Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

New Zealand 2026 election: accessible transport, mobility and independent living

For someone with a mobility impairment who rents and wants to remain independent, there are several connected issues to compare when considering your vote: accessible public transport, reliable door-to-door transport, disability support services, and the ability to afford and adapt a rental home.

A party might support disability rights in principle but have few specific commitments on wheelchair-accessible buses, accessible train stations, Total Mobility, or funding for support workers. It is worth separating those commitments from what a party has already implemented while in government.

I'll focus on New Zealand-wide policies and publicly documented positions, rather than assuming you live in a particular city. Because the general election is in 2026, I'll also distinguish confirmed policy announcements from existing policies and proposals that still need verification.

1. Which parties have specific commitments?

The following comparison draws on 2026 party announcements, published policies and independent disability-policy coverage available as of 16 October 2026. It is not a ranking: the parties differ in how specifically they address transport, housing and support.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Specific transport commitments

The Greens propose restoring a 75% subsidy for Total Mobility taxi trips, making the scheme easier to use and increasing the supply of accessible vehicles. They also promise a disability rights law with enforceable accessibility standards, more accessible and affordable housing, and income support for disability-related living and medical costs. DisabilityHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

What this could mean for you: lower eligible taxi fares, more legal backing for accessibility, and a stronger focus on accessible rental and community living. The vehicle expansion and legal standards would still need implementation.

Sources: Greens' 2026 disability policy

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Transport affordability and support rights

Labour has proposed a $20-per-week public transport fare cap. On disability support, it promises to repeal the current Government's Disability Support Services legislation and replace it with rights-based legislation developed alongside disabled people and carers. Labour's $20 fare cap scrutinised over cost, reach and real impactRelease: Labour will scrap harmful disability Bill

What this could mean for you: potentially lower regular public transport costs and a different legal framework for disability support and choice. The fare cap is not itself a guarantee of accessible vehicles, stations or routes, and Labour's 2026 platform has not identified a specific new accessible-transport package.

Sources: Labour's disability legislation announcement

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Accessibility standards proposal

In July 2026, NZ First introduced a member's Accessibility Standards Bill. It proposes addressing barriers at the design stage in places such as transport hubs, public buildings, footpaths and social housing developments. The bill was not selected from the members' ballot for further parliamentary consideration at that point. Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyoneHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

What this could mean for you: if enacted in a suitable form, accessibility could be built into new infrastructure rather than added later. This is a legislative proposal, not a guarantee that existing buses, stations or footpaths would be upgraded.

Source: NZ First's accessibility proposal

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

Te Pāti Māori

The party's wider disability approach emphasises self-determination for tāngata whaikaha Māori and whānau hauā, culturally grounded services and accessibility in transport and public life. Independent policy coverage identifies this as a broader accessibility approach, rather than a detailed national transport programme with specified targets. Disability PoliciesDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

What this could mean for you: its approach is relevant if you value disability-led decision-making and accessible services designed around communities. Ask for specific 2026 commitments on Total Mobility, accessible public transport and nationwide implementation.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

New Zealand National Party

National has focused its disability-support approach in government on financial sustainability, consistent service allocation and some restoration of flexibility in individual funding. It announced $1.1 billion over five years for disability support services in 2024. However, the independent 2026 policy review identified no specific National transport-accessibility policy for this election. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Disability Policies

What this could mean for you: the key questions are whether existing support funding will meet your needs reliably, and whether National will commit to specific accessibility standards and transport improvements. Existing disability funding commitments should not be confused with a new accessible-transport pledge.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT New Zealand

ACT's disability-related approach emphasises individual choice, direct or individualised funding and reducing bureaucracy. The independent 2026 policy review did not identify a specific transport-accessibility commitment. Disability PoliciesDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

What this could mean for you: if flexibility in managing support funding is important, ask how ACT would protect that flexibility in practice, alongside its position on accessible public infrastructure and subsidised transport.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

TOP proposes a universal citizen's income of up to $370 per week, alongside a universal disability allowance projected at about $6,000 per year and needs-based top-ups. Its policy says this income reform would not replace specific disability funding for transport or assistive technology. It also emphasises accessible housing, but no specific 2026 transport-accessibility package was identified in the independent review. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Disability Policies

What this could mean for you: potentially more predictable income, depending on eligibility, final policy design and how existing payments would be replaced. Check carefully how the proposed system would interact with your current benefits and support entitlements.

These are published positions, not guarantees of delivery. Some are formal manifesto commitments; others are broader policy directions or proposals whose final form and funding remain uncertain.

2. What matters most for independent living?

For your circumstances, I would separate the policies into four practical questions.

Accessible public transport

Can you reliably board a bus, use a train station, reach the stop on an accessible footpath, and travel without a long detour or advance booking?

The Greens' proposed enforceable standards and NZ First's proposed accessibility legislation address structural accessibility. Labour's fare cap addresses price rather than physical access. Ask every party whether it will set deadlines and fund upgrades to existing infrastructure.

Door-to-door transport

If buses or trains aren't practical for a particular journey, can you afford a taxi or wheelchair-accessible vehicle?

The Greens have a specific proposal to restore the Total Mobility subsidy to 75%, up from the 65% level reported for 2026. Ask whether other parties would restore that subsidy, expand the accessible vehicle fleet and improve availability outside major centres. DisabilityHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Support services and control

Can you get the personal assistance, equipment, home support and disability funding you need without risking sudden reductions or restrictive rules?

Labour's proposed replacement of the Disability Support Services legislation and the Greens' proposed rights-based framework address this area directly. National has emphasised consistency, funding sustainability and flexibility within existing arrangements. Compare the actual safeguards each party would provide. Release: Labour will scrap harmful disability BillDisabilityHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Accessible rental housing

Can you remain in your home, get permission for necessary modifications, and find another accessible rental if you need to move?

The Greens explicitly propose universal-design standards for public and private housing. NZ First's proposed standards also refer to social housing developments. For every party, check its position on accessible rental supply, modification costs, landlord obligations and the availability of suitable public housing. DisabilityEstablishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyone

3. Questions to ask before voting

The Disabled Persons Assembly, CCS Disability Action and Your Way Kia Roha have asked seven major parties to answer questions on disability rights, support funding and enforceable accessibility standards. As of 16 October 2026, their published notice said the responses were still being compiled. Disability Scorecard for 2026 General Election » Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

You can use these questions to assess party promises and follow up with candidates:

  • Will you guarantee a minimum national standard for accessible buses, trains, stations, stops and footpaths, with deadlines for compliance?
  • Will you restore or increase the Total Mobility subsidy, and ensure enough wheelchair-accessible vehicles are available?
  • Will you protect disability support funding, individual choice and access to essential support workers?
  • Will you increase the supply of accessible rental homes and help renters obtain necessary home modifications?
  • Will you publish measurable targets, budgets and progress reports so disabled people can hold the government accountable?

The answers are particularly useful when a party's general commitment to inclusion does not specify what would change in practice.

4. Where to verify the latest commitments

These sources let you check the original policy wording rather than relying solely on campaign summaries.

Bottom line

The Greens have the most explicit published combination of commitments in the areas you asked about: a higher Total Mobility subsidy, enforceable accessibility standards, disability-related income support and accessible housing. Labour has specific proposals on transport affordability and disability-support legislation, while NZ First has proposed a legislative framework for accessibility. National, ACT, Te Pāti Māori and TOP have relevant positions on some parts of disability policy, but the specificity of their transport commitments differs. These distinctions are based on published policies, not a judgment about which party you should vote for. DisabilityRelease: Labour will scrap harmful disability BillEstablishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyoneDisability Policies

For someone who wants to keep renting and living independently, the key distinction is between making transport cheaper and making it genuinely accessible and dependable. Ideally, you would assess transport, housing and disability support together rather than judging a party on only one of those areas.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

For voters with mobility impairments who rent and want to maintain independent living, the 2026 New Zealand general election features varying approaches to accessibility, public transport, and disability support. Different political parties propose distinct changes to how transport networks, housing accessibility, and support systems are funded and regulated.

The key positions and proposed changes from New Zealand's political parties regarding mobility access, public transport, and independent living include:

1. Green Party

  • Transport and Mobility Access: Advocates for making urban public transport fare-free, starting specifically with the disabled community. Proposes co-designing public transport and mobility infrastructure with disabled people, with targeted investments in both urban and rural areas. They also support developing a national mobility scheme meeting strict accessibility standards.
  • Accessibility Legislation & Housing: Strongly pushes for strengthening the Accessibility for New Zealanders Act by introducing firm timelines and legally enforceable accessibility standards for transport, physical buildings, and digital spaces. Supports expanding accessible public and social housing options.
  • Support & Independent Living: Grounded in the Enabling Good Lives framework, aiming to expand individualized funding, remove rigid deficit-based assessments, and reduce bureaucratic barriers.

2. New Zealand Labour Party

  • Transport: Proposes a nationwide weekly public transport fare cap ($20 a week in Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch, and $10 elsewhere, making further trips free that week).
  • Disability Support & Rights: Focuses on a rights-based, equity-focused approach aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Enabling Good Lives principles. Key commitments include repealing recent proposed changes to disability support legislation to protect individualized funding mechanisms and service flexibility.

3. Te Pāti Māori

  • Transport & Public Spaces: Frames accessibility through the lens of mana (dignity) and inclusion. Supports embedding mandatory accessibility frameworks directly into transport networks, housing, and public spaces.
  • Support Systems: Proposes establishing a Mana Hauā Authority and reallocating a portion of disability funding to kaupapa Māori disability organizations and independent networks to improve localized delivery and self-determination.

4. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Housing and Infrastructure: Focuses heavily on reforming the Building Code to mandate that new homes are built accessible by default, alongside increasing the supply of accessible public housing.
  • Legislation: Supports co-designing enforceable accessibility legislation with the disabled community.

5. National Party

  • Support and Strategy: Focuses primarily on the financial sustainability and national consistency of disability support services, restoring flexibility in funding models, and introducing a refreshed Disability Strategy (2026–2030).
  • Transport: Does not have a standalone, disability-specific transport accessibility policy for 2026, instead addressing transport through broader infrastructure management.

6. ACT New Zealand & New Zealand First

  • Approach: Neither party emphasizes expanding statutory accessibility legislation with enforceable transport timelines. ACT generally focuses on broad economic management and targeted assistance rather than mandate-driven infrastructure overhauls. New Zealand First's past focus has centered on general oversight and localized infrastructure, though individual members have previously engaged with private member's bills regarding baseline accessibility standards.

Would you like more details on how these parties approach independent living support funding or tenancy rights for renters with disabilities?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

Major New Zealand political parties approach disability accessibility, independent living, and transport through distinct policy frameworks and varying degrees of targeted reform.

As a renter with a mobility impairment looking to maintain independence, you will find that parties place different emphasis on enforceable standards, public transport upgrades, and housing accessibility. Below is an overview of how key parliamentary parties address these areas based on their policy platforms and advocacy sector analysis.

Overview of Party Positions on Accessibility and Independent Living

Party Accessibility Legislation & Standards Public Transport & Mobility Housing & Independent Living Support
Green Party Supports strengthening the Accessibility for New Zealanders Act with enforceable standards and firm timelines. Focuses on inclusive infrastructure and universal design principles across public networks. Advocates for expanded public and accessible housing stock alongside strengthened community support funding.
Labour Party Historically initiated accessibility frameworks and supports rights-based approaches to disability services. Supports funding for accessible urban public transport upgrades and Total Mobility scheme considerations. Focuses on public housing builds with universal design standards and funding stability for Disability Support Services.
Te Pāti Māori Frames accessibility as a matter of mana and inclusion, supporting enforceable standards. Emphasizes accessible community infrastructure and public services for whānau hauā (disabled Māori). Advocates for increased public and affordable housing with explicit focus on community-led support.
The Opportunities Party**(TOP)** Aligns policies with the Enabling Good Lives principles, requiring universal design from the outset. Advocates to steadily remove barriers to make buses, trains, and physical transit options fully usable. Supports barrier removal in housing and public buildings through universal design mandates.
National Party Relies on general economic and administrative reform; has not advanced specific standalone accessibility legislation. Focuses on broad transport infrastructure without a dedicated disability-specific transit accessibility policy. Focuses on mainstream housing supply and market-led solutions rather than mandated universal design quotas.

Detailed Breakdown by Party

: The Greens place a strong emphasis on legislative enforcement, explicitly supporting the strengthening of the

Accessibility for New Zealanders Act

by introducing legally binding standards and strict timelines for public transport, physical buildings, and digital infrastructure. Their framework prioritizes universal design to ensure independent community participation. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Labour Party

: Labour's approach centers on public service delivery, funding allocations for regional and urban public transport infrastructure, and supporting the ongoing evolution of Disability Support Services (DSS). They emphasize public housing procurement that incorporates accessible design principles to help renters stay in the community.

: Te Pāti Māori approaches accessibility through a rights-based and cultural lens (mana), advocating that infrastructure, public transport, and housing decisions must be codesigned alongside whānau hauā. They support enforceable standards and increased provision of accessible public housing.

  • The Opportunities Party

(TOP): TOP explicitly grounds its platform in the

Enabling Good Lives principles

, arguing that public spaces, transport, and housing must be designed universally from inception. Their policy includes targeted measures to systematically eliminate physical and logistical barriers across bus and train networks. [Blind Low Vision NZ]

  • National Party

: National’s platform generally centers on broader economic growth, administrative efficiency, and mainstream infrastructure delivery rather than standalone disability manifestos. Independent disability sector reviews note a lack of specific, enforceable targets for transport accessibility or specialized housing quotas within their current policy documents. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

To review full manifestos and local candidate positions as the election progresses, consult resources provided by

Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

and

Blind Low Vision NZ

.

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties offer distinctly different approaches to accessible public transport, the Total Mobility scheme , and independent living supports.

The National Party (Current Coalition Government) focuses on economic sustainability, while opposition parties like Labour and the Greens push for increased subsidies, fare caps, or completely free access.

🏛️ The National Party (Current Coalition Government)

The National Party's focus is on stabilising the costs of transport and support systems while introducing structural updates to ensure the long-term viability of these programs.

  • Total Mobility Scheme: The government implemented a policy reducing the Crown fare subsidy from 75% down to 65%. However, they are introducing changes to strengthen the scheme's operating standards, reviewing the 20-year-old payment rate for wheelchair-accessible vehicles, and proposing a national public transport concession (including a free companion fare) for Total Mobility users. They also chose not to implement controversial trip caps or stricter impairment evidence requirements.
  • Support Services & Independent Living: Following funding reviews, the government standardized the nationwide support allocation process and eased some flexible funding purchasing restrictions to give individuals more choice over their respite and care support within set budgets.
  • Accessibility: National introduced a national service dog identification card to prevent public transport and business access denials.

🔴 The Labour Party

The Labour Party strongly opposes recent reductions to the Total Mobility subsidy, framing them as an unfair burden on disabled New Zealanders during a high cost-of-living period.

  • Public Transport Fares: Labour’s core transport platform includes a $20-per-week public transport fare cap across the board to limit commuting costs.
  • Mobility Access: Labour has criticized the government’s 10% cut to the Total Mobility subsidy. While they have not released an entirely separate disability-specific transport policy for 2026, their stance relies heavily on restoring and protecting previous affordability measures.

🟢 The Green Party

The Green Party features the most comprehensive set of specific commitments targeted directly at disabled renters and commuters, focusing on universal rights and co-design.

  • Free Public Transport: The Greens promise to make urban public transport completely fare-free , beginning directly with the disabled community and Total Mobility card holders.
  • Infrastructure Co-Design: They pledge to mandate that all public transport and mobility infrastructure must be actively co-designed alongside the disabled community. They also want a strengthened Accessibility Act featuring firm timelines and enforceable accessibility standards.
  • Renting & Independent Living: The Greens are advocating for robust, enforceable universal design standards for both public and private housing to ensure renters with mobility impairments have accessible options. They also promise to boost main benefit levels to a livable income that scales to cover actual medical and living costs.

🔵 Other Parties

  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports a comprehensive mana-based design philosophy that embeds structural accessibility directly into all public transport networks.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes a universal citizen’s income paired with a specific $6,000 annual universal disability allowance. This allowance would act as a top-up and would not replace existing transport or assistive technology funding.

If you want to look deeper into a specific area before casting your vote, let me know:

  • Would you like more detail on the housing and renting policies of these parties?
  • Are you interested in the specifics of how support funding rules (like flexible funding) differ between the platforms?
  • Do you need help checking the physical accessibility of voting places in your region?
Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account