeowner, insurer, council, central government or some combination—and what is the limit?
  3. A plan before the next flood: Will support be available to reduce risk or relocate early, rather than only after substantial damage?

Based on the published proposals reviewed, Opportunity has the most explicit new proposal on insurance retreat and national risk-sharing. National's government has an established adaptation framework, while Labour and the Greens have broader published commitments without a verified, specific guarantee of insurance cover or buyout compensation in the material reviewed. That is a comparison of the documented proposals, not a prediction of how any party would govern or a recommendation on how to vote.

You can explore the National Adaptation Framework through the Ministry for the Environment and read Opportunity's reported insurance-retreat proposal.

If you want to go further, I can compare the parties' full flood-risk policies or explain the mortgage risks after a flood.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a mortgaged home in an area affected by flooding. Insurance affordability, protection works and what happens after another flood are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose for homeowners whose property becomes difficult to insure or unsafe to live in?

For homeowners in flood-prone areas grappling with rising insurance costs, the safety of their homes, and uncertainty after repeated weather events, the question of who pays for climate adaptation and managed retreat is a major issue in the New Zealand political landscape.

Different political parties approach the intersection of private property rights, local and central government responsibilities, and insurance market failures through distinct lenses:

1. National (Current Government / Centre-Right)

  • Focus: Practical infrastructure, regulatory certainty, and local economic resilience.
  • Stance on Protection & Flooding: National emphasizes streamlining regulations to make local physical protection works easier to execute. For example, they advocate for national standards for river gravel extraction and local flood-mitigation infrastructure projects to protect existing communities where feasible.
  • Stance on "Who Pays" & Insurance: National leans toward a model where risk signals should remain transparent, and property owners bear foreseeable responsibilities, while infrastructure providers build resilience into long-term planning. They emphasize market certainty and balanced cost-sharing rather than sweeping state-funded buyouts for high-risk private assets.

2. Labour (Centre-Left)

  • Focus: Shared responsibility models and long-term legislative frameworks (such as progressing the intent behind the stalled Climate Adaptation Act).
  • Stance on Protection & Flooding: Supports central government backing for community resilience and infrastructure upgrades, but insists that local government cannot carry the burden alone.
  • Stance on "Who Pays" & Insurance: Labour advocates for a shared responsibility model, where central government contributes funding when a natural hazard risk exceeds a local council's financial capacity or affects broad regional infrastructure. They view managed retreat and property acquisition frameworks as a necessary safety net that requires clear rules on compensation and liability so homeowners aren't left stranded by retreating insurance markets.

3. The Greens & Te Pāti Māori (Left / Indigenous-led)

  • Focus: Proactive climate mitigation, nature-based solutions, and equity for vulnerable communities.
  • Stance on Protection & Flooding: Prioritizes "green infrastructure" (such as wetlands, native reforestation, and urban greening) alongside hard engineering to absorb floodwaters naturally.
  • Stance on "Who Pays" & Insurance: They argue that central government must take a leading, well-funded role in supporting communities facing managed retreat, ensuring that lower-income homeowners or those unable to secure private insurance are not forced into destitution. They view climate adaptation through an environmental justice lens, pushing for systemic government intervention to support displaced residents.

4. ACT & New Zealand First (Right / Populist-Right)

  • Focus: Economic pragmatism, property rights, and skepticism of expensive new bureaucratic climate adaptation frameworks.
  • Stance on Protection & Flooding: ACT has generally downplayed sweeping state-led climate emergency interventions, focusing instead on property rights and local council planning freedoms. New Zealand First places a heavy emphasis on traditional economic development and core infrastructure (like roads and stopbanks) rather than specialized climate-only bureaucracy.
  • Stance on "Who Pays" & Insurance: These parties are typically resistant to large-scale taxpayer-funded bailouts for repeatedly flooded private properties, preferring that local land-use decisions remain with councils and that private property owners manage property risks within standard market and legal frameworks.

Key Takeaways for Homeowners

When evaluating your vote, parties generally split along these lines:

  • National / ACT / NZ First tend to emphasize local responsibility, practical engineering/mitigation works (like stopbanks and gravel extraction), and market-led realities with limited direct central government compensation for high-risk private land.
  • Labour / Greens / Te Pāti Māori advocate for more robust central government intervention, formalized managed retreat frameworks with structured cost-sharing/buyouts, and equity support for homeowners priced out by insurance markets.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a mortgaged home in an area affected by flooding. Insurance affordability, protection works and what happens after another flood are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose for homeowners whose property becomes difficult to insure or unsafe to live in?

For homeowners in flood-affected areas worried about insurance retreat, property values, and managed retreat, the major political parties approach climate adaptation through differing philosophies on funding, local vs. central government responsibility, and market transparency.

Because comprehensive, durable legislation for managed retreat and climate adaptation has been slow to lock in across changes in government, parties position their responses around the following frameworks: [RNZ]

  • The National-led Government / Coalition Approach: Current settings emphasize localized decision-making, economic discipline, and practical local protections rather than wide-scale, pre-funded government buyouts. The administration has favored establishing independent reference groups and focusing on regional infrastructure standards (such as river gravel extraction and regional flood-protection works) rather than a centralized national compensation framework. The emphasis is largely on enabling local councils and private property owners to manage local risk, balancing fiscal restraint against community-led resilience.

  • The Labour Party Approach: Labour points to the groundwork laid during its previous term—including commissioning an expert working group report on managed retreat and leaning into findings from Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee inquiry into climate adaptation. While formal and detailed election manifestos on adaptation continue to roll out, Labour’s general stance is that the cost of adaptation and retreat requires a mixed funding model involving central government intervention rather than leaving vulnerable communities or local councils to shoulder catastrophic costs alone. [RNZ]

  • The Green Party Approach: The Greens advocate for moving past short-term political cycles to establish a durable, legislated cross-party consensus on climate adaptation and managed retreat. They frame retreat and adaptation as an urgent equity and public-safety issue, arguing for structured central government leadership, support for local authorities, and comprehensive backing for communities facing un-insurability or displacement. [RNZ]

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) Approach: TOP has put forward a specific Climate Resilient Aotearoa policy featuring a National Insurance Support Framework. Their proposal introduces formal rules for "insurance retreat" (when insurers raise prices or withdraw from high-risk zones), mandatory climate-risk disclosures on property and mortgages, an expanded role for the Natural Hazards Commission (NHC), and a transparent cost-sharing mechanism split between central government, local councils, insurers, and property owners.

If you'd like to explore this further, let me know:

  • Are you more concerned about short-term protection works for your current location, or long-term exit/buyout strategies if the home becomes unsafe?
  • Which specific region or local council area is your property in?

I can provide more tailored details on what local vs. central initiatives apply to your situation.

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a mortgaged home in an area affected by flooding. Insurance affordability, protection works and what happens after another flood are major concerns for us. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose for homeowners whose property becomes difficult to insure or unsafe to live in?

AI Overview

With the 7 November 2026 general election approaching, how New Zealand will fund climate adaptation, manage uninsurable homes, and execute managed retreat are central debates. Because no standalone "Managed Retreat Act" has been fully passed into law yet, political parties offer starkly different paths forward for homeowners facing flood risks, rising premiums, or property uninsurability.

Here is how the major parties approach these issues:

🔵 National Party

  • Core Approach: National focuses on practical, engineering-based local infrastructure and regional planning to protect properties where possible, rather than rushing into state-funded buyouts.
  • Key Policy: They support a National Adaptation Framework that establishes clear rules for local councils. They advocate for uniform standards regarding river gravel extraction and flood defenses to mitigate risks before properties become entirely unliveable.
  • Who Pays: They favor a model that balances regional infrastructure needs but leans heavily on practical, local council execution rather than a centralized public insurance buyout scheme.

🔴 Labour Party

  • Core Approach: Labour supports a regulated, multi-party legislative framework for managed retreat, leaning on the work of previous expert working groups and select committee inquiries.
  • Who Pays: Labour outlines a mixed funding model for cost-sharing. They believe the financial burden of properties becoming unsafe or uninsurable should be split systematically across the beneficiaries, the exacerbators, the public (taxpayers), banks, and private insurers.

🟢 Green Party

  • Core Approach: The Greens advocate for an integrated mitigation-and-adaptation framework embedded deeply within legislation. They heavily prioritize nature-based solutions (like restoring wetlands and floodplains) over heavy concrete engineering to protect communities.
  • Managed Retreat & Funding: They support a comprehensive cross-party framework for managed retreat with guaranteed central government financial support and clear guidelines for local councils. This framework includes integrating Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles to ensure equitable local buyouts and community transitions.

🟡 ACT New Zealand

  • Core Approach: ACT urges caution against over-regulation and strongly opposes councils using "extreme climate scenarios" to restrict land use or devalue properties.
  • Key Policy: They prioritize practical engineering alternatives to keep homes safe rather than forcing homeowners into managed retreat or public buyouts. They favor market-led solutions and property-owner autonomy.

🪙 The Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • Core Approach: TOP has released the most specific policy directly targeting insurance retreat through their Climate Resilient Aotearoa platform.
  • Key Policy: They propose a National Insurance Support Framework to set formal national rules for identifying and managing insurance retreat. It would mandate climate-risk disclosures across mortgage and insurance products and establish an expanded role for the Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) to protect families from being financially stranded.
  • Who Pays: They advocate for a pre-determined, shared-responsibility cost-sharing structure between central government, local government, insurers, and property owners.

🇳🇿 New Zealand First (NZ First)

  • Core Approach: NZ First frames this issue entirely around regional infrastructure and economic resilience rather than explicit climate-adaptation legislation.
  • Key Policy: They point to their $1.2 Billion Regional Infrastructure Fund , which actively targets regional flood protection schemes and water storage physical works to defend vulnerable towns and properties from future weather events.

Direct Policy Comparison

Party Stance on Managed Retreat Preferred Funding Model ("Who Pays?") Focus on Protection Works
National Framework to guide councils; prioritized as a later resort. Balanced local/central split; heavily emphasizes fiscal discipline. High focus on river management and infrastructure standards.
Labour Supports formalized, legislated managed retreat guidelines. Multi-party split: Government, banks, insurers, and property owners. Reconciled through a systematic, state-coordinated approach.
Greens Strong support via a comprehensive cross-party framework. High central government backing funded via progressive wealth taxes. High focus, specifically on nature-based solutions.
ACT Highly skeptical; opposes strict council-enforced retreats. Market-driven; individual responsibility with minimal state intervention. Prefers physical engineering adaptations over forced property changes.
TOP Formal rules to manage insurance retreat and property safety. Defined cost-sharing structure + expanded Natural Hazards Commission role. High focus on proactive risk mapping and insurance partnerships.
NZ First Not prioritized under explicit climate legislation platforms. Funded through the $1.2B Regional Infrastructure Fund. High focus on hard regional flood protection infrastructure.

If you are looking to dig deeper into a specific party's platform or compare candidates in your local electorate, you can use interactive tools like the Policy.nz 2026 Election Guide to see real-time updates as the campaigns finalize their manifestos.

To help narrow down how these policies might affect your mortgage or insurance layout, would you like to explore how banks are responding to uninsurable properties , or details on current Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) land-only coverage caps?

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account