Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

2026 New Zealand election: fuel costs for people who rely on their cars

For someone living in a small town, working locally rather than farming, and driving long distances for healthcare, shopping and other services, fuel is not an optional extra. It is a cost of getting to work and accessing essential services.

The key distinction when comparing parties is whether they would make petrol or diesel cheaper directly, help keep fuel prices competitive, or reduce the need to drive in the first place. These approaches have different benefits for people who cannot realistically switch to public transport.

The clearest direct fuel-cost proposal so far

Fuel prices hit all-time highs as Luxon signals decision on relief soon

Labour — freeze fuel tax and regulate fuel pricing

Direct help for motorists

Labour has announced a three-year freeze on fuel excise tax, estimating that an average family would save $520 a year by 2030. It also proposes weekly fuel-price reporting by the Commerce Commission, action against fuel-company price gouging, and stronger competition for independent petrol stations. Labour's Cost of Living PlanA Fair Go For Drivers

For a household that must drive long distances, these measures are more directly relevant than a public-transport fare discount.

There are two important qualifications:

  • The $520 figure is Labour's estimate for an average family, not a guaranteed saving for every household. Your savings would depend on how much fuel you buy.
  • A fuel-tax freeze would not stop petrol prices rising because of international oil prices, exchange rates or other costs. The price-monitoring proposal is intended to help ensure savings are passed on when fuel costs fall. Labour's Cost of Living PlanA Fair Go For Drivers

How the main parties compare

The following reflects published policies I could verify as of 25 October 2026. It is important to distinguish specific election promises from general party positions.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

1. New Zealand First

Direct fuel-price cut proposed

On 24 October 2026, NZ First announced it would abolish the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) cost applied to fuel. The party estimates this would reduce prices by 12–14 cents per litre, depending on whether you buy petrol or diesel. NZFirst to Remove Climate Tax From Fuel

Why it matters to you: This is a proposed reduction at the pump, rather than a discount that requires you to use public transport. The actual saving would depend on implementation and how much of the reduction reaches retail prices.

South Island Election Conference 2026

2. Labour Party

Tax freeze plus pricing rules

Labour's three-year fuel-tax freeze is intended to prevent additional fuel excise increases. Its separate plans target excessive fuel prices, improve competition between retailers and give independent mechanics a fairer chance to compete. Labour's Cost of Living PlanA Fair Go For Drivers

Why it matters to you: This combines a direct tax measure with action on fuel-market competition. It would not eliminate all fuel-price increases.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

3. National Party

National's published 2026 platform emphasises no new taxes, fiscal restraint, economic growth and lower household costs. I could not verify a specific new election commitment to cut petrol prices or freeze fuel excise in the material reviewed. 2026 Election Policy

Why it matters to you: Compare its broader tax and economic approach with the specific fuel-price reductions offered by other parties. A promise not to introduce new taxes is not the same as cutting existing fuel costs.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

4. Green Party

The Greens' transport approach is generally oriented towards reducing dependence on private cars, expanding public transport and supporting lower-emissions travel. I could not verify a specific 2026 commitment for direct petrol or diesel relief for people in towns without transport alternatives.

Why it matters to you: The key question is whether proposed transport improvements would reach your community, rather than primarily benefit people in larger cities.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

5. ACT New Zealand

ACT's general emphasis on lower taxes, reduced regulation and personal choice is relevant to the cost of motoring. I could not confirm a specific 2026 fuel-price relief commitment comparable to the newly announced NZ First proposal or Labour's fuel-tax freeze.

Why it matters to you: Look for a concrete commitment on fuel excise, ETS charges and road-user charges, rather than relying on general tax-cutting principles alone.

For the Greens and ACT, these are limits of what I could verify in the published material reviewed, not proof that they have no relevant policies. A useful independent comparison is Policy.nz's 2026 election transport and infrastructure guide.

What matters especially for small-town households?

Fuel prices are only one part of your transport burden. I would assess each party against these four questions:

Issue What to look for
Petrol and diesel prices A specific tax reduction, and a realistic estimate of your annual saving
Long-distance healthcare trips More local services, outreach clinics, mobile health services or help with travel costs
Limited local employment Policies that support regional businesses, jobs and reliable connections to larger employment centres
Future transport costs Whether changes to fuel taxes, ETS charges or road-user charges could increase what you pay to drive

One additional issue is road-user charges. The government is working towards replacing petrol tax for light vehicles with electronic road-user charges, although NZTA says a date for moving all light vehicles to the new system has not been set. That makes it worth asking each party how its fuel-tax proposals would interact with future road charges. Replacing fuel tax with road user charges

How much could a fuel-price cut save your household?

For illustration, here is what NZ First's proposed 12–14 cents per litre reduction would mean if it were fully passed on at the pump.

Estimate your annual fuel savings

Adjust the figures to reflect your household's driving.

Litres per fill

40 L

20 L

60 L

100 L

20 L

60 L

100 L

20 L

60 L

100 L

Fills per week

2

1

3

5

1

3

5

1

3

5

Assumed price reduction

12 cents per litre (petrol and diesel lower estimate)

13 cents per litre (illustrative midpoint)

14 cents per litre (diesel estimate)

Estimated annual saving

$541

Assumes the full price reduction is passed on and your driving stays the same. This is an illustration, not a guaranteed saving.

My take for your situation

Based on the specific proposals verified, NZ First and Labour have the clearest direct fuel-cost commitments to compare first:

  • NZ First is proposing a larger immediate reduction at the pump through removing the ETS cost on fuel.
  • Labour is proposing a three-year fuel-tax freeze, alongside stronger fuel-price monitoring and competition measures.
  • For all other parties, I would look for a specific, costed commitment that benefits people who cannot reasonably avoid driving.

Neither direct fuel relief nor cheaper public transport alone solves the problem of having to travel a long way for a doctor or a decent job. Regional healthcare access and local employment should be part of your comparison, too.

You do not have to choose a party based on its farming policies just because you live outside a city. Your circumstances as a worker and a household that relies on a car are distinct and worth assessing on their own merits.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

Living in a small town or regional area where you rely heavily on driving for work, family logistics, and healthcare—while facing high transport costs and limited public transport—is a central issue in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Political parties approach the pressure of fuel costs, regional connectivity, and infrastructure through very different lenses. The primary approaches break down as follows:


1. National and ACT (Centre-Right / Coalition Focus)

  • Roading and Infrastructure Focus: The National-led government's strategy has prioritized targeted transport funding for regional economic corridors and maintaining highway networks, arguing that reliable, well-maintained roads lower the wear-and-tear and operational costs on vehicles.
  • Fuel Excise and User-Pays Reforms: ACT heavily champions shifting the funding model away from traditional petrol excise towards a comprehensive electronic Road User Charges (RUC) system for all vehicle types. They argue that fuel taxes are blunt and outdated, and that a universal RUC system creates a fairer user-pays framework over time.
  • Energy and Fuel Supply: To address broader energy and fuel pricing, the right-of-centre parties lean heavily into increasing domestic energy supply. National has pushed to promote oil and gas exploration to ease energy security pressures, arguing that boosting supply is the fundamental way to tame fuel and power costs, rather than temporary subsidies.

2. Labour and the Greens (Centre-Left / Left Focus)

  • Cost-of-Living and Hardship Support: Parties on the left emphasize that high transport and fuel costs disproportionately punish regional and low-income households who have no access to trains or frequent buses. They generally argue that universal market solutions do not protect vulnerable households facing immediate cost-of-living spikes.
  • Targeted Relief vs. Public Alternatives: While temporary fuel tax cuts have been used in past crises, Labour and the Greens tend to focus structural support on building long-term resilience. This includes funding regional public transport trials, supporting community-led transport schemes (like localized health shuttles or regional connectivity grants), and assisting the transition toward lower-emissions vehicles via incentives.
  • Transition and Climate Goals: The Greens strongly oppose fossil fuel expansion, arguing that relying on cheaper oil is a short-term fix that fails to protect families from volatile global oil shocks. Instead, they advocate for systemic changes—such as ramping up financial support for EV adoption, localized renewable energy generation, and subsidising regional transport alternatives so that rural and small-town residents are less dependent on volatile global fuel markets.

3. NZ First (Populist / Nationalist Focus)

  • Cost of Fuel & Refining: New Zealand First has historically targeted fuel market competition and taxation transparency, expressing strong frustration over market pricing and fuel company margins. They advocate for strict regulatory oversight on fuel companies to prevent price gouging at the pump, particularly in regional areas where lack of local competition often leads to higher prices than in major cities.

What this means for your vote

When weighing your options for the 2026 election, parties generally divide into two distinct philosophies regarding your situation:

  • The Supply & Efficiency Route (National, ACT, NZ First): Focuses on keeping transport networks flowing, reforming how road taxes are collected to be "fairer" per kilometre, and boosting domestic energy/fuel supply to bring baseline costs down.
  • The Transition & Hardship Route (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Focuses on direct cost-of-living assistance, cushioning households against volatile global oil prices, and expanding localized transport grants or EV/hybrid transition support specifically for regional communities who cannot easily swap to public transport.

Are there specific aspects of regional living—such as road maintenance quality, access to health shuttles, or the cost of transitioning your household vehicle—that weigh most heavily on your decision?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

For rural and small-town New Zealanders who rely heavily on private vehicles for commuting, accessing healthcare, and running daily errands due to limited public transport, the cost of fuel is a major household pressure.

As the November 7, 2026 general election approaches, political parties have put forward distinct approaches to address fuel costs and transport expenses. Their proposed policies reflect different strategies for easing this financial burden:

  • New Zealand First has promised to immediately remove the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) carbon price component from petrol and diesel. The party states this would reduce petrol prices by roughly 12 cents per litre and diesel by 14 cents per litre, aiming for immediate relief at the pump for motorists and regional transport-dependent industries.

  • The Labour Party has proposed a three-year freeze on fuel excise taxes to prevent planned tax increases from raising pump prices, estimating savings of around $520 for families by 2030. Labour is also proposing measures targeting fuel companies, including making it illegal to overcharge and requiring consumer refunds if excessive pricing is identified, alongside regional public transport fare caps ( $10 weekly outside major metro centers) for areas where services do exist. [NZ Labour Party]

  • The National Party has centered its transport funding approach on a one-year freeze on fuel excise and road user charge increases for 2026/27, prioritizing the National Land Transport Fund toward maintaining and expanding roading infrastructure. National has criticized competing long-term tax freeze proposals as underfunding necessary road maintenance and emergency weather repairs.

  • The Green Party focuses its economic and transport platform on shifting structural reliance away from imported fossil fuels. Rather than cutting fuel taxes directly, the Greens emphasize sweeping tax system overhauls to cut income taxes for the majority of earners, coupled with major investments in localized rail, regional transport links, and EV/clean transport incentives to reduce long-term exposure to global fuel price spikes.

  • ACT New Zealand generally opposes new climate or fuel levies and emphasizes market-led approaches, focusing infrastructure funding on roads of national significance while opposing additional fuel excise tax increases. [Policy.nz]

Summary for your situation:
If your primary concern is the direct cash price at the pump, parties like NZ First and Labour offer direct interventions through ETS removals or excise freezes. Parties like National focus tightly on road funding stability with short-term relief, while the Greens propose addressing the broader cost-of-living and systemic transition away from car dependency. You can review complete, searchable party comparisons on platforms like Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about fuel costs for people who have few public transport alternatives?

AI Overview

For voters in regional New Zealand who must drive long distances and have limited access to public transport, the major political parties have put forward distinct strategies to address fuel costs and regional driving expenses ahead of the 2026 general election.

The Major Parties: National vs. Labour

The two largest parties have entered a direct battle over the immediate future of the fuel excise tax, both attempting to offer relief at the pump.

Political Party Fuel Tax Position Long-Distance & Regional Impact
National Party Phased increases from 2028. Cancelled a scheduled 12c/litre hike for January 2027, replacing it with a staggered 5c increase every six months between 2028 and 2030. Focuses heavily on roading infrastructure and maintenance. Long-term, they intend to transition all light vehicles to an electronic Road User Charges (RUC) system based on distance travelled rather than fuel bought.
Labour Party A total 3-year fuel tax freeze. Committing to zero fuel tax increases during their entire next term to give families "breathing room" from cost-of-living pressures. Proposing a $10 weekly public transport fare cap for regional areas outside the main cities, though acknowledging this doesn't help those with zero public transport access. Also promising a "right to repair" package to lower vehicle maintenance costs by forcing manufacturers to share technical data with local regional mechanics.

Minor Parties: Alternative Approaches

The minor parties focus on either eliminating specific climate-related fuel costs entirely or heavily subsidizing regional alternatives.

  • New Zealand First: Abolishing the ETS tax on fuel. The party promises to entirely remove the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) component from fuel prices, which they state would immediately lower petrol and diesel costs by 12 to 14 cents per litre at the pump.

  • Green Party: Targeted direct relief and regional buses. While aiming to transition away from fossil fuels long-term, the Greens' platform includes a direct immediate relief payment for low-income and regional communities heavily impacted by fuel costs. They also plan to heavily fund and expand reliable, on-demand regional and rural bus networks to connect small towns to services.

  • ACT Party: User-pays and fuel transparency. ACT supports moving away from fuel taxes in favor of electronic road-user charges and tolling, ensuring that tax money goes strictly toward funding the specific infrastructure drivers use.

Because your voting decision is also tied to your family's broader lifestyle, would you like to explore where these parties stand on expanding regional healthcare access or supporting local job creation outside of farming?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account