Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

New Zealand 2026 election: what could change your council rates?

For a retired homeowner living mainly on NZ Super, the key distinction is between limiting how quickly councils can increase rates and controlling the total cost of living. National parties can change the rules councils operate under, but councils still make many decisions about local services, infrastructure and how rates are charged.

As at 25 October 2026, one major election issue is already clear: National has proposed a rates-capping system, and the legislation has passed its first reading in Parliament. It is not yet fully in force. The general election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. Keeping rates affordableRates Capping Bill passes first readingSummary of 2026 election tax policies

1. What a national rates cap could mean for you

National's proposed 2–4% annual rates range

National proposes requiring councils to keep the average rates increase within an initial target range of 2–4% a year, with limited exemptions. Councils would start taking the range into account from 2027, with compliance intended from 1 July 2029. Keeping rates affordableProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

Potentially more predictable bills

If your council would otherwise raise rates faster than the cap, the policy could moderate the increase in the council's average rates revenue. That may help with budgeting on NZ Super.

Your own bill would not be capped at 4%

The proposed limit applies to an average measure of rates across a council's rating units, not to each homeowner's individual bill. Your rates could rise by more or less, depending on property valuations, targeted rates and the way your council allocates charges. Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

An important detail is that the proposed cap includes a minimum as well as a maximum. It is intended to permit continued funding of essential services and infrastructure, rather than simply freezing rates.

The proposal also allows for exemptions, including exceptional circumstances such as natural disasters and certain justified financial-planning needs. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

2. What would still be decided by your council?

Even if a national rates cap is enacted, councils would retain responsibility for many choices that affect the services you receive and the bill you pay. The Government's own policy explanation confirms this division. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

Decision Who mainly decides?
The overall legal framework and rates cap Central government and Parliament
Local roads, parks, libraries and recreation facilities Your council
Local infrastructure investment and maintenance priorities Your council, within national rules
The rates charged to different properties Your council
Whether to reduce or change some local services Your council, with community consultation where required
Whether an exemption from the cap is justified The proposed independent regulator, under the legislation

Why this matters: a council facing a limit on rates revenue may need to reprioritise spending, find other funding, defer some projects or seek an exemption. A cap can constrain revenue increases, but it does not automatically make road repairs, water infrastructure or insurance cheaper. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportProposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

3. Which other national-party policies are relevant?

For the 2026 election, it helps to look beyond the headline rate increase and ask how parties would fund the services councils provide. These are some relevant documented positions, rather than a ranking of parties.

National

National's published policy commits to the 2–4% rates-capping framework, implementation from 2029 and an independent regulator. It also proposes directing a growing share of International Visitor Levy funding to councils to help communities meet visitor-related costs. Keeping rates affordable2026 Election Policy

Question to consider: would the cap and alternative funding be enough to keep local services maintained without shifting costs elsewhere?

Labour

Labour's published 2026 priorities include cost-of-living measures and more affordable healthcare, including three free GP visits a year through its proposed Medicard and free prescriptions. Those measures could be relevant to your overall household budget, but they are not the same as a direct reduction in council rates. Labour's 2026 Election Policies

Question to consider: what specific rates rules or alternative council-funding arrangements would Labour implement, and when?

The Green Party

The Greens have proposed enabling councils to introduce a levy on visitor accommodation, with the design and rate set locally. The stated aim is to help councils fund infrastructure and services used by visitors rather than relying as heavily on local ratepayers. Greens back bed levy, National wants more car parks and Labour focuses on Elevate NZ Venture Fund

Question to consider: could visitor contributions help your community, and what would happen in areas where tourism contributes relatively little?

New Zealand First

New Zealand First has supported removing GST from council rates in its response to a 2026 tax-policy survey, explicitly noting the pressure rates can put on retirees on fixed incomes. This is a tax proposal, not a limit on how much councils can increase their underlying rates. Election 2026: Will parties’ tax policies support public health and equity?

Question to consider: how would the proposal be implemented, and how would councils' finances be affected?

These positions do not exhaust the parties' local-government policies, and proposals can change during the campaign or coalition negotiations. In particular, the effects of any policy depend on its final legislation, funding arrangements and implementation.

4. The important catch: rates are only one part of your housing costs

For your budget, I would separate the main costs like this.

Household cost What national policy could change What to watch
Council rates The cap, tax treatment or alternative council funding Your actual bill may rise by more or less than the average
Water charges Separate water-services legislation and funding arrangements Water-related charges are excluded from the proposed rates cap
Home insurance National regulation and policies affecting the insurance market Premiums can still rise because of rebuilding costs and natural-hazard risks
Electricity Energy-market rules, generation and infrastructure policy A rates cap does not cap your power bill
Healthcare Public health funding, GP subsidies and prescription policies Check which services would actually become cheaper for you

Proposed rates cap: Technical questions and answers for Local Authorities - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport2026 Election PolicyLabour's 2026 Election Policies

For example, even if your council keeps its average rates increase within the proposed range, your total household costs could still rise because of insurance premiums, electricity prices or separate water charges.

5. What to check before you vote

I would use these five questions to assess whichever parties you are considering:

  • Rates: Is the party proposing a cap, a different funding model, or neither? When would it start?
  • Local services: If councils have less room to raise revenue, how would the party protect essential maintenance and infrastructure?
  • Retirees: Does it offer specific help for people on NZ Super who own their homes but have limited disposable income?
  • Healthcare: Would its proposals reduce your actual out-of-pocket GP, prescription and other healthcare expenses?
  • Other bills: What, if anything, would its policies do about electricity and home insurance costs?

You can also check whether you qualify for the existing Government rates rebate scheme. Eligibility depends on factors including income, rates and household circumstances, so it is worth checking rather than assuming you are ineligible because you own your home.

My main takeaway

The key distinction for your vote is whether you want tighter national limits on council rates increases, different ways of funding local services, or broader household-cost relief. These approaches can overlap, but they solve different problems.

A rates cap may improve predictability without guaranteeing that your individual rates bill, water charges or total cost of living will fall. And whatever happens nationally, your council will still make important decisions about the services and infrastructure in your community.

For the most reliable current detail, start with the Ministry's explanation of the proposed rates-capping system and the parties' published policies linked above. Proposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and TransportKeeping rates affordableLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

For a retired homeowner relying mainly on NZ Super, keeping fixed costs like local rates, power, and insurance under control is a central budget concern.

Reviewing National Party policies in the context of the New Zealand general election, here is how proposed central government changes could impact local rates, alongside the responsibilities that would remain under local council decision-making.


What National Party Policies Could Change About Local Rates

  • Introduction of a Rates Capping System:
    National has proposed a rates-capping framework to curb steep annual increases. Under this policy, annual council rate increases would be directed into an initial target range of 2% to 4%.
    • Timeline: Councils would need to factor this target range into their Long-Term Plans starting 1 July 2027, with the caps taking full effect from 1 July 2029.
    • Exclusions: Water services infrastructure charges are excluded from this specific capping system and will be regulated separately. An independent regulator would monitor compliance and handle any exemption applications.
  • Refocusing Councils on Core Services:
    National's local government approach emphasizes shifting councils away from non-core spending and directing them to prioritize fundamental infrastructure and services, with the stated aim of keeping overall financial demands on households more affordable.

What Would Still Be Decided by Councils

Despite central government guidelines or caps, local authorities retain autonomy and responsibility over several key areas:

  • Setting Individual Property Valuations and Allocations:
    Councils decide how to slice the rates pie within their district. Even under a percentage cap, the exact impact on your individual rates bill depends on your property’s capital valuation reassessment relative to others in your area, and whether your council uses a uniform annual general charge or a value-based general rate.
  • Service Levels and Local Infrastructure Choices:
    Decisions regarding local road maintenance, community facilities, libraries, parks, and local environmental management continue to be made by elected local councillors through their long-term and annual planning consultation processes with the community.
  • Operational and Management Decisions:
    Day-to-day spending choices, staff structures, and contracting models for local service delivery remain under the governance of local mayors and councils, provided they stay within broader legislative boundaries.

Other Budget Pressures: Power and Healthcare

While rates are heavily influenced by local decisions and central policy frameworks, other major cost-of-living components you mentioned—such as power bills and healthcare—are managed differently:

  • Power Bills: National's energy policies target structural electricity costs and support home energy independence measures (such as home energy funds for electrification) rather than direct council control.
  • Healthcare: Regular healthcare costs, GP visits, pharmaceuticals, and public health services are funded and structured through central government health policy and PHL/Te Whatu Ora, independent of local council rates.

As a voter, balancing how much intervention you want central government to have over local council spending (such as rates caps) versus protecting local democratic autonomy is a key consideration for this election.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

For a retired homeowner living mainly on New Zealand Superannuation, managing fixed costs like local authority rates is a vital part of budgeting.

The National Party's policy direction introduces a central government framework aimed at reining in local rate increases. Under National's proposed Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment Bill , the changes and boundaries for local rates are outlined below alongside what remains firmly under local council control.

What National’s Policies Would Change (Central Government Control)

  • Rates Capping Framework: National's policy introduces a target range limiting annual rates increases to between 2% and 4% per capita. A transition period begins for long-term planning, with the full regulatory model taking complete effect.

  • Core Service Refocus: The legislation is designed to push councils to curb spending on non-essential projects ("nice-to-haves") and refocus tightly on core infrastructure and baseline services like roading, local parks, and rubbish collection.

  • Exemptions & Overrides: While the 2% to 4% cap is the standard target, exceeding the cap will require specific regulatory approval, restricted to extreme circumstances such as major natural disasters or severe historical infrastructure underinvestment. [National Party]

  • Central Funding & Alternative Tools: National has explored or progressed alternative funding toolkits alongside Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ)—such as regional deals, public-private partnerships, or sharing GST on new builds—to help ease infrastructure funding pressures without leaning solely on traditional property rates.

What Would Still Be Decided by Councils (Local Autonomy)

  • Property Valuations & Allocation: Councils will still manage the revaluation cycles of local properties. How individual property values translate into your specific share of the rates bill (the rating valuation base) remains a local function.

  • Service Levels and Delivery Choices: Decisions on how core services are delivered—such as the frequency of rubbish/recycling collections, the operational management of local libraries, or local pool facilities—remain with elected council members, provided they fit within the financial cap.

  • Non-Rates Revenue & User Fees: Fees and charges for specific council services (such as building consents, resource consents, parking, or specific venue hires) are determined locally by each council.

  • Local Priorities Within the Cap: Within the permitted 2% to 4% rate increase boundary, local elected members still debate and decide how to allocate their constrained budgets between competing local projects, community grants, and maintenance schedules. [National Party]

If you'd like, I can also outline how other cost-of-living areas you mentioned—such as Pharmac funding/healthcare access or power/energy schemes —line up under current policy settings. Let me know what you'd like to explore next.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

AI Overview

Balancing a tight household budget on NZ Super while facing rising costs for insurance, power, and healthcare can be highly stressful. As you consider your vote for the 2026 general election, understanding how party policies alter your outgoings is critical.

The National Party's policies shift the dynamic between central government control and local council independence, directly impacting your local rates and how utility costs are distributed.


What National Party Policies Change (Central Government Control)

If you are looking at National's approach to the cost of living and local government, their primary policy focuses heavily on capping council expenses and reorganizing utilities.

  • The 4% Rates Cap: National has passed legislation mandating that councils must keep annual rates increases within a strict target range of 2% to 4% per capita. This policy is designed to put an explicit brake on the double-digit rates spikes seen across the country, providing more certainty for retirees on fixed incomes.

  • "Back to Basics" Mandate: Central government policies under National force councils to restrict spending to "core services" such as rubbish collection, road/pothole maintenance, and libraries. Spending on non-essential, climate-focused, or cultural "nice-to-haves" is restricted.

  • The "Local Water Done Well" Reform: National repealed the previous government's centralized Three Waters plan and replaced it with a model that encourages councils to move water infrastructure out of their general budgets and into Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs).

  • The budget impact: By shifting water to a utility model, the cost of fixing old pipes is stripped out of your property rates. However, these long-term water network upgrades (estimated at $49 billion over the decade) will instead be funded through separate water metering and volumetric user charges. This shifts costs from your general rates bill to your monthly utility usage bill.


What is Still Decided by Your Local Council

While the central government establishes the legal boundaries (like the 4% cap), your local council still retains total authority over how money is collected and spent within those boundaries.

  • Your Individual Property Valuation: Rates are calculated based on the capital or land value of your home. Your council determines the valuation cycle, meaning if your property value rises faster than your neighbors', your individual rates bill could still fluctuate, even if the council stays under the 4% average cap.

  • The Distribution of the Rates Burden: Councils decide how to balance the rates split between commercial businesses and residential homeowners. They also control the Uniform Annual General Charge (UAGC) —a fixed charge applied equally to every property regardless of value. A higher fixed charge hurts fixed-income retirees more than asset-wealthy homeowners.

  • Which Local Amenities Stay or Go: To fit under the government's 4% cap, councils must choose what to cut. Your local council decides whether to reduce opening hours at local swimming pools, defer local road sealing, or cut funding to community halls and senior groups to meet their budget.


Summary of National's Policy Impacts on a Fixed-Income Budget

Expense Category National Party Policy Direction Remaining Council Decision
General Council Rates Restricted by law to a maximum 4% annual increase. Decides how much of that burden falls on residential vs. commercial properties.
Water Services Split from general rates into utility companies. Determines the local price per litre for drinking and wastewater.
Power & Utilities Pledges to increase general energy security and streamline generation consents to ease power grid costs. No direct council control over private power companies.
Healthcare Access Funding ring-fenced for frontline health services and specific medicine access, separate from local government. No local council control over healthcare.

Financial Safety Nets to Consider Right Now

Regardless of which party wins the election, remember to check your eligibility for the

Rates Rebate Scheme

via your local council, which provides a subsidy for low-income homeowners on fixed incomes. Additionally, the SuperGold Card continues to provide off-peak public transport savings and commercial discounts on insurance or power, depending on your provider.

If you would like to explore how other parties compare on these issues, please let me know. To help narrow down options, would you like to see Labour's alternative property tax plans , or look into how the different party policies impact power and insurance prices specifically?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account