Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 783 answers recorded on 31 October 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
31 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 6 and 7.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, rationale, review_provenance, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, caveat

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, assessment, quote, earlier_quote, draft_id, scenario, result_id, earlier_result_id, current_review_provenance, earlier_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, common_6_7, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    issue, edition, answers, median_words, party_counts

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    earlier_edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier_result_id, result_id, same_text, same_party_set, added, removed, same_displayed_party_set

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    id, party, contexts, entityId, counted, reason, scope

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, scope, assistant, domain, answers, totalAnswers

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

What National's policies could mean for your household in 2026

The key distinction is that National's proposed rates cap would limit increases in ordinary council rates, but it would not cap your total council bill or your water charges.

For a household with a mortgage, two working parents and school-age children, that distinction matters. You could see more predictable rates increases while still facing substantial increases in water, wastewater and stormwater costs.

There are three separate things to understand:

  1. What National proposes to change about council rates.
  2. What its water reforms mean for water bills.
  3. What councils would still be able to decide themselves.

I'll separate the party's promises from what has actually become law, because that matters when assessing what you could realistically expect after the election.

1. Ordinary council rates: National's proposed 2–4% cap

Proposed policy

National's 2026 policy is to introduce a target range limiting annual increases in council rates to 2–4%.

The Rates Capping Bill passed its first reading on 1 September 2026. Its proposed arrangements are:

  • Councils would generally have to keep annual rates increases within 2–4%.
  • The lower limit is intended to allow councils to maintain essential services and infrastructure.
  • The upper limit is intended to constrain excessive increases.
  • Exceptional circumstances, including natural disasters, could justify exemptions.
  • Councils demonstrating prudent financial management could also seek exemptions.
  • An independent regulator would oversee compliance and exemptions.

National proposes that councils consider the cap when preparing long-term plans from July 2027, with the cap fully taking effect from 1 July 2029. Keeping rates affordableRates Capping Bill passes first readingLocal Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill

What this could mean for you:

If your ordinary rates component were $4,000 a year, a 2–4% increase would mean:

Increase Extra per year
2% $80
3% $120
4% $160

These are illustrative figures, not a forecast of your actual council bill.

The important limitation is that the cap would not necessarily restrict every component of your council invoice.

2. Water, wastewater and stormwater: no equivalent 2–4% cap

Important household distinction

National's water policy is called Local Water Done Well.

It has been implemented through the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025. It replaced the previous Government's Three Waters model.

The central idea is that councils retain ownership of water assets, but must demonstrate that water services are financially sustainable and properly maintained. Local Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportLOCAL WATER

What would change?

There are four important elements.

A. Water services must pay their own way

Councils must demonstrate that water revenue is sufficient to cover:

  • Maintenance and repairs.
  • Depreciation and replacement of pipes.
  • Infrastructure upgrades.
  • Capacity for population growth.

Water funding must be ring-fenced, meaning it cannot simply be diverted to other council activities.

B. Water charges are not covered by the rates cap

This is particularly important.

The Rates Capping Bill explicitly excludes rates relating to:

  • Drinking water.
  • Wastewater.
  • Stormwater.

These costs are regulated separately. Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment BillLocal Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill

That means a council could potentially increase water charges by more than 4%, even if its ordinary rates increase stayed within the proposed cap.

C. Councils retain choices about how households pay

National does not prescribe one national water pricing model.

Councils could choose:

  • Fixed annual water charges.
  • Metered, usage-based water charges.
  • Charges for new connections.
  • Water costs included in rates.
  • A combination of these approaches.

National's policy proposes economic regulation to ensure water pricing is fair and infrastructure investment is adequate. LOCAL WATERLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

D. Water infrastructure could still mean higher household costs

National says access to longer-term borrowing could spread infrastructure costs over the life of assets.

That could reduce immediate pressure on some water bills.

However, National also acknowledges that some councils will need to increase charges to fund necessary investment.

There is no promise that household water bills will fall. LOCAL WATER

3. What remains a council decision?

Even under National's approach, councils would retain significant influence over your household costs.

Decision Who has influence?
Ordinary rates within the proposed cap National sets the framework; councils set actual rates
Water charging method Councils, subject to legislation and regulation
Water prices and charges Councils/providers, subject to economic regulation
Water infrastructure spending Councils/providers, subject to investment requirements
Whether to form a regional water organisation Councils
Local roads, parks and libraries budgets Councils, subject to central government rules
Local service levels and priorities Councils, within their statutory responsibilities

For water services, councils could choose to establish a separate council-controlled organisation (CCO), potentially shared with neighbouring councils.

That might enable more borrowing and separate water finances from ordinary council finances.

But National does not require every council to adopt this structure. LOCAL WATERLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

4. What this means for a family budget

Consider an illustrative annual household council bill:

Example only – not a forecast

$5,500

Current combined annual council costs

Ordinary rates

$4,000

Water and wastewater

$1,500

Illustrative next-year scenario

Component Increase Extra cost
Ordinary rates 3% $120
Water charges 10% $150
Total $270

Combined bill rises from $5,500 to $5,770, despite ordinary rates remaining within the proposed cap.

This illustrates why looking only at the headline rates cap could give a misleading impression of what happens to your household budget.

5. What has actually become law?

There are two different stages to keep in mind as you consider your 2026 vote.

Policy Position as at 31 October 2026
Local Water Done Well Established in legislation in 2025
Rates capping Bill passed first reading; not yet fully enacted
2–4% target Proposed initial range
Rates cap commencement Proposed 1 July 2029

The Rates Capping Bill was referred to the Finance and Expenditure Committee. Parliament was dissolved on 1 October ahead of the general election, so the next Parliament will need to consider its progress. Rates Capping Bill passes first readingLocal Government (Rates Capping) Amendment BillLocal Government (Rates Capping) Amendment BillLocal Water Done Well - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

6. Five questions worth considering before voting

Given that your household has a mortgage, children and two incomes to support it, I'd suggest looking beyond whether a party promises lower rates.

These are useful questions to put to National and other parties:

  1. Will my total council bill actually be more predictable? Does the policy cover water, wastewater and stormwater as well as ordinary rates?

  2. Who pays for ageing infrastructure? Will costs fall on existing households, future developments, taxpayers or some combination?

  3. What happens if water charges rise substantially? Are there protections for households already struggling with essential living costs?

  4. Will councils have enough flexibility? Could a rates cap result in reduced services, deferred maintenance or greater reliance on separate charges?

  5. What happens before 2029? The proposed rates cap does not immediately protect your household from increases over the next few years.

For independent information, these are useful starting points:

My overall takeaway

National is proposing to give households greater protection against increases in ordinary council rates, but it is not promising to limit the total increase in household council-related costs.

Its water policy places greater emphasis on financial sustainability, infrastructure investment and separate accountability for water services. Those objectives may improve long-term infrastructure management, but they do not guarantee cheaper water.

The most important distinction for your family is that a 2–4% rates cap is not a 2–4% cap on your total council bill.

One particularly useful next step would be to examine your actual council rates invoice and separate ordinary rates from water charges. That would show how much of your household expenditure National's proposed cap could potentially protect, and how much would remain exposed to council water-pricing decisions.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

For a household managing a tight budget on two wages with school-age children, understanding how central government policy intersects with local council decisions is crucial—especially regarding household fixed costs like rates and water.

Under the National-led government’s local government framework (including the "Local Water Done Well" policy and associated regulatory settings), here is how policies affect local rates and water costs, versus what remains entirely a council decision.


1. What National Party / Central Government Policies Change

Central government policy sets the boundaries, financial tools, and rules within which local authorities must operate:

  • Refocusing on Core Services: National’s local government policy framework emphasizes pushing councils to rein in spending and refocus strictly on delivering core local services (such as infrastructure, roads, and water) rather than non-essential discretionary spending, aiming to keep overall rate increases more affordable.
  • Water Infrastructure Framework ("Local Water Done Well"): Rather than central mandates (like the previous Three Waters model), National’s policy requires local councils to maintain local ownership of water assets while establishing financially sustainable long-term Water Service Delivery Plans.
  • Access to Specialized Financing: To prevent massive immediate spikes in household rates or water bills caused by aging infrastructure, the government enables councils and council-controlled organizations (CCOs) to access specialized, lower-cost borrowing via the Local Government Funding Agency (LGFA) or structure dedicated entities to spread the cost of major infrastructure upgrades over longer periods.
  • Economic Regulation: Water services and council rating structures face closer economic oversight (with elements like information disclosure regulation overseen by the Commerce Commission) to ensure transparency on how water costs and infrastructure investments are priced.

2. What Remains Strictly a Council Decision

Despite central government frameworks, local authorities (your city or district council) retain independent legal autonomy and accountability for the day-to-day decisions that directly hit your household budget:

  • Setting the Level of Rates: The actual percentage increase in your property rates, the structure of your general rates, Uniform Annual General Charges (UAGC), and targeted rates are decided entirely by your elected local councillors through their Long-Term Plan (LTP) and Annual Plan consultation processes.
  • Water Pricing and Delivery Models: How you pay for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater—whether it is funded through your general property rates, targeted property rates, or volumetric water meters (if your council utilizes them)—is decided at the local level. Councils choose whether to manage water in-house or via a council-controlled organization (CCO).
  • Local Spending Priorities: Decisions on what community assets, parks, libraries, community grants, or local amenities are funded, scaled back, or prioritized remain up to the local council table.

Summary for Your Household Budget

While National’s policy environment attempts to rein in council scope and provide cheaper financing tools to ease infrastructure-driven rate shocks, the final decision on how much your rates bill and water costs increase rests with your local council. When local elections or annual plan submissions occur, council-level choices on spending and debt remain the primary drivers of your household buffer.

Are you looking at how a specific council's proposed long-term plan or water delivery model might affect your household rates?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

For households running on tight margins with school-age children, keeping track of local authority costs is critical. Under the National Party's policy framework and legislative agenda, the approach to rates and water infrastructure centers on central government control over rate increases combined with decentralized, structured delivery of water services.


What National Party Policies Change (Central Government Actions)

  • Capping General Council Rates: National has introduced and advanced the

Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill

, which mandates that councils restrict annual general (non-water) rates increases.

  • An initial target range is set between 2% and 4%.

  • While councils consider this in long-term plans starting mid-2027, the caps take full legal effect from 1 July 2029.

  • Exemptions are tightly restricted and only permitted under exceptional, proven circumstances (such as natural disaster recovery or tightly audited prudent financial management).

  • Restructuring Water Delivery via "Local Water Done Well": National replaced the previous government's "Three Waters" model, returning water asset ownership and responsibility back to local communities. However, central policy requires councils to operate under financial sustainability frameworks.

  • Councils are moving into standalone or multi-council Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs) to gain financial scale and specialized borrowing power.

  • Independent economic oversight via the Commerce Commission applies to ensure water pricing and investments remain transparent and regulated.

  • Water-related rates and charges are formally excluded from the general 2–4% rates-capping mechanism because they are governed and funded through these separate long-term water delivery plans.


What Remains a Local Council Decision

  • Water Infrastructure Delivery Models: While the government mandates that councils have approved water service delivery plans, how they structure it is up to the local level. Councils decide whether to manage drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater entirely in-house or join together into shared regional water organizations.

  • Setting Water Service Charges and Debt Funding: Decisions on how to finance massive pipe upgrades—including how much to borrow, how to phase capital works over decades, and how water pricing or targeted water rates are distributed across local properties—remain decisions for individual or combined local councils and their CCO boards.

  • Core "Back-to-Basics" Spending Priorities: Councils retain decision-making power over their internal budgets within the allowed rate caps. They decide how to prioritize local spending on community amenities (such as parks, pools, and local roads/potholes) versus deferring non-essential projects.

  • Community Consultation and Exception Applications: Councils must still consult their local communities when formulating long-term plans. If a council believes it faces unique structural costs that justify moving outside the central 2–4% non-water rates limit, the council itself must initiate and justify the application for a formal exemption.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would national party policies change about local rates and water costs, and what remains a council decision?

AI Overview

With a tight budget, managing mortgage interest rates and local household bills is a constant balancing act. In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election , local council funding and water management are pivotal topics directly impacting your household expenses.

The National Party’s policies focus heavily on shifting water governance away from central mandates and imposing tighter fiscal control over what local councils can charge.


1. Local Council Rates: The Hard Cap

If you are looking closely at your fixed outgoings, the biggest proposed change in National’s policy platform is a legislative cap on annual council rates increases.

  • The 4% Rates Cap: National has committed to passing a law (pledged to be introduced within their first 100 days if re-elected) that caps annual council rates increases to an initial target range of 2% to 4%. The explicit goal is to block the steep, double-digit rate hikes many regions have experienced recently.

  • "Back to Basics" Mandate: To operate under this cap, central government legislation would push councils to heavily prioritize essential infrastructure (like roading, pothole repairs, and rubbish collection) over "nice-to-have" civic projects.

2. Water Costs: "Local Water Done Well"

Following the complete repeal of Labour’s centralized "Three Waters" program, National’s alternative system, known as Local Water Done Well , is currently rolling out across the country.

  • Shift to Council-Controlled Organizations (CCOs): Instead of large, centralized national entities, water assets remain locally owned. However, councils are being grouped or allowed to establish independent, multi-council water organizations (such as Wellington's Tiaki Wai or Waikato's IAWAI). itsourplace.nz

  • Separation of Finances: A cornerstone of this policy is requiring councils to "ring-fence" water revenue. The money you pay for water will, by law, only be spent on water infrastructure—preventing councils from using water revenue to subsidize other council operations. scoop.co.nz

  • Impact on Your Bill: Because these new water CCOs can borrow money independently to fix aging pipes without stacking that debt directly onto the council's main balance sheet, it is designed to keep immediate rate hikes lower. However, because independent economic regulators (the Commerce Commission) and safety regulators (Taumata Arowai) will enforce strict quality standards, long-term infrastructure costs mean water prices will still need to reflect the true cost of local upgrades. mcert.govt.nz


What Still Remains a Council Decision?

While National’s policies set the legal framework, your local council still holds immense power over how those laws materialize on your doorstep:

Policy Area What Central Government (National) Controls What Your Local Council Discretion Decides
Rates Setting Imposes the structural 2% to 4% cap on annual increases. Decides how the rates burden is split between residential home owners and commercial businesses, and which local services get cut to stay under the cap.
Water Delivery Mandates financial sustainability, strict water quality standards, and bans asset privatization. Chooses the exact business model (e.g., keeping water services entirely in-house, creating a standalone council unit, or partnering with neighboring districts).
Water Charging Structure Sets rules via the Commerce Commission on transparent pricing. Chooses how you are billed (e.g., whether you pay for water via a fixed charge inside your standard rates bill, or through targeted water meters based on volume usage).
Local Infrastructure Priorities Forces a legal focus on "core basics." Decides which specific projects get greenlit—such as picking whether to upgrade your local park, fix a specific suburban road, or fund local community pools.

Household Trade-offs to Consider

If you are evaluating this for a family budget, the primary tension of National's policy is a short-term buffer versus long-term infrastructure funding. A hard rates cap directly protects your immediate cash flow from unexpected spikes. However, local government advocates argue that capping rates without providing councils alternative revenue streams (like local bed or tourism taxes, which National opposes) may eventually force councils to reduce hours at local libraries, pull back on community event funding, or defer long-term climate resilience infrastructure. facebook.comGreens and Te Pāti Māori Should Listen

To help you look into this further, would you like to explore how other major political parties propose to handle council funding, or look at how National's wider tax and education policies apply to families with school-age kids? national.org.nzGovernment to cap rates | National Party

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account