Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 783 answers recorded on 31 October 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
31 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 6 and 7.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, rationale, review_provenance, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, caveat

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, assessment, quote, earlier_quote, draft_id, scenario, result_id, earlier_result_id, current_review_provenance, earlier_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, common_6_7, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    issue, edition, answers, median_words, party_counts

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    earlier_edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier_result_id, result_id, same_text, same_party_set, added, removed, same_displayed_party_set

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    id, party, contexts, entityId, counted, reason, scope

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, scope, assistant, domain, answers, totalAnswers

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would the parties' tax plans affect take-home pay for workers on modest incomes?

For your household, the key issue is not simply whether a party promises lower taxes. It's how much money you actually receive in your bank account each payday, and how well that income holds up when your rostered hours fall.

There are three things worth separating when comparing New Zealand's 2026 election tax policies:

  1. Take-home pay: How much tax you pay on each dollar earned.
  2. Income volatility: Whether the policy helps when one or both of you work fewer hours in a particular week.
  3. Household costs: Whether any tax reduction is offset by changes to Working for Families, benefits, accommodation support or other assistance.

An important distinction: a tax cut that gives someone $20 more every week is useful, but it doesn't necessarily help when their pay suddenly drops by $200 because of fewer shifts.

1. What the main party proposals mean

The following reflects policy announcements available as at 30 October 2026, rather than older election promises. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. Tax Policy BulletinTax Tips: 2026 General Election

Party Personal income tax approach
National No new personal income tax cuts announced for the immediate term; promises no new taxes.
Labour No new general personal income tax rate cuts announced. Focuses on cost-of-living measures and other services.
Green Party $10,000 tax-free threshold and revised tax brackets.
Te Pāti Māori $30,000 tax-free threshold, followed by revised tax brackets.
New Zealand First Has proposed making the first $14,000 of income tax-free.
ACT No broad personal income tax cut in its announced package; focuses on other tax changes.
Opportunity Replaces the income tax structure with new rates and introduces a Citizen's Income of up to $370 per week for eligible adults.

Sources: PwC's tax policy analysis, party announcements and the Public Health Communication Centre's policy comparison. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionElection 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?Tax Reset2026 Election Policy

Green Party

The Greens propose:

  • First $10,000 tax-free.
  • 10% on the next $10,000.
  • 17.5% on $20,000–$40,000.
  • 25.5% on $40,000–$60,000.
  • 30.5% on $60,000–$80,000.
  • Higher rates above that, including 45% over $160,000.

The intention is to reduce income tax for most workers while raising more revenue from very wealthy individuals and large corporations. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionA tax system for all of us

Te Pāti Māori

Its proposed tax-free threshold is $30,000, with:

  • 15% on $30,001–$60,000.
  • 33% on $60,001–$90,000.
  • 39% on $90,001–$180,000.
  • Higher rates above that.

This is a substantial change for people earning below $60,000, because a much larger portion of their wages would be tax-free. Tax Tips: 2026 General Election

New Zealand First

Its proposed $14,000 tax-free threshold is particularly relevant to lower-paid workers. However, the final design and how it interacts with the existing tax brackets need to be checked before treating a particular dollar saving as guaranteed. Election 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?What the parties' tax proposals could mean for your business.

Opportunity

Opportunity's approach is different: rather than relying primarily on tax cuts, it proposes a Citizen's Income of up to $370 weekly for eligible adults, alongside a land value tax and new income tax rates.

For a renter, the proposed regular payment is potentially significant because it is not dependent on how many shifts you work that week. However, the proposal would replace many existing benefits and tax credits, so the full household calculation matters. Tax ResetTax Tips: 2026 General Election

2. What could the tax cuts mean in actual dollars?

This is where the differences become easier to understand.

New Zealand's current individual income tax rates are 10.5% up to $15,600, 17.5% up to $53,500, and 30% up to $78,100, with higher rates above that. Tax rates for individuals

Here is an illustrative comparison for one worker earning a consistent annual gross income.

Annual income tax only, using proposed rates. Rounded to nearest dollar. Excludes ACC levies, KiwiSaver, student loan repayments and tax credits.

Annual gross pay Current tax Greens tax Te Pāti Māori tax
$30,000 $4,158 $2,750 $0
$40,000 $5,908 $5,300 $1,500
$50,000 $7,658 $7,050 $3,000
$60,000 $10,221 $9,600 $4,500

The approximate annual savings would be:

Annual pay Greens Te Pāti Māori
$30,000 $1,408 $4,158
$40,000 $608 $4,408
$50,000 $608 $4,658
$60,000 $621 $5,721

These figures are calculated directly from the published proposed tax brackets, not official party household forecasts.

An important observation: the proposed Te Pāti Māori threshold produces particularly large reductions in income tax for workers earning $30,000–$60,000. The Greens' proposed structure also reduces tax, but its savings are more modest at these income levels.

These are individual earnings, not combined household earnings. If you and your partner each earn $40,000, for example, you should calculate the two incomes separately.

3. What happens when your roster changes?

This is probably the most important part of your situation.

Imagine one of you normally earns $50,000 annually but experiences a period of reduced shifts, bringing annual earnings down to $40,000.

Under the illustrative calculations:

  • Current tax at $50,000: $7,658.
  • Current tax at $40,000: $5,908.
  • Green proposal at $40,000: $5,300.
  • Te Pāti Māori proposal at $40,000: $1,500.

Lower earnings mean less income tax overall. However, your rent and essential bills don't automatically reduce alongside your pay.

There are three important considerations.

A. Tax cuts don't necessarily provide income stability

A tax reduction increases the proportion of your earnings you keep. But it doesn't guarantee a minimum weekly income.

B. Regular payments could matter more than tax brackets

Opportunity's proposed Citizen's Income is interesting in this respect. A regular payment could provide some additional income even during a week with fewer shifts, subject to eligibility and the final rules.

C. Household assistance matters

If you have children, Working for Families and other income-tested assistance could materially change the result. A tax cut alone doesn't tell you whether your household is better off overall.

4. What about National, Labour and ACT?

These parties have different approaches that are worth understanding even though they haven't proposed comparable broad income tax cuts.

  • National: Its 2026 position is no new taxes. It has ruled out immediate income tax cuts, with future tax relief dependent on the government's fiscal position. Its emphasis is on debt reduction, economic growth and retaining existing investment tax settings. Tax Policy Bulletin2026 Election Policy
  • Labour: It has not announced a new general personal income tax reduction. Its package instead includes measures such as a fuel tax freeze, public transport fare caps and free prescriptions. It also proposes increasing compulsory employer KiwiSaver contributions to 6% by 2032. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesTax Policy Bulletin
  • ACT: It has focused on investment and savings taxation, including removing tax on KiwiSaver investment earnings while ending government KiwiSaver contributions. This is more relevant to long-term savings than immediate weekly wages. Tax Policy Bulletin

One distinction worth watching is KiwiSaver: an increase in employer contributions is not necessarily the same as more cash in your weekly bank account. Equally, changes to employee contribution requirements could reduce take-home pay.

5. What I would pay particular attention to as a renter

There are some questions that go beyond the headline tax rates.

Issue Why it matters
Income tax thresholds How much of each pay packet you retain
Citizen's Income Whether there is regular income independent of shifts
Benefit and tax-credit rules Whether assistance changes when your earnings fluctuate
GST and food costs How much of your remaining income goes towards essentials
Land value tax Whether changes to landlords' costs affect rents
KiwiSaver Whether retirement contributions reduce accessible weekly income

For example, Opportunity's proposed land value tax would apply to land rather than buildings. Although the policy aims to shift taxation away from working people, the actual effect on rents would depend on how landlords and the property market respond. Tax Reset

6. How to compare the parties for your circumstances

I would use three separate measures rather than just looking at the amount of tax saved:

  1. Normal week: How much extra money would you retain when both of you receive your usual hours?
  2. Reduced-hours week: How much financial support would remain when one person's roster drops?
  3. Difficult month: What happens if both incomes fall at the same time, while rent, power, food and transport remain payable?

Also remember that PAYE deductions during a variable-pay year aren't necessarily your final annual tax liability. Your final tax depends on total taxable income for the year and the applicable rules.

For further independent comparisons, these are useful resources:

7. I can calculate what the policies might mean for your household

The biggest missing piece is your actual income pattern. I can compare the proposals using two individual incomes rather than treating you and your partner as one taxpayer.

What would help me make the comparison accurate is your approximate earnings.

I'll use that to compare potential weekly take-home pay, annual tax savings and income protection when shifts are reduced, while keeping the assumptions and unconfirmed proposals clearly separate.

The goal is to understand not just who offers a tax cut, but how each proposed system would affect your ability to keep paying rent and bills when work becomes unpredictable.


Worked for 13s

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would the parties' tax plans affect take-home pay for workers on modest incomes?

Navigating fluctuating rostered hours and variable take-home pay while fixed costs like rent and bills stay the same is a significant stressor. In the context of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have proposed starkly different approaches to income tax, cost-of-living support, and worker financial security.

The major parties and groupings approach take-home pay and modest-income support through distinct economic lenses:

1. National & ACT (Status Quo / Targeted Relief & Growth Focus)

  • National: Has campaigned heavily on a "no new taxes" approach, focusing instead on economic management, regulatory simplification, and previously implemented personal tax threshold adjustments. For workers on modest or irregular incomes, National relies on keeping inflation down and avoiding broad tax increases rather than introducing new direct income-tax cuts for lower brackets.
  • ACT: Generally advocates for lower government spending and simpler tax structures. While previous election cycles featured aggressive personal tax-cut packages, their current focus leans towards structural changes, such as removing tax on KiwiSaver schemes, which impacts long-term savings rather than immediate weekly take-home pay.

2. New Zealand First (Direct Tax-Free Threshold)

  • New Zealand First: Has put forward specific policies aimed at low- and fixed-income households. A key proposal is establishing a tax-free threshold on the first $14,000 of income (targeting April 2027), which would directly increase weekly take-home pay for lower earners. However, they also propose measures like expanding compulsory KiwiSaver contributions over time, which would automatically deduct a higher percentage from pay packets unless offset.

3. Labour (Targeted Support & Social Investment)

  • Labour: Generally maintains current personal income tax rates and thresholds while focusing cost-of-living relief through targeted public services and structural changes—such as proposing free primary care/GP visits funded via a capital gains tax on commercial and residential investment properties. For workers with student loans, Labour has proposed reducing domestic student loan repayment rates (from 12% to 10%), which would immediately increase net take-home pay for graduates working modest or variable hours.

4. The Greens & Te Pāti Māori (Progressive Tax Overhauls & Low-Income Thresholds)

  • Green Party: Proposes significant tax reform, including introducing a tax-free threshold for the first $10,000 of income. While this puts more money in the pocket of lower earners, they also introduce a new 45% top tax rate for income over $160,000 and wealth/capital taxes aimed at high-net-worth individuals.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for reducing income tax rates for those earning below $60,000 alongside removing GST from food, which is designed to immediately alleviate grocery cost pressures for variable-income earners.

5. The Opportunity Party (TOP) (Universal Basic Income Model)

  • TOP: Proposes a radical overhaul via a Universal Basic Income (UBI) of $19,400 a year (tax-free) for eligible residents, funded by sweeping land and tax reforms. For a worker with highly irregular hours, a UBI-style framework would theoretically provide a guaranteed baseline cushion regardless of how many rostered shifts they pull in a given week.

Summary for Variable-Income Renters

  • If you are looking for immediate, direct increases to weekly take-home pay via lower tax thresholds, parties like New Zealand First (tax-free threshold up to $14,000) and the Greens ($10,000 tax-free threshold) offer specific bracket adjustments.
  • If you are looking for indirect cost-of-living relief (such as reduced student loan repayment deductions or cheaper access to healthcare), Labour focuses heavily on those structural levers.
  • If you prefer macroeconomic stability without new taxes, National centers its pitch on avoiding fiscal shocks to the economy.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would the parties' tax plans affect take-home pay for workers on modest incomes?

Navigating fluctuating rostered hours and tight household budgeting means that steady, predictable take-home pay is vital—especially when fixed costs like rent and power bills don't bend. Heading into the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct visions for the tax system that approach low-to-modest incomes in very different ways.

The major party approaches and proposals affecting modest-income earners shape up as follows:

  • Green Party: Proposes introducing a $10,000 tax-free threshold on personal income, which would provide an income tax cut for about 96% of New Zealanders. This is funded by higher taxes on top earners (income over $160,000), a net asset tax on wealth over $10 million, and reinstating higher corporate and property-related tax settings. For modest-income workers, a tax-free threshold means immediate weekly relief on the first dollars earned.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes a much higher $30,000 tax-free threshold , alongside a targeted "Kai Credit" for individuals earning $60,000 or less. Like the Greens, their plan shifts the tax burden toward wealth taxes, land and vacant house taxes, and higher company tax rates. This model would exempt a significant portion of part-time or low-bracket earnings from income tax altogether.

  • New Zealand First: Has proposed establishing a tax-free threshold on the first $14,000 of income (targeted for implementation by April 2027) aimed specifically at low- and fixed-income families, while explicitly opposing broad wealth or new capital taxes.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Proposes a structural overhaul via a Citizen’s Income of $19,400 a year for eligible residents, paired with a reset income tax scale (28% up to $50,000) and a Land Value Tax. For workers with volatile or dropping hours, a universal citizen’s income style baseline changes how safety nets interact with fluctuating weekly pay.

  • Labour Party: Has centered its major tax announcements around a 28% capital gains tax on residential investment and commercial property (with revenues ring-fenced for health) alongside small-business cash flow and write-off support, rather than a sweeping personal income tax overhaul for low earners.

  • National Party / ACT: Campaigning broadly on a "no new taxes" and fiscal restraint pledge, focusing instead on prior adjustments to tax thresholds or managing bracket creep without introducing new wealth or asset structures, while maintaining current settings designed to incentivize general economic growth.

What it means for fluctuating hours

If your primary concern is cushioning the blow when rostered hours drop unexpectedly:

  • Parties advocating for tax-free thresholds (like the Greens, Te Pāti Māori, or NZ First) directly reduce the percentage of tax taken out of your lower-earning weeks, letting you keep a higher proportion of every hard-earned hour.

  • Broader structural reforms (like TOP’s Citizen's Income) attempt to decouple basic security from hourly fluctuations, whereas status-quo or capital-focused approaches look more toward public service funding or broader economic management rather than direct weekly income boosts for wage earners.

You can review comprehensive breakdowns of these proposals through analysis updates like PwC's Tax Tips for the 2026 General Election or directly via individual party manifestos.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would the parties' tax plans affect take-home pay for workers on modest incomes?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are approaching income tax and take-home pay with highly distinct strategies. Because you work rostered hours that fluctuate week to week, policies that alter tax-free thresholds or targeted credits will change your take-home pay immediately on your payslip, whereas policies introducing capital or wealth taxes generally target higher earners.

The primary division lies between parties pledging no new income tax changes and parties proposing a restructure to shift the tax burden away from low-to-modest earners.


🏛️ The Governing Parties: National, ACT, and NZ First

The current coalition parties lean toward stability or business-focused tax cuts rather than broad adjustments to personal income tax brackets.

  • National: Campaigning on a strict "no new taxes" pledge. This means your current tax brackets and take-home pay structure would remain exactly as they are now. national.org.nz

  • ACT: Proposes moving toward a simplified two-rate income tax system , with a top rate of 28%. They are also focused on removing taxes on KiwiSaver earnings and accelerating tax relief for landlords. rnz.co.nz

  • New Zealand First: Focuses on reducing the small-business tax rate to 20% for companies with turnovers under $30 million. For families, they propose permanently retaining the $50-a-week boost to the Working for Families in-work tax credit. rnz.co.nz


🌹 Labour Party

Labour’s strategy does not change the core personal income tax brackets, meaning your direct weekly PAYE deductions would not alter under their standalone platform. Instead, they focus on offsetting your cost of living through targeted public services funded by alternative revenue streams. labour.org.nz

  • Capital Gains Tax (CGT): Labour's flagship policy is a flat 28% capital gains tax on profits from selling residential investment and commercial property, set to start on 1 July 2027. rossholmeslawyers.com

  • Exemptions: Your family home, personal items, shares, and inheritances are explicitly excluded. labour.org.nz

  • Direct Benefit: 100% of the revenue raised from this tax is ring-fenced for healthcare. Labour promises this would fund three free GP doctor visits per year for all New Zealanders, which can reduce your out-of-pocket bills during low-income weeks. labour.org.nz


🌿 The Green Party

The Greens propose a comprehensive restructuring of the tax system aimed at lowering income taxes for 96% of New Zealanders by shifting the burden to the wealthy and mega-corporations. greens.org.nzA tax system for all of us - Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

  • Tax-Free Threshold: They introduce a $10,000 tax-free threshold. The first $10,000 you earn each year would face 0% tax, giving an immediate boost to your take-home pay regardless of how many rostered hours you pull that week.

  • Higher Brackets: To offset this, they introduce a new 45% top tax bracket on personal income over $160,000.

  • Wealth & Corporate Taxes: They propose a 2.5% net asset wealth tax on wealth exceeding $10 million and raising the corporate tax rate to 33% for the largest corporations. greens.org.nz


🗺️ Te Pāti Māori and The Opportunity Party (TOP)

Both minor parties are campaigning on structural tax overhauls that aggressively target low-to-modest incomes for relief.

: Proposes a $30,000 tax-free threshold alongside higher progressive income brackets peaking at 48%. They also feature a targeted "Kai Credit" providing up to eight weeks' worth of grocery relief annually for individuals earning $60,000 or less.

  • The Opportunity Party

(TOP): Promotes a "Tax Reset" featuring a broadly universal, tax-free Citizen's Income of $19,400 per year ($370 weekly) for eligible adults. This is funded by a 1.75% urban land value tax and shifting income tax rates to 28% for earnings up to $50,000. opportunity.org.nz


📊 Direct Comparison: What it means for your wallet

Party Income Tax / Take-Home Pay Changes Funding Source / Impact on High Earners
National No changes. Your current take-home pay remains the same. No new taxes; focus on reducing government debt.
Labour No direct change to payslip. Offsets bills via 3 free GP visits/year. 28% Capital Gains Tax on investment properties upon sale.
Green Party Higher take-home pay via a $10,000 tax-free threshold. 2.5% wealth tax over $10M; 45% income tax over $160k.
ACT Structural flat-tax shift. Focuses on removing tax on KiwiSaver earnings. Two-rate income tax system (28% top rate).
NZ First No direct change to payslip. Keeps $50/week Working for Families boost. Cuts tax rates for small businesses under $30M turnover.
Te Pāti Māori Significantly higher take-home pay via $30k tax-free threshold + Kai Credit. Progressive wealth tax; income tax brackets up to 48%.

If you'd like to look closer at how these platforms interact with your specific budget, tell me:

  • Roughly what your combined weekly or annual income looks like on an average week versus a "low hour" week.

  • Whether you or your partner have dependent children (which activates different tax credits like Working for Families). rnz.co.nz

I can map out how a shifting roster might interact with these different thresholds.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account