2026 New Zealand election: Northland road funding and the cost to small businesses

For a business near Whangārei transporting goods to Auckland on State Highway 1, the important question is not simply how much a party promises to spend on roads. It is which sections it will fund, how quickly it will address disruption, and who ultimately pays through fuel taxes, road-user charges, tolls or general taxation.

There are four issues worth separating when comparing the parties:

1. Whangārei–Warkworth connectivity: improvements to the northern Auckland–Northland corridor, including the Brynderwyn Hills and the approaches to Auckland.
2. Road resilience: preventing slips, washouts and closures, and providing reliable alternative routes.
3. Funding: government capital spending, borrowing, fuel excise, road-user charges and tolling.
4. Business operating costs: the effect on freight costs, delivery times, insurance, vehicle expenses and working capital.

One important distinction: a promise to build a road is not necessarily a commitment to maintain the existing highway or provide a reliable alternative when it closes.

1. The road projects that matter to your business

10

The Northland Corridor is a planned 100km programme comprising three main sections:

Section	Why it matters
Warkworth–Te Hana	Bypasses parts of Dome Valley, Wellsford and Te Hana
Te Hana–Port Marsden Highway	Improves the northern connection towards Whangārei
Port Marsden Highway–Whangārei	Improves access to Whangārei and Northland freight routes

The Brynderwyn Hills are particularly important. NZTA reports that SH1 was closed in both directions for 36 days and southbound for another 37 days during the disruption period it describes. That is a substantial vulnerability for businesses dependent on this route. Northland CorridorNorthland Corridor

There is also an important distinction between the projects:

• Warkworth–Te Hana has progressed to a public-private partnership (PPP), with the contract awarded in 2026.
• The wider Northland Corridor still has further sections to deliver.
• A new motorway around Dome Valley does not, by itself, resolve the Brynderwyn Hills problem.

Warkworth to Te HanaProject phasesNorthland Corridor

2. How the political parties compare

The following comparison uses published 2026 party statements and an October 2026 transport-industry election debate. It distinguishes confirmed commitments from broader policy positions.

Election position as at 31 October 2026. National, Labour and the Greens provided written transport submissions to the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport. NZ First, ACT and TOP were represented in the October industry debate.

National

National PartyRoad expansion and user-pays

National's transport spokesperson Chris Bishop sets out the following approach:

• Continue the Roads of National Significance programme, including the Northland Corridor.
• Prioritise road maintenance and renewals.
• Provide $400 million in Budget 2026 for state highway resilience work on vulnerable routes.
• Progress electronic road-user charges across the vehicle fleet.
• Expand the use of tolls, time-of-use charging and infrastructure levies.
• Increase fuel excise and equivalent RUC by five cents every six months from January 2028 to January 2030, then annually by five cents from January 2030.

National also says it will simplify some heavy-vehicle regulations and improve freight resilience through road, rail and coastal shipping.

What this could mean for you: Greater continuity for the Northland motorway programme, with the possibility of improved journey times and alternative routes. However, your business could face additional tolls, fuel taxes and road-user charges over time.

Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and TransportThe sizzling final transport election debate of 2026

Labour

New Zealand Labour PartyCharge restraint and project scrutiny

Labour's transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere has outlined:

• No increases in fuel excise duty or RUC for three years.
• Honour existing contracts and funded projects, rather than abandoning them simply because Labour did not initiate them.
• Greater scrutiny of expensive infrastructure projects and their business cases.
• An integrated transport investment programme.
• A weekly public transport fare cap, starting in July 2027.

Labour has criticised the scale and cost of the Roads of National Significance programme. However, it has said it would honour existing signed commitments.

What this could mean for you: A period without the planned fuel excise and RUC increases could help control operating expenses. However, Labour has not provided the same commitment to expanding the entire Northland motorway programme. Its funding approach would require reprioritising or scaling some transport projects.

An important uncertainty is which projects would be delayed or reduced to accommodate the revenue changes.

Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and TransportLabour’s Fare Cap Election PolicyThe sizzling final transport election debate of 2026

Green Party

Green Party of Aotearoa New ZealandMaintenance, rail and alternatives

The Greens' transport spokesperson Julie Anne Genter has emphasised:

• Maintenance and safety before large new expressways.
• Investment in rail for passengers and freight.
• Greater support for coastal shipping.
• Public investment in logistics services to reduce freight costs.
• Lower-emission transport and electrification.
• A more user-pays approach to road funding, while questioning the value of expensive motorway expansion.

The Greens have explicitly criticised National's four-lane expressway programme, arguing that it risks diverting funding from maintenance and safety improvements across the existing network.

What this could mean for you: Greater emphasis on maintaining existing roads and developing alternative freight modes. However, there is less commitment to building the proposed large-scale Northland motorway programme in its current form.

For a business that relies heavily on trucks, the practical question is whether alternative freight infrastructure would be sufficiently developed and reliable to reduce dependence on SH1.

Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and TransportThe sizzling final transport election debate of 2026

ACT

ACT New ZealandInfrastructure and user-pays

At the October transport debate, ACT representative Cameron Luxton:

• Supported toll roads.
• Favoured selecting the most affordable and safe infrastructure option first.
• Supported a greater role for user-pays funding.
• Supported directing more transport funding towards local roads where heavy vehicles operate.

ACT's approach is consistent with greater use of private financing and toll-funded infrastructure.

What this could mean for you: More opportunities to develop roads through tolls and private investment, potentially accelerating construction. But freight operators could face direct costs for using upgraded routes.

The distinction to investigate is whether ACT would support tolls on new roads only or broader corridor charging.

The sizzling final transport election debate of 2026NZ Election 2026 Transport Policies Compared | Roads, Rail & Public Transport

New Zealand First

New Zealand FirstRegional infrastructure and maintenance

At the October debate, NZ First representative Andy Foster emphasised:

• Maintenance ahead of new projects.
• More balanced regional investment.
• Concern that infrastructure funding is distributed unevenly between regions.
• The importance of strategic infrastructure and regional development.

NZ First did not submit a written transport policy response to CILT's September comparison, so its specific commitments to Northland motorway construction and tolling are less clearly documented in the material reviewed.

What this could mean for you: A regional maintenance emphasis could be relevant to Northland's existing highway network. However, you should seek a specific commitment on the Brynderwyns and the remaining Northland Corridor sections rather than assume general regional-development support guarantees funding.

The sizzling final transport election debate of 2026Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

The Opportunities PartyInfrastructure efficiency

TOP participated in the October transport debate. Its representative Ben Wylie-van Eerd discussed accelerated electric vehicle uptake, including:

• Accelerated depreciation for electric vehicles.
• Government departments purchasing electric vehicles.
• Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new homes.

The debate report does not establish a sufficiently detailed TOP commitment on Northland's SH1 construction, tolls or Brynderwyn resilience to make a firm comparison.

The sizzling final transport election debate of 2026

3. What tolls could mean for your freight costs

rnz.co.nz

This is one of the most tangible issues for your business.

NZTA consulted on tolling the new Warkworth–Te Hana motorway in March–April 2026. The proposed tolls, expressed in 2025 dollars, were:

Toll point	Light vehicle	Heavy vehicle
Northern point	$1.50	$3.00
Southern point	$3.00	$6.00
Both points	$4.50	$9.00

These are proposed charges, not confirmation that tolling has commenced or been finally approved. Northland Corridor Warkworth to Te Hana – Tolling consultationWarkworth to Te Hana tolling proposal consultation brochure

Example: what could this cost a small freight business?

Assume one truck uses both toll points in each direction.

Illustrative toll expenditure per truck

One-way trip

$9

Return trip

$18

20 return trips/month

$360

12 months

$4,320

Assumes the full proposed heavy-vehicle toll on both journeys, 20 working days per month and no discounts. Excludes inflation, other toll roads and any additional operating costs.

For a small business, that could mean:

• Reduced profit margins if you cannot pass toll costs on to customers.
• Higher delivery prices if tolls are incorporated into freight quotations.
• More difficult decisions about whether to use the faster motorway or the free existing SH1.
• Additional administrative work tracking toll expenditure across vehicles and jobs.

Importantly, NZTA's proposal retains existing SH1 as an untolled alternative for the Warkworth–Te Hana section. That means you could avoid the toll, but would need to weigh the cost against the time and reliability benefits of the new road. Northland Corridor Warkworth to Te Hana – Tolling consultation

There is also a longer-term consideration: NZTA says future sections of the Northland Corridor could be assessed for tolling as part of an end-to-end corridor. Therefore, the $9 proposal should not automatically be treated as the maximum possible toll expense for your future Auckland–Northland journeys. Northland Corridor Warkworth to Te Hana – Tolling consultation

4. Comparing the likely business implications

This table summarises the differences without ranking the parties.

Party	Northland road investment approach	Potential cost implications
National	Continue major motorway programme and resilience investment	Future fuel/RUC increases, tolls and other road charges
Labour	Honour existing commitments, scrutinise and reprioritise future projects	Three-year freeze on fuel excise and RUC increases
Greens	Prioritise maintenance, safety, rail and coastal shipping	Greater emphasis on existing road upkeep and alternative freight options
ACT	User-pays infrastructure and tolling	Greater potential for direct road-use charges
NZ First	Maintenance and regional infrastructure	Specific Northland toll and project commitments need clarification
TOP	Efficiency and transport electrification	Specific SH1 funding and toll commitments need clarification

Sources: party transport submissions and the October 2026 industry debate. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and TransportThe sizzling final transport election debate of 2026

5. What matters most for a business moving goods between Whangārei and Auckland?

I would separate the issues into five practical business considerations.

1. Reliability rather than just speed

A motorway saving 7–10 minutes on a particular section is useful, but avoiding a full-day or multi-day disruption is potentially much more valuable.

For your business, the Brynderwyn Hills deserve particular attention. Ask parties whether they will fund preventative slope stabilisation, drainage, alternative routes and rapid emergency repairs.

2. Predictability of road charges

A toll is a direct cost that can be calculated per journey. Fuel excise and RUC increases affect broader operating costs.

The important question is whether your business can recover these costs through freight pricing, particularly when contracts have fixed delivery charges.

3. Alternative routes

A new motorway around Dome Valley provides another route, but it does not solve every vulnerability between Whangārei and Auckland.

Look for commitments covering the whole corridor, including the Brynderwyns.

4. Maintenance of existing roads

Even if new motorway construction takes place, your vehicles will continue using existing roads for local collections, deliveries and access to customers.

5. Freight alternatives

Rail and coastal shipping could eventually provide alternatives for some types of goods. However, they need reliable schedules, suitable terminals, competitive handling costs and road connections.

For a small business, switching modes is not necessarily practical if goods need direct delivery to Auckland customers.

Northland CorridorNorthland Corridor Warkworth to Te Hana – Tolling consultationThe sizzling final transport election debate of 2026Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

6. Questions I would put to every party before voting

These are particularly useful questions for your local electorate candidates and party transport spokespeople.

1. Will you guarantee funding for preventative maintenance and resilience improvements on the Brynderwyn Hills?
2. Will you continue funding all three sections of the Northland Corridor between Warkworth and Whangārei?
3. Will you support tolling Warkworth–Te Hana? If so, will heavy vehicles pay the proposed $9?
4. Will you consider concessions, rebates or exemptions for small freight businesses that regularly use tolled roads?
5. Will you protect funding for existing SH1 maintenance while new motorways are constructed?
6. What alternative freight arrangements will you support when SH1 is closed?
7. Will you publish a long-term schedule of fuel excise and RUC increases so businesses can plan their operating budgets?

The distinction between a general promise to support Northland and a funded commitment to improve the actual route is particularly important.

7. Useful sources to check before election day

These are the most relevant primary and industry sources I found:

• NZTA – Northland Corridor: project scope and the three road sections.
• NZTA – Warkworth to Te Hana tolling consultation: proposed toll rates and free alternative route.
• NZTA – Warkworth to Te Hana project: construction status and delivery arrangements.
• CILT – Where the parties stand on transport: National, Labour and Green transport policy submissions.
• Transporting New Zealand – October 2026 transport election debate: National, Labour, Greens, ACT, NZ First and TOP perspectives.
• Ministry of Transport – Tolling policy: how road tolls fit into New Zealand's transport funding system.

My suggested way to assess the decision

For your circumstances, I would keep three separate measures when evaluating the parties:

• Reliability: How much will their policies reduce the risk of losing deliveries when SH1 is disrupted?
• Affordability: What will their policies mean for your annual fuel, RUC, toll and vehicle operating expenses?
• Certainty: Are their road improvements funded, contracted and scheduled, or simply election promises?

These measures let you compare the policies against the financial realities of running your business without assuming that more motorway spending necessarily means lower business costs.

One useful next step: I can build a personalised annual cost comparison for your business, showing how National's proposed tolls and fuel/RUC increases compare with Labour's three-year freeze, using your approximate number of Auckland return trips and the type of vehicles you operate.

2026 New Zealand election: What could the parties mean for Northland roads and your business?

Information checked 31 October 2026 · General election: 7 November 2026

For a small business near Whangārei transporting goods to Auckland, this election has a very practical financial dimension: will the next government make SH1 more reliable, how quickly will it fix the vulnerable sections, and how much will your business have to pay to use the improved roads?

There are three particularly important issues:

1. The proposed Northland Expressway between Auckland and Whangārei.
2. The alternative route around the Brynderwyn Hills, where closures can interrupt freight movements.
3. The funding model: fuel taxes, Road User Charges (RUC), tolls, public funding and private finance.

The parties have different approaches. National and ACT favour a stronger programme of road construction and user-pays funding. Labour places greater emphasis on affordable transport charges and scrutinising major projects. The Greens favour targeted road improvements, maintenance and alternatives such as rail and coastal shipping.

Let's look at what that means in practical terms.

1. The roads that matter to your business

8

The Northland Corridor is a proposed 100km programme connecting Warkworth with Whangārei. It consists of three major projects.

Road section	Current position
Warkworth–Te Hana	26km expressway, progressing to construction
Te Hana–Port Marsden Highway	Includes the proposed alternative to the Brynderwyn Hills; route protection underway
Port Marsden Highway–Whangārei	Four-laning proposed; future timing subject to funding

An important distinction: the first project is progressing, but the whole corridor is not funded and ready to build.

NZTA's July 2026 update says the Brynderwyn alternative remains a priority, but detailed design and construction require funding confirmation. The remaining corridor planning has also slowed. Northland CorridorWarkworth to Te HanaPort Marsden Highway to Whangārei

Why this matters:

• Brynderwyn Hills: a closure can force substantial detours, delay deliveries and increase fuel and driver costs.
• Dome Valley and Wellsford: congestion, safety and travel-time reliability affect north–south freight.
• Whangārei approaches: improvements would help businesses moving freight between Whangārei, Marsden Point and Auckland.

The scale of the resilience problem is significant. NZTA reports that the Brynderwyn section experienced 73 days of closure or partial-direction disruption in the year referenced in its project information. Northland Corridor

2. How the parties compare

One particularly useful source is the September 2026 issue of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport. It invited the parties to explain their transport and freight policies directly.

National, Labour and the Greens provided submissions. NZ First did not submit by the deadline. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

National

National Party

Approach: Build major roads, improve maintenance and expand user-pays funding.

National supports the three Northland Corridor projects as part of its Roads of National Significance programme.

Its stated priorities include:

• Building Warkworth to Te Hana, with construction and early works progressing in late 2026.
• Progressing the alternative to the Brynderwyn Hills.
• Continuing the wider Whangārei–Auckland corridor programme.
• Spending more on road maintenance and resilience.
• Using public-private partnerships (PPPs), tolling and other financing tools.

National's September 2026 transport submission also outlines a revised charging programme:

• The scheduled 2027 fuel excise and equivalent RUC increases have been cancelled.
• Five-cent-per-litre fuel excise increases, with equivalent RUC adjustments, are planned every six months from January 2028 for two years.
• Five-cent annual increases are planned from January 2030.

National also supports electronic RUC for the wider vehicle fleet and time-of-use charging. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

What this could mean for your business

• Potentially better road reliability and fewer disruptions if the corridor is completed.
• More predictable travel times if the new routes address existing bottlenecks.
• Additional costs from tolls and future RUC increases.
• Possible long-term benefits from fewer vehicle delays, damage and missed delivery windows.

Labour

New Zealand Labour Party

Approach: More affordable transport charges, integrated infrastructure planning and greater scrutiny of large projects.

Labour's September 2026 submission says it would:

• Freeze fuel excise and RUC increases for three years.
• Review major infrastructure commitments on their costs, benefits and confirmed funding.
• Continue projects that are contracted, underway and funded.
• Invest in public transport and freight infrastructure.
• Avoid imposing additional transport charges on households already facing cost pressures.

Labour argues that the National Government's road-building programme contains projects that lack sufficient financial justification or confirmed funding. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

What this could mean for your business

• Less immediate pressure from scheduled fuel excise and RUC increases.
• Potentially lower short-term operating costs.
• Greater uncertainty about the timing, scope or scale of some proposed Northland expressway projects.
• More emphasis on evaluating whether smaller targeted improvements deliver better value than large motorway projects.

An important question for Labour is whether it would retain the Brynderwyn alternative as a priority and how it would fund it.

ACT

ACT New Zealand

Approach: More road investment, stronger user-pays funding and greater emphasis on cost efficiency.

ACT's published infrastructure policy, Keep New Zealand Moving, supports:

• Building roads ahead of population and traffic growth.
• Protecting maintenance and renewal funding.
• Requiring major projects to publish lower-cost safe alternatives.
• Greater accountability for infrastructure expenditure.
• Prioritising freight and road reliability.

ACT's approach is consistent with greater use of tolls, road-user charges and private investment to fund infrastructure. ACT New ZealandACT New ZealandNZ Election 2026 Transport Policies Compared | Roads, Rail & Public Transport

What this could mean for your business

• Support for additional road capacity and freight infrastructure.
• Potential improvements to journey reliability.
• Greater exposure to user-pays charges, depending on the final funding arrangements.
• A stronger focus on whether road expenditure produces measurable economic benefits.

An important distinction is that ACT's support for additional roads does not, by itself, guarantee that every Northland Corridor section will receive construction funding on a particular timetable.

Green Party

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Approach: Targeted road improvements, maintenance, rail investment and coastal shipping.

The Greens oppose National's proposed large four-lane expressway programme where they consider it too expensive or poorly justified.

Their stated priorities include:

• More investment in rail for freight and passengers.
• Better coastal shipping connections.
• Targeted road safety improvements.
• Greater investment in maintaining existing roads.
• More sustainable transport funding.
• Less reliance on expanding major highways.

The Greens also argue for a more user-pays approach to road funding, while opposing large new expressways at the expense of maintaining the existing network. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

What this could mean for your business

• Potentially more emphasis on fixing existing vulnerable roads.
• More investment in alternatives that could provide additional freight capacity.
• Less certainty around the proposed four-lane Northland Corridor.
• Possible long-term benefits if coastal shipping and rail become practical alternatives for some goods.

For a business that must deliver directly to Auckland by truck, however, rail or shipping investment would not necessarily replace the need for a dependable SH1.

New Zealand First

New Zealand First

Approach: Regional development, strategic infrastructure and regional connectivity.

NZ First has historically supported:

• Regional infrastructure investment.
• Road and rail connectivity.
• Strategic transport links.
• Regional economic development.

Its position as a coalition partner is relevant because it participates in the current government's transport decisions.

However, NZ First did not provide a transport submission to the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport's September 2026 election comparison.

I would therefore distinguish its historical regional infrastructure priorities from a confirmed 2026 commitment to fund each Northland Corridor section or oppose particular tolls. Where the parties stand on transport | The Chartered Institute of Logistics and TransportNZ Election 2026 Transport Policies Compared | Roads, Rail & Public Transport

3. The tolling issue: what could a truck actually pay?

This is particularly important because the proposed Warkworth–Te Hana project has a specific tolling proposal.

Proposed charges, not a confirmed final toll schedule

NZTA consulted on tolling for the new 26km road. The consultation closed on 15 April 2026.

The proposal contains two toll points, one on either side of the Wayby Valley interchange.

Toll point	Light vehicle	Heavy vehicle
Northern	$1.50	$3.00
Southern	$3.00	$6.00
Both toll points	$4.50	$9.00

These are proposed 2025-dollar rates. Northland Corridor Warkworth to Te Hana – Tolling consultation

The existing SH1 would remain a free alternative if the new road is tolled.

What this could mean financially

For a heavy vehicle using both toll points:

Illustrative toll cost per truck

$18

One return journey, assuming both toll points are used in each direction

Frequency	Annual toll cost
1 return trip per week	$936
3 return trips per week	$2,808
5 return trips per week	$4,680
10 return trips per week	$9,360

Assumes 52 weeks of operation, constant proposed tolls and one truck. Excludes GST treatment, inflation and any future changes.

That is a meaningful operating expense for a small business, particularly when margins are tight.

However, tolls need to be considered alongside savings.

If the new road saves 7–10 minutes per journey, as NZTA estimates, there could be savings in:

• Driver hours.
• Fuel and vehicle operating costs.
• Delivery scheduling.
• Reduced exposure to congestion.
• The financial consequences of late deliveries.

The critical question is whether those savings exceed the toll and other costs.

For a business with regular heavy-vehicle movements, I would calculate this on a per-truck, per-week basis rather than simply treating the toll as a small additional charge.

Source: NZTA's Warkworth–Te Hana tolling consultation.

4. Other charges that could affect your business

Tolls are only one part of the equation.

New Zealand's land transport system is primarily funded through fuel excise and RUC, with tolls supplementing these sources in some cases. Tolling

Charge	Potential business impact
Fuel excise	Increases affect petrol-powered vehicles and may flow through to transport costs
RUC	Direct cost for diesel heavy vehicles and other RUC-liable vehicles
Road tolls	Additional charge when using designated tolled roads
Time-of-use charges	Potential future charges for using certain roads at particular times
Council rates	Can indirectly affect local business costs through infrastructure funding

National supports expanding electronic RUC and time-of-use charging. ACT also supports stronger user-pays funding.

Labour's proposed three-year freeze on fuel excise and RUC increases would provide short-term relief, although it raises questions about how the resulting transport funding gap would be managed.

The Greens favour greater investment in alternative transport and a different balance of public funding and user charges.

One important distinction: a toll is not the same as RUC. A truck could potentially pay both when travelling on a tolled road.

5. What is already committed, and what remains uncertain?

This is arguably the most important distinction when assessing election promises.

Warkworth–Te Hana

Contract awarded

NZTA has awarded a design, build, finance, operate and maintain PPP contract to Northway. The project is scheduled for August 2026 to December 2033, with early works expected to begin in late 2026.

Alternative to Brynderwyn Hills

Funding to confirm

The project remains a priority. Route protection and approvals are progressing, but construction funding is not yet confirmed.

Te Hana–Whangārei corridor

Future staging

NZTA has slowed further planning and route designation work. The next steps depend on future transport funding decisions.

Warkworth to Te HanaNorthland Corridor

This creates an important issue for your voting decision: a party might support the Northland Expressway in principle without committing to the same construction timetable or funding arrangements.

Also, changing government does not automatically cancel an existing PPP contract. Any proposed changes would need to account for contractual obligations and associated costs.

6. What I would examine as a small-business operator

Rather than looking only at which party promises to build the most roads, I would assess their policies against five business considerations.

Business consideration	What to look for
Delivery reliability	Will the Brynderwyns have a dependable alternative route?
Journey time	Will upgrades reduce delays between Whangārei and Auckland?
Operating costs	What happens to RUC, fuel costs and tolls?
Cash flow	Will charges increase before the promised road improvements arrive?
Long-term resilience	Will there be alternatives when slips, flooding or accidents close SH1?

There is also a question about who carries the cost of disruption.

For example, when SH1 closes:

• Your driver may spend additional hours on the road.
• Fuel consumption increases through detours.
• Deliveries may miss their scheduled windows.
• Customers may delay payment if goods arrive late.
• Your business may need additional stock or working capital to manage uncertainty.

These costs don't necessarily appear in government transport budgets, but they are real costs to a small business.

7. Questions worth putting to candidates before election day

I would ask candidates from each major party the following questions. They are specific enough to make it harder to receive a general campaign answer.

1. Will you commit to funding and completing an alternative to the Brynderwyn Hills, and what is your expected construction timetable?
2. Will you support the full Northland Corridor through to Whangārei, including the Port Marsden Highway connection?
3. Will heavy commercial vehicles pay the proposed $9 return toll on Warkworth–Te Hana, or will there be concessions for regular freight operators?
4. What will happen to RUC and fuel excise over the next three years?
5. How will you fund emergency repairs and alternative routes when SH1 is closed by slips or flooding?

I would particularly seek written answers to questions three and four. Those are the ones most likely to affect your operating budget directly.

8. Useful sources for checking the parties yourself

These are the most relevant sources I found:

• CILT – Where the parties stand on transport, September 2026 – direct submissions from National, Labour and the Greens.
• NZTA – Northland Corridor – project stages and construction updates.
• NZTA – Warkworth to Te Hana tolling consultation – proposed heavy-vehicle and light-vehicle charges.
• ACT – Keep New Zealand Moving – ACT's infrastructure policy.
• Ministry of Transport – Tolling – how tolling fits into New Zealand's transport funding system.

My suggested way to evaluate the election

There are two separate decisions worth keeping in mind:

First: Which party's infrastructure policy would give Northland businesses a more reliable freight network?

Second: Which party's funding policy would leave your business with an affordable and predictable cost of moving goods?

Those questions are related, but they are not identical. A government could build better roads while increasing the cost of using them. Equally, a government could restrain transport charges while delaying infrastructure improvements.

For a small business, both outcomes matter.

I would pay particular attention to the balance between Brynderwyn resilience, the timing of the wider Northland Corridor, and the total cost of tolls and RUC.

One useful next step: I can build a small-business cost comparison for your Whangārei–Auckland freight operation, comparing National, Labour, ACT and the Greens under different weekly truck-trip frequencies. That would show how proposed tolls and charging changes could affect your annual operating costs, rather than just comparing political promises.

---

Worked for 17s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searched 10 websites