Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 783 answers recorded on 31 October 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
31 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 6 and 7.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, rationale, review_provenance, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, caveat

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, assessment, quote, earlier_quote, draft_id, scenario, result_id, earlier_result_id, current_review_provenance, earlier_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, common_6_7, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    issue, edition, answers, median_words, party_counts

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    earlier_edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier_result_id, result_id, same_text, same_party_set, added, removed, same_displayed_party_set

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    id, party, contexts, entityId, counted, reason, scope

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, scope, assistant, domain, answers, totalAnswers

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

2026 New Zealand election: what school costs mean for household budgets

For a household with a mortgage, two working parents and school-age children, education policy is about more than how much money goes into schools. It is also about how much money you have to find yourself.

There are four particularly important areas to compare:

  1. School funding: Does the government adequately fund schools so they can provide the basics without repeatedly asking parents for money?
  2. Learning support: What happens if a child needs extra help, teacher-aide time, specialist assessment or additional resources?
  3. Everyday school costs: What do families pay for uniforms, stationery, devices, activities, trips and donations?
  4. Public services and tax: Are families receiving more support through schools, or are costs and responsibilities being shifted onto households?

An important distinction for the 2026 election is between a party's announced policy, what it has actually implemented in government, and what it promises to do if elected. I'll keep those separate.

1. How the main parties compare

The following reflects policies available as at 30 October 2026, ahead of the 7 November general election.

National

Incumbent government

National's approach centres on achievement, curriculum standards, early identification of learning difficulties and additional support within schools.

School funding

Learning support

  • Learning Support Coordinators for all schools with Years 1–8 from 2028.
  • Additional teacher-aide hours, building towards two million extra hours annually from 2028.
  • School Start Checks and expanded early intervention services.
  • Continued investment in specialist classrooms and schools. Teaching the basics brilliantlyParty policies, simplified: Education

Family costs

  • National has not made a comparable broad promise to eliminate everyday school expenses such as stationery, uniforms and devices in its published education commitments.
  • Its focus is more on improving school provision than directly reimbursing parents for school expenses.

What to examine: Whether the additional teacher-aide hours and school funding will be sufficient to reduce the need for families to pay for additional educational support themselves.

Labour

Labour's approach includes more direct interventions in the costs parents face and additional staffing for children who need help.

School funding and staffing

Learning support

Family costs

One important detail: Labour's proposed lunches are subsidised, not universally free.

Green Party

The Greens place greater emphasis on universal provision, reducing financial barriers and making the education system more inclusive.

School funding

Learning support

Family costs

An important distinction is that the Greens' learning-support proposal is about changing access and coordination across the system, not simply adding teacher-aide hours.

ACT

ACT emphasises parental choice, school autonomy, alternative education options and reducing some compulsory expenses.

School funding

  • Supports charter schools, including publicly funded alternatives to mainstream state schools.
  • Supports more choice for parents and educators over educational approaches.
  • Has advocated fairer funding arrangements for independent schools. ACT New ZealandPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Learning support

  • Its approach places emphasis on alternative schooling options, including charter schools.
  • It has not set out the same specific nationwide teacher-aide expansion commitment as National or Labour in the material reviewed.
  • ACT also supports allowing proportionate physical intervention by teachers in certain circumstances involving serious disruption or safety risks. This is a separate but relevant part of its education approach. Party policies, simplified: EducationACT New Zealand

Family costs

  • Proposes limiting compulsory branded uniform items to three.
  • Requires generic alternatives for everyday items such as socks, shorts, trousers and skirts.
  • Supports allowing children to use available empty seats on school buses, including buses not designated for their particular school. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

ACT's uniform proposal is particularly relevant to families buying uniforms for multiple children.

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori puts emphasis on Māori-led education, cultural identity, equitable access and community provision.

School funding

Learning support

  • Proposes a Māori-led taskforce to transform how disabled, neurodivergent and learning-different students are supported.
  • Wants more resources for support teachers, accessible learning environments and professional development.
  • Emphasises addressing systemic exclusion in schools. Party policies, simplified: Education

Family costs

These are proposals to change how education is delivered and supported, rather than a narrowly focused uniform or stationery subsidy.

New Zealand First

NZ First's education commitments are less developed in the published material I could verify.

Its party-signed education response includes:

  • Retaining 20 free ECE hours.
  • Changes to ECE supervision and staffing ratios.
  • An independent curriculum council.
  • Changes to tertiary student allowances and student-loan arrangements.
  • Support for vocational education pathways. 2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans

On school learning support, it did not provide specific new commitments in the disability-focused party questionnaire examined by The D*List. Party policies, simplified: Education

I would therefore avoid assuming that NZ First has a particular policy on additional teacher aides or reducing school expenses without further detail.

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

TOP's main education proposal is a longer-term structural change.

  • Establish a 10-year, cross-party education plan.
  • Develop that plan with educators, learners and families.
  • Support an independent curriculum and assessment council.
  • Address teacher shortages, workload, professional development and workforce planning. Future fit Education

TOP did not provide detailed answers to The D*List's disability education questionnaire. Its published material does not establish a specific nationwide teacher-aide expansion or family school-cost subsidy. Party policies, simplified: Education

2. Quick comparison: what could affect your household?

Party Learning support School lunches Uniform costs Other family costs
National More coordinators and aide hours Continue existing programme No comparable new broad proposal identified School infrastructure
Labour 1,000 extra teacher aides Subsidised lunches Cheaper generic options Rural buses
Greens Broader eligibility and specialist support Restore and expand programme No equivalent specific proposal identified Free ECE
ACT Choice and alternative schooling No equivalent major proposal identified Limit branded items More school-bus access
Te Pāti Māori Māori-led support and accessibility Expand provision No equivalent specific proposal identified Free student transport, counselling
NZ First No clear new school-wide commitment identified No clear new commitment identified No clear new commitment identified ECE changes
TOP Long-term system reform No clear specific commitment identified No clear specific commitment identified Teacher workforce reform

This table distinguishes identifiable new election commitments from policies that have not been specified. A missing proposal does not necessarily mean a party opposes that measure.

3. What parents are legally expected to pay

This is an important part of the comparison because the phrase "free education" can be misleading when you look at the actual household budget.

For domestic students at state schools, the curriculum and compulsory school attendance are free. Schools cannot require payment for ordinary curriculum delivery.

However, families can still face expenses such as:

Expense Current position
School donations Voluntary at state schools
Stationery Families may be asked to buy it
Uniforms Generally paid by parents
School devices Can be a family expense
School camps Some costs may be optional; curriculum participation cannot be denied for non-payment
Sports and extracurricular activities Often involve family costs
State-integrated school attendance dues Compulsory

Schools participating in the government donation scheme receive additional funding and cannot request ordinary school donations, although camp payments remain optional.

These rules are explained by the Ministry of Education. School costs and donationsFees and charges at school

Why this matters: A party promising more school funding might reduce pressure on schools to seek donations, but that does not automatically mean parents will spend less on uniforms, devices or activities.

4. What the current government is already funding

It is worth looking at the existing baseline rather than comparing promises in isolation.

Budget 2026 included:

  • $160.4 million in additional school operating grants.
  • $213.3 million for the Healthy School Lunches Programme.
  • Funding for 240,000 students in more than 1,000 schools and kura to receive lunches.
  • $22 million for students with significant health needs, including teacher-aide support.
  • $3 million for Deaf education services.
  • $10 million for English-language learning support. Education - Budget 2026Student support

This means the election question is partly about whether parties want to extend, change or replace existing programmes, rather than starting from zero.

5. The four questions I would use when comparing party policies

Given the pressure of mortgage payments and everyday household expenses, I would look beyond headline education spending and ask these questions of every party.

  1. Will it reduce the amount of money I need to spend at the start of each school year?

Look for specific commitments around:

  • Uniform affordability.
  • Stationery and learning materials.
  • Devices and internet access.
  • School donations and camps.
  1. Will my child receive support without me having to pay privately?

Look for:

  • Teacher-aide availability.
  • Learning Support Coordinators.
  • Access to educational psychologists and specialists.
  • ORS eligibility and funding.
  • Waiting times for assessments and support.
  1. Will it reduce recurring weekly expenses?

School lunches and transport are particularly relevant. A lunch programme can mean a meaningful household saving over an entire school year.

For comparison, a $5 school lunch over five days is $25 per child per week, before accounting for holidays and absences.

  1. Are the promises funded and when will they start?

A policy beginning in 2028 does not help with school expenses in 2027. Check whether the party has published:

  • A costed policy.
  • A funding source.
  • An implementation date.
  • Eligibility rules.
  • A commitment that survives a change of government.

6. Where to investigate before voting

These are useful independent and official resources:

My suggested way of assessing the differences

Rather than looking at which party spends the most on education overall, consider separating your household concerns into three categories:

Your concern Policy area to scrutinise
Mortgage leaves little spare cash Uniforms, stationery, lunches and transport
Children need additional help Teacher aides, ORS and specialist services
Want reliable, well-resourced schools Operational funding, staffing and infrastructure

One final distinction is worth keeping in mind: a party can have a strong policy on academic achievement without necessarily having a policy that reduces parents' out-of-pocket expenses. Equally, a cheaper-uniform policy does not necessarily mean better learning support.

Your vote can take both considerations into account.

The most useful next step would be to compare the parties against your actual school-age children's expenses and needs, particularly whether you have primary-school or secondary-school students. That would make it easier to distinguish policies that could genuinely change your household budget from policies that are mainly about the wider education system.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

Balancing a mortgage and two wages with tight household buffers means that the details of educational policy—particularly out-of-pocket school costs and support services—have a direct impact on your family budget.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties offer distinct approaches to school funding, learning support, and family-paid school costs.


1. School Funding & Curriculum Focus

  • National & Right-Leaning Parties (ACT, NZ First):
    • National centres its education policy on "teaching the basics brilliantly", focusing heavily on core academic achievement, structured literacy, and regular assessment.
    • ACT pushes heavily for structural alternatives, such as expanding charter school enrolments (setting a target of 10,000 by late 2029) and streamlining vocational training pathways in secondary schools.
  • Labour & Left-Leaning Parties (Greens, Te Pāti Māori):
    • Labour emphasizes direct state resourcing for public infrastructure and workforce numbers, including targeted investments to repair schools and boost staffing.
    • The Greens and Te Pāti Māori advocate for broader socio-economic support systems anchored around schools, linking educational success to wider community funding, equitable resource distribution, and localized programs.

2. Learning Support & Special Needs

For families navigating learning difficulties, neurodivergence, or behavioral challenges, the provision of teacher aides and specialist resources is a major differentiator:

  • Labour: Has pledged funding for an additional 1,000 teacher aides over four years to provide more one-on-one and small-group support for students requiring extra assistance.
  • National & ACT: Focus heavily on classroom management and behavioural frameworks. For instance, ACT has proposed specific policy levers allowing teachers explicit legal power to remove "seriously or persistently disruptive" students from classrooms, alongside measures holding parents accountable for student behavior and property damage. National focuses on structured intervention models backed by centralized agency targets.

3. Out-of-Pocket Costs for Families (Uniforms, Donations, & Activities)

School-age children come with a steady stream of hidden costs—from school donations and activity fees to sports gear and branded uniforms. Parties approach these financial pressures differently:

  • Targeting Uniform Costs (ACT): ACT has proposed specific regulations targeting school uniform expenses, which often strain tight household budgets. Their policy would limit state schools to a maximum of three compulsory branded uniform items, require schools to offer generic, standard-retailer alternatives for high-use items (like shorts, skirts, pants, and socks), and curb excessive uniform monopolies.
  • Donations & Schemes: While state and state-integrated schools can opt into the Government’s donations scheme (agreeing not to ask parents for compulsory donations in exchange for a per-student payment from the Crown), parties differ on broader cost-of-living reliefs.
  • Broader Cost-of-Living Policies: Because your household buffer is slim, parties' broader cost-of-living platforms matter just as much as direct school policies. For instance:
    • Labour is campaigning on broader household savings like free doctor visits, free prescriptions, and a public transport fare cap.
    • National emphasizes tax relief, family-focused support, and curbing local council rates increases.
    • The Greens and NZ First focus on adjustments to Working for Families tax credits, benefit/wage floors, and universal entitlements to alleviate general household inflation.

Summary for a Dual-Income, Mortgage-Holding Family

  • If your primary concern is reducing direct out-of-pocket school expenses (like uniforms) and establishing firm classroom discipline, right-of-centre policies (such as ACT's uniform controls or National's focus on economic management) may align with your priorities.
  • If your primary concern is state-funded specialist learning support (like teacher aides) or broader public service cost relief (health/transport), left-of-centre policies (such as Labour's staffing pledges) are more heavily weighted toward direct government provision.

Are you leaning toward prioritizing direct classroom support (like teacher aides) or household cost-of-living relief when you cast your vote?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

When managing a tight household budget on two wages with school-age children, the indirect and direct costs of education—as well as the systemic support your children receive in the classroom—matter significantly.

The major and minor political parties approach school funding, learning support, and family-borne education costs through distinct lenses for the 2026 general election cycle. You can explore complete, unfiltered policy listings on platforms like Policy.nz. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026


1. Direct Costs for Families (Uniforms, Lunches, and Supplies)

For households with little financial buffer, everyday school expenses can add up rapidly. Parties differ sharply on how much they expect families to shoulder versus what the state should provide:

  • Labour: Focuses heavily on reducing out-of-pocket household costs. They have proposed policies to make school uniforms cheaper by permitting "affordable, generic" alternatives. They also pledge to reinstate a structured school lunch program ($5 a meal for primary/intermediate, $6.50 for years 9 to 13), aiming to cut weekly grocery bills for families.

  • National: Focuses less on direct household cash/subsidy transfers like lunches or uniform price caps, concentrating instead on curriculum expansion (such as scaling up math tutoring programs and financial literacy courses) while leaving traditional uniform and supply expectations largely school-by-school.

  • ACT: Emphasizes school choice, charter/partnership school expansion, and structural changes. They have proposed specific ideas like a $500 "sharesies" account for Year 11 students rather than broad cost-of-living subsidies for primary/secondary families, and policies to limit the number of compulsory uniform items schools can mandate to lower clothing costs.

  • Greens / Te Pāti Māori: Generally support universal state provisions to remove poverty barriers, with Te Pāti Māori focusing heavily on kaupapa Māori pathways, Kōhanga Reo expansion/refurbishment funds, and equitable resourcing to ensure low-income and indigenous families are not out-of-pocket.


2. Learning Support (Teacher Aides and Special Needs)

If a child needs extra help with learning, behavioral support, or neurodiversity, classroom resourcing dictates whether schools can cope or whether parents are forced into costly private assessments and tutoring.

  • Labour: Has campaigned explicitly on funding 1,000 extra teacher aides ($80 million over four years) to provide targeted, one-on-one classroom help and relieve pressure on teachers. They also propose building on previous reviews to plug systemic learning support gaps.

  • National: Defends and highlights the current government’s recent funding allocations (pointing to substantial investments in learning support, hundreds of thousands of additional teacher aide hours delivered through existing baselines, expanded Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) high-needs places, and shortened early intervention wait times via private-sector contracting). Their emphasis is on optimizing and expanding these existing delivery pipelines rather than adding a brand-new top-down pledge.

  • ACT: Proposes a different angle on classroom management, including legal powers for teachers to remove disruptive students from class to protect overall learning environments, prioritizing structural classroom order alongside specialized interventions.


3. General School Funding and Stability

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Advocates for a 10-year cross-party stability plan for education, aiming to stop the cycle where each changing government rolls back previous curriculum or funding frameworks, which costs schools time and adaptation money.

  • Labour / National / Others: Labour has promised to freeze further sweeping overhauls to the school curriculum and NCEA to let schools settle, whereas National continues to push structured literacy, math targets, and achievement metrics.

Summary for Your Household

If your primary concern is immediate relief at the checkout and school gate (uniform savings, food support), center-left and left-wing parties (Labour, Greens) are explicitly targeting direct financial relief for family out-of-pocket costs. If your focus is on classroom stability, core academic metrics, and leveraging existing specialist channels , center-right parties (National, ACT) lean toward core curriculum focus, student behavior management, and working within established funding implementations.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on school funding, learning support and costs that families pay themselves?

AI Overview

With tight household budgets across New Zealand under the pressure of mortgage payments and everyday costs, education policy plays a direct role in family finances. In the 2026 general election , political parties differ significantly on how they plan to fund schools, structure learning support, and absorb or manage out-of-pocket expenses for parents.

A comparison of the major parties shows distinct pathways for family budgets and schooling support:

1. Out-of-Pocket Family Costs

Direct costs—like uniforms, school lunches, and stationery—heavily impact families living with a narrow financial buffer.

Party School Lunches School Uniforms & Other Costs
National Maintains the targeted, reformed lunch system introduced during the coalition term to manage government spending. Standardises school year dates from 2028 to remove unexpected school closures that disrupt working parents.
Labour Reinstates the original local-provider model with school lunches priced at $5 for primary and $6.50 for secondary students, emphasizing local preparation. Mandates cheaper school uniforms by allowing and requiring schools to accept "affordable, generic" alternatives.
ACT Favors targeted, cost-efficient delivery rather than universal state-funded expansions. Limits state schools to three compulsory branded uniform items , forcing generic options for the rest to drive down costs.
Greens Expands free school lunches permanently to an additional 400 schools, aiming to save families an estimated $473 per year per child. Introduces free public transport fares for children to completely erase school commuting costs for families.

2. Learning Support & Classroom Environment

If your children require extra help or a stable learning environment, the parties propose different interventions:

  • Labour: Pledges to fund 1,000 additional teacher aides nationwide to give dedicated attention to students needing extra help, while also expanding a maths acceleration program to cover 40,000 students in Years 7 to 10.

  • National: Focuses on structural curriculum changes, expanding its targeted maths program to 40,000 students, banning/limiting early childhood through Year 3 screen time, and mandating that students finish Year 11 rather than leaving at 16.

  • ACT: Prioritizes classroom management by giving teachers clear legal powers to remove persistently disruptive students from classrooms. They also pledge to protect and expand the charter school system, targeting 10,000 enrolments by 2029 to provide alternative environments for students who struggle in mainstream schools.

  • Greens: Campaigns for a fully funded learning support system alongside teacher pay parity to ensure specialized staff are consistently available in classrooms.

3. School Choice & Funding Structures

The underlying funding models dictate how resources flow to the schools your children attend:

  • ACT: Champions the eventual introduction of Student Education Accounts (SEAs) , which would place a child's government funding directly into a digital account controlled by parents to spend at any public or private school. They also propose automatically increasing funding for independent (private) schools in step with state school operational funding. act.org.nz

  • Labour & Greens: Strongly oppose the expansion of charter schools and funding increases for private institutions. Both focus funding entirely on the public state school system. Labour additionally proposes freezing current curriculum changes under an Independent Council for Curriculum and Assessment (ICCA) to prevent continuous political disruption for teachers. labour.org.nzOur Priorities

To help narrow down which policies align best with your family's situation, let me know if your children primarily utilize state, integrated, or private schooling , or if you want to look closer at early childhood education (ECE) subsidies. oece.nz

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account