Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

    783rows

    Download complete answers (CSV)

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

    2,227rows

    Download answers included in each comparison (CSV)

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

    37,859rows

    Download party names found in answers (CSV)

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

    783rows

    Download sources recorded with each answer (CSV)

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

    31rows

    Download what the voting-guidance answers did (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

    11rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

    11rows

    Download statements selected for checking (CSV)

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

    10rows

    Download research findings (CSV)

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

    10rows

    Download evidence behind the findings (CSV)

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

    32rows

    Download what changed for each voter (CSV)

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

    63rows

    Download answers read in detail (CSV)

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

    510rows

    Download party counts by edition (CSV)

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

    60rows

    Download answer length by assistant (CSV)

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

    248rows

    Download location comparisons by edition (CSV)

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

    20rows

    Download changes by topic (CSV)

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

    783rows

    Download links visible in answers (CSV)

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

    716rows

    Download separate website reference totals (CSV)

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

    780rows

    Download answers compared with 23 october (CSV)

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

    9rows

    Download checks across editions (CSV)

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

    21,110rows

    Download statements and sentiment assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

    26,774rows

    Download original saved statement assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

    8,656rows

    Download original saved source records (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

    4,767rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

    118rows

    Download national and location answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

For your situation in a small New Zealand town, I’d focus on parties’ specific commitments to rural and provincial healthcare access, rather than just their promises to increase health funding overall.

The policies most relevant to your family are those that could reduce long trips for appointments, improve access to GPs and nurses, bring more specialists into regional communities, and make it easier to get urgent care close to home. Because you also mention limited local jobs, it’s worth looking at whether parties plan to recruit and retain healthcare workers outside the main centres.

One important distinction: the 2026 general election is upcoming, and a party’s existing policies or past commitments are not necessarily its final 2026 election platform. I’ll distinguish concrete proposals from broader intentions where the available evidence allows.

Which parties have the most relevant plans?

The strongest starting points for your concerns are Labour, the Greens, National, ACT and New Zealand First. They have identifiable 2026 health proposals, but they differ in whether they prioritise affordability, local services, workforce shortages or expanding treatment capacity. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryLabour's 2026 Election Policies

South Island Election Conference 2026

1. Labour Party

Focus: affordability and more primary-care capacity

Labour proposes:

Why it matters to you: Lower GP costs could help your household, while the doctor-loan scheme is particularly relevant to communities struggling to attract or retain a local GP.

What to check: The proposals do not by themselves guarantee a nearby clinic, after-hours cover or shorter travel for specialist appointments.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

2. Green Party

Focus: community-based care and reducing access barriers

The Greens propose:

Why it matters to you: Mobile services and care delivered in the community are especially relevant if your town has few local providers and travelling for routine treatment is difficult.

What to check: Ask where mobile services would operate, how often they would visit, and how the party would fund and staff them.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

3. National Party

Focus: expanding treatment capacity and workforce training

National's approach includes:

  • Expanding urgent and after-hours care and online GP services.
  • Using public and private providers to increase the number of elective procedures.
  • Expanding medical training, including the new University of Waikato graduate medical school, with its first 120 students planned for 2028 and a regional and rural clinical focus.
  • Health targets to measure access and performance. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters to you: The regional medical-training initiative could help build the future workforce, while urgent-care expansion could improve access outside normal GP hours.

What to check: More medical graduates nationally do not automatically mean more doctors in your town. Ask about specific rural recruitment, retention and local-service commitments.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

4. ACT New Zealand

Focus: making more providers available and reducing waiting lists

ACT proposes:

  • Allowing pharmacists and other health professionals to provide a wider range of everyday healthcare.
  • Greater use of private providers to reduce public waiting lists.
  • Increasing the health budget's share spent on medicines over time.
  • Supporting the Waikato medical school after seeking a cost–benefit analysis. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters to you: Expanding what local pharmacists and other clinicians can do could make some basic services more accessible without requiring a doctor for every visit.

What to check: Which services would actually be available locally, and whether private-provider expansion would reduce the need to travel for your family's care.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

Focus: doctor recruitment and access to specialist treatment

Its 2026 health proposals include:

  • International recruitment to address a claimed need for about 2,000 additional doctors.
  • Nurse practitioner-led digital health clinics in areas that are difficult to staff.
  • A proposed annual $925 million GP-controlled fund for purchasing specialist consultations and operations for patients on waiting lists.
  • An additional $1.3 billion for medicines, alongside a proposed new medicines agency. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Why it matters to you: The staffing and digital-clinic proposals are relevant to towns with few clinicians, while the waiting-list fund could help people waiting for specialist treatment.

What to check: How digital clinics would connect patients to physical examinations, urgent care and local follow-up, and how the waiting-list fund would work in practice.

What about Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity?

  • Te Pāti Māori emphasises Māori-led healthcare, whānau-centred services, prevention and strengthening Māori health provision. This may be particularly relevant if your community relies on kaupapa Māori providers or has significant unmet health needs. Its broader governance proposals are less directly focused on travel distances for all rural residents. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) is also worth comparing. It has a published 2026 health policy, but the evidence reviewed here does not establish a specific, funded rural-access commitment that clearly outranks the proposals above. Election 2026Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

How I would compare them for your family

Rather than choosing on health spending alone, I would compare the parties against these four practical tests.

What matters in your town What to look for in a party's policy
Fewer long drives for healthcare A local urgent-care service, mobile clinics, visiting specialists or reliable local diagnostic services
Finding a GP Specific recruitment and retention incentives, sustainable clinic funding and after-hours coverage
Family healthcare costs Free or cheaper consultations, prescriptions and travel assistance
Local employment Rural healthcare training placements, nursing and allied-health jobs, and incentives for clinicians to stay locally

One useful independent resource is Hauora Taiwhenua's 2026 election page. The Rural Health Network has put rural healthcare access directly to political representatives, including questions about workforce shortages, rural training hubs, technology and services closer to home. Its rural health election manifesto also outlines priorities against which parties' promises can be judged. Election 2026Election 2026

My takeaway: If your immediate concern is the cost of seeing a GP, examine Labour's proposals closely. If you want services to come to smaller communities, scrutinise the Greens' mobile-care approach. If you're interested in workforce expansion, examine National's regional medical-training plans, ACT's wider use of health professionals, and New Zealand First's recruitment and digital-clinic proposals.

None of those approaches alone guarantees that your town will get the services it needs. The most important question to ask each party is: What specific healthcare service will become available closer to home, by when, and with what funding and staffing?

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

In the 2026 New Zealand general election, healthcare access for small towns and rural communities is being addressed through broader primary care initiatives, workforce training schemes, and targeted funding approaches. Rather than isolated geographic silos, parties are approaching rural health through their national primary care and workforce platforms:

Overview of Party Approaches

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reducing financial barriers to primary care. Their headline policy is the Medicard, which provides three free general practitioner (GP) visits per year for every eligible New Zealander. To address workforce shortages in smaller areas, they have proposed the Family Doctor Loan Scheme to support doctors entering practice ownership, alongside guaranteeing employment for New Zealand-trained graduate nurses. They also propose free maternity scans and restoring free prescriptions.
  • National Party (and Coalition Government context): Focuses on expanding primary care capacity and workforce capability within existing fiscal constraints. Key actions include investing in primary care capacity (such as Budget funding) and advancing structural projects like the new medical school at the University of Waikato to help pipeline future doctors into regional and provincial areas. Policies also target increasing the scope of work for pharmacists and other health roles to ease GP pressure.
  • Green Party: Proposes an expansion of public healthcare, aiming for unlimited free GP visits and free dental care starting in high-need and under-resourced areas. Their framework emphasizes community care clinics and localized public service delivery, funded via a wealth tax.
  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes strengthening the core public health system, reducing waitlists through targeted funding pools (such as a multi-million-dollar waitlist reduction fund), and supporting regional diagnostic access.
  • ACT Party: Advocates for a "government-as-purchaser rather than provider" model. Rather than localized public expansion, ACT emphasizes market-based incentives, such as health savings options or insurance models, and opposes ethnicity-based health funding prioritisation.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for decentralized, Māori-led community health services and the restoration of an independent Māori Health Authority, aiming to link funding directly to patients via a Māori Health Card and providing free primary care and dental for lower-income whānau.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes a 10-year cross-party health plan (Healthy People) to remove health policy from short-term electoral cycles, alongside a "Teal Card" program providing free primary, dental, and mental healthcare to under-30s.

Sector Advocacy and Specific Rural Demands

Ahead of the 2026 election, sector groups like Hauora Taiwhenua (Rural Health Network) have pushed a six-point manifesto focusing directly on rural and small-town needs. They have called on all parties to commit to:

  1. Growing and sustaining a specialized rural health workforce.
  2. Recognizing the broad clinical skills required for rural generalist practice.
  3. Funding the higher operational costs of delivering healthcare in remote and small-town environments.
  4. Expanding digital and telehealth infrastructure.
  5. Investing in rural health research.
  6. Embedding rural health expertise into emergency planning.

Note: Specific party commitments vary on whether they adopt these targeted frameworks entirely or address them through general primary care funding and regional workforce incentives.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

For voters in small towns and rural communities, healthcare access—particularly GP shortages, distance to secondary services, and workforce retention—is a central issue in the 2026 general election. Peak bodies like the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network have actively pressed all parties to address the higher costs of rural delivery, workforce sustainability, and broader clinical scopes required outside major urban centres.

The approaches and specific proposals from major political parties regarding rural and provincial health access highlight distinct strategies:

  • National Party: National’s approach generally focuses on front-line capacity, meeting health targets, and expanding workforce pipelines through practical incentives rather than structural overhauls. Their strategy relies on integrating alternative clinician roles (such as pharmacist-led care and physician associates) to ease primary care pressures in provincial areas, alongside utilizing both public and private capacity to clear waitlists that disproportionately affect regions distant from major hospitals.
  • Labour Party: Labour’s healthcare platform places heavy emphasis on reducing the direct cost barriers of accessing primary care (such as targeting GP costs) and rebuilding regional and rural workforce numbers. They propose funding expanded health commitments through dedicated revenue mechanisms (like a capital gains tax on certain properties) ring-fenced specifically for the health sector, aiming to stabilize community health infrastructure in provincial and secondary towns. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]
  • Green Party: The Greens advocate for a comprehensive expansion of publicly funded primary and community healthcare. For rural and smaller-town access, their policy framework emphasizes mobile healthcare delivery (including mobile dental and mental health services) to bridge the physical distance gap. They also focus on pay parity and conditions for primary care nurses and local hauora (Māori health) providers to keep local clinics staffed. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]
  • New Zealand First: NZ First historically and actively targets regional, provincial, and rural advocacy. In the health space, their 2026 policy platform includes proposals targeting structural funding and procurement—such as overhauling Pharmac (replacing it or significantly increasing funding and transparency for medicines)—to ensure regional supply chains and equitable access to life-saving drugs do not disadvantage remote populations. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]
  • ACT New Zealand: ACT's health policies lean toward market-oriented reforms, choice, and public-private partnerships (such as supporting independent or contracted care models) to deliver localized services and cut through bureaucratic delays in underserved regions. They also propose specific rural training incentives, such as increasing funding for rural doctors and nurses to train specifically in urgent care capabilities.

To compare exact, up-to-date candidate positions and detailed party manifestos line-by-line as the final weeks of the campaign unfold, you can explore the non-partisan voter comparison tool on Policy.nz or review sector-specific priorities directly via the Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network. Election 2026

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties have specific plans for healthcare access in smaller towns and rural communities?

AI Overview

As you consider your vote for the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties are addressing regional and rural health inequities through contrasting approaches. The core divide lies between the current Government’s strategy of maximizing alternative workforces and digital access versus the opposition parties' focus on structural funding, subsidized primary care, and worker retention.

The primary advocate for rural health, Hauora Taiwhenua Rural Health Network, has pushed all parties to adopt its 2026 Election Manifesto. This includes expanding the rural workforce, boosting funding for long-distance care, and scaling up digital health.

The specific strategies and platforms put forward by the major parties for smaller towns and rural access include:

🔵 National Party

The National Party relies on its governance track record, prioritizing structural waitlist reductions and a highly leveraged workforce to keep people out of distant hospitals.

  • Digital Health Infrastructure: Promising a 24/7 digital health service capable of delivering over 20,000 virtual consultations, specifically aimed at reducing travel times for families needing basic health advice.

  • Workforce Expansion: Building a third medical school at the University of Waikato to train more primary care and rural doctors, alongside an increase of 2,000 nurses and 120 nurse practitioner training placements.

  • Local Pharmacy Services: Expanding the scope of pharmacist-prescriber and physician associate roles to allow locals to access basic treatments and 12-month repeat prescriptions without needing to drive to a distant GP.

🔴 Labour Party

The Labour Party is focusing heavily on affordability and targeted financial incentives to bring permanent doctors back to underserved towns.

  • The "Medicard" and Free Care: Planning to introduce a Medicard providing three free GP visits a year for all New Zealanders, alongside fully restoring free prescriptions and free maternity scans to alleviate cost pressures for families traveling for care.

  • Rural GP Financial Assistance: Backing a specialized Family Doctor Loan Scheme and financial support packages targeted at encouraging GPs to take up ownership and permanently settle in rural practices.

  • Workforce Guarantees: Implementing a Graduate Nurse Job Guarantee to transition domestic nursing graduates straight into frontline health roles, stabilizing regional staff shortages.

🟢 Green Party & ACT

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on addressing rural health inequities through localized public funding. They advocate for expanding localized community health hubs that integrate mental health and standard medical services under one roof so smaller towns don't rely entirely on single-GP clinics.

  • ACT Party: Aligns broadly with the National coalition government's approach but emphasizes reducing administrative bloat within Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) to free up direct frontline funding for regional clinics.

Key Policy Comparison

Party Core Strategy Primary Rural Care Benefit Local Workforce Solution
National Digital options & alternative workforces 24/7 Virtual health & expanded local pharmacy services Waikato Medical School & +2,000 nurses
Labour Lowering financial barriers & local GP support Three free GP visits (Medicard) & free prescriptions Rural practice ownership grants & nurse job guarantee

To explore detailed, policy-by-policy breakdowns as political platforms develop closer to the November 7th election date, you can monitor the Policy.nz Health Guide or check the non-partisan manifesto tracking at Hauora Taiwhenua.

If you would like to look closer into these platforms, let me know:

  • Are you most interested in emergency care , mental health , or maternity/family services?

  • Would you like information on any party’s regional infrastructure and job creation policies outside of health?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account