Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 7

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 783 answers recorded on 31 October 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
31 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

    783rows

    Download complete answers (CSV)

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

    2,221rows

    Download answers included in each comparison (CSV)

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

    37,757rows

    Download party names found in answers (CSV)

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

    783rows

    Download sources recorded with each answer (CSV)

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 6 and 7.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

    778rows

    Download answers compared across editions (CSV)

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

    11rows

    Download checks across editions (CSV)

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, rationale, review_provenance, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction

    31rows

    Download what the voting-guidance answers did (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily

    21rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

    21rows

    Download statements selected for checking (CSV)

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, caveat

    10rows

    Download research findings (CSV)

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, assessment, quote, earlier_quote, draft_id, scenario, result_id, earlier_result_id, current_review_provenance, earlier_review_provenance

    32rows

    Download what changed for each voter (CSV)

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

    63rows

    Download answers read in detail (CSV)

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

    510rows

    Download party counts by edition (CSV)

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

    60rows

    Download answer length by assistant (CSV)

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, common_6_7, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

    248rows

    Download location comparisons by edition (CSV)

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    issue, edition, answers, median_words, party_counts

    40rows

    Download party counts by topic (CSV)

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

    783rows

    Download links visible in answers (CSV)

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

    781rows

    Download separate website reference totals (CSV)

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    earlier_edition, prompt_id, platform, region, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, earlier_result_id, result_id, same_text, same_party_set, added, removed, same_displayed_party_set

    778rows

    Download changes between repeated answers (CSV)

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

    25,609rows

    Download statements and sentiment assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

    33,626rows

    Download original saved statement assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

    8,013rows

    Download original saved source records (CSV)

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    id, party, contexts, entityId, counted, reason, scope

    1,696rows

    Download party-name context checks (CSV)

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, scope, assistant, domain, answers, totalAnswers

    2,609rows

    Download websites cited across editions (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

    4,166rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

    116rows

    Download national and location answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

For a Pacific family living in a multigenerational household, healthcare affordability is about more than the cost of visiting a doctor. It also means being able to look after children, support older relatives, afford prescriptions, attend specialist appointments and access services that understand Pacific cultures and family responsibilities.

The 2026 election presents some important differences between the parties, particularly around:

  • Healthcare costs: GP fees, prescriptions, maternity care and dental treatment.
  • Access to services: GP availability, hospital waiting lists, mental health and specialist care.
  • Pacific-responsive healthcare: Culturally appropriate services, Pacific health providers and equitable health outcomes.
  • Household affordability: Wages, transport, housing and the cost of supporting extended family.

The comparison below reflects policies and announcements available as at 31 October 2026. These are election commitments, not guaranteed outcomes.

1. How the parties compare on healthcare

Party Main healthcare approach
Labour Three free GP visits annually, free prescriptions and free maternity scans.
Green Party Expand publicly funded primary care, dental care and preventive healthcare.
National Increase treatment capacity, improve waiting times, expand medicines and strengthen workforce.
ACT Increase provider choice, expand pharmacists' and other professionals' roles, and increase medicines funding.
NZ First Increase medicines funding, reduce waiting lists and expand doctor recruitment and health coaches.
Te Pāti Māori Māori-led healthcare, community-based services and whānau-centred prevention.
Opportunity Increase health spending towards 9% of GDP and establish a 10-year health plan.

Sources:

The New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 election health analysis and Policy.nz's party policy comparison.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Navigating the 2026 general election in Aotearoa New Zealand as part of a multigenerational Pacific household means weighing how different political parties plan to tackle the intersecting pressures of household costs, housing space, and healthcare accessibility.

Political parties offer distinct approaches to these challenges, particularly regarding how health services are funded, delivered, and made culturally accessible for Pacific families.

1. Healthcare Affordability and Primary Access

For households balancing children and older relatives, the cost of visiting a general practitioner (GP) and picking up prescriptions is often a major barrier. Parties break down into distinct strategies here:

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reducing direct primary care costs. Their headline policy introduces a "Medicard" providing three free GP visits a year for everyone, alongside restoring universally free prescriptions and funding free maternity scans and cervical screening. They propose funding this via a capital gains tax on specified investment and commercial property. To tackle GP shortages, they propose a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to support practice ownership.
  • National Party: Emphasizes continuity, infrastructure capacity, and workforce expansion within fiscal constraints. Rather than universal free GP visits, National focuses on expanding Pharmac’s budget (by $604 million, partially offset by adjustments to foreign aid) to broaden access to life-saving cancer and specialty medications. They also back preventative programs like the "Healthy Kiwis Programme" (expanding active prescriptions to target chronic conditions like diabetes) and providing 3-day postnatal stays.
  • Green Party: Proposes a broad, long-term transition to a fully publicly owned and free health system, covering primary care, dental care, mental health, and aged care. They emphasize preventative healthcare, workforce fair wages, and embedding kaupapa Māori and equity models.
  • ACT Party: Focuses on fiscal restraint, opposing new taxes, and shifting a larger share of the health budget directly into medicines (aiming for parity with Australia by 2033). They generally emphasize clinical need over identity-based frameworks and lean on market-driven or regulatory efficiencies rather than large state-led spending packages.
  • New Zealand First: Centers its health program on a long-term plan ("Make NZ Healthy") focusing on metabolic health, chronic illness prevention, and expanding the medicines budget to ease waiting lists, while favoring delivery according to clinical need.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for a major structural shift toward whānau wellbeing and prevention, proposing to transfer a significant share of health funding to Māori- and Pacific-aligned community providers. Their policies include free dental and primary healthcare for all whānau, lowering bowel screening starting ages for Māori and Pacific peoples, and investing heavily in mobile and community-based clinics.

2. Services Accessible to Pacific Families

Access goes beyond just the clinic door—it involves whether services are culturally safe, community-based, and designed around the realities of multigenerational households (such as supporting both young children and older aunties, uncles, or grandparents).

  • Targeted vs. Universal Services: Parties of the left (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) lean heavily into targeted support, community-led health initiatives, and removing user fees to directly assist lower- and middle-income households. Te Pāti Māori specifically emphasizes culturally safe, decentralized care (such as marae- and community-based clinics and mobile units) that can better reach Pacific and Māori communities who face systemic health access disparities.
  • Mainstream Capacity and Pharmac: Parties of the center and right (National, ACT, NZ First) tend to favor mainstream capacity-building—such as pumping funds into Pharmac for advanced medicines, streamlining clinical workforces, and reducing surgical waitlists—arguing that a rising tide lifts all boats when the acute hospital system functions efficiently.

3. Household Costs and Space (Housing)

Because your household's concerns explicitly tie health to household costs and space, housing and cost-of-living policies heavily influence overall family wellbeing:

  • Housing Supply:
    • Labour has campaigned on expanding social housing (committing to at least 6,000 new social homes over four years through a capital and infrastructure plan).
    • The Greens and Te Pāti Māori push for much larger public and affordable housing builds to combat overcrowding.
    • National relies more heavily on planning reforms, releasing land, and partnering with community housing providers rather than large state builds.
    • ACT opposes large-scale state building, arguing that supply shortages are best solved by sweeping away planning and zoning restrictions.
  • Cost of Living: Parties differ sharply on tax and cost-relief mechanisms—ranging from Labour's proposed property-related taxes and public transport caps to National and ACT's emphasis on spending restraint, avoiding new taxes, and tax-relief adjustments.

Summary for Your Vote

When evaluating your options, consider:

  1. Do you prefer direct relief on everyday bills and GP visits (e.g., Labour's Medicard and free prescriptions)?
  2. Or do you prioritize specialized medicine funding, shorter hospital waitlists, and economic restraint (e.g., National or ACT's focus on Pharmac investment and fiscal management)?
  3. Do you favor systemic structural changes that shift resources directly to community- and culturally-led health services tailored for Pacific and Māori whānau (e.g., Te Pāti Māori or Green Party proposals)?

Would you like to explore how any specific party's housing or cost-of-living policies align with the needs of a multigenerational household?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

For a Pacific household balancing the needs of young children, working adults, and older relatives, the key pressure points come down to three interconnected issues highlighted by community leaders heading into the 7 November 2026 general election: wellness (affordability/cost), wait times, and workforce.

New Zealand political parties approach these challenges through distinct philosophical lenses—focusing either on broad system-level funding and service expansion or targeted, free-at-the-point-of-contact care.

1. Parties on the Left (Labour, Green Party)

  • Approach to Affordability: Focus heavily on removing direct financial barriers for families. Both Labour and the Greens advocate for making general practice (GP) visits free or heavily subsidized, alongside removing prescription fees and providing free pregnancy/maternity scans. For a multigenerational household where multiple doctor visits add up quickly, universal or low-cost primary care is framed as vital for early intervention.

  • Services and Workforce: Propose direct public investment in the health workforce, including job guarantees for nursing graduates and boosting the capacity of community-based and Māori/Pacific-led health providers. The emphasis is on resourcing the public health system directly rather than relying on structural shifts or private delivery.

  • Broader Household Costs: Align healthcare affordability with cost-of-living relief, linking health access to broader economic supports for low-to-middle-income families.

2. Parties Currently in Government / Centre-Right (National, ACT, New Zealand First)

  • Approach to Affordability & Efficiency: Focus on maximizing existing health funding efficiency rather than broad blanket subsidies. Their strategies center on expanding Pharmac funding to subsidize a broader list of essential medicines, which benefits older relatives needing ongoing prescriptions.

  • Services and Workforce Innovation: Aim to ease wait times and workforce shortages by shifting and expanding the scope of practice for existing professionals—such as empowering pharmacists and introducing or expanding roles like physician associates. They also point to structural investments, such as supporting pipeline projects like a new medical school at Waikato University to train more domestic doctors.

  • Pacific and Community Focus: Center accountability on measurable reductions in wait times and practical health delivery, with NZ First and governing parties emphasizing frontline service delivery over administrative expansion.

3. Independent / Minor Parties (e.g., The Opportunity Party / TOP)

  • Approach to Services: Often advocate for targeted economic and structural reforms—such as reshaping tax and welfare support to indirectly ease the cost-of-living pressures on large households, while restructuring primary healthcare to target high-needs communities directly based on socioeconomic metrics rather than broad generalized rollouts.

Comparing the Options for a Pacific Multigenerational Home

  • If your primary priority is immediate out-of-pocket savings at the clinic: The policies from parties on the left (free GP visits, zero prescription co-payments) offer a direct reduction in weekly household expenses when taking children or elders to the doctor.

  • If your primary priority is faster access and fixing systemic bottlenecks: The centre-right/governing parties focus on expanding Pharmac medicine lists, streamlining workforce tasks (like pharmacist-led prescriptions), and increasing clinical training capacity to clear waitlists over time.

You can compare specific party manifestos side-by-side using the Policy.nz Health Comparison Guide, or review community-focused debates via Pacific Media Network (PMN) to see how leaders responded directly to Pacific health priorities on wellness, wait times, and workforce.

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

AI Overview

For a multigenerational Pacific household managing tight everyday costs, the space requirements of a large family, and the medical needs of both children and older relatives, the 2026 general election presents clear, competing strategies for health access and community support. pmn.co.nzWellness, wait time, workforce: Pacific Health leaders put parties to the testA new PMN News

The political spectrum is broadly divided between a center-left focus on reducing direct upfront costs and protecting Pacific-specific strategies, and a center-right focus on general cost-of-living relief, increasing overall sector efficiency, and removing ethnicity-specific targets. policy.nzPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

Directly Comparing the Major Parties

The table below breaks down how the key political parties compare on issues that directly impact a multi-generation household's healthcare access and budget.

Party Healthcare Cost Direct Relief Workforce & Wait Times Approach to Pacific & Community Services
Labour High direct relief : Offers 3 free GP visits a year via a "Medicard", fully removes the $5 prescription fee by July 2027, and provides free maternity scans. Pledges to end health hiring freezes and offers a job guarantee for NZ-trained graduate nurses to keep staff local. Prioritizes targeted Pacific health strategies under the Pae Ora framework, working directly with ethnic communities to remove systemic barriers.
National Indirect relief : Focuses on broader tax relief and economic management to lower general living costs. Points to expanding regular prescriptions to 12-month durations. Recruiting to fill 2,400 nursing vacancies, funding an extra 24,000 planned treatments, and creating an aged-care reform steering group for older relatives. Rejects ethnicity-based criteria for public services. Favors an integrated national health system where resources are distributed purely by socioeconomic deprivation and clinical need.
Green Party High direct relief : Advocates for large-scale systemic health funding increases to completely eliminate primary care cost barriers. Focuses heavily on expanding the broader public healthcare workforce and raising front-line medical pay. Strongly defends ring-fenced Pacific health provider funding and advocates for culturally-grounded, whānau-centred prevention.
ACT Targeted structural changes : Pledges to build a new dedicated national cancer centre ("Starship for Cancer") with dual campuses. Aims to drastically increase Pharmac’s budget share to 12% by 2033 to subsidize more advanced medicines. Explicitly opposes ethnicity-based health targeting, arguing that resources should focus on individual medical need rather than cultural background.
NZ First Preventative focus : Pledges to shift funding toward chronic illness prevention, metabolic health, and nutritional education. Supports expanding counseling and mental health access, particularly at the school level for children. Favors a needs-based system rather than ethnicity-targeted health policies.

Key Trade-offs for Your Household

1. Managing Household Costs vs. Healthcare Bills

  • The Left Bloc (Labour / Greens): If your biggest immediate pressure is paying to take the kids or grandparents to the doctor, these parties focus on removing those specific bills. They intend to fund these health cuts via new revenue structures, such as Labour's proposed 28% capital gains tax on investment properties. apex.org.nz2026 Election Policy Summaries - ApexMEANS FOR NEW ZEALANDLabour's 2026 Election Policies in Auckland and Wellington by The Oceanic Press on Facebook - 1 minute 30 seconds

  • The Right Bloc (National / ACT): If your primary pressure is general inflation, groceries, and power bills, these parties argue that reducing overall government waste and providing income tax relief leaves more money in your pocket to choose your own care. national.org.nzOur Plan | National Party

2. Culturally-Led Services vs. Universal Needs-Based Funding

  • Pacific-Specific Models: Labour and the Greens support maintaining structural, dedicated Pacific health provider frameworks. Proponents argue that Pacific-led clinics understand large multigenerational family dynamics and deliver better preventative care. theconversation.comOnly structural change will fix NZ's glaring health equity gapLIVE NOW | AUCKLAND PACIFIC POLITICAL PANEL 2026

  • Universal Models: National, ACT, and NZ First stand firmly on removing ethnicity-based metrics. They argue a unified system based strictly on poverty metrics and clinical urgency ensures fair treatment for everyone without dividing the system by race. nzmj.org.nzElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

3. Housing and "Enough Space"

While health is a major issue, the physical requirement of a multigenerational household—needing larger, affordable homes—is heavily debated. Left-aligned parties tend to focus on funding community and Pacific-led housing providers who design homes explicitly for large, extended families. Right-aligned parties look to increase overall housing supply by reforming resource management laws (RMA) to make building multi-unit or larger private homes cheaper and faster. pmn.co.nz

Ask anything

Captured 31 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account