Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

New Zealand 2026 election: affordable mental health support for tertiary students

If you're renting a room, working part-time and relying on a student loan, mental health support is not just about whether counselling exists. It's also about whether you can afford it, access it without a long wait, and fit appointments around classes, assignments and paid work.

When comparing parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to separate three things:

  • Cost: Would you be able to get counselling or therapy for free or at a price you can afford?
  • Access: Would you have more appointments available through your university, a GP, a community provider or the public mental health system?
  • Financial pressure: Would policies on student allowances, living costs and housing leave you with more time and money to look after yourself?

A party might propose more mental health funding without guaranteeing affordable counselling for every tertiary student. Likewise, a policy that increases your disposable income could help you afford support without increasing the number of therapists available.

How the main parties' approaches compare

The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The comparison below reflects policies and announcements available in the current campaign; proposals can still change before polling day.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner? Winner Odds | Lines.com

1. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

Accessible care and student wellbeing

The Greens' 2026 manifesto calls for accessible, safe and culturally relevant mental health care, action on workforce shortages and long waiting times, and improvements to tertiary education that address student poverty and under-resourced student services. Manifesto 2026PF010: Mental health and addiction · AI election answers

Relevance to you: Their approach connects mental health with the pressures of rent, living costs and studying. Check the detailed commitments for a specific guarantee of free student counselling, how many sessions would be covered, and when services would expand.

South Island Election Conference 2026

2. New Zealand Labour Party

Lower healthcare costs and primary care access

Labour proposes three free GP visits a year through its Medicard and removing the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027. Its wider healthcare platform includes measures to improve access to care. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesPF010: Mental health and addiction · AI election answers

Relevance to you: Free GP visits could make it easier to discuss anxiety, stress or low mood and explore treatment options. But free GP appointments are not the same as free ongoing counselling or psychotherapy, and the published offer does not establish a student-specific counselling entitlement.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

3. New Zealand National Party

System capacity, navigation and youth services

The National-led Government launched a 10-year Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy in August 2026, with a three-year implementation plan focused on faster access, more frontline workers and crisis response. It also announced three new Youth Hubs for people aged 16–25 in Hamilton, Nelson and Hawke's Bay, offering counselling, peer support and specialist services, with opening expected by the end of 2026. Promised Mental Health Strategy launchedYouth Hubs to deliver faster access to support

Relevance to you: Integrated services and youth hubs could reduce the difficulty of finding help, and phone or online services may fit around work. However, the three hubs are in specific locations, and these initiatives do not guarantee free ongoing counselling for every tertiary student nationwide.

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

4. ACT New Zealand

Service efficiency and provider choice

ACT's wider health approach emphasises making existing funding work more efficiently, expanding provider choice and improving access to medicines. The available sources do not establish a specific 2026 commitment guaranteeing free counselling for tertiary students. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Relevance to you: When reviewing ACT's full election policy, look for concrete commitments on counselling subsidies, youth service capacity, waiting times and the amount of public funding allocated to mental health.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

Medicines, waiting lists and prevention

Health-policy analysis describes NZ First's approach as emphasising medicines, waiting lists, international recruitment and prevention. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Relevance to you: These priorities may affect access to the wider health system, but I could not verify a specific nationwide promise of free ongoing counselling for tertiary students. Check its latest mental health policy for service costs and delivery targets.

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

6. Te Pāti Māori

Māori-led care and cultural safety

Te Pāti Māori's health approach emphasises Māori-led decision-making and services, prevention, cultural safety and whānau wellbeing. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryPF010: Mental health and addiction · AI election answers

Relevance to you: Māori students looking for kaupapa Māori or whānau-centred support may wish to examine these commitments closely. The sources reviewed do not establish a universal free-counselling entitlement for all tertiary students.

The key distinction: counselling versus general healthcare

For your circumstances, these are three different policy outcomes worth distinguishing.

Policy outcome How it could affect you
Free or subsidised counselling Directly reduces what you pay for sessions.
More publicly funded counsellors and shorter waits Makes it more likely you can get support when you need it, including around study and work.
Cheaper GP visits and prescriptions Reduces some healthcare costs, but may not cover the cost of ongoing therapy.

The Greens' manifesto puts explicit emphasis on accessible mental health care, while Labour's free-GP proposal addresses an identifiable upfront healthcare cost. National's current strategy focuses on improving access and the overall service system. For ACT, NZ First and Te Pāti Māori, the specific question to check is whether their final policies include a funded, measurable commitment to affordable counselling for students. These are differences in policy emphasis, not a guarantee of what the next government would deliver. Manifesto 2026Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesPromised Mental Health Strategy launchedElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Don't overlook the cost of being a student

Because you are juggling rent, work and study, mental health policy is only part of the picture. You could also compare each party's proposals on:

  • Student income support: eligibility for the Student Allowance, living-cost payments and hardship grants.
  • Housing: renter protections and measures intended to reduce housing costs.
  • Study costs: tuition fees, student-loan rules and funding for campus support services.
  • Flexible access: online counselling, evening appointments, peer support and services available outside major centres.

For example, Labour proposes a 10% reduction in eligible student-loan balances, while the Greens propose restoring Fees Free and working towards debt-free tertiary education. These are different approaches to financial pressure; neither policy by itself guarantees more affordable counselling. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesWhich Party Should I Vote For? Your Guide to the 2026 Election

Where to check the policies before voting

These sources are useful for verifying the latest details rather than relying on campaign summaries:

One question worth asking every party: If I am a tertiary student who cannot afford private counselling, what exactly would you fund, how much would I pay, how long would I wait, and when would the service be available?

That question gets beyond general promises about mental health and towards the practical difference a policy could make to your life.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

For tertiary students navigating the pressures of renting, part-time work, and student loans, mental health support is a critical issue in the 2026 general election. While political parties approach healthcare and student support through different economic and systemic lenses, their policies generally fall into distinct categories regarding affordability, primary care, and targeted youth or student interventions.

The primary differences in how the major and minor parties propose addressing mental health support and student financial pressure include the following:

1. Broad Health & Primary Care Affordability (Impact on Student Costs)

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on lowering the direct out-of-pocket costs of seeing health professionals. Their platform includes introducing three free GP (doctor or nurse) visits per year for all New Zealanders via a "Medicard" system, alongside removing prescription fees. For students, reducing the cost of visiting a doctor or accessing medical certificates/mental health referrals directly addresses affordability barriers. Additionally, Labour proposes adjustments to student loans, such as reducing compulsory repayment rates and cutting eligible loan balances by 10% under specific criteria, which indirectly alleviates financial anxiety.
  • Green Party: Proposes a comprehensive universal free healthcare model, aiming to transition privately funded services into fully publicly owned, free services—explicitly including mental health services and general practitioner clinics. The Greens aim to eliminate therapy waiting lists entirely by training and deploying more mental health professionals (such as psychologists, psychotherapists, and social workers).
  • National Party / ACT Party: Generally focus on fiscal restraint, expanding clinical capacity, and reducing wait times through public-private targets and workforce expansion rather than sweeping universal free care models. Their approach emphasizes fixing the basics of the public health infrastructure, increasing overall system capacity, and targeting funding toward clinical need.

2. Youth and Student-Specific Support Models

  • Targeted Youth Services & Hubs: Advocacy groups like the Mental Health Foundation and youth health sector advocates heavily emphasize the need for integrated, free "one-stop shop" youth health hubs and expanded education-setting support. Parties vary in their specific commitments to scaling up these community-led or campus-linked models versus mainstreaming mental health services through standard primary health organizations (PHOs).
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on a system shift toward prevention, whānau wellbeing, and restoring Māori-led health solutions. Their framework emphasizes culturally safe, holistic mental health and suicide prevention services (including Kaupapa Māori options), which heavily benefit indigenous and diverse student populations seeking culturally grounded care.

3. Addressing Root Causes: Cost of Living and Student Stress

Because student mental distress is deeply intertwined with financial precarity (rent, balancing part-time work with study, and student loan debt), parties offer sharply contrasting solutions to the underlying stress:

  • The Left/Progressive Bloc (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Tend to favor policies that directly inject financial relief into student hands—such as changes to student loan repayment thresholds, student allowance adjustments, or broader cost-of-living interventions (like free healthcare access) to reduce the necessity of overworking in part-time jobs.
  • The Right/Centre-Right Bloc (National, ACT, NZ First): Emphasize economic management, curbing inflation, and creating flexible labor markets or economic conditions that encourage job growth, viewing broad economic stability as the primary mechanism to ease overall living cost pressures.

Are you looking at how a specific party's policies impact tertiary allowances and student loans, or would you like to explore what mental health support services are currently available on New Zealand tertiary campuses?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

Balancing a part-time job, a student loan, and the financial pressure of renting while studying is a heavy load. When looking at the 2026 general election, New Zealand’s political parties approach affordable mental health support through different overarching health frameworks, funding strategies, and youth-targeted provisions.

The primary differences in party approaches concerning mental health support—particularly impacting young people and tertiary students—include:

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on free, universal, and accessible mental health services. Their platform explicitly proposes free mental health services targeted at youth and children, expanding alcohol/drug rehabilitation, establishing community/school-linked wellbeing hubs, and heavily scaling up the training and recruitment of mental health professionals.

  • Labour Party: Emphasises public health infrastructure and workforce capacity. Their approach generally centers on expanding access within the public health system, supporting community-based mental health initiatives, and integrating mental health professionals into emergency responses rather than standalone privatised models. [Policy.nz]

  • National Party: Emphasises structural accountability, targeting workforce pipelines, and community funding. Their strategy includes establishing dedicated mental health leadership (such as a dedicated ministerial focus or agency alignment), increasing training positions for clinical psychologists and psychiatrists, and creating targeted funding pools for community mental health organisations rather than sweeping universal free-access schemes. [Policy.nz]

  • ACT Party: Focuses on administrative efficiency and targeted spending oversight. They advocate for a streamlined national mental health and addiction agency to ensure funding achieves measurable frontline results rather than broad bureaucratic expansion, with less emphasis on universal free-care mandates and more on fixing operational delivery.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Proposes specific age-banded primary healthcare support, including free basic healthcare and mental health support explicitly targeted for demographics under the age of 30, which directly encompasses the majority of tertiary students. [Policy.nz]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on culturally grounded solutions, advocating for the establishment of independent kaupapa Māori mental health services and increased resourcing for community and whānau-centred prevention models. [Policy.nz]

You can compare party manifestos in-depth using the Mental Health Foundation Election Scorecard or explore side-by-side comparisons on Policy.nz. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026 - Policy.nz

If you'd like, we can look into:

  • Specific student allowance or student loan policy changes proposed by these parties for 2026
  • How to access current mental health support through your tertiary institution right now

Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

AI Overview

Juggling part-time work, study commitments, and student finances is incredibly stressful, and navigating mental health challenges while under economic pressure is a reality for many New Zealand tertiary students.

Heading into the 2026 General Election , political parties offer fundamentally different approaches to providing affordable mental health support. The core difference lies between the left-leaning parties , who favor lowering primary healthcare costs and increasing direct student allowances, and the right-leaning government parties , who focus on community-level early intervention, workforce expansions, and reducing welfare dependency.


Direct Policy Comparison for the 2026 Election

Political Party Primary Approach to Affordable Care Impact on Student Cost & Work Pressures
Labour Lowering barriers to primary care through the "Medicard" scheme, offering three free GP visits and free prescriptions. They also promise to write off 10% of student loan balances for graduates staying in NZ. Direct financial relief. Free doctor visits lower the cost of getting an initial mental health assessment or referral. The loan write-off relieves long-term debt anxiety.
Green Party Universal student payments for those training in essential health/social support sectors. They advocate for expanding access to learning/wellbeing support directly within places of learning. Time and income relief. A universal payment allows students in target fields to drop stressful part-time work hours. Campus-integrated care reduces the time needed to seek external clinical support.
National Early intervention and preventative models , focusing heavily on building up the mental health workforce. They support community-led youth wellbeing hubs and the deployment of digital solutions like e-therapy and telehealth. Accessibility over direct subsidies. The focus is on making sure there are actual staff available to see you, though it relies heavily on non-government organizations (NGOs) and digital platforms rather than direct student cash injections.
ACT Reducing mental health-related benefit dependencies and budgeting $600 million to bring Jobseeker mental health numbers down to 2017 levels. They support targeted, evidence-based mental health support in education but caution against transforming learning spaces into clinics. Strictly clinical focus. ACT prioritizes economic productivity and structural public sector changes. They support timely access to care but want schools and tertiary providers to stay focused on education first.

Key Trade-offs to Consider for Your Vote

  • If you want immediate financial relief for health visits: Left-leaning choices like Labour or the Greens focus heavily on making sure seeing a doctor doesn’t cost you anything out-of-pocket.

  • If you want to work fewer hours: Look closely at the Green Party’s income support policies for students, which aim to address the root economic causes of student burnout.

  • If you value building up frontline services: National and ACT emphasize growing the health workforce and streamlining services to reduce overall wait times, rather than implementing universal subsidies.


If you would like to explore how these plans stack up further, let me know:

  • What specific type of mental health support is most important to you? (e.g., free counselling sessions, cheaper doctor consultations, or structural campus resources)

  • Whether you want to look into how their broader student allowance and living cost policies differ to help clear up your work schedule.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account