Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

New Zealand 2026 election: support for family carers

If you work part-time while caring for an older family member every day, the key election issue is not just how much funding goes into healthcare. It is whether the health system, home-support services and financial assistance work together — so you are not left coordinating everything yourself.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I would examine party policies across five practical areas:

  • One coordinated care plan: Can a GP, hospital, needs assessor and home-support provider work from the same plan?
  • Reliable help at home: Are there commitments to more home-care hours, respite care and backup when a support worker cancels?
  • Support for unpaid carers: Is there financial assistance, paid leave, flexible employment or training for people who care for relatives?
  • A smoother hospital-to-home transition: Who arranges equipment, medication, rehabilitation and home help after a hospital stay?
  • A single point of contact: Can you reach someone who can coordinate services and resolve problems without repeatedly explaining your family member's situation?

These are distinct policy questions. A party might promise more healthcare funding without specifying how it will improve day-to-day coordination for families.

What the parties are proposing

The following is a comparison of publicly available 2026 election policies and recent party statements as of 26 October 2026. A crucial distinction is whether a party has made a specific commitment for family carers, or has announced a broader health policy that might help indirectly.

National sources: Grey Power's September 2026 party questionnaire and the parties' published policy material. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Affordable healthcare and support-worker pay

Labour's announced policies include three free GP visits a year through a proposed Medicard, free prescriptions from July 2027, and restoring pay equity legislation with an immediate pay rise for care and support workers. It also proposes measures to improve GP access and increase the primary-care workforce. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

What this could mean for your family: Lower GP and prescription costs, and potentially a stronger home-support workforce.

What to check: Whether Labour will fund more respite, guarantee reliable home-care hours, and introduce a named coordinator for older people receiving care at home. The headline health proposals do not themselves guarantee those things.

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Treatment access, medicines and health-system capacity

National emphasises improving frontline capacity, meeting health targets, increasing access to treatment, and funding more medicines and earlier care. Its published policies also include additional support for seniors and seniors' housing. 2026 Election PolicyElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

What this could mean for your family: Better access to treatment and healthcare capacity could help the person you care for.

What to check: The specific commitments for home and community care, respite when you need a break, and coordination between hospital teams and home-support providers. The published headline priorities do not establish a new guaranteed family-carer coordination service.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Accessible community healthcare and ageing with dignity

The Greens propose expanding publicly funded primary and dental care, improving healthcare workforce conditions, and strengthening community-based and preventive services. They have also called for long-term investment in aged care, including home care, so older people can live with dignity and autonomy. Manifesto 2026Long-term investment in aged care can't wait - delaying it will only increase the costElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

What this could mean for your family: More emphasis on community services, the ability to remain at home, and adequate staffing in aged care.

What to check: The funded number of home-support and respite hours, how services would be coordinated, and whether there would be explicit financial or employment support for unpaid family carers.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Aged-care reform and coordination

New Zealand First has identified aged-care reform as a priority and supports better coordination between primary, community and aged care. Its stated approach also emphasises practical support for older people who need care, based on need and dignity. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersElection Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand

What this could mean for your family: Greater attention to the hand-offs between GPs, community providers and aged-care services.

What to check: Whether this translates into a named care coordinator, dependable home visits, emergency cover and more flexible respite for unpaid carers.

Registration of party logo for The Opportunities Party (TOP)  | Elections

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Long-term planning and community-based care

TOP proposes a 10-year, cross-party Health Plan, with more investment in primary and preventive healthcare and stronger community-based services. Its stated approach includes helping older people age at home and recognising the economic disadvantages that can arise from interrupted careers and part-time work due to caring. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersElection Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand

What this could mean for your family: A stronger focus on continuity of care over time and the financial effects of caring responsibilities.

What to check: Whether the plan includes enforceable service standards, paid leave or income assistance for carers, and a clearly funded respite entitlement.

ACT and Te Pāti Māori: I could not verify a sufficiently detailed, directly comparable 2026 commitment from the material reviewed on a coordinated aged-care service for unpaid family carers. That is not evidence that either party has no relevant policy. ACT was invited to respond to Grey Power's older-persons questionnaire but did not complete it; Te Pāti Māori did not respond. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersACT New Zealand

The policy gap to watch: who coordinates the care?

There is an important national policy development beyond individual party manifestos. In August 2026, the Government's Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group recommended a substantial redesign of New Zealand's aged-care system. Its September update describes the current system as fragmented and difficult to access. The recommendations include a more integrated care pathway, advanced in-home care, training and restorative support for carers, and better access to urgent clinical advice. These are recommendations, not yet guaranteed services or an adopted package of reforms. Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group: Frequently asked questions September 2026

That gives you a concrete benchmark against which to assess each party.

What to look for The practical question to ask
A named care coordinator Who takes responsibility for joining up the GP, specialist, home-care provider and hospital?
Guaranteed home support Will approved visits actually happen, with a backup when staff are unavailable?
Respite and emergency cover Can you get temporary replacement care if you become ill or need time off?
Financial security for carers Is there direct financial support, paid leave or protection for people reducing their working hours?
Support after hospital discharge Will equipment, medication, transport and home help be arranged before the person returns home?
Accountability Will the party publish measurable targets for waiting times, missed visits and access to respite?

Where to compare the full policies

These resources let you check the parties' own wording rather than relying only on summaries.

One final consideration for your situation

Because you work part-time and provide care every day, I would pay particular attention to the difference between support for the person receiving care and support for you as the carer. More GP appointments or better hospital access may help your family member, but they do not necessarily give you a break, protect your income or save you time coordinating services.

A useful question to put to every party is:

“If I am working part-time and caring for an older relative at home every day, what specific, funded support will your government provide so that I can keep working, take a break when necessary, and know that my relative's care will continue reliably?”

Ask for the eligibility rules, the amount of support, when it would begin, and who would be accountable for delivering it. Those details will tell you much more about the likely effect on your daily life than a general promise to improve healthcare.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

Balancing part-time work with daily, unpaid caregiving is demanding, and navigating the health and support system for an older family member involves multiple overlapping sectors (primary care, aged care, and disability support). Different political parties approach the coordination of care, health access, and support for home-based carers through distinct frameworks:

1. Primary Healthcare Access & Cost Reductions

Because carers frequently manage medical appointments, prescriptions, and health monitoring for family members, policies lowering the direct barriers to primary care are a central point of debate:

  • Labour: Proposes targeted primary care reductions, including three free general practitioner (GP) visits a year for everyone via a "Medicard," alongside removing the $5 prescription fee. They also propose a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to support practices in retaining local workforce capacity.
  • The Greens: Propose a broader expansion of free healthcare, advocating for unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded through a wealth tax, alongside community care clinics prioritized in highest-need areas.
  • National / Coalition Government: Focuses its health strategy on capacity building, reducing waitlists through targeted funding, and maintaining fiscal restraint, alongside implementing recent framework updates such as the government's cross-sector carer action plans.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for free primary care and dental for lower-income whānau and a structural shift toward Māori-led and whānau-centred community health services.

2. Support Systems for Unpaid Carers and Home Care

Support for informal and family carers centers on respite availability, financial sustainability, and the structure of funded family care:

  • National / Current Framework: Emphasizes administrative stability, nationally consistent assessments, and maintaining flexible funding mechanisms within support services, coupled with recently introduced government roadmaps recognizing unpaid carers.
  • Labour & The Greens: Approach support through a rights-based framework aligned with Enabling Good Lives principles. Labour has pledged to repeal recent government disability support legislation to rebuild arrangements in closer partnership with affected communities, while the Greens advocate for significantly increased income support, removal of punitive benefit or partner-means testing barriers, and expanded individualised funding.
  • ACT: Emphasizes direct, individualised funding models (cash-like allocations to individuals rather than provider-heavy management) to reduce administrative bureaucracy for families navigating care.

Evaluating Your Options

When considering your vote, you may want to look closely at how each party intends to address:

  • Respite and Relief: Whether policies guarantee reliable, flexible relief hours so you can maintain part-time employment without risking burnout.
  • Navigational Simplicity: How easily health and support services communicate with one another to reduce the administrative burden placed on family coordinators.
  • Financial Recognition: Whether parties propose direct financial security or wage-equity adjustments for family members acting as primary support providers.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

Navigating part-time work alongside daily, unpaid caregiving is a demanding balancing act, and finding reliable support systems is a central issue for many households. For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties approach healthcare coordination, aged care, and family/carer support with distinct emphases.

You can compare specific candidate and party platforms directly on platforms like Policy.nz. General stances and proposals from major and responding parties regarding healthcare affordability, community aging, and care support include the following:

  • New Zealand Labour Party: Labour’s 2026 health platform focuses heavily on easing overall healthcare costs and boosting workforce support. Key proposals include introducing a "Medicard" system providing three free GP or nurse visits per year for all New Zealanders, removing the $5 prescription fee, and implementing a care worker pay equity rise (proposing a $4/hour increase for care workers) intended to stabilize the strained home and residential care workforce.

  • Green Party & The Opportunity Party (TOP): Both parties place a distinct programmatic emphasis on "aging in place". Their approaches prioritize expanding community-based health services, strengthening localized primary care infrastructure, and directly increasing support mechanisms and resources for family and informal carers. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand First: NZ First has identified aged-care reform as a primary platform focus, emphasizing structural improvements to how elder care and regional health services are delivered and coordinated. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand National Party & ACT: While not participating in specific sector-wide surveys, National's broader 2026 campaign priorities center on broader economic growth, managing the cost of living, and improving frontline healthcare delivery metrics rather than standalone structural overhauls specifically dedicated to informal carer coordination.

Where to look next:
To dig deeper into how each party plans to resource home-based support and workforce retention, you can review the detailed responses gathered by the Aged Care Association or review broad voter comparison tools on Policy.nz. Advance voting for the 2026 general election is open, with election day concluding on Saturday, 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about coordinating healthcare and support for families caring for someone at home?

AI Overview

Navigating part-time work alongside daily caregiving is a major balancing act, and finding reliable, coordinated support can be incredibly stressful. For the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties are addressing home-based care and family support through two main lenses: building workforce reliability (so you can get consistent help) and direct support for family carers (like respite and financial assistance).

Advocacy groups like Carers NZ note that specific campaign policy targeting unpaid family care has been relatively quiet from party leaders this election cycle. However, a bipartisan commitment remains to the overarching Carers' Strategy , which was updated in September 2026 by the National-led coalition government with a rolling Action Plan.

Here is how the major parties propose to handle healthcare coordination and home support:

National Party & the Coalition Government

The current government's approach centers on continuity, structural targets, and boosting frontline capacity rather than overhaul.

  • The Carers' Strategy: Launched an updated national strategy and rolling Action Plan to keep carer support on the multi-year agendas of public ministries.

  • Frontline Staffing: Emphasizing workforce expansion (such as the new medical school in Waikato) to stabilize the healthcare pipeline.

  • Aged Care Capacity: Budget 2026 provisions aim to fund additional aged-care bed capacity to relieve broader health system bottlenecks.

  • Coordination Philosophy: Prefers an integrated national health system model under Health NZ following the abolition of Te Aka Whai Ora, aiming to measure success by practical healthcare delivery outcomes.

Labour Party

Labour’s proposals focus heavily on workforce pay injections to solve reliability issues, alongside making foundational primary healthcare cheaper for families.

  • Care Worker Pay Rise: Promising an immediate $2.5 billion funding injection over four years to raise wages by $4 an hour for 65,000 care and support workers. This is designed to solve the exact shortage and reliability issues families face when trying to book in-home support.

  • Affordable Healthcare Access: Proposing three free GP visits a year via a new "Medicard" and retaining free prescriptions, reducing the cost burden of managing an older relative's health.

  • Workforce Guarantees: Implementing a Graduate Nurse Job Guarantee and a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to quickly staff the community care sector.

Green Party

The Greens emphasize "ageing in place" via heavily funded community services and a "high-trust" model for family support.

  • Carer Subsidy Reforms: Pledging to specifically improve the Carer Support subsidy, aiming to give families easier access to respite care while centering the carers' voices in the process.

  • Pay Equity Laws: Strongly advocating to restore strict pay equity legislation and allocate $1.1 billion a year to settle frozen claims for home support workers.

  • Community Health Focus: Shifting health funding explicitly toward community-based health services and supporting Work and Income to use high-trust models that preserve caregiver dignity.

ACT New Zealand & New Zealand First

  • ACT: Focuses on practical administrative simplification. They propose creating simpler, direct access to respite care, clearer information distribution, and tighter coordination between home carers and primary health services to prevent emergency hospital admissions.

  • New Zealand First: Has named overall aged-care reform a major priority for their platform, advocating for a targeted Seniors Housing Plan and expanding funding options that allow older New Zealanders to age in place safely.


If you would like to look closer into your options before voting, I can help you find out:

  • How to check if your family member qualifies for Individualised Funding (IF) , which gives you more direct control over hiring support workers.

  • The process for requesting a Needs Assessment (NASC) to see if you can access subsidized respite care or paid family caregiving options.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account