Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 783 answers recorded on 31 October 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
31 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 6 and 7.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, rationale, review_provenance, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, caveat

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, assessment, quote, earlier_quote, draft_id, scenario, result_id, earlier_result_id, current_review_provenance, earlier_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, common_6_7, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    issue, edition, answers, median_words, party_counts

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    earlier_edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier_result_id, result_id, same_text, same_party_set, added, removed, same_displayed_party_set

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    id, party, contexts, entityId, counted, reason, scope

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, scope, assistant, domain, answers, totalAnswers

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Being made redundant after years in one industry is a significant disruption, particularly when rent and everyday expenses don't stop while you work out your next move.

There are really two separate questions to consider before the 2026 New Zealand general election:

  1. Getting income back quickly: Which policies help you find another job, access income support and meet living costs while unemployed?
  2. Building a sustainable next career: Which policies help you retrain, change industries and move into work that offers reasonable long-term security?

These aren't necessarily the same thing. A party might have policies that encourage employers to hire, while another might emphasise vocational education, apprenticeships or government-supported training.

For someone in your position, I'd examine both rather than treating unemployment as simply a matter of finding another job.

What the main parties are proposing

The following comparison uses policies published for the 2026 election, rather than relying on older campaign promises.

1. Labour

Jobs, apprenticeships and practical employment pathways

Labour's 2026 jobs package includes:

  • Start Work Now: building homes, repairing schools and hospitals, with a stated ambition to get people back into work and nearly 30,000 apprentices into employment.
  • Apprenticeship Boost: extended employer payments, a $1,000 toolbox grant and five additional trades covered from July 2027.
  • Backing Māori into Skilled Work: Māori-led training to help people gain skills and enter better-paid employment.
  • Small Business Action Plan: measures intended to help small businesses invest and grow.

There are also cost-of-living policies, including a public transport fare cap. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

What to investigate: Whether Start Work Now would actually provide opportunities for experienced redundant workers, not just new apprentices, and whether you could access training without taking on substantial student debt.

Policy: Labour's 2026 policies.

2. Green Party

Job creation, vocational training and paid apprenticeships

The Greens' Good Jobs for All of Us package includes:

  • An economic investment programme that the party estimates will support 64,000 new jobs.
  • Investment in construction, engineering, science, technology, education, health and public services.
  • A $2,000 equipment grant for apprentices.
  • Abolishing the training wage.
  • A $30 million annual funding increase for Māori and Pasifika-led training and employment support.
  • $2,000 completion bonuses for employers who support apprentices through their qualifications.

An important qualification: the Greens' Youth Jobs Guarantee is specifically for people aged 16–24 who have been unemployed for six months. It is not a general employment guarantee for all redundant workers. Good Jobs For All of UsGreen Party to abolish training wage and provide more support for apprentices

What to investigate: Whether the proposed job creation translates into actual vacancies in your industry or a realistic alternative industry, and how quickly the investment would create those jobs.

Policy: Good Jobs for All of Us.

3. National

Employment services and work-readiness expectations

National's approach focuses on helping people receiving Jobseeker Support return to employment.

Its published commitments include:

  • More intensive employment assistance for 30,000 work-ready people who have been receiving a benefit for more than a year.
  • Greater employment support for young people.
  • A focus on growth industries including primary industries, construction, infrastructure, tourism and hospitality.
  • Stronger benefit requirements for people who remain unemployed long term.

There are also proposed reductions in benefit payments for certain long-term recipients from April 2028. A firm, fair and affordable welfare system

What to investigate: Whether you would qualify for the intensive employment assistance before reaching the one-year threshold, and whether the support includes funded retraining or primarily job-search requirements.

Policy: National's welfare policy.

4. Other parties worth examining

Which policies actually match your circumstances?

Rather than selecting a party winner, I'd distinguish the policy approaches by what they would offer someone who has already established a career.

Your priority Policies to examine particularly closely
Finding work quickly Labour's Start Work Now; National's employment assistance
Changing industries Green investment and vocational training; Labour's skills programmes
Getting paid while retraining Green apprenticeship proposals; Alliance's KiwiWorks
Finding work in a smaller community Green local job creation; Alliance public works
Reducing pressure on employers to hire ACT's small-business policies
Protecting income while unemployed Each party's welfare and income-support policies

One important distinction: a policy promising to create jobs isn't the same as a policy that helps an unemployed person access those jobs.

Likewise, a training subsidy isn't necessarily useful if you cannot afford rent while completing the qualification.

What to check before trusting any party's promises

I'd use these seven tests.

  1. Eligibility: Does the programme cover experienced workers made redundant, or is it primarily for young people, graduates or long-term beneficiaries?

  2. Speed: Can you get assistance within weeks, or would you need to wait months or years for a new programme?

  3. Actual financial support: Does it cover course fees, transport, equipment and living expenses? Does it provide income while retraining?

  4. Employment outcomes: Can the party demonstrate how many people it expects to move into sustained employment, rather than simply enrol in training?

  5. Industry relevance: Are the jobs being created in industries where your existing skills can transfer?

  6. Funding: Is there a detailed budget, an identified funding source and a realistic implementation timetable?

  7. Security: What happens if you retrain and cannot find work? Would you still have adequate income support?

I'd pay particular attention to the difference between a policy announcement, a funded commitment and a programme that is already operating.

For independent comparisons, two useful resources are:

The second is useful for seeing how policies across the parties compare, rather than relying solely on party advertising.

Don't wait for the election to get financial support

There are practical options available now, regardless of which party wins.

Work and Income – Redundancy Support

Available now

Work and Income says it can help before and after redundancy, including:

  • Connecting you with employers.
  • Finding suitable training opportunities.
  • CV and interview assistance.
  • Financial assistance between jobs.
  • Potential Transition to Work Grants for expenses involved in starting employment.

Read the redundancy support information

Help with rent and living expenses

Depending on your circumstances, you may qualify for:

  • Jobseeker Support.
  • Accommodation Supplement.
  • Temporary Additional Support.

Redundancy payments can affect the initial benefit stand-down calculation, so ask Work and Income how your particular payment will be treated.

Check what financial assistance you could receive.

One other thing to investigate: New Zealand's Fees Free rules are changing. The current final-year Fees Free scheme is ending on 31 December 2026, and qualifications completed in 2027 or later will not qualify under that scheme. Don't assume a retraining course will be free. Eligibility for Fees FreeApplying for Fees Free

My suggested way to approach your decision

I wouldn't automatically abandon an industry in which you've spent years building experience.

You may have transferable skills that are valuable elsewhere: project management, compliance, technical knowledge, customer relationships, logistics, supervision or operational experience.

Before committing to a completely new qualification, investigate three possibilities:

  • Option A: Find a similar job in your existing industry.
  • Option B: Move into a related industry using your existing qualifications and experience.
  • Option C: Retrain for a substantially different occupation where there is demonstrable demand.

Option B can sometimes provide a useful middle ground: less retraining, faster return to income and a new career direction.

A question that would make this comparison much more useful

What industry have you been working in, and approximately how old are you?

I'm asking because the difference between a good retraining policy and a good employment policy can be substantial for someone with 20 years of experience compared with someone entering the workforce.

With those two details, I can help identify:

  • Which industries might make use of your existing skills.
  • Which party policies actually address the needs of established workers changing careers.
  • What government-funded retraining or employment assistance you could investigate now.

That would give you a much more meaningful basis for evaluating the parties before casting your vote on 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Navigating redundancy after spending years in the same industry is a stressful experience, especially when immediate pressures like rent are on the line.

In the context of the November 2026 New Zealand General Election, political parties have put forward distinct philosophies and policy toolkits for getting displaced workers back into employment.


Overview of Party Approaches to Employment and Retraining

Different parties approach job-loss and re-entry through contrasting economic lenses:

  • National: Focuses heavily on macroeconomic conditions, reducing government debt, and streamlining business growth to organically generate private-sector jobs. Their welfare-to-work policies lean toward active, intensive case management for long-term jobseekers, coupled with expanded support for targeted trades and apprenticeships alongside stricter obligations and mutual-obligation frameworks for benefit recipients.
  • Labour: Emphasizes direct state-backed employment and large-scale public sector and infrastructure investment (such as housing construction and school/hospital repairs) to stimulate immediate demand for workers and trades. Their retraining framework features heavily subsidized or targeted vocational training, micro-credentials, and support for sector-specific workforce transitions.
  • Green Party / Te Pāti Māori: Tend to focus on broader economic interventions, job-creation targets in emerging sectors (such as green energy and technology), and stronger safety nets or legal income protections for those transitioning between industries.

Which plan is "most convincing" depends entirely on your personal situation: If you prefer rapid placement into traditional trades or private enterprise growth, centre-right policies may appeal to you. If you are looking for structured state-supported retraining grants, public sector projects, or robust income safety nets while you study, centre-left platforms may align better with your needs.


What to Check Before Trusting a Party's Judgment

When evaluating these political promises against your urgent need to pay rent and find stable work, cut through the rhetoric by checking the following practical criteria:

  1. Immediate Cashflow vs. Long-Term Payoff:
    • Check: Does the policy help you pay next week's rent (e.g., through bridging benefits, fast-tracked MSD support, or immediate job matching), or does it rely on a multi-year economic build-up (like large infrastructure projects) that might take too long to materialize for your current bills?
  2. Targeting and Eligibility:
    • Check: Are retraining grants or job-subsidy schemes restricted to youth, specific industries, or new apprentices, or can an experienced, mature worker made redundant from a legacy industry easily access them? Look past the headline numbers (e.g., "30,000 places") to see who actually qualifies.
  3. Regional vs. National Relevance:
    • Check: Are the promised jobs concentrated in specific main centres or specific sectors, or are they genuinely accessible where you live?
  4. Implementation Timeline:
    • Check: When do these policies actually roll out? Even if a party wins the election in November 2026, legislative changes, funding allocations, and programme rollouts take months or years. You need to weigh what immediate support is available right now via existing Work and Income (MSD) services or regional transition hubs.

Are you looking more towards jumping straight into a similar role in a different company, or are you leaning heavily toward completely retraining in a new field?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Navigating redundancy after a long tenure in a single industry is a stressful position, especially with immediate financial pressures like rent.

Deciding whether to retrain or dive straight back into a similar job involves weighing immediate survival (income and job availability) against long-term security (future-proofing your skills).

As an AI, it is not possible to declare one political party’s plan as the "most convincing." Deciding which plan is best depends heavily on your personal risk tolerance, your assessment of your industry's future, and your view on how government should intervene in the economy.

However, you can evaluate the competing approaches of New Zealand’s major political blocs regarding employment, and look at the critical verification steps to take before casting your vote.


Comparing General Approaches to Redundancy & Re-entry

Different parties approach workforce transition through distinct economic lenses:

  • Centre-Right / Incumbent/Market-Led Approaches (e.g., National, ACT):

  • The Strategy: Focus heavily on stimulating broader economic growth, reducing business compliance costs, and incentivizing private-sector job creation. Welfare and jobseeker support systems often feature tighter work-search obligations, mutual obligations, or specific time-limits/check-ins to push people back into active employment quickly.

  • Retraining View: Generally favors targeted, industry-backed short courses or employer-linked training (like apprenticeships or partnerships with polytechnics/industry training organizations) rather than broad, state-directed re-education. The philosophy is that the fastest path off the benefit and paying rent is a job—any viable job—in the active economy.

  • Centre-Left / Labor-Market Interventionist Approaches (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori):

  • The Strategy: Focus more on direct government investment in regional development, industry-specific workforce planning (including managing shifts like AI or green energy transitions), and bolstering income support/welfare safety nets for those out of work.

  • Retraining View: Tends to place a higher emphasis on subsidized public retraining schemes, funding through tertiary institutions (like Te Pūkenga/polytechnics), or specialized grants to transition workers into high-demand future sectors. The philosophy is that deep structural redundancy requires upgrading skills rather than forcing people into potentially low-wage or mismatched immediate roles.


What You Should Check Before Trusting Any Plan

To figure out which platform genuinely serves someone with rent to pay and an urgent need for income, look past the political rhetoric and check the following criteria:

  1. Immediate Cashflow vs. Long-Term Promise
  • Check: Does the party's policy address your next four weeks of rent, or is it focused entirely on a 3-to-5-year economic horizon? Look closely at their policies on income support, Jobseeker/redundancy assistance, and temporary abatements (how much you can earn before your support drops).
  1. Feasibility and Funding
  • Check: Is the retraining or job-support scheme fully costed, or is it vague? Look for details on who pays for the training, whether you receive a living allowance while studying, and whether the targeted industries actually have live vacancies waiting at the end of the course.
  1. Past Track Record and Delivery
  • Check: If the party has been in government before, look at how they handled previous economic downturns or large-scale redundancies (such as forestry, manufacturing, or public sector cuts). Did their previous training initiatives lead to sustained employment, or were they slow to roll out?
  1. Independent Policy Breakdowns
  • Check: Avoid relying solely on party pamphlets or campaign ads. Neutral, comprehensive comparison tools like Policy.nz allow you to see side-by-side what every registered party proposes for incomes, employment, and training. You can also review economic analysis from independent think tanks, unions, or business enterprise groups regarding which sectors are actively hiring in New Zealand right now.

Next Practical Step: While evaluating political platforms for the long term, consider speaking immediately with a local WorkandIncome service or an employment transition agency to map out what immediate financial assistance or rapid-skills training grants you might already be eligible for today.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

AI Overview

Deciding on the most convincing political plan for re-entering the workforce depends entirely on whether your priority is immediate private-sector job creation, state-supported vocational retraining, or a stronger social safety net while you transition.

For the 7 November 2026 General Election , the major New Zealand political parties offer two distinctly different paths for workers facing redundancy.

1. Left-Aligned Platform: Labour, Greens, and Te Pāti Māori

This approach focuses on enhancing worker security, increasing minimum welfare standards, and expanding state-funded training.

  • Retraining & Skills: The Labour Party platform promises an expanded Apprenticeship Boost, regional targeted vocational training tailored to local industry needs, and investments in specific sector pipelines like Māori-led trades training. labour.org.nzLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour Promises Māori-Led Training for 3000 in Skills and Jobs by Waatea News on Facebook - 30 seconds

  • Employment Rights: These parties advocate for reversing recent employment reforms by abolishing 90-day trial periods, rolling back the statutory independent contractor gateway test, and reviewing minimal redundancy compensation protections.

  • Cost of Living & Safety Net: To protect those facing immediate bills like rent, Labour has committed to indexing main benefits to whichever is higher between inflation or average wage growth, alongside cost-mitigation policies like a $20 weekly public transport cap and three free GP visits annually. rnz.co.nzLabour releases manifesto collating policies ahead of election

2. Right-Aligned Platform: National, ACT, and NZ First

This approach focuses on driving private-sector job growth by reducing compliance costs and keeping employment laws flexible for businesses.

  • Job Creation: The National Party focuses on a macroeconomic goal of creating 220,000 jobs over four years through business-friendly regulations, infrastructure pipelines, and regional investment. national.org.nz2026 Election Policy | National Party

  • Employment Flexibility: This platform preserves 90-day trial periods and the independent contractor framework. Proponents argue that making it easier and less risky for businesses to hire encourages employers to take a chance on workers transitioning from other industries.

  • Education & Training: Right-aligned priorities generally favour funding tertiary and training providers based on job-placement outcomes rather than universal enrollment subsidies, aligning course availability closely with active job market demands. businessnz.org.nzElection Priorities


What to Verify Before Trusting Policy Promises

Before aligning your vote with a specific party's plan, check these critical factors to ensure the policy will actually deliver what you need:

  1. Immediate vs. Long-Term Relief: Parliamentary legislation takes time. For example, major employment acts passed in 2026 may not fully implement structural changes for up to two years. If you have rent due immediately, look at what the current Work and Income (MSD) system offers today rather than waiting for post-election changes.

  2. MMP Coalition Dynamics: Under New Zealand's MMP system, major parties rarely govern alone. A party's manifesto promises are frequently compromised or traded away during post-election coalition negotiations. Check how minor parties (like ACT or the Greens) plan to alter the employment agendas of National or Labour.

  3. Independent Policy Trackers: Avoid relying solely on party advertisements. Consult non-partisan tools such as the Policy.nz 2026 Tracker to compare exact policy wording side-by-side, and review Treasury statements or independent economic analyses to see if retraining funds are realistically costed. policy.nzPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nzHolidays Act reform: Employment Leave ActLabour is promising to “restore pay equity” if elected ... by The Spinoff on Facebook - 1 minute 31 seconds

If you want to look at your immediate next steps while considering your vote, let me know:

  • What industry you were in, and if your skills are easily transferable?
  • Whether you are leaning towards a quick return to any work or want a complete career pivot?

I can provide practical steps on finding immediate job support or checking course eligibility.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account