Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 3

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 16 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
16 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text. Parties covers all 17 tracked parties; displayed parties covers the seven charted parties.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, displayed parties, literal url answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,275rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed claim and assistant, including cells where the assertion was not stated.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, whatTheSourceSays, checkedOn, evidence

    18rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair in this edition.

    edition, prompt id, platform, city region, national result id, city result id, same party names, same text

    123rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    All 17 tracked parties; one row per identical question, assistant and location across the 12 and 16 October collections. Earlier coding restated after the 20 October identity correction.

    earlier edition, prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier result id, current result id, same party set, added, removed, earlier parties, current parties

    792rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

  • Party-identity corrections

    nz-election-2026-party-identity-corrections.csv

    Ten reviewed false matches removed from the restated Edition 2 and current Edition 3 comparisons; original answer text is unchanged.

    edition, result id, party, before present, include, reason, reviewer, reviewed on

    10rows

    Download party-identity corrections (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

Because your main constraint is “I want to increase my paid hours, but childcare and the withdrawal of support can make the extra work barely worthwhile,” I’d compare parties on three separate things: childcare costs, what happens to your benefit/tax credits as earnings rise, and whether their policies make it easier to increase work hours.

I wouldn’t tell you which party to vote for, but these are the parties whose 2026 policies are most directly relevant to that situation.

The key issue in your situation

The current system matters just as much as election promises.

If you receive Sole Parent Support, Work and Income currently says you can earn up to $160/week before tax before the benefit starts reducing. From $160–$250, the reduction is 30 cents per $1 earned, and above $250 it is 70 cents per $1. There is a special childcare-related rule that can raise the initial threshold to $180/week, depending on childcare costs. Work and Income

At the same time, the Childcare Subsidy can cover childcare for eligible low- and middle-income families. If you're working, studying or in approved training, it can generally cover up to 50 hours of childcare per week. Work and Income

And Working for Families is income-tested, so increasing your hours can affect that support too. Inland Revenue

That means I'd pay particular attention to effective marginal gains from working more, rather than simply asking which party offers the biggest childcare payment.

Parties to examine closely

National

National is particularly relevant because FamilyBoost is already operating under the current government. The scheme was expanded in 2025: the rebate increased from 25% to 40% of eligible ECE costs, the maximum rose to $120/week, and the household-income limit rose to just under $230,000. The Beehive

National's current 2026 policy platform also describes its approach as maintaining a welfare system focused on employment and affordability for taxpayers. National Party

For you, the questions to investigate are therefore:

  • How much would FamilyBoost actually reimburse given your childcare bill?
  • Does it continue to make sense as you increase your hours and income?
  • What does National propose for Sole Parent Support and benefit abatement?
  • Would its welfare settings leave you with a meaningful increase in disposable income when you take on another shift or day of work?

National's approach is particularly worth comparing with the other parties because you can look at an existing policy rather than just an election promise.

Labour

Labour's 2026 platform is worth examining particularly closely if your concern is the broader interaction between low-paid work, family income and government support. Its current election programme includes a substantial cost-of-living package and says its policies are fully costed and funded. Labour Party NZ

Labour has previously proposed increasing the Working for Families abatement threshold to $50,000 and increasing the In-Work Tax Credit; however, because we're now in the 2026 election, I'd put much more weight on Labour's current 2026 policy documents than on its 2023 platform. William Buck Australia

The particularly important questions for you are:

  • Would Labour change benefit abatement rates or thresholds?
  • What would happen to Working for Families as your earnings rise?
  • Does Labour propose making childcare itself cheaper, or primarily increasing household income?
  • Does its policy give you a stronger financial incentive to move from part-time to more hours?

Green Party

The Greens deserve a close look if reducing the underlying cost of raising a child, rather than relying primarily on tax rebates, is important to you.

Their 2026 manifesto puts considerable emphasis on putting tamariki and whānau at the centre of policy and addressing child poverty and family wellbeing. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

I'd specifically examine the Greens' detailed policies for:

  • ECE/childcare funding and fees
  • Working for Families
  • Sole-parent income support
  • Housing/rent support
  • The interaction between benefits and paid employment

For a renting sole parent, that combination is important: a policy that increases childcare assistance but leaves rent and benefit withdrawal largely unchanged can have a very different practical effect from one that changes several parts of the household budget.

New Zealand First

NZ First is also relevant because it has explicitly campaigned in 2026 for a substantial increase to Working for Families, alongside annual minimum-wage increases for the next three years. New Zealand First

It has also proposed a Kiwi Kids Grant supporting New Zealand citizens raising their first three children during their first three years. New Zealand First

The important caveat for your situation is that your child is preschool-aged, so you should check the precise eligibility and duration of any proposed payment rather than assuming it would offset your childcare costs.

A useful way to compare them

Rather than asking “Which party is best for single parents?”, I'd put each party through this test:

Question Why it matters to you
How much childcare would I pay after government assistance? Directly determines whether another workday is affordable.
How quickly does my benefit fall as I earn more? Determines whether extra hours actually increase your household income.
What happens to Working for Families as my income rises? Another potentially significant withdrawal of support.
Does support increase with childcare costs? Particularly important if additional hours require additional days of childcare.
Can I work 20 → 25 → 30 hours without hitting a financial cliff? This is probably more relevant than the headline childcare payment.
What happens to Accommodation Supplement and other assistance? Rent means this can materially change the calculation.
Are the changes actually legislated/funded, or merely proposed? Existing policy has a different level of certainty from an election promise.

One particularly useful calculation would be:

Net benefit from working an additional day = extra after-tax pay + extra tax credits/assistance − additional childcare − additional benefit/tax-credit withdrawal − other costs of working.

That's the number I'd use to compare parties' proposals.

One important distinction

Don't focus solely on “childcare subsidy.” There are several different pieces of the system: Childcare Subsidy, 20 Hours ECE, FamilyBoost, Working for Families, Sole Parent Support and potentially Accommodation Supplement. Inland Revenue

For someone in your circumstances, a party could make childcare somewhat cheaper but still leave you little better off from taking additional hours if other support is withdrawn quickly. Conversely, a party could leave the headline childcare subsidy unchanged but improve the overall financial return from working.

So, for your particular question, I would put National, Labour, the Greens and NZ First under the microscope, while also checking ACT's welfare proposals because ACT is explicitly proposing changes designed to increase the employment focus of the benefit system. ACT New Zealand

If you tell me roughly how much you currently earn per week, how much your childcare costs per week, and how many extra hours you would like to work, I can make a neutral 2026 party-by-party comparison of what each proposal could mean for your household, including the benefit/childcare interaction.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

As a sole parent renting and working part-time with a preschooler, your major financial puzzle involves the "effective marginal tax rate" trap: when you take on extra hours, you often lose Working for Families abatements, Accommodation Supplement support, or face higher childcare fees as subsidies taper off, meaning extra work barely increases your take-home pay.

To make your vote count for affordable childcare and realistic pathways to working more, looking closely at how different parties approach Early Childhood Education (ECE) affordability, income support, and working-parent abatement thresholds is key.

1. The Left and Green Bloc (Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori)

  • The Focus: Universal or heavily subsidized public funding to structurally lower out-of-pocket costs.
  • The Policies:
    • The Green Party has campaigned heavily on a comprehensive plan to make ECE entirely free, framing it as a public good similar to primary schooling to eliminate the ~$10,000 average annual cost per child.
    • Labour historically focuses on expanding funded hours (such as extending 20 hours ECE to younger ages) and strengthening community-based, non-profit childcare centers over private models.
  • Why look at them: If your primary barrier to working more is the sheer upfront invoice of childcare, these parties aim to eliminate or radically slash those fees at the source, meaning any extra hours you work translate directly into disposable income rather than paying off a childcare bill.
  • What to weigh: Broader economic impacts, how these sweeping universal policies are funded, and whether they align with your broader views on taxation.

2. The Center-Right Bloc (National, ACT, NZ First)

  • The Focus: Targeted assistance, workforce participation incentives, and supply-side flexibility.
  • The Policies:
    • National tends to favor targeted support for working families—such as family tax credits, childcare rebates, or tax incentives designed to make work "pay" (e.g., adjustments to Working for Families and abatement thresholds so you keep more of what you earn when you increase your hours).
    • ACT and NZ First focus heavily on economic management, reducing regulatory barriers for providers to increase supply, and using targeted tax relief or specific grants (like NZ First’s family-focused grants) rather than fully universal free government services.
  • Why look at them: If you want to work more hours, parties like National and ACT emphasize reforming tax thresholds and welfare/abatement rules so that taking on an extra day or two of work rewards your effort without clawing back too much via benefits or childcare support.
  • What to weigh: Targeted rebates still require you to pay fees upfront or deal with complex MSD/IRD bureaucracy, which can present a cash-flow hurdle for a sole renter.

Key Questions to Ask the Parties Before You Vote:

When evaluating candidate meetings or party manifestos in the lead-up to the 2026 election, look specifically for answers to these three practical questions:

  1. The Abatement Trap: What are your specific plans for Working for Families thresholds and benefit/supplement clawbacks so that a sole parent working part-time isn't penalized for taking on extra shifts?
  2. Upfront vs. Rebate: Do you support reducing the direct hourly cost of ECE at the provider level, or relying on post-hoc tax credits and rebates that require upfront cash?
  3. The 20-Hour Rule: Are there plans to expand fully funded ECE hours to cover preschool ages comprehensively during standard working hours (e.g., 8 AM to 5 PM)?
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

For a sole parent renting, working part-time, and trying to balance the cost of preschool childcare against the viability of taking on extra work hours, the political landscape in the 2026 New Zealand general election offers distinct approaches.

When reviewing the Policy.nz guides and party platforms for the upcoming November election, different political parties emphasize contrasting mechanisms—ranging from universal caps on childcare fees and direct state funding to tax-credit incentives and regulatory streamlining.

Parties approach early childhood education (ECE), childcare affordability, and low-income/sole-parent support with varying priorities:

1. The Green Party

  • Core Proposal: Focuses heavily on direct intervention in childcare costs to make quality early learning affordable or free.

  • The "Why": The Greens have campaigned on capping charges at $10 per day per child beyond the existing 20-hour free ECE entitlement, with a roadmap to make ECE entirely free by expanding the weekly entitlement to 35 hours. They propose shifting full funding directly to community-based and public/non-profit centers while eliminating public subsidies for corporate for-profit chains.

  • Relevance to You: If your primary barrier to working more hours is the sheer out-of-pocket weekly ECE invoice, a hard daily cap and expanded free hours directly targets the "work penalty" where extra wages are swallowed up by childcare fees.

2. The Labour Party

  • Core Proposal: Historically aligns with supporting the 20 hours free ECE framework, boosting ECE workforce pay parity, and working-for-families/abatement structures to assist low-to-middle-income earners. (While their prominent 2026 announcements to date have heavily targeted children's screen use limits in ECE/schools and after-school sport/recreation grants), Labour generally champions public sector funding over private models.

  • The "Why": Labour positions itself around strengthening core public education infrastructure and maintaining subsidised support floors for working families.

  • Relevance to You: Labour's approach tends to favor broad-based public provision and protecting family assistance thresholds, though you should check their specific tax and Working for Families abatement updates as manifestos finalize for the November 7, 2026 election. [Policy.nz]

3. The National Party

  • Core Proposal: Emphasises economic management, tax adjustments, and regulatory tweaks rather than expansive new universal operational subsidies for ECE. Their current 2026 education announcements regarding ECE focus heavily on developmental metrics, ending digital screen use in ECE, and tracking developmental milestones, alongside wider economic policies like adjustments to student loan repayment rates.

  • The "Why": National's philosophy leans toward choice and flexibility, focusing on reducing broader living costs via general economic and tax policy rather than heavy market intervention in childcare fee caps.

  • Relevance to You: If you are looking for broader economic settings (such as tax relief or incentives that make general household budgeting easier while working part-time), National aligns with that framework, though it may offer less direct relief on the specific hourly cost of extra childcare compared to parties pushing fee caps.

4. ACT New Zealand

  • Core Proposal: Focuses on regulatory reduction, cutting compliance costs for ECE providers, and shifting oversight (such as moving ECE regulatory functions to the Education Review Office). ACT has historically been skeptical of centralized mandates like teacher pay parity if it drives up overall costs.

  • The "Why": ACT argues that easing regulatory constraints on childcare providers allows more operators to enter the market, fostering supply-side flexibility.

  • Relevance to You: Their theory is that supply-side deregulation lowers costs through competition, though it lacks the immediate, guaranteed out-of-pocket fee relief offered by direct subsidisation or price-capping models.

Key Factors to Weigh for Your Vote:

  • Direct Cost vs. Supply: Do you believe childcare becomes cheaper by the government capping prices and funding centers directly (e.g., Greens), or by cutting red tape so more providers can open (e.g., ACT/National)?

  • Abatement and Support Thresholds: Look closely at how each party plans to adjust Working for Families and income thresholds. As a part-time earner stepping up hours, you want to ensure that earning an extra dollar doesn't trigger an aggressive abatement (withdrawal) of government assistance that neutralises your net gain.

You can compare individual party manifestos directly on platforms like Policy.nz as the final weeks before the 7 November 2026 election unfold. [Policy.nz]

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a sole parent with a preschool child, renting and working part time. Childcare costs and support rules affect how many hours I can take on. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I want to work more, but childcare has to be affordable. Which parties should I look at most closely, and why?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , major political parties have put forward distinctly different models for early childhood education (ECE), childcare funding, and welfare obligations.

As a renting sole parent with a preschool child seeking to balance work hours against childcare affordability, the following party platforms stand out based on their direct impacts on your costs and work limits:

The Green Party

The Green Party offers the most direct policy for reducing out-of-pocket childcare fees for working parents:

  • Capped Childcare Fees: They have pledged to cap parent ECE fees at $10 per day per child above the standard 20-hour free entitlement.
  • Universal Free Care Goal: Their long-term platform transitions to a fully free ECE network of up to 35 hours per week by 2029.
  • Sector Restructuring: They plan to phase out public funding for private, for-profit ECE centres by 2028, redirecting funds into community, not-for-profit centres and kindergartens.
  • Relevance to you: If you want to increase your part-time work hours, a strict $10 daily cap gives you total cost certainty without your wages being swallowed up by hourly ECE fees.

The Labour Party

The Labour Party focuses heavily on the structural funding of the childcare workforce and child-associated living costs:

  • Teacher Pay Equity: Labour has committed $600 million over four years to lift childcare teacher wages, aiming for pay parity with school and kindergarten teachers to stabilise centre staffing.
  • Broader Cost-of-Living Relief: To offset general household pressures for renters, their 2026 platform includes a $20 public transport fare cap ($10 in smaller regions) and introducing free GP visits and prescriptions.
  • Relevance to you: While Labour historically expanded the 20 hours free ECE to two-year-olds, their current ECE focus is on sector quality. However, their wider policies directly target reducing your overhead costs (travel, medical) as you increase work hours.

The National Party

The National Party centers its family policies on early-stage parental support, regulation, and work readiness:

  • Paid Parental Leave Extension: They are actively campaigning on gradually extending paid parental leave from 26 to 30 weeks by 2029 (with a long-term goal of 40 weeks) and introducing a $1,500 KiwiSaver "Baby Boost".
  • ECE Developmental Rules: Their specific 2026 ECE commitments focus on regulation rather than funding alterations—specifically banning screen use in ECE centres and requiring centers to report against developmental milestones.
  • Relevance to you: Because your child is already a preschooler, the parental leave extensions will not directly assist you. National's approach relies heavily on broader economic tax relief and welfare-to-work pathways, meaning you would need to assess whether current childcare subsidies (like the Family Assist / childcare subsidy adjustments) match your budget under their wider fiscal rules.

Comparative Policy Summary

Party Core Childcare Focus Direct Financial Impact on a Working Parent
Green Party Direct fee caps & transition to fully free ECE. Immediate relief: Fees locked at max $10/day above the 20-hour free limit.
Labour Party Sector funding ($600M for teacher pay) and living-cost cuts. Indirect relief: Workforce stability to prevent centre closures; cheaper transport and healthcare.
National Party Extended parental leave and developmental milestone reporting. Early-stage relief: Best suited for newborns rather than existing preschoolers.

Key Work & Income Rule to Keep in Mind

Regardless of who you vote for, keep a close eye on the current Sole Parent Support work test obligations. Under standard Ministry of Social Development rules:

  • If your child is under 3 , you only have "work preparation" obligations.
  • Once your child turns 3 , you face a part-time work test requiring you to look for or sit in part-time work of at least 20 hours per week.

When looking at party manifestos, check how the minor parties in potential coalitions (like ACT or NZ First) propose altering benefit abatement thresholds—these thresholds dictate exactly how much money you can earn from your part-time job before your Sole Parent Support begins to reduce.

If you want to dive deeper into a specific area, would you like me to look into how much income you can earn before your benefit is reduced under the current rules, or look up minor party policies regarding rental tenant protections?

Ask anything

Captured 16 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account