ChatGPT · National
I owe $500,000 on my mortgage, with 25 years left. My bank has offered 5.69% fixed for a year. Another lender offers 5.49% for a year and $3,000 cash, but moving would cost $1,400 and the cash has to be repaid if I leave within three years. Is switching worth it?
Is switching your NZ$500,000 mortgage worth it?
On the numbers you've given, switching looks financially attractive in the first year — provided you can stay with the new lender for three years and the $3,000 cashback doesn't come with other significant conditions. The main question is whether the short-term savings justify the three-year cashback commitment.
Let's break it down in New Zealand dollars.
1. Compare the two offers
Your mortgage details:
- Mortgage balance: $500,000
- Remaining term: 25 years
- Current bank: 5.69% fixed for one year
- New lender: 5.49% fixed for one year
- Switching costs: $1,400
- Cashback from new lender: $3,000, repayable if you leave within three years
The new lender's rate is 0.20 percentage points lower. On a $500,000 mortgage, that is a meaningful saving, although the exact amount depends on how your repayments are structured.
2. How much would you save?
Assuming principal-and-interest repayments over 25 years, with monthly repayments and the rates unchanged for the first year:
Current bank · 5.69%
~$3,135/mo
Estimated repayment
New lender · 5.49%
~$3,075/mo
Estimated repayment
Monthly repayment reduction
~$60
First-year interest saving
~$950
Estimates only; actual repayments depend on the lender's repayment calculation and schedule. Interest savings are separate from the reduction in principal.
3. The cashback makes the difference
Here's the approximate first-year financial benefit of switching:
| Item | Benefit / cost |
|---|---|
| Cashback received | +$3,000 |
| Switching costs | −$1,400 |
| First-year interest saved | +$950 |
| Net first-year benefit | +$2,550 |
That is a solid potential gain. Even without the cashback, the lower rate would save about $950 in interest in the first year, which would not cover your $1,400 switching costs.
The important catch is the three-year cashback condition. New Zealand's Financial Markets Authority warns borrowers to weigh cashback incentives against the longer-term costs and conditions of a mortgage. Mortgage adviceMortgages and home loans
4. What if you switch again after one year?
This is the crucial decision point.
- Stay with the new lender for three years: You keep the $3,000 cashback, assuming you meet all the conditions. You can then reassess your options.
- Leave after one year: If the full cashback must be repaid, your net first-year result becomes approximately a $450 loss: $950 interest saved minus $1,400 switching costs, with the cashback received and then repaid.
- Your existing bank offers to match 5.49%: You could potentially get the lower rate without paying switching costs or accepting the new cashback lock-in. Ask your current bank to match it before committing.
Also confirm whether the $1,400 covers every cost, including legal fees and any break fee on your existing fixed loan. The Consumer Protection website explains that early repayment charges may apply when you leave a fixed-rate mortgage early. Mortgages and home loansRefinancing your mortgage
My recommendation
I'd lean towards switching, provided you expect to keep the mortgage with the new lender for at least three years, the cashback terms are clear, and the $1,400 covers all switching costs. The estimated $2,550 first-year benefit is worthwhile.
However, I'd first ask your current bank to match the 5.49% rate. If it does, you may avoid the hassle and cost of refinancing while keeping your flexibility.
One question that could change my recommendation: Is your current 5.69% fixed rate already due to expire, or would you have to break the existing fixed term to switch? If you have to break it early, the break fee could materially change the numbers.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Captured 11 October 2026