Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

New Zealand election 2026: Grocery prices and household bills

The central debate in the 2026 New Zealand general election is how to make everyday essentials more affordable: should the government create more competition between supermarkets, crack down on companies charging excessive prices, or take a more direct role in providing affordable food and energy?

The main parties broadly agree that grocery competition needs attention, but they differ sharply on how far government intervention should go. On household bills, the debate also covers electricity, petrol, transport, rates and the cost of accessing healthcare. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorLabour's 2026 Election Policies2026 Election PolicyElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

1. Grocery prices: the main differences

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National — increase competition between supermarket chains

National proposes separating Foodstuffs' PAK’nSAVE and New World/Four Square businesses so they compete more directly on prices, specials and product range. The proposal is subject to an independent Commerce Commission assessment.

Approach: change the market structure to encourage stronger competition, rather than directly regulating grocery prices. National's policy page also emphasises fiscal restraint and no new taxes. 2026 Election PolicyGrocery

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour — stronger price-gouging rules and fairer wholesale access

Labour proposes making excessive pricing of essentials illegal, including groceries, fuel and electricity. It wants the Commerce Commission to investigate suspected overcharging and require companies to repay customers where appropriate. It would also make large supermarkets open up wholesale supply on fairer terms, helping independent grocers compete.

Approach: stronger consumer protections and competition rules aimed directly at the market power of large companies. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Cost of Living Plan

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party — public ownership and food security

The Greens propose nationalising at least 120 Woolworths and Foodstuffs stores and creating a publicly owned KiwiMart supermarket chain. They also propose a national food strategy, more support for food banks and community food initiatives, and greater food sovereignty.

Approach: use public ownership and community-led food systems to put affordability and food security ahead of maximising private profits. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT — make it easier for new supermarkets to enter

ACT favours reducing red tape and speeding up the approvals needed to establish new supermarkets. It opposes government-forced supermarket break-ups, arguing that new entrants and greater competition are preferable to direct intervention.

Approach: remove barriers to business and let competing retailers put pressure on prices. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

NZ First — break up the supermarket duopoly and strengthen enforcement

NZ First proposes breaking up the supermarket duopoly, tougher penalties for competition breaches and faster, stronger Commerce Commission enforcement. It also emphasises fairer treatment for New Zealand food producers and suppliers.

Approach: more aggressive action against supermarket market power, backed by stronger enforcement. NZ First Campaign Policy Announcement: NZ First Will Break Up the Supermarket Duopoly, Bring Food Prices Down for KiwisElection 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Te Pāti Māori — Māori-owned food alternatives and direct assistance

Its proposed Kai Sovereignty package includes support for Māori-owned supermarket chains and a food tax credit for people earning $60,000 or less, intended to help eligible households afford food.

Approach: build alternative food supply networks and give targeted help directly to households struggling with food costs. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

2. Household bills beyond the supermarket

The biggest differences become clearer when you look at electricity, transport and other regular expenses.

Party Main approach to household costs
National Increase electricity supply and competition, support household energy upgrades through its Home Energy Fund, and maintain its commitment to no new taxes. 2026 Election PolicyPower Prices for 2026
Labour Freeze fuel excise tax for three years; cap weekly public transport fares at $20 in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch and $10 elsewhere; provide government-backed solar loans and targeted assistance; ban excessive pricing of essentials. Labour's Cost of Living Plan
Greens Establish publicly owned electricity generator Kiwipower, offer zero-interest loans for solar and batteries, expand home insulation and warmer-homes support, and invest in community-owned renewable energy. Green Party launches plan to cut power bills and take power back from the big energy companies
ACT Emphasise private investment, competition and removing regulatory barriers to new energy supply, rather than expanding government ownership or price controls. Power Prices for 2026Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

For Labour, the wider cost-of-living package is particularly explicit: it also includes free prescriptions, three free GP visits annually under its proposed Medicard, and measures to reduce hidden fees and subscription traps. These are election promises, not savings that households can assume will automatically occur. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

3. What do the proposals mean for an ordinary household?

4. The key question to ask before voting

The critical distinction is between a policy that changes the rules of the market and one that directly reduces a household's costs.

A supermarket split might increase competition, but it does not guarantee an immediate reduction in your weekly grocery bill. Stronger price-gouging laws depend on how excessive pricing is defined and enforced. Solar subsidies can reduce power bills, but the benefit depends on eligibility, the upfront investment and the household's circumstances.

For a useful comparison, look at three things for each party:

  1. How much could your household realistically save? Check the proposed amount, who qualifies and when it would start.
  2. How would the policy be funded? Consider whether it involves taxes, borrowing, spending cuts or private investment.
  3. What happens if the policy does not deliver? Look for measurable targets, independent oversight and accountability.

My overall reading is that the election offers three broad directions: market-led competition (National and ACT), stronger regulation and consumer protections (Labour and NZ First), and a greater role for public ownership and community provision (the Greens and, for food sovereignty, Te Pāti Māori). These approaches overlap in places, but they reflect different ideas about how government should tackle the cost of living.

For current policy details, the most useful independent starting points are Consumer NZ's supermarket policy comparison and Retail NZ's grocery election policy tracker. Election promises are proposals, so their eventual impact on prices will depend on implementation and market responses.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

Heading into the 2026 New Zealand general election, the cost of living, grocery prices, and household bills are central voter concerns. With households facing persistent cost-of-living pressures—including spikes in food, energy, and transport costs—political parties have proposed distinct approaches to tackle grocery prices and wider household expenses.


1. Grocery Prices and Market Competition

High grocery prices, heavily driven by the supermarket duopoly of Woolworths New Zealand and Foodstuffs, have prompted targeted regulatory and structural proposals:

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on structural market reform to increase competition. National has proposed pursuing a structural separation or corporate breakup of the Foodstuffs cooperative (which operates New World and PAK'nSAVE) so that its major brands compete more aggressively against one another on pricing, specials, and product ranges.
  • Labour Party: Proposes breaking open the grocery market by forcing the legal separation of the wholesale and retail arms of the major supermarket giants (both Woolworths and Foodstuffs). Labour's policy aims to end unfair supplier contracts and crack down on anti-competitive wholesale practices to drive down retail food costs.
  • NZ First & Te Pāti Māori: Have historically advocated for or floated tax-based relief measures on essentials, such as removing Goods and Services Tax (GST) from basic food items or all food to give immediate relief at the checkout.

2. Household Bills (Energy and Utilities)

Household utility bills—particularly electricity and fuel, which have seen sharp increases—have drawn contrasting solutions:

  • National Party: Emphasizes its multi-point energy plan designed to tackle the structural drivers of high power bills and secure a more stable energy future. This includes a Home Energy Fund targeted at helping households, farms, and small businesses electrify and become more energy-independent to lower long-term power costs.
  • Labour & The Green Party: Generally favor a mix of direct market intervention, expanded public investments, and cost-of-living buffers. The Greens and Labour have championed broader public transport subsidies and structural investments to offset everyday expenses (such as the Greens' proposals for free public transport during fuel crises).
  • ACT Party: Opposes government subsidies or price controls, arguing instead that the most effective way to lower household bills is through sweeping fiscal discipline, cutting government spending, and lowering income taxes to increase net household take-home pay.

3. Broader Cost of Living and Tax Strategies

Beyond specific grocery and utility interventions, parties differ on how to increase overall household disposable income:

  • National: Emphasizes fiscal management, maintaining a commitment to "no new taxes," controlling government debt, and supporting workers through mechanisms like enhanced KiwiSaver policies.
  • ACT: Advocates for smaller government, reduced public spending, and a simplified two-rate income tax system (with a top rate of 28%) to tackle what it frames as a productivity-driven cost-of-living crisis.
  • The Greens & Te Pāti Māori: Propose progressive wealth taxes and tax-free thresholds (e.g., Te Pāti Māori’s proposed $30,000 tax-free threshold) funded by wealth taxes on high-net-worth individuals, which would be redirected toward free or subsidized public services like healthcare, dental, and public transport.

Are you interested in how a specific party's policies compare on taxation, housing, or healthcare for this election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

In the context of the political landscape and policy announcements surrounding the New Zealand general election cycle, political parties have put forward distinct approaches to address household bills and grocery sector pricing driven by concerns over market concentration and the cost of living.

According to party policy releases and consumer affairs reporting (such as via Consumer NZ), the main competing approaches include:

  • Green Party Approach: The Greens focus heavily on structural market intervention and direct public competition in the retail food sector. Their flagship "Affordable Kai" policy proposes a $6 billion over four years investment to establish a publicly owned supermarket chain named "KiwiMart". This approach aims to force dominant supermarket operators (the existing duopoly of Foodstuffs and Woolworths) to divest a substantial number of stores and distribution centres to break up market power. They have also advanced legislative proposals targeting excessive pricing models within the supermarket sector.
  • Labour Party Approach: Labour proposes a broader regulatory and legal framework to crack down on market power across essential sectors (including food, fuel, power, banking, and insurance). As outlined in their policy platform, Labour plans to make it illegal for dominant companies with substantial market power to charge "excessive" prices for essential goods or pay "unfairly low" prices to suppliers. Under their proposed "Fair Go/Fairer Grocery Prices" rules, the Commerce Commission and consumer groups would be empowered to investigate dominant firms, take them to court, force the return of excess profits, and apply penalties for price gouging. [Consumer NZ]
  • National Party and Other Parties: Other parliamentary parties generally frame household bills and high living costs around broader economic management, regulatory streamlining, or fiscal settings rather than direct state-backed retail creation or heavy anti-gouging market litigation, emphasizing instead economic growth and competitiveness.
Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account