Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

If you're voting for the first time, healthcare is a useful issue to compare because party policies can affect how quickly you see a GP, how much you pay at the doctor's office, and how long you wait for hospital treatment.

The key thing to understand is that parties can agree on the problem – people are struggling to access care – but disagree on how to fix it, how much to spend, and who should provide the services.

I'll focus on practical differences rather than political jargon. One important distinction: a policy a party has announced is not the same as a change it has delivered. As the 2026 election approaches, new promises may still be announced, so it's worth checking the latest policies before voting.

  1. The main differences at a glance:
    • Labour: Make doctor visits and medicines more affordable. Proposes three free GP visits a year for everyone through a new Medicard, free prescriptions by removing the $5 charge, and free maternity scans. Labour also says it would increase health funding and reverse planned service cuts.
    • National: Improve access by increasing capacity and measuring results. Emphasises hiring and training more health workers, funding GP practices, setting targets for faster treatment and using available private-hospital capacity to reduce public waiting lists. Its approach is not to make GP visits universally free.
    • Green Party: Expand affordable care and invest more in the public system. Supports free GP visits and broader access to care, with a focus on properly staffed hospitals, accessible community services, and reducing health inequalities.
    • ACT: Use a mix of public and private providers and focus on results. Supports measurable health targets, reducing administrative waste, allowing pharmacies to provide more everyday care, and using private providers to help cut waiting lists.
    • New Zealand First: Put more emphasis on preventing illness and supporting GPs. Focuses on prevention, nutrition, reducing paperwork for general practices, bringing health coaches into primary care, and supporting nurses.
    • Te Pāti Māori: Give Māori communities more control over healthcare. Focuses on Māori-led health services and better health outcomes for Māori. Emphasis on who designs and delivers care and whether people can access services that meet their needs.

For more detail, the parties' own policies are available from Labour, National, the Greens, ACT, New Zealand First, and Te Pāti Māori.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political jargon confusing, and wanting clear, practical answers is a great place to start.

When it comes to healthcare in New Zealand—specifically seeing a doctor (primary care) and getting hospital treatment—the political parties generally fall into different camps about who should pay, how much the government should step in, and how to fix wait times.

Here is how the main parties approach these issues in plain terms:

1. Seeing a Doctor (GP and Primary Care)

The main debate here is whether seeing a family doctor should be heavily subsidised or made completely free for everyone, versus targeting support only to those who need it most.

  • Labour: Focuses on reducing direct costs for everyday families. Their flagship policy is the Medicard, which gives every New Zealander three free GP visits per year, alongside bringing back free prescriptions. They also propose loan schemes to encourage more doctors into practice ownership.
  • The Green Party: Proposes going further by making unlimited GP visits completely free for everyone, alongside free dental care, funded by a wealth tax.
  • National: Prefers funding primary care capacity directly rather than blanket free visits (such as investing in workforce and clinic capacity through recent budgets). They argue that universal free schemes can end up heavily subsidising people who can easily afford to pay.
  • ACT: Believes in a system where the government acts as a purchaser rather than a direct provider. They have floated ideas like health savings accounts and incentives for people to opt out of the public system entirely into private cover.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care and dental for lower-income whānau (under a specific income threshold) and proposes a Māori Health Card to directly tie funding to patients.
  • New Zealand First & The Opportunity Party: NZ First focuses more heavily on hospital waitlist reduction funds rather than sweeping free GP changes, while The Opportunity Party proposes targeted free primary, mental health, and dental care for younger New Zealanders (e.g., under 30 via a Teal Card).

2. Hospital Treatment and Wait Times

The debate here centers on whether to fix public hospitals strictly from within the public system, or to pay private healthcare providers to take on public patients to clear backlogs faster.

  • National (and the current Government approach): Emphasizes using private sector involvement to cut wait times. They utilize programmes (like the "Elective Boost") to contract private hospitals to handle public surgery waitlists alongside setting strict public health targets (such as targets for emergency department flows and four-month elective surgery wait times).
  • Labour & The Greens: Strongly oppose heavy reliance on outsourcing to private hospitals. They argue that funneling public money into private facilities starves the public system of the resources, staff, and funding it desperately needs, and that solutions should focus entirely on rebuilding public hospital capacity.
  • ACT: Fully supports expanding private sector involvement, viewing the government's role as buying services from the best provider (public or private) to ensure shorter waits.
  • NZ First: Generally focuses on injecting funds into dedicated waitlist reduction funds and rapid diagnostics to clear bottlenecks within the public framework.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on structural changes, advocating for Māori-led health services and authorities to address deep-seated inequities in how different communities access hospital care.

Summary Checklist to Help You Decide

When looking at these options, ask yourself what matters most to you:

  1. Do you want universal freebies? (Parties like Labour and the Greens want the government to cover the cost of doctor visits directly for everyone).
  2. Do you prefer targeted spending or private options? (Parties like National and ACT lean toward targeted capacity building and using private hospitals to get people through surgeries faster).
  3. Do you want system-wide overhauls? (Parties like Te Pāti Māori focus heavily on redesigning who controls and delivers the health services).

Is there a specific part of healthcare—like getting a prescription, seeing a GP, or surgery wait times—that weighs most heavily on your mind right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political jargon confusing. When it comes to seeing a doctor or getting hospital treatment in New Zealand, the main political parties approach the problem differently—ranging from making visits completely free for everyone to encouraging more private insurance options.

An overview of how the main parties approach healthcare for the 2026 general election highlights these distinctions:

  • New Zealand Labour Party focuses on universal, government-funded relief to lower direct costs for everyday people. Their key 2026 proposals include introducing free doctor (GP) visits, free prescriptions, free maternity scans, and free cervical screening, alongside a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to attract and retain more primary care medical staff.
  • New Zealand National Party focuses on funding capacity, infrastructure, and targeted clinical results within the existing public-private mix rather than broad universal free GP schemes. Their stated health priorities emphasize funding more subsidized medicines, earlier cancer care services, and bolstering primary care capacity through targeted budget investments.
  • Green Party advocates for expanding free public healthcare even further than Labour. They propose unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded by implementing new taxes on high wealth (such as a wealth tax). They also prioritize building community care clinics in high-need areas first. [WhichParty NZ]
  • ACT New Zealand favors shifting away from a purely government-run model toward private options and personal choice. They have proposed a government-as-purchaser model that includes financial incentives (such as a tax-credit style rebate/incentive) for New Zealanders to opt out of the public health system and purchase private health insurance instead. [WhichParty NZ]
  • New Zealand First places its primary health focus on managing hospital waitlists and funding backlog reduction, supporting mechanisms like a waitlist reduction fund to ease immediate pressure on secondary hospital care. [WhichParty NZ]
  • Te Pāti Māori supports free primary healthcare and dental care for all whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a distinct "Māori Health Card" framework to directly tie funding to patients and community-led health providers. [WhichParty NZ]

Summary of Differences

  • If you want free or cheaper access to local doctors: Parties like Labour and the Greens want the government to pay for doctor visits directly (either for everyone or funded by new taxes), lowering costs at the clinic.
  • If you want shorter hospital waitlists or targeted treatments: Parties like National and NZ First focus on funding the existing system's capacity, specific cancer care, and waitlist reduction funds.
  • If you prefer private solutions: ACT encourages private insurance uptake to take pressure off the public system. [WhichParty NZ]

You can look further into detailed party manifestos on platforms like the Policy.nz Health Guide or compare side-by-side stances on WhichParty NZ. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account