Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would the parties change about rental affordability, tenancy protections and the supply of rental homes?

New Zealand 2026 election: renting, security and affordability

For you and your partner, the key issue is that your income can change from week to week, but your rent and essential bills generally cannot. That makes this election about more than whether rents go down: it is also about how much notice you get, whether you can challenge a rent increase, how secure your tenancy is, and whether enough rental homes are being built to ease pressure on prices.

I’ll compare the main parties in New Zealand on three areas:

  • Rental affordability: rent increases, housing assistance and the impact of housing costs on your take-home income.
  • Tenancy protections: eviction rules, rent-setting rules, notice periods and security for tenants.
  • Rental supply: policies intended to build more homes, encourage landlords to offer rentals and increase the range of places available to rent.

One important distinction: the 2026 general election is still ahead, so a party's current policies, its record in government and any new promises for this election are not necessarily the same thing. I’ll distinguish those where the available evidence allows it.

1. The main parties compared

The table below focuses on the six parties represented in Parliament, using policies reported during the 2026 campaign. It is a snapshot as of late October 2026, not a guarantee that every proposal will be implemented. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up2026 Election Policy

Party Rental affordability Tenancy protections Rental supply
Labour No announced general rent cap identified; proposes a 28% capital gains tax on property gains arising after July 2027, excluding family homes. No comparable new rent cap or restoration of no-cause eviction protections identified in its headline housing package. 6,000 additional social housing places over four years; proposes retaining interest deductibility for landlords.
National No general rent cap identified in its headline policies. No new rent cap or equivalent broad restoration of renter protections identified in the headline package. Focuses on enabling development, planning changes, infrastructure and access to home ownership.
Green Party Proposes limiting annual rent increases, with its detailed campaign policy reported as the lower of inflation and average wage growth. Proposes stronger renter rights, longer-term or permanent tenancies, reversing no-cause evictions, and rental property inspections. Tens of thousands of additional public homes, stronger community housing support and more Māori housing.
ACT Proposes allowing landlords to offset rental losses against other income by abolishing loss ring-fencing. No general rent cap identified. No comparable new rent cap or restoration of no-cause eviction protections identified in the headline package. Emphasises planning reform, property rights and reducing barriers to private development.
New Zealand First No general rent cap identified in the housing proposals reviewed. No comparable new rent cap or broad tenancy-protection restoration identified in the headline package. Proposes a 30-year population plan linking immigration, housing and infrastructure; also proposes infrastructure requirements for fast-tracked developments.
Te Pāti Māori Proposes universal rent control. Proposes repealing no-cause evictions and expanding support for tenants at risk of losing their homes. Proposes 2,000 homes on ancestral Māori land within four years and allocating 50% of new social housing to Māori.

Sources: Policy.nz's 2026 election guide, Interest.co.nz's October 2026 housing-policy comparison, Greens' housing announcement, and Labour's policy page. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upGreens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisLabour's 2026 Election Policies

A note on the table: where I say a policy was not identified, that does not prove a party has no relevant policy elsewhere. Some parties were still releasing or refining policies during the campaign.

2. What the differences could mean for your household

Rental affordability: can you keep up when your pay drops?

303 Roscommon road, Clendon Park, Manukau City, Auckland

Rent increases

The Greens and Te Pāti Māori have proposed direct controls on rent increases. Under the Greens' detailed proposal, the annual increase would be limited to whichever is lower: inflation or average wage growth. Labour, National, ACT and New Zealand First have not been identified as proposing an equivalent general rent cap in the headline policies reviewed. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upGreens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis

Denied credit because of identity theft? Here are your options

Help when income is irregular

A rent cap limits how quickly your rent can rise, but it does not automatically lower your existing rent or make a high rent affordable relative to your wages. For your situation, the other question is whether income support, accommodation assistance or employment policies provide help during lower-paid weeks. The housing announcements alone do not establish a new universal payment that automatically adjusts to fluctuating rostered earnings.

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities Waterview Court Development Case Study | Dulux

Landlord tax settings

Labour proposes a 28% capital gains tax on gains from investment and commercial property sales after July 2027, while retaining landlords' interest deductibility. ACT proposes ending the restriction that prevents landlords from offsetting rental losses against other income. The Greens propose reversing landlord tax concessions. These are different ways of treating property investment; none guarantees a particular rent reduction.

Why the distinction matters: with variable pay, your biggest risk may be a cash-flow squeeze rather than an unusually large annual rent increase. A cap can improve predictability, but a lower weekly housing cost or more help during a low-income period would address a different part of the problem.

Tenancy protections: how much security would you have?

The most concrete proposed differences are between parties offering explicit changes to tenancy law and those concentrating on supply or investment incentives.

For you, security matters because a tenancy ending unexpectedly can mean bond and moving costs, time off work, and potentially a higher new rent. A policy that improves security could help even if it does not reduce your current weekly payment.

Rental supply: will more homes mean more affordable choices?

There are two broad approaches in these policies.

More public and community housing

The Greens propose building tens of thousands of public homes and increasing financing for councils and community housing providers. Labour proposes 6,000 additional social housing places over four years, while Te Pāti Māori proposes 2,000 homes on ancestral Māori land over four years. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up

Potential effect: more homes outside the market-rent sector, particularly for households eligible for public or community housing. The number actually delivered and eligibility rules matter.

More private development and investment

National emphasises planning reform, development and infrastructure. ACT emphasises property rights and fewer barriers to building, alongside its landlord tax proposal. New Zealand First links housing growth to long-term population and infrastructure planning. 2026 Election PolicyThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up

Potential effect: more private homes and rental choices if construction responds. The effect on your rent depends on where homes are built, what they cost and how quickly supply catches up with demand.

More supply can ease competition between renters, but it is not an immediate guarantee of lower rents. Public housing can provide an alternative to market rentals for eligible households, while planning reform usually takes time to translate into completed homes.

3. The policy details worth checking before you vote

For your circumstances, I would look beyond the headline promises and ask each party these five questions.

  1. Can rent rise faster than our income?

Check whether a proposed cap is tied to inflation, wages or a fixed percentage, and whether it applies to existing as well as new tenancies.

  1. Can we stay in our home?

Check the rules on no-cause terminations, notice periods, fixed-term renewals and the grounds landlords can use to end a tenancy.

  1. Is there help when our pay falls?

Look for specific proposals on accommodation assistance, eligibility thresholds, income support and how irregular earnings are assessed. A promise to reduce rents over time is not the same as help paying next week's rent.

  1. Will the home be warm, dry and safe?

Compare proposals for Healthy Homes enforcement, rental inspections, landlord accountability and remedies when standards are not met.

  1. How many affordable homes will actually be delivered?

Look for funded targets, delivery dates, the location and type of housing, and whether homes will be public, community or private rentals.

For a current, broader comparison, Policy.nz's 2026 election guide lets you compare housing affordability, renting, housing quality and public housing. You can also check the official Labour policy page, National policy page and Greens' housing plan.

4. One final consideration: your two votes

New Zealand's MMP system gives you a party vote and an electorate vote. Your party vote helps determine each party's share of seats in Parliament; your electorate vote chooses your local representative. The policies above are national-level proposals, so you do not need to nominate a city to compare them. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policy.nz

The central trade-off to consider is between immediate protection against rent rises and unexpected tenancy loss, direct help with household costs, and policies intended to increase housing supply over time. Those are separate goals, and parties differ in how explicitly they address each one.

For a household with rostered, variable income, it is worth checking whether a party's proposals would help you manage a bad pay week, not just whether they might make housing more affordable in the longer term. That is a useful way to assess the policies without assuming any one party's approach will necessarily deliver its intended result.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would the parties change about rental affordability, tenancy protections and the supply of rental homes?

Navigating variable income alongside fixed household costs like rent and bills is a significant stressor. Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election, the political parties have put forward distinct visions for the rental market, affecting affordability, security, and supply.

Here is how the major parties approach these specific areas:


1. Rental Affordability and Cost Controls

The debate over how to rein in or stabilize rent costs splits sharply along ideological lines:

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on direct intervention for affordability. They propose introducing rent caps (limiting annual rent increases to a maximum of 2% or tying them strictly to inflation/wage metrics) and rolling out mandatory rental warrants of fitness to ensure homes are warm and energy-efficient, which can lower secondary power and heating costs.
  • Labour Party: Positions itself around cost-of-living relief and public supply, and has proposed reversing recent settings to curb rapid rent growth, alongside initiatives like SolarSaver to reduce household energy bills.
  • National and ACT: Generally oppose price controls or rent caps, arguing that capping rents discourages private investment and ultimately shrinks the pool of available housing. Instead, they emphasize market-led solutions. National has maintained the full interest deductibility rules for landlords (which allow investors to deduct mortgage interest from rental income tax), contending this prevents landlords from passing heavy tax costs directly onto tenants through higher rents.

2. Tenancy Protections and Stability

For renters dealing with fluctuating weekly hours, security of tenure and flexibility are critical:

  • Green Party: Advocates strongly for a comprehensive Renters’ Rights Bill. Their policies include ending "no-cause" evictions so that tenants cannot be asked to leave without a legally specified reason, giving renters greater stability when personal income dips. They also look to encourage longer-term tenancy agreements as standard.
  • Labour: Historically favours balanced tenant rights and stricter enforcement of standards through the Tenancy Tribunal, aiming to prevent arbitrary displacement.
  • National and ACT: Generally favour maintaining a balanced framework between landlords and tenants to ensure property owners retain confidence in the market. They argue that overly restrictive tenancy laws can cause risk-averse landlords to exit the market, reducing overall choices for renters.

3. Supply of Rental and Affordable Homes

Long-term affordability ultimately relies on how many homes are built:

  • Labour: Emphasizes public and social housing supply. Their housing platform includes funding thousands of additional social housing places and multi-billion-dollar injections for Kāinga Ora to scale up state builds.
  • National and ACT: Focus heavily on deregulation and planning reform to free up land and speed up construction. National is focused on replacing the Resource Management Act (RMA) to streamline building consents, alongside a turnaround plan for Kāinga Ora. ACT similarly pushes to bypass local council bottlenecks in consenting to stimulate a private building boom.
  • The Greens: Combine large-scale state and public housing builds with strict environmental standards (such as universal design and energy efficiency mandates) for new constructions.
  • New Zealand First: Frames its housing approach heavily around demand-side pressures, emphasizing stricter immigration settings as a "handbrake" on population-driven housing demand, alongside prioritizing social housing availability primarily for citizens.

As you weigh your vote, consider whether you prefer direct market interventions (like rent caps and stronger tenant protections championed by the Greens and Labour) or supply-side deregulation and tax settings designed to encourage private landlord investment (favored by National and ACT).

Would you like to explore how any of these specific party policies interact with other cost-of-living measures, such as income support or tax changes?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would the parties change about rental affordability, tenancy protections and the supply of rental homes?

Navigating fluctuating rostered hours and the rigid, unyielding nature of rent and household bills is a massive pressure, particularly when income drops unexpectedly. For the upcoming general election, New Zealand’s political parties offer distinctly different philosophies on how to handle rental affordability, tenant rights, and housing supply.

A broad overview of where the major and minor parliamentary parties stand reveals starkly contrasting approaches:

1. The Left / Progressive Bloc (Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori)

These parties generally favour a higher level of government intervention in the housing market, stronger legal protections for renters, and dampening investor demand to improve affordability for first-home buyers and tenants.

  • Green Party: Proposes some of the most direct interventions for renters. They advocate for capping annual rent increases (e.g., at 2% a year), ending "no-cause" evictions, and introducing a legally binding, independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness to guarantee housing quality. On supply and tax, they oppose interest deductibility for landlords and favour wealth/land taxes to curb speculative property investment.

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on a broader reset of property taxation, proposing a 28% capital gains tax on residential investment and commercial properties (excluding the family home and farms) starting mid-2027 to level the playing field between homeowners and property speculators. They also historically support boosting public and social housing supply through state entities like Kāinga Ora. [NZ Herald]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on expanding and funding accessible public and whānau housing targets, alongside progressive wealth taxes and prioritizing state support to alleviate severe housing deprivation for Indigenous and low-income families.

2. The Right / Centre-Right Bloc (National, ACT)

These parties generally lean towards a supply-side, market-driven approach. They argue that the best way to lower rent costs and help tenants is to reduce red tape, incentivize private property developers, and restore financial settings for landlords so they supply more rental homes.

  • National Party: Emphasises boosting housing supply through aggressive planning and zoning reforms to free up land and make building easier. They previously restored interest deductibility for residential landlords to encourage private rental stock back into the market, arguing that squeezing landlords restricts supply and ultimately drives rents higher. [Realestate.co.nz]

  • ACT Party: Focuses strongly on property-rights-based planning reforms and reducing local government barriers to housing developments to scale up supply. They generally oppose centralized mandates like rent controls, arguing that artificial caps restrict the construction of new rental properties and worsen shortages over time.

3. Centre / Populist (New Zealand First)

  • New Zealand First: Tends to take a nationalist approach to housing, advocating that social and public housing allocation should prioritise New Zealand citizens "first and foremost". They generally support targeted infrastructure backing while balancing regional development needs. [The D*List]

Comparing Approaches Against Your Situation

When weighing your vote with fluctuating income in mind:

  • If you believe stability comes from direct market controls , parties like the Greens offer direct relief via rent increase caps and tenancy security.

  • If you believe stability comes from lowering broader economic costs via supply and private market incentives , centre-right parties like National and ACT argue that unlocking land and encouraging private landlords is the most sustainable path to keeping rent pressures down.

  • If you want to dive deeper into candidate and party specifics or cross-reference individual pledges, you can explore the independent Policy.nz Housing Guide.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would the parties change about rental affordability, tenancy protections and the supply of rental homes?

AI Overview

Managing variable income from rostered hours makes fixed expenses like rent and bills a significant stress point. For the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties offer distinctly different approaches to rental affordability, tenancy protections, and rental supply.

The primary policy differences among the parties are outlined below:

Policy Comparison Overview

Party Rental Affordability Tenancy Protections Supply of Rental Homes
National Market-driven. Believes tax relief for landlords downwardly pressures rent. Landlord flexibility. Retains no-cause evictions to encourage property owners. Private sector focus. Uses Resource Management Act (RMA) replacements to boost builds.
Labour Tax-focused. Introduces a 28% Capital Gains Tax to cool investor demand. Tenant stability. Pledges to ban no-cause evictions again. Public sector pledge. Commits $2.9 billion to build 6,000+ social homes.
Greens Direct controls. Implements a strict 2% annual rent cap. Strongest tenant rights. Bans no-cause evictions and adds a Rental Warrant of Fitness. State-led building. Promises tens of thousands of new public homes.
ACT Market-driven. Relies on deregulation and freezing the minimum wage. Landlord flexibility. Opposes quotas or regulations that burden property owners. Private-led. Focuses heavily on planning deregulation and property rights.

Rental Affordability

  • National & ACT: Focus on lowering costs for landlords to pass savings to tenants. National fully restored mortgage interest deductibility for landlords and opposes rent controls, arguing they restrict supply and drive up prices long-term.

  • Labour: Aims to deter property speculation. Their core policy introduces a flat 28% Capital Gains Tax on residential investment properties (excluding the family home) starting July 2027 to stabilize house and rental prices.

  • Green Party: Proposes direct intervention with a Renters’ Rights Bill to cap rent increases at 2% per year. They also want to strip away landlord tax incentives to prioritize housing as a necessity over an investment.

Tenancy Protections

  • National & ACT: Maintain the rule allowing landlords to end periodic tenancies with 90 days' notice without giving a reason (no-cause terminations). They argue this gives property owners confidence to rent out properties.

  • Labour: Pledges to reverse no-cause evictions , requiring landlords to provide specific, justifiable reasons to end a tenancy, ensuring greater security for renters facing income instability.

  • Green Party: Aims to scrap no-cause evictions, establish a national register of landlords and property managers , and mandate an independent Rental Warrant of Fitness (WoF) to enforce warm, dry living standards.

Supply of Rental Homes

  • National & ACT: Rely heavily on private sector development. In September 2026, the current government replaced the Resource Management Act with the Natural Environment Bill and the Planning Bill to remove zoning barriers and spark a private housing boom.

  • Labour: Focuses on state-backed supply, promising $2.9 billion for Kāinga Ora to deliver at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years.

  • Green Party: Advocates for large-scale public intervention, pledging to build tens of thousands of new public and community-provided homes to directly reduce the social housing register waitlist.


To help look closer at how these platforms align with your lifestyle, would you like more information on what parties are proposing regarding minimum wage and working hours for rostered employees, or do you want to explore the solar and energy savings schemes some parties are offering for renters?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account