Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to healthcare and disability-related services?

New Zealand 2026 election: healthcare, disability support and independent living

For someone with a mobility impairment who rents and wants to remain independent, the important differences between political parties go beyond healthcare funding. They include whether you can get the support you need to live at home, travel to appointments and everyday activities, afford accessible housing, and retain control over your own care.

The key policy areas to compare are:

  • Healthcare access: GP visits, specialist appointments, hospital treatment, rehabilitation and access to mobility equipment.
  • Disability support: eligibility for funded support workers, personal care, household assistance, respite and equipment.
  • Accessible transport: Total Mobility, public transport accessibility, mobility parking and transport to health services.
  • Housing and renting: accessible rentals, home modifications, housing affordability and security of tenure.
  • Income and independence: disability-related costs, benefit settings and whether support arrangements give you flexibility and choice.

One important distinction: a party's general promise to improve health services is not necessarily a commitment to increase disability support funding. Likewise, a pledge to improve public transport does not automatically mean more accessible vehicles, stops or door-to-door transport.

1. How the parties' published policies compare

The following comparison uses policies compiled for the 2026 election by Blind Low Vision NZ, a disability-sector organisation, alongside Labour's and National's published election policies. The disability resource is useful across disability types, although some of its examples specifically concern people with vision impairments. Policies can change during the campaign. Blind Low Vision NZ - Election ResourceLabour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election Policy

Healthcare and disability support

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Focus: reducing everyday healthcare costs and strengthening disability rights

  • Healthcare: proposes three free GP visits per year for everyone through a Medicard, and removing prescription charges from 1 July 2027.

  • Disability services: commits to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Enabling Good Lives principles, with disability-service design centred on those principles.

  • Accessibility: proposes enforceable accessibility legislation and accessible, timely income support and housing.

    Source: Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

New Zealand National Party

Focus: earlier access to treatment and medicines, within its broader health and fiscal programme

  • Healthcare: its 2026 platform emphasises more medicines and earlier care, particularly for people with cancer and other serious illnesses.

  • Disability services: Blind Low Vision NZ's policy review did not identify a dedicated National disability policy at the time it compiled its report.

  • What to clarify: specific commitments on personal care, home support, accessible rentals and transport for disabled people.

    Source: 2026 Election PolicyBlind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Focus: disability rights, accessible public services and financial security

  • Healthcare: proposes universal, free and accessible diagnosis, treatment and ongoing management, and removing barriers to health services.

  • Disability services: proposes timely income support for disability-related living and medical costs, without making eligibility depend on relationship status or the cause of disability.

  • Transport and accessibility: proposes free urban public transport, starting with disabled people, a national mobility scheme, and accessibility standards for public facilities and transport infrastructure.

    Source: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT New Zealand

Focus: targeted public support and changes to health funding and administration

  • Healthcare: the disability-policy review identifies proposals to increase funding for medicines and Pharmac, and let pharmacists treat a wider range of conditions.

  • Disability services: the review did not identify a dedicated disability policy on ACT's website. It lists a proposal for health and disability benefit assessments to be issued independently by a pool of Ministry of Social Development-approved doctors.

  • What to clarify: commitments on accessible transport, home support, accessibility legislation and disabled people's control over their services.

    Source: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Focus: no comprehensive disability-specific programme identified in the sector review

  • Healthcare and disability services: the review did not identify a dedicated disability policy or specific transport programme.

  • Accessibility: it notes an Accessibility Standards Bill listed as a potential member's bill, covering aspects of the built and digital environment. That is different from a confirmed government commitment to enact it.

  • What to clarify: whether the party would support enforceable accessibility standards and expand disability-related assistance.

    Source: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

Te Pāti Māori

Focus: accessible public services, health equity and income security

  • Healthcare: supports free, accessible primary healthcare, better access to quality health services and reducing inequities affecting disabled and low-income people.

  • Disability services: emphasises reducing poverty, improving income security and enabling disabled people and whānau to live with dignity.

  • Housing and transport: supports more public and affordable housing and says public services, housing, transport and community infrastructure should be accessible. The review did not identify a specific transport programme.

    Source: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

Focus: integrating health and disability support, accessible services and income reform

  • Healthcare: proposes more funding for primary and community care, accessible treatment and rehabilitation, a support navigator chosen by the disabled person, and better coordination between health, disability support, education and ACC.

  • Disability services: proposes a Citizens' Income and Disability Allowance and changing benefit rules so disabled people can work without automatically losing support.

  • Transport and housing: proposes progressively removing barriers in transport and making housing and public buildings more accessible.

    Source: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

These are summaries of published proposals, not guarantees that a party will implement them. The lack of a specific policy in the sector review does not necessarily mean a party opposes that policy. Blind Low Vision NZ - Election Resource

2. What the differences could mean for your day-to-day life

For your circumstances, it is worth looking beyond the headline policies to the practical details.

Your priority Policies and commitments to examine
GP visits and prescriptions Labour's proposed free GP visits and prescriptions; Green proposals for free accessible healthcare; other parties' plans for primary care and medicines.
Personal care and home support Whether a party commits to predictable funding, sufficient support-worker hours, flexible budgets and your choice of provider.
Accessible transport The Greens' proposal for free urban public transport starting with disabled people; Labour's proposed weekly fare cap; each party's position on accessible vehicles, stations and specialised transport.
Staying in a rental home Commitments on accessible and affordable rentals, landlord responsibilities, modifications such as ramps and grab rails, and security of tenure.
Disability-related living costs The Greens' proposals for disability-related costs, TOP's proposed Disability Allowance, and parties' positions on the existing Disability Allowance and Supported Living Payment.
Rights and independence Whether parties support enforceable accessibility standards, disability-rights protections and meaningful disabled people's involvement in decisions.

Sources: Blind Low Vision NZ - Election ResourceLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesDisability Scorecard for 2026 General Election » Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

Two particularly important distinctions

  1. Free public transport is not the same as accessible transport.

A fare subsidy is useful only if you can board the service, get to the stop, travel safely and reach your destination. If you rely on Total Mobility taxi subsidies or specialised transport because buses and trains are inaccessible, ask parties specifically whether they would improve those services and their funding.

  1. General healthcare funding is not the same as funding for independent living.

Free GP visits and prescriptions can reduce expenses, but they do not necessarily pay for personal care, cleaning, meal preparation, rehabilitation or assistance getting out of the house. Ask parties what they would do about eligibility for disability support, funding limits, waiting times and the ability to choose how support is delivered.

3. Questions to ask parties before you vote

The Disabled Persons Assembly NZ, CCS Disability Action and Your Way Kia Roha have asked seven major parties questions about disability rights, support funding, benefit rules and enforceable accessibility standards for their 2026 election scorecard. As of 16 October, DPA said the responses were still being collated, with the scorecard expected in the following weeks. Disability Scorecard for 2026 General Election » Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

You can use these questions when reviewing candidates' answers or contacting party offices:

  • Will you protect funding for the personal care and household assistance that enables disabled people to live independently?
  • Will you ensure disability support is based on assessed need, with clear rules, timely decisions and a way to challenge decisions?
  • Will you make GP visits, prescriptions, specialist care and rehabilitation more affordable for people on limited incomes?
  • Will you improve Total Mobility and the availability of accessible public transport, including in places where bus and train services are limited?
  • Will you increase the supply of accessible rental housing and help renters obtain necessary accessibility modifications?
  • Will you support enforceable accessibility legislation and involve disabled people directly in decisions affecting their lives?

For more detailed, independent election information, these resources are useful:

4. How to use this information in your voting decision

New Zealand's general election is scheduled for Saturday, 7 November 2026. You have a party vote and an electorate vote, so you can consider both a party's overall programme and your local candidate's commitments. The main parties vying to form New Zealand's next governmentPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Rather than relying on a general label such as “pro-disability”, compare the actual commitments that affect your life. In particular, distinguish between a policy that is formally published, a proposal that has been costed and funded, and a broad aspiration without a clear implementation plan.

The central question for your circumstances is: Which parties have specific, credible commitments on the combination of healthcare access, ongoing disability support, accessible transport and secure accessible rental housing that you need to remain independent?

You deserve to be able to assess those commitments on their substance, without having to infer what a party might do from its general position on health or welfare.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to healthcare and disability-related services?

For New Zealand voters navigating the 2026 general election with mobility impairments and a focus on independent living, accessible transport, and healthcare, political parties offer distinct philosophies and policy approaches.

The primary differences lie between parties advocating for rights-based legislative frameworks, centralized public service delivery, and expanded individual choice, versus those prioritizing fiscal restraint, targeted primary health support, or streamlined administrative systems.


Overview of Party Positions on Disability Services and Independent Living

1. New Zealand Labour Party

  • Approach: Grounded in a rights-based framework, alignment with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the Enabling Good Lives principles.
  • Disability Services: Proposes repealing recent government changes to disability support legislation to return focus to individual control, flexibility, and community-based support.
  • Healthcare & Cost-of-Living: Features prominent primary healthcare policies aimed at reducing out-of-pocket costs, including the introduction of a "Medicard" providing three free GP visits per year for everyone entitled to publicly funded healthcare, and the reintroduction of universally free prescriptions.

2. New Zealand National Party

  • Approach: Focuses heavily on the financial stability and sustainability of the Disability Support Services (DSS) system, paired with national consistency and administrative efficiency.
  • Disability Services: Rather than sweeping structural overhauls, National’s strategy emphasizes a refreshed national disability strategy (such as the 2026–2030 framework), maintaining core flexible funding models while aiming to standardise regional inequities and assessment criteria.
  • Healthcare: Focuses on health system performance metrics, reducing waitlists, and targeted workforce support rather than universal free primary care schemes.

3. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

  • Approach: Strongly rights-based, emphasizing systemic reform, enforceable accessibility legislation, and comprehensive welfare changes.
  • Disability Services & Independence: Advocates for expanding individualised funding, removing rigid deficit-based assessments, and embedding Enabling Good Lives across all social services.
  • Welfare & Health: Proposes significant increases to main benefit levels toward a livable income, removing partnered means-testing so disabled people are not financially penalized by a partner's income, and ensuring barrier-free, universal access to health, transport, and community infrastructure.

4. ACT New Zealand

  • Approach: Anchored in individual choice, personal responsibility, smaller government, and rigorous spending accountability.
  • Disability Services: Favours streamlined, individualised funding models that minimize bureaucracy and give disabled individuals direct choice over providers, paired with tighter auditing and spending oversight rather than expanded rights-based legislation.
  • Healthcare: Generally leans toward targeted assistance and market-driven efficiencies rather than universal subsidies.

5. Te Pāti Māori & New Zealand First

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on holistic, whānau-centred, and Māori-led health and social delivery systems where disability support is integrated rather than treated in isolation, alongside increased income security and tax-free thresholds for lower-income earners.
  • New Zealand First: Tends to address disability requirements indirectly through broader health, senior citizen, and regional public-health lenses, prioritizing public health access, regional equity, and cost-of-living relief.

What to Look For When Deciding

When evaluating how these platforms impact your goal of living independently with a mobility impairment, consider:

  • Service Control vs. System Stability: Do you prefer policies that guarantee legislative rights and flexible individual funding (Labour, Greens), or those prioritizing fiscal management, administrative consistency, and streamlined delivery (National, ACT)?
  • Primary Health Access: Parties like Labour offer direct financial relief for everyday medical costs (free GP visits and prescriptions), whereas other parties focus on core infrastructure funding or targeted health subventions.
  • Accessibility and Transport: Review how parties plan to fund and enforce physical infrastructure, public transport accessibility, and housing modifications to ensure your independence is supported outside the home.

Are there specific aspects of independent living—such as housing modifications, public transport funding, or caregiver support—that are most critical to your vote decision?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to healthcare and disability-related services?

New Zealand political parties differ significantly in their approaches to funding healthcare, managing disability support services, and supporting independent living and accessibility in rental housing.

Voters can review comprehensive, up-to-date and side-by-side policy comparisons on health, housing, and community access for the general election via platforms like Policy.nz and official voting support information from the Electoral Commission.

Key Policy Differences Across Parties

  • National Party (Government / Centre-Right): Focuses on centralized health targets, clinical wait times, and sustainable fiscal paths for Health New Zealand alongside primary care investment. Disability support frameworks lean toward tight fiscal management, operational sustainability, and workforce delivery targets rather than large structural expansions.

  • Labour Party (Centre-Left): Emphasizes strengthening public health infrastructure, increasing Pharmac funding, expanding free or low-cost primary care and GP access, and protecting or expanding dedicated disability support funding models that promote community-based independent living. [Policy.nz]

  • Greens and Te Pāti Māori (Left / Progressive): Advocate for substantial increases in public health and disability support funding, free universal dental and mental health care, increased investment in accessible public transport infrastructure, and stricter accessibility and modification standards for rental housing to protect tenants with mobility impairments.

  • ACT Party (Libertarian / Right): Favors tighter government spending constraints, prioritizing core clinical delivery, and utilizing alternative or contracted service models in health and disability support to drive efficiency over centralized bureaucratic structures.

Practical Factors for Independent Living and Renting

  • Accessibility and Tenancy: Left-leaning parties generally propose stronger regulations and subsidies for retrofitting rental homes with mobility modifications (ramps, wet-area showers) and stronger tenant rights. Centre-right and right-leaning parties focus more on general housing supply and economic management to lower overall living costs.

  • Transport Support: Policies regarding Total Mobility schemes and accessible public transport upgrades vary, with urban-focused and progressive parties pushing for faster rollout of fully accessible fleet transitions, and conservative parties emphasizing roading and fiscal prioritization.

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to healthcare and disability-related services?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties present contrasting visions for healthcare and disability support services. These differences primarily center on the recently passed Disability Support Services (DSS) Act 2026 , funding models, and the level of structural, rights-based legislation.

Because you rent and value independent living and accessible transport, the parties' approaches can be broadly split into two camps: those prioritizing system stabilization and individual choice within tighter budgets , and those pushing for expanded public funding, rights-based overhauls, and universal support.


Comparison of Party Policies for the 2026 Election

Political Party Policy Approach to Disability Services & System Framework Healthcare, Transport & Rental/Independence Policies
National Party • Focuses on fiscal sustainability and consistency across regions to end the "postcode lottery".
• Enacted the DSS Act 2026 to clarify how public funding can be used.
• Promotes the Disability Strategy 2026–2030 to improve housing accessibility audits and early health interventions. • Dedicated funding to keep baseline health services running amid rising costs.
• Retains the structured Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) system to allocate independent living plans.
Labour Party • Pledges to repeal the DSS Act 2026 , calling it an attack on independence that gives the Minister too much power to alter funding thresholds.
• Commits to replacing it with co-designed, rights-based legislation under the principle of "nothing about us without us". • Healthcare: Promises 3 free GP visits under "Medicard," free prescription co-payments, and a $4/hour pay rise for care workers.
• Transport & Community: Implements a $20 weekly public transport cap and a "Tell Us Once" portal so disabled individuals don't have to repeatedly prove their conditions to multiple agencies.
Green Party • Advocates for the most explicitly rights-based framework , firmly opposing the DSS Act due to a lack of community consultation.
• Proposes a Te Tiriti-based disability rights law and enforceable, mandatory accessibility standards across all public infrastructure. • Independence & Renting: Strongly advocates for stricter accessible housing quotas within the rental sector.
• Transport & Services: Pledges to restore the 75% Total Mobility taxi scheme subsidy and transform ACC into a comprehensive care agency to eliminate support disparities between accidents and congenital conditions.
ACT New Zealand • Does not have a standalone disability manifesto; views the sector through a lens of smaller government and cutting bureaucratic overhead.
• Favors direct, individualized funding to allow users to purchase their own care rather than relying on state-directed providers. • Focuses on wider public sector efficiency and spending reductions.
• Supports individual choice mechanisms over centralized regulatory standards.
New Zealand First • Does not have a standalone 2026 disability policy; handles disability support indirectly under broader health and senior care portfolios. • Focuses heavily on preventative health measures, expanding primary care access, and infrastructure stability.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) • Integrates disability care into structural economic shifts rather than a siloed program. • Proposes replacing the Supported Living Payment with a Universal Basic Income (UBI) of up to $370/week , paired with a $6,000 annual universal disability allowance that would not affect separate transport or assistive tech funding.
Te Pāti Māori • Focuses on tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) for tāngata whaikaha (Māori disabled) and their whānau. • Advocates for Māori-led, culturally safe services that bridge the gap between healthcare and community support.

Core Areas Impacting Your Independence

  • The Legislative Debate (National vs. Labour/Greens): The DSS Act 2026 passed by the National-led coalition aims to control costs and establish clear funding frameworks, but critics (including Labour, the Greens, and organizations like CCS Disability Action) argue it opens the door for future Ministers to alter support thresholds or shift unpaid care burdens onto family networks without enough public oversight.
  • Transport Policies: If you rely heavily on the Total Mobility scheme or buses, the Greens' focus on a 75% taxi subsidy restoration and Labour's $20 weekly public transport cap represent direct financial relief measures, whereas National and ACT center their transport platforms on broader infrastructure delivery and individual choices.
  • Renting and Housing Modifications: National's 2026–2030 strategy targets social housing accessibility reviews, but if you rent privately, the Greens' push for legally enforceable accessibility design standards provides the most explicit path toward widening accessible rental availability.

For comprehensive voting information, polling locations, and to check your enrolment details, you can visit the official Vote NZ platform.

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account