Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

NZ 2026 election: GP costs and access for working people

For someone renting, sharing household costs with a partner, and working changing shifts, there are two distinct questions to consider: Will you be able to afford a GP appointment when your pay is lower than expected, and will you actually be able to get an appointment when you need one?

As of 26 October 2026, New Zealand's main parties differ on whether to reduce or remove patient charges, increase funding for general practices, or pursue both approaches. The general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?2026 Election Q&A

What the parties are proposing

The comparison below focuses on published 2026 positions, rather than assuming every party has a fully costed policy.

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Three free visits proposed

Labour proposes a Medicard, available to everyone eligible for publicly funded healthcare, providing three free GP or nurse visits per year at their enrolled practice. It also proposes removing the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027.

Labour estimates the free-visit package would cost $553 million annually, including $490 million for the visits, and says it would fund the package through a proposed 28% tax on gains from selling investment and commercial property. It also proposes an independent authority to set GP funding rates from July 2028.

For your situation: this would directly reduce the cost of routine appointments, including in weeks when your income falls. However, after-hours visits, ACC visits and immunisations are excluded from the Medicard offer, and three visits may not cover all your needs. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Fully free care is the long-term goal

The Greens propose working towards fully free, publicly delivered primary and dental care. Their manifesto includes Māori-led clinics and mobile health and dental services for rural communities.

The 2026 manifesto does not specify a timetable or cost for achieving fully free primary care, nor exactly how existing GP fees and prescription charges would change during the transition.

For your situation: the goal is to remove the financial barrier more broadly, rather than provide only a fixed number of free visits. The key unanswered questions are how quickly it would happen and how it would be funded and delivered. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Free primary care proposed

Te Pāti Māori commits to investing in free primary healthcare for all whānau, alongside free dental care, free medication delivery, marae-based clinics, mobile health units and increased Pharmac funding.

Its manifesto does not specify a delivery timetable or an independently assessed cost for the free-primary-care commitment.

For your situation: the proposal aims to remove fees across primary care, rather than limit free routine visits to three per year. Its practical impact would depend on the details of implementation and available appointment capacity. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

More GP capacity proposed

ACT proposes an additional $400 million for general practice over four years — $100 million annually — to help practices retain experienced doctors, offer competitive pay and potentially provide more appointments and longer opening hours.

ACT argues that making visits free could increase demand without solving the shortage of doctors. Its announced plan does not specify a reduction in GP fees, a change to prescription charges or a funding source for the additional $400 million.

For your situation: the focus is on making appointments more available, rather than directly making them cheaper. Whether this would reduce your out-of-pocket costs is not established by the announced policy. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

New Zealand National Party

Current approach: subsidise practices

National has not announced a new election policy specifically to make GP visits free or remove prescription charges. Its position is reflected in its record in government.

A 2026 Health NZ funding agreement added $120.6 million in GP funding for 2026/27 and holds practice fees until 1 July 2027, subject to exceptions. The government also reinstated the $5 prescription charge in July 2024 for most people aged 14 and over.

For your situation: the fee-hold arrangement offers some short-term price stability, but it does not make appointments free. The policy beyond July 2027 is not specified in this comparison. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

No specific published position was identified in the reviewed 2026 material on reducing GP fees or removing the $5 prescription charge.

The party has other health-related priorities, but these should not be taken as a commitment to free GP visits. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

The Opportunity Party

Opportunity has not stated a specific position on GP fees or prescription charges in the material reviewed. It does support a 10-year, cross-party plan for health, including a larger role for primary care.

For your situation: this is a broader health-system proposal, not a specific promise to reduce what you pay at your next GP visit. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

What matters when your pay changes from week to week?

The differences become clearer when you separate the cost of care from the ability to get care.

Question to ask Relevant party proposals
Could I pay less for a routine GP appointment? Labour's three free visits; the Greens' and Te Pāti Māori's longer-term free-care proposals
Could it become easier to get an appointment? ACT's proposed GP workforce funding; also consider how each party plans to increase primary-care capacity
Could I face more predictable charges? National's fee-hold agreement until July 2027, subject to exceptions; Labour's proposed free visits for eligible routine care
What if I need more than three appointments a year? Compare Labour's limit with the Greens' and Te Pāti Māori's broader free-care goals
What about prescriptions as well as consultations? Labour proposes removing the $5 prescription charge; the other parties' positions differ or remain unspecified

Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

There is a reason to consider both affordability and access. In the 2024/25 New Zealand Health Survey, 14.9% of adults reported not visiting a GP because of cost, while 25.5% reported that the time taken to get an appointment was a barrier. These are separate problems: removing a fee will not automatically create more appointment slots, and adding doctors will not automatically make visits affordable. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

A practical point about your eligibility

You may also qualify for existing assistance, regardless of which party you vote for:

  • Community Services Card: eligible people pay less for many GP visits and some prescriptions. Eligibility depends on circumstances and income; irregular earnings are worth discussing with Work and Income.
  • Practice fees: GP practices set their own fees, so it is worth asking your enrolled practice about its standard, after-hours and nurse-consultation charges.
  • Prescription costs: the $5 prescription charge generally applies to eligible people aged 14–64 who do not qualify for an exemption, subject to the applicable annual limit and other rules. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

How to use this comparison when deciding your vote

Given your circumstances, you might want to weigh three questions separately:

  1. Immediate financial protection: Does the policy lower the amount you must pay in a low-income week?
  2. Ongoing protection: Does it help if you need frequent appointments or prescriptions over the year?
  3. Practical access: Does the party explain how it will make enough appointments available, including at times that fit around rostered shifts?

No single policy announcement guarantees all three. The published plans also vary in how much detail they provide about funding, timing and implementation. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

You can read the full party-by-party evidence in Undecided's 2026 comparison of GP and prescription costs, which distinguishes announced commitments from policies that have not been specified.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

For households navigating fluctuating rostered hours and fixed living costs, the barrier of unpredictable GP fees is a key issue in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Political parties offer sharply contrasting approaches to addressing GP costs and primary healthcare access:


1. Labour Party

  • The Proposal: Labour’s flagship health policy is the introduction of a "Medicard" and Medicard App, which would provide every New Zealander entitled to public healthcare with three free general practitioner (GP) visits per year at their enrolled practice.
  • Additional Cost Relief: They are also campaigning to permanently remove the $5 prescription charge, make targeted health checks (like cervical screening and referred maternity scans) free, and introduce a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to support local practice ownership and bolster workforce capacity.
  • Funding: Proposed to be funded through a capital gains tax on specified residential investment and commercial property profits.

2. Green Party

  • The Proposal: The Greens propose going significantly further than Labour by introducing unlimited free GP visits for everyone, alongside free dental care.
  • Focus: Their model prioritises funding community care clinics in the highest-need areas first as part of a broader expansion of public health and preventive care.
  • Funding: Proposed to be supported by a wealth tax.

3. Te Pāti Māori

  • The Proposal: Focuses heavily on low-income households and equity. They support providing free primary care and dental care for all whānau earning under $60,000.
  • Access Model: Proposes a "Māori Health Card" system that links funding directly to the patient to reduce structural and financial barriers.

4. The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • The Proposal: Proposes universal or targeted free primary healthcare access focused initially on younger demographics—such as free primary healthcare, mental health, and dental care for under-30s via a Teal Card program.

5. National Party (Current Government Approach)

  • The Proposal: National has generally rejected universal blanket subsidies (such as Labour's Medicard, which National critics labeled as untargeted support).
  • Focus: Instead of broad-brush free visit schemes, National's approach has centered on building long-term primary care capacity, workforce investment, and managing waitlists within fiscal constraints, alongside utilizing private sector contracting to clear hospital backlogs.

6. ACT New Zealand & NZ First

  • ACT: Generally opposes universal state-funded models, instead favoring a "government-as-purchaser" framework and proposing alternatives like health savings accounts or incentives for private health cover.
  • NZ First: While historically sympathetic to reducing health costs, their primary 2026 health focal points lean toward public system resourcing, diagnostics, and waitlist reduction funds rather than universal free GP rollouts.

Summary for Working Households

If your primary concern is immediate out-of-pocket relief for sudden doctor visits, Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori are campaigning on direct fee-reduction or free-visit models (varying from capped free visits to unlimited or income-threshold free care). Conversely, National and ACT focus more on systemic capacity, waitlist management, or structural alternatives rather than direct universal price controls on standard GP consultations.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

When managing variable rostered hours and fluctuating weekly income, unexpected GP costs can quickly become a barrier to healthcare. Ahead of the 2026 general election, New Zealand political parties have laid out distinct approaches to primary care affordability, ranging from universal targeted cards to funding capacity-building or private-insurance incentives.

Where major and minor parties stand on GP costs and access includes:

  • Labour Party: Proposes the Medicard , a flagship policy providing every eligible New Zealander with three free GP or nurse visits per year at their enrolled practice. This is designed to be universal (accessible via card or app) and is proposed to be funded via capital gains tax revenue.

  • Green Party: Advocates for unlimited free GP visits for everyone, alongside free dental care. Their approach prioritises rolling out community care clinics in high-need areas first, funded through a wealth tax.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care and dental for all whānau earning under $60,000, alongside a dedicated Māori Health Card framework linking funding directly to the patient. [WhichParty NZ]

  • National Party: Focuses on strengthening overall primary care capacity and frontline sustainability through direct funding injections (such as investments in primary care capacity and workforce pipelines) rather than universal free visit schemes, arguing that broad policies like the _

Medicard_ direct government subsidies to higher-income earners.

  • ACT New Zealand: Disagrees with universal free-visit models, favoring a government-as-purchaser framework and promoting incentives (such as proposed tax or policy credits) for individuals to opt out of the public health system and secure private health insurance instead. [WhichParty NZ]

  • New Zealand First: Focuses its health priorities heavily on hospital and health system waitlist reduction funds rather than committing to universal free GP visits. [WhichParty NZ]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Generally aligns with expanding free or low-cost access to foundational primary and preventative healthcare. [WhichParty NZ]

Would you like to explore how these parties' broader tax and cost-of-living policies might impact a household with variable income, or do you want to look into Community Services Card entitlements available under current settings?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

AI Overview

With variable shift work and unpredictable income, managing upfront healthcare costs can be an immense challenge. In the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have drawn distinct battlelines over how to handle General Practitioner (GP) costs and doctor shortages. The left-leaning parties favor universal or large-scale free primary care, while the right-leaning parties focus on targeted funding for low-income earners, expanded roles for pharmacists, and practice efficiencies.

A comparison of what the major political parties are proposing to improve GP costs and access for working people shows distinct differences:

Political Party Core GP Cost & Access Proposals How it Impacts Inconsistent Earners
Labour Party • Three free GP or nurse visits per year for everyone via a new "Medicard" app/card.
• Scrap the $5 prescription fee.
• Free up 4.5 million appointments via clinical phone triaging and tech support. Immediate, guaranteed relief. You get 3 free visits regardless of your fluctuating weekly earnings, eliminating the upfront fee barrier when your cash flow drops.
Green Party • $3 billion annual boost to health spending to heavily subsidize and expand free primary care.
• Transition the system toward universally free local dental and medical clinics. Broad structural relief. A dramatic cash injection aims to lower overall fees and cut wait times, making it easier to book short-notice appointments around changing rosters.
National Party • Targeted support instead of universal free visits.
• Focus on freezing GP fee increases and subsidizing Community Services Card (CSC) holders.
• Expand the role of pharmacists and physician associates to take the pressure off clinics. Income-dependent. If your income drops low enough to qualify for a Community Services Card, you get cheap care. However, if your average pay is just above the threshold, you still pay full standard fees.
ACT New Zealand • $400 million funding boost over four years directly to general practices.
• Cutting administrative red tape to free up more doctor availability. Improved clinic availability. The funding targets practice survival and capacity, meaning it may be easier to find a doctor, but it does not mandate universally lowered appointment fees.
NZ First • Comprehensive health reform focused on preventive care to reduce emergency room dependency. Long-term structural changes. Focuses heavily on managing system capacity, though specific universal fee-reduction mechanisms are not the central pillar.

Left-Wing Proposals: Universal Cost Drops

  • Labour’s Medicard: Designed to tackle the statistic that 1 in 6 Kiwis skip the doctor due to cost. The Labour Cost of Living Plan guarantees three free doctor or nurse appointments per year. To combat the resulting clinic congestion, they plan to use phone triage and practice tech grants to free up 4.5 million slots.

  • The Green Party’s Health Boost: Through the Green Party Fiscal Plan, they intend to funnel $3 billion annually into health. This policy treats primary care as a public good, intending to steadily reduce average fees to zero for everyone over time.

Right-Wing Proposals: Targeted Support & Private Efficiency

  • National's Targeted Model: National argues universal free visits spread funding too thin by subsidizing wealthy individuals who can afford to pay. They favor capping fee increases and using targeted subsidies for those on low incomes or benefits via the Community Services Card system. They aim to ease access by shifting routine treatments to local pharmacies.

  • ACT's Practice Funding: ACT's approach promises $400 million to strengthen GP clinics financially. The goal is to keep clinics from closing or raising prices due to operational strain, improving doctor availability without introducing universal government handouts.

If you would like to explore this further, let me know:

  • Do you or your partner currently qualify for a Community Services Card?

  • Are you more concerned about the upfront cost of the appointment, or the difficulty of booking a slot around your roster?

I can break down how specific workforce plans (like training more doctors or nurses) might affect wait times in your area.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account