Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

I'm sorry you're facing this. Being made redundant after years in the same industry can leave you dealing with two difficult decisions at once: how to keep paying the rent now, and whether your next career move should build on your existing experience or take you in a new direction.

For New Zealand's 2026 general election, I'd suggest examining parties through three practical questions:

  • How quickly could their policies help you get back into paid work? Look at employment services, job-matching support, incentives for employers to hire experienced workers, and policies affecting demand for workers in your industry.
  • Could you afford to retrain? Compare the availability of funded courses, eligibility rules, living-cost support, and the time it would take to qualify for a new role.
  • What happens while you're looking for work? Consider Jobseeker Support, housing assistance, and other measures that could help you meet rent and essential expenses during the transition.

The key distinction is between a policy that promises to create jobs generally and one that gives a recently redundant worker a realistic, affordable route into suitable employment.

What the main parties are proposing

The election is on Saturday 7 November 2026, so party policies announced during the current campaign are particularly relevant. The comparison below focuses on the published proposals I could verify, rather than assuming that campaign promises will necessarily be delivered. elections.nz

1. New Zealand Labour Party: employment through projects, apprenticeships and skills

Labour's 2026 employment platform includes its Start Work Now initiative, which proposes building social housing, upgrading more than 2,000 schools, repairing hospitals and supporting nearly 30,000 apprentices. It also proposes extending Apprenticeship Boost, including a $1,000 toolbox grant and support for additional trades. labour.org.nz

What this could mean for you:

  • If your existing experience transfers to construction, maintenance, infrastructure, project management or related fields, government-backed projects could offer another route into employment.
  • If you need a new qualification or trade, apprenticeship support could be relevant.
  • Labour's small-business policies may also be worth examining if you could work for a smaller employer or start a business.

What to verify: How many of the proposed jobs would be open to experienced workers changing industries, rather than people already training in a particular trade? What are the eligibility rules, locations and expected start dates? And would your existing qualifications count towards an apprenticeship?

Read Labour's published policies at Labour's official policy page.

2. New Zealand National Party: targeted employment support and work expectations

National's published welfare policy proposes more intensive employment assistance for 30,000 work-ready people who have been receiving Jobseeker Support for more than a year. It identifies growth areas including primary industries, construction, infrastructure, tourism and hospitality. The party also proposes stricter benefit conditions for some long-term recipients, including a lower payment rate for certain people from April 2028. national.org.nz

What this could mean for you:

  • If you can use your existing experience in one of the identified growth sectors, employment support and job matching may be more immediately relevant than a lengthy course.
  • If you have been unemployed for less than a year, check which services would be available to you immediately. The specific intensive-support proposal is aimed at long-term Jobseeker recipients.
  • If your job search takes longer than expected, changes to benefit conditions could affect your financial security.

What to verify: Would the employment assistance cover retraining or only job-search activities? Would it provide access to employers, wage subsidies or recognised qualifications? How would any benefit changes affect your household if you remained unemployed?

Read the details at National's official welfare policy page.

3. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand: investment-led job creation and training support

The Green Party's employment proposals include public investment in transport, clean energy, infrastructure, science, innovation and public services. It estimates that its proposed investments would support an additional 64,000 jobs. Its apprenticeship proposals include abolishing the training wage, a $2,000 equipment grant and additional support for employers taking on apprentices. It has also proposed a $380 weekly payment for students in specified training placements. greens.org.nz, greens.org.nz

What this could mean for you:

  • If your skills transfer to infrastructure, engineering, clean energy, science or public services, the proposed investment could be relevant.
  • If retraining is necessary, the apprenticeship measures could help with equipment costs and pay.
  • If you need to undertake a qualifying training placement, the proposed student payment may be worth investigating.

What to verify: How many of the projected jobs would be accessible to people with your background? How quickly would investment translate into vacancies? Would you qualify for the training support, and would it cover enough of your living costs to make studying feasible?

The party's own employment estimates are projections, not guaranteed job outcomes. Check the proposals at The Green Party's official employment policy page.

How to compare the proposals fairly

What matters to you Labour National Greens
Getting into work relatively quickly Examine the timing and recruitment for proposed building and repair projects. Examine access to employment services and jobs in identified growth sectors. Examine whether proposed investment will generate suitable vacancies soon enough.
Retraining Examine apprenticeship support and eligible trades. Establish what training support accompanies employment services. Examine apprenticeship grants, training wages and eligibility for student support.
Paying rent during the transition Check the financial assistance available alongside employment initiatives. Examine benefit eligibility and the implications of proposed changes for longer-term recipients. Check how its income-support and training proposals would apply to your circumstances.
Evidence of delivery Check funding, project schedules and recruitment commitments. Check programme funding, eligibility and implementation dates. Check funding, implementation plans and the assumptions behind projected job numbers.

This comparison is based on the parties' published proposals; it does not establish that any one party would deliver better employment outcomes for you. Each party's proposals also need to be considered alongside its wider economic policies, which can affect employers' willingness to recruit.

What you should check before trusting any party's plan

A party's headline promise is only the starting point. I'd test each proposal against these six questions.

1. Are the jobs real, additional and accessible?

Look for the number of jobs expected, the industries involved, when vacancies might appear, and whether the jobs are permanent or temporary.

For example, a plan to build infrastructure might create jobs for project managers, administrators, tradespeople and engineers, but that doesn't mean every redundant worker can move directly into one of those roles.

Ask whether employers will receive funding to hire people like you, or whether the party is relying on general economic growth to produce more vacancies.

2. Is retraining actually affordable?

Check whether a proposal pays for:

  • Tuition and course fees.
  • Equipment, licences and other training expenses.
  • Living costs while you're studying.
  • Travel or relocation if suitable work is elsewhere in New Zealand.

Also check whether you're eligible based on your age, previous qualifications, employment history and the type of course.

Be particularly careful about confusing free tuition with affordable retraining. A course can have no tuition fees and still be financially impossible if you cannot pay your rent while attending it.

3. What support is available immediately?

This is particularly important because you're already dealing with redundancy and rent.

Don't rely on a future election promise when you might be eligible for assistance now.

New Zealand's existing support includes:

Eligibility conditions apply, but investigating these options could help protect your finances while you decide what to do. workandincome.govt.nz, workandincome.govt.nz, workandincome.govt.nz, workandincome.govt.nz

4. Does the party explain how it will pay for its promises?

Check whether each policy has:

  • A published budget or cost estimate.
  • A funding source.
  • A timetable for implementation.
  • Measurable targets.
  • An explanation of what happens if the expected results aren't achieved.

For example, the Greens' projected job creation figures are estimates of the effects of proposed investment. You should investigate the assumptions behind those estimates rather than treating the numbers as guaranteed vacancies. greens.org.nz

5. What is the party's record?

Look beyond campaign material.

Ask:

  • What did the party promise at the previous election?
  • Which commitments did it implement?
  • Did the programmes reach the people they were intended to help?
  • What happened to employment and training opportunities during its time in government?
  • If it has been in opposition, what alternative policies has it developed and supported?

Distinguish a party's own account of its record from independent assessments and official statistics.

6. What would happen if you were still unemployed in six months?

This is an important stress test.

Consider whether the party's policies would still support you if finding a suitable job took longer than expected. Look at benefit settings, housing assistance, access to retraining and support for older or experienced workers who need to change careers.

For someone paying rent, the ability to withstand a prolonged job search can matter just as much as the possibility of finding work quickly.

How should you decide between retraining and staying in your industry?

Your voting decision and your immediate career decision are related, but they aren't the same thing. You don't need to wait for the election to investigate your options.

I'd compare three possible paths:

Path What to investigate Main risk
Stay in your industry Whether employers are hiring, which skills remain in demand and whether your experience transfers to other roles Your industry may be contracting for the long term.
Retrain for a related occupation Whether a short course or additional qualification would make you employable in a growing field You could spend money and time without improving your job prospects enough.
Change industries completely Whether another industry offers sustainable demand, reasonable pay and accessible entry routes You may need to start at a lower salary or spend longer training.

Before committing to a costly qualification, look for actual vacancies, speak to prospective employers and check whether the qualification is genuinely required.

You may find that a short course, a recognised industry certificate or a change in the way you present your existing experience is sufficient. Alternatively, you may discover that a more substantial career change is justified.

Where to compare the parties' claims

These resources can help you check published policies and independent summaries:

My suggested next step

Rather than deciding which party has the best overall employment plan, identify which policies address your particular barriers to getting back into work.

To make that comparison more useful, I'd like to understand three things:

  1. What industry have you worked in, and what kind of role did you have? For example, manufacturing, IT, finance, retail, construction, administration or management.
  2. Roughly what age bracket are you in? For example, under 35, 35–49, 50–59 or 60+. This matters because some training and financial support has age-related eligibility rules.
  3. What is your biggest immediate concern? Is it finding another job quickly, keeping up with rent while unemployed, or finding a realistic and affordable route into a new career?

With those details, I can compare the parties' documented policies against the practical issues you're facing, including which proposals might apply to you, what their limitations are, and what evidence you should look for before deciding how much weight to give them when voting.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

Navigating redundancy after a long tenure in a single industry is a stressful experience, particularly with ongoing living costs like rent to manage.

When evaluating the political parties ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, different political blocs approach your dilemma—choosing between rapid re-employment in a similar field versus retraining for a new career path—through distinct economic and social lenses.


How the Political Landscape Approaches Your Situation

  • Centre-Right/Conservative Parties (e.g., National, ACT):
    • Focus: Streamlined paths back into any available work, economic growth driven by the private sector, and tax relief.
    • The Plan for You: Their emphasis tends to be on fast-tracking re-employment through active labour market policies, supporting businesses to encourage hiring, and maintaining flexible employment frameworks (such as 90-day trials or streamlined health and safety/employment regulations to lower barriers for employers taking on staff).
    • Retraining View: Generally favours targeted, industry-aligned short courses or on-the-job training rather than broad-based tertiary subsidies, emphasizing immediate independence from welfare support.
  • Centre-Left/Left Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori):
    • Focus: Worker protections, robust income support, and structured industry transformation or targeted workforce planning.
    • The Plan for You: Their approach places heavier emphasis on strengthening safety nets (such as Jobseeker Support and Accommodation Supplements to help cover rent), rebuilding worker representation, and funding public or sector-specific retraining schemes (such as green jobs, regional workforce plans, or targeted industry training funds) to help displaced workers transition into growing sectors.

What to Check Before Trusting Their Judgements

Because every party claims their economic roadmap is best for workers, you should cut through the rhetoric by checking the following practical criteria:

  1. Immediate Cashflow vs. Long-Term Payoff:
    • Check: Does the party's plan provide immediate income security (like enhancements to the Accommodation Supplement or benefit structures) to ensure your rent is paid next week, or does it rely entirely on long-term macro-growth that could take years to trickle down to an individual job seeker?
  2. The Reality of Retraining Support:
    • Check: If you choose to retrain, does the party offer financial stipends, fee-free targeted modules, or allowances that allow you to survive while studying, or are you expected to take on student loans or live without an income while retraining?
  3. Industry Demand and Realistic Transitions:
    • Check: Look past broad slogans about "creating jobs." Examine whether a party has concrete data or partnerships with industries currently experiencing labor shortages or structural growth in New Zealand, or if their retraining schemes match actual regional employer demands.
  4. Existing Government Assistance vs. Political Promises:
    • Remember that regardless of who is campaigning, Work and Income (MSD) currently offers immediate redundancy support, job-matching services, Transition to Work Grants (for clothes, travel, or living expenses until your first pay), and emergency income support (like the Accommodation Supplement or Temporary Additional Support). Check how each party intends to alter, fund, or scale these baseline services.

Summary Strategy

If your priority is fast re-entry into the workforce with minimal friction, centre-right policies emphasizing business growth and flexible hiring may appeal to you. If your priority is stronger income safety nets and government-backed retraining subsidies while you pivot industries, centre-left policies will likely align better with your needs.

To help narrow this down: Are you leaning more toward trying to find a similar role immediately to stabilize your rent, or do you feel strongly about completely retraining for a new industry?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

First, I am really sorry to hear about your redundancy. Finding yourself out of work after years in the same industry—especially with rent and everyday costs looming—is a stressful and daunting place to be.

Choosing a political party’s plan as "most convincing" depends heavily on whether you lean toward retraining for a brand-new career or fast-tracking back into your current or a similar sector. Because different political parties approach economic recovery, job creation, and income support through distinct lenses, evaluating their proposals requires looking closely at how they balance immediate survival with long-term security.


How the Major Approaches Differ

  • The Centre-Right / Governing Parties (e.g., National and ACT):

  • The Strategy: Focus heavily on broad economic conditions, business confidence, and removing regulatory or compliance hurdles to stimulate private-sector hiring. Their approach to employment and training often relies on targeted industry-led training, apprenticeship support, and keeping the cost of doing business down to encourage companies to take on staff.

  • For your position: The emphasis is typically on getting you back into the workforce as fast as possible through market demand, rather than expanding broad-scale state-funded retraining.

  • The Centre-Left / Opposition Parties (e.g., Labour, Greens, and Te Pāti Māori):

  • The Strategy: Tend to focus on direct government intervention, stronger income safety nets (like redundancy support or welfare adjustments), and heavily subsidized or free public tertiary/vocational retraining schemes.

  • For your position: The emphasis leans toward cushioning the transition period and giving you government-backed pathways to learn new skills if your old industry is shrinking.

(Note: You can explore and compare individual party manifestos side-by-side using the neutralPolicy.nz voter tool.)


What to Check Before Trusting Their Plans

To decide which plan is genuinely viable for your specific situation (paying rent today vs. investing in tomorrow), cross-examine their policies with these four practical tests :

  1. Immediate Cash Flow vs. Long-Term Promise: Does their policy provide immediate income support or a buffer for your rent while you look for work or study, or does the help only kick in months down the track? Check what immediate financial assistance (like Jobseeker Support, Accommodation Supplement, or specific redundancy assistance) they are proposing or protecting.
  2. Realism of Retraining: If a party promises free or subsidized retraining, check whether it connects to industries facing actual labour shortages in New Zealand. Will that qualification guarantee a job at the end of it, or will you finish studying just to face another competitive job market?
  3. Implementation Timeline: How quickly can their proposed job-creation or training schemes be stood up? A macro-economic policy that "grows jobs over the next five years" does not help you pay next week's rent. Look for targeted, immediate employment placement or regional support initiatives.
  4. Funding and Fiscal Credibility: Check if their promises are backed by realistic funding. Unfunded tax cuts or spending commitments can lead to inflation or cuts elsewhere in public services, which can destabilize the very job market you are trying to re-enter.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

  • Whether you are leaning more toward retraining or finding a job right now
  • What your previous industry was

I can help outline which specific policy areas or support mechanisms from the 2026 platforms align with your priority.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I've recently been made redundant after years in the same industry. I have rent to pay, and I'm unsure whether to retrain or keep looking for similar work. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party has the most convincing plan for someone in my position to get back into work, and what should I check before trusting that judgement?

AI Overview

For someone who has recently been made redundant and faces immediate rental costs while deciding between retraining or job hunting, the "most convincing" political plan depends entirely on whether you value immediate, state-backed training and safety nets or employer-driven job creation.

In the lead-up to the Saturday, 7 November 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties are presenting fundamentally divergent pathways back into employment. Because your rent is a critical, immediate pressure point, you can evaluate the major party platforms based on how they address your twin dilemmas:


The Political Portfolios: Two Distinct Approaches

Feature The Left-Bloc Approach (Labour / Greens) The Right-Bloc Approach (National / ACT)
Core Philosophy State-funded training, employee protections, and direct safety nets. Pro-business growth, deregulation, and flexible hiring practices.
Retraining Support Focuses on direct support like Labour's Apprenticeship Boost or the Greens' plan to abolish the lower training wage. Focuses on boosting business confidence so companies have the capital to train you themselves.
Job Market Focus Aims to build public sector and domestic industry jobs via initiatives like the NZ Future Fund. Aims to increase private sector hiring by reducing compliance costs and accelerating dispute resolution.
Welfare & Safety Net Historically advocates for fewer benefit stand-down barriers and higher baseline support. Emphasizes stricter enforcement and tight medical certification for job-seeker benefits.

1. The Case for Retraining & Direct Support (Labour / Green Party)

If you decide to retrain , the center-left policies offer more targeted mechanisms:

  • Labour: Their platform highlights the Apprenticeship Boost and a "Good Jobs Plan" designed to cushion the transition into new industries. They have also proposed a dedicated AI Action Plan to help workers manage industry displacement.

  • Greens: If you are looking at entry-level training, the Green Party's Manifesto pushes to abolish the training wage, meaning you would be legally entitled to the full adult minimum wage while learning a new trade on the job.

2. The Case for Quick Re-Entry to the Workforce (National / ACT)

If you decide to keep looking for similar work within the private sector, the center-right focus relies on a business-led recovery:

  • National: Their Our Plan emphasizes economic growth by cutting red tape and making it easier for small businesses to take on staff or apprentices. The theory is that a booming private sector creates a fast, organic job market for experienced workers.

  • ACT: Campaigns on freezing the minimum wage and introducing highly flexible employment laws, such as a "golden handshake" rule to lower the risk for employers looking to hire.


What to Check Before Trusting the Judgement

Political promises during an election campaign are often idealized. To determine which party's plan genuinely protects you while you pay rent, check the following realities before casting your vote:

  • The Stand-Down Period Reality: Under current Work and Income (WINZ) rules, redundancy payouts can result in a benefit stand-down period. Look closely at whether any party plans to reform the immediate welfare safety net or accommodation supplements to help renters who find themselves suddenly empty-handed.

  • Coalition Compromises: New Zealand's MMP system means no party governs alone. Polls show a incredibly tight race. If Labour relies on the Greens, expect higher taxes on investment properties to fund training. If National relies on ACT, expect a more employer-friendly environment with fewer employee protections. Check how your preferred party's "bottom lines" affect employment.

  • Industry Longevity vs. AI Disruption: You mentioned being in the same industry for years. Check if the industry you left is facing permanent structural decline or automation. If it is, a pro-business policy aimed at saving old jobs may not help you as much as a proactive retraining subsidy. You can utilize the Policy.nz Income and Employment Guide to filter specific promises side-by-side.


To help narrow down the best move for your specific situation, you could share:

  • What industry were you in, and are your skills easily transferable to other sectors?

  • Do you have an emergency financial buffer , or do you need immediate income to cover rent next month?

  • Are you leaning toward a specific new trade or career path if you do choose to retrain?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account