Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

New Zealand 2026 election: GP access, hospital waiting times, staffing and funding

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the key health-policy questions are how parties would make it easier to see a GP, reduce delays for specialist appointments and planned surgery, recruit and retain enough health workers, and pay for improvements to the health system.

It's important to distinguish between promises to increase capacity, targets for faster treatment, and actual funding commitments. A party may promise shorter waiting times, for example, without specifying how many extra doctors or nurses it will employ or how much additional money it will spend.

1. How the major parties compare

The following summarises the main proposals published or reported by 26 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, so these are campaign commitments, not guarantees of delivery. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Capacity and targets

  • GP access: Expand online, urgent and after-hours care; Budget 2026 supports a further 53,000 general-practice enrolments.
  • Hospital waits: Use both public and private providers to deliver more planned treatments. Budget 2026 provides for a further 24,000 planned-care treatments, 42,000 additional inpatient episodes and 26,000 additional emergency-department events.
  • Staffing: Increase medical training places at Auckland and Otago universities and establish the Waikato graduate medical school, with its first 120 students planned for 2028.
  • Funding approach: Continue the current direction, using targets and additional service capacity while maintaining fiscal restraint. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Affordability and access

  • GP access: Three free GP or nurse consultations per year through a new Medicard; a Family Doctor Loan Scheme offering up to 50 loans annually to help doctors buy into practices; and a target of freeing up more than 4.5 million GP appointments each year through phone triage, technology and targeted funding.
  • Hospital waits: An emergency-department recovery plan to move patients into hospital beds faster, address staffing and discharge bottlenecks, prepare for winter demand and support older people recovering at home.
  • Staffing: Guarantee jobs from 2027 for eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurses—around 2,400 graduates a year—and end the current hiring freeze.
  • Funding approach: A targeted 28% capital gains tax on specified property profits, with revenue ring-fenced for health. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesRelease: Labour will get emergency departments movingElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Major funding expansion

POLICY TRACKER: TOP wants to fund cheaper doctor visits with junk-food tax | New Zealand Doctor

ACT New Zealand

Choice and productivity

  • GP access: Allow pharmacists and other health professionals to handle more routine conditions, tests and ongoing care within their professional scope.
  • Hospital waits: Increase use of private providers to reduce public waiting lists, with more emphasis on productivity and measurable outcomes.
  • Staffing: Make better use of the existing workforce by expanding professional scopes of practice; ACT also supports the Waikato medical school.
  • Funding approach: Prioritise efficiency and choice. Its medicines policy would increase the share of the health budget spent on medicines by one percentage point annually, funded from existing health spending. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Direct waiting-list fund

  • GP access: Easier entry into general practice for appropriately registered doctors, nurse practitioner-led digital clinics in hard-to-staff areas, less administration and greater GP autonomy.
  • Hospital waits: An annual NZ$925 million GP-controlled Waitlist Reduction Fund would allow GPs to purchase approved specialist consultations and operations for patients on waiting lists.
  • Staffing: Estimates that about 2,000 additional doctors are needed and would prioritise international recruitment.
  • Funding approach: The proposed waiting-list fund is a specific annual commitment. NZ First also proposes replacing Pharmac with a new medicines agency and adding NZ$1.3 billion for medicines. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Māori-led and whānau-centred care

  • GP access: Emphasise accessible, culturally safe, community- and whānau-centred services.
  • Hospital waits: Prioritise prevention and whānau wellbeing to reduce crisis-driven care, alongside stronger Māori-led health services.
  • Staffing: Emphasise Māori participation and Māori-led delivery; a specific quantified workforce expansion commitment was not evident in the policy summaries reviewed.
  • Funding approach: Focus on shifting resources towards prevention and Māori-led health provision. A directly comparable, quantified overall health-funding commitment was not evident in the sources reviewed. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

Opportunity Party

Long-term funding reform

  • GP access: Increase the share of health spending directed to primary care and prevention.
  • Hospital waits: Pursue a cross-party, 10-year health plan intended to improve the system's long-term capacity.
  • Staffing: The available policy summary does not specify a comparable numerical staffing target.
  • Funding approach: Increase health spending from 7.4% to 9% of GDP through its proposed 10-year plan. NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

2. What do the funding commitments mean in practice?

The clearest difference is between parties proposing to spend substantially more overall, parties earmarking money for specific services, and parties seeking better results from existing resources.

Party Main funding commitment What it is intended to achieve
National Budget 2026 funding for additional treatments, hospital activity and GP enrolments Increase service capacity and meet health targets
Labour Ring-fenced revenue from a targeted 28% property capital gains tax Make primary care more affordable and fund additional services
Greens NZ$3 billion extra annually for four years Rebuild capacity, improve staffing and strengthen primary and hospital care
ACT Shift existing health spending towards medicines and improve productivity Expand treatment options and make better use of available resources
NZ First NZ$925 million annually for waiting-list reduction; NZ$1.3 billion additional medicines funding Purchase more specialist consultations and operations and widen access to medicines
Te Pāti Māori Greater emphasis on Māori-led services and prevention Improve equitable access and community-based care
Opportunity Increase health expenditure from 7.4% to 9% of GDP over its proposed 10-year plan Establish a more stable, long-term funding path

Sources: party policy summaries and the New Zealand Medical Journal's October 2026 election analysis. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident DoctorsGreens to deliver more staff, shorter wait times and a healthier country with significant health investment

Important qualification: these figures are not directly comparable. Some are annual additional expenditure, some are spending targets, and some are funding for specific programmes. They should not be treated as equivalent totals or as money already spent.

3. Which proposals address staffing most directly?

Staffing is central to whether any of these promises can work.

  • Graduate nurse employment: Labour's guarantee is a direct response to the problem of newly qualified nurses struggling to find jobs while hospitals report staffing pressure.
  • Training more doctors: National's expanded medical-school capacity is a long-term investment. The Waikato programme's first intake is planned for 2028, so it will not immediately resolve shortages.
  • Recruiting doctors from overseas: NZ First places greater emphasis on international recruitment and estimates that around 2,000 additional doctors are needed.
  • Retaining staff and improving conditions: The Greens explicitly link safe staffing to pay parity, reasonable workloads and better employment conditions.
  • Making better use of existing clinicians: ACT emphasises pharmacists and other health professionals taking on more clinical work, alongside greater use of private providers.
  • Expanding the GP workforce: Labour's practice-ownership loans and appointment-capacity proposals aim to make it easier for GPs to establish or remain in community practices.

These approaches tackle different problems. Training takes years, international recruitment depends on available workers and registration, and employing graduates helps only if funded jobs and appropriate supervision are available. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryRelease: Labour will get emergency departments movingElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryNZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

4. How will you know whether the promises are working?

New Zealand already has a national primary-care access target: more than 80% of people should be able to obtain an appointment with a general-practice provider within one week, with the target intended to be achieved by 2030. Initial national results are expected in late 2026. Primary care health target

For voters comparing the parties, the most useful measures are:

  • GP access: How long patients wait for an appointment, whether they can afford it, and whether they can enrol with a practice.
  • Hospital waiting lists: How many patients receive specialist assessments and planned operations on time—not just how many procedures are performed.
  • Emergency departments: How long patients wait to be assessed and admitted, and whether staffing and bed capacity improve.
  • Workforce: Net increases in employed doctors and nurses, vacancies, retention and safe staffing levels.
  • Funding: Whether additional spending is genuinely new, whether it keeps pace with population growth and costs, and whether it pays for the staff and facilities needed to deliver care.

The distinction matters because free GP visits do not automatically create more appointments, and funding extra operations does not automatically provide the surgeons, nurses, beds and recovery services needed to perform them.

Bottom line

  • For cheaper GP visits: Labour has the clearest specific proposal, with three free consultations a year.
  • For a substantial increase in overall health funding: The Greens have made the clearest quantified additional annual spending commitment.
  • For directly purchasing more treatment for people on waiting lists: NZ First has the most explicit proposal through its NZ$925 million annual fund.
  • For expanding private-sector capacity and shifting routine care to other providers: National and ACT put more emphasis on capacity, provider choice and productivity.
  • For long-term workforce growth: National emphasises medical training, Labour graduate nurse employment, NZ First overseas recruitment, and the Greens training, recruitment and retention.
  • For Māori-led and whānau-centred healthcare: Te Pāti Māori puts this at the centre of its approach.

These are differences in policy emphasis, not a definitive ranking of which party will deliver the shortest waits. The decisive questions are whether each plan has enough funding, enough workers, and a credible timetable for turning promises into appointments and treatment.

For further detail, the New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association's 2026 election policy comparison and the New Zealand Medical Journal's election health analysis provide useful starting points.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

Healthcare and the performance of the health system—particularly General Practice (GP) access, hospital waitlists, workforce shortages, and sustainable funding—are major focal points for political parties.

Parties offer distinct structural and philosophical approaches to addressing these challenges:


1. Improving GP Access and Primary Care Affordability

With cost acting as a severe barrier for many New Zealanders visiting a doctor, parties propose contrasting ways to ease the pressure:

  • Labour Party: Proposes the "Medicard" system, providing every New Zealander with three free GP consultations per year. To tackle capacity issues alongside increased demand, Labour has also pitched a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to help doctors enter practice ownership and build workforce numbers.
  • Green Party: Advocates for an even broader expansion, promising unlimited free GP visits (alongside free dental care), prioritized for highest-need community care clinics first.
  • National Party / Coalition Government: Focuses more on direct capacity injections and infrastructure rather than universal blanket subsidies. For instance, the government has directed funding toward primary care capacity (such as Budget investments) and emphasizes strengthening clinical pipelines rather than rolling out universal free cards, which they argue strain public finances.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports free primary care and dental for targeted groups, including all whānau earning under a specific threshold, alongside a Māori Health Card linking funding directly to patients.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Advocates for a long-term cross-party 10-year health plan that lifts primary and community care spending from roughly 5.7% to 10% of Health New Zealand's total allocation, alongside targeted programs like a "Teal Card" for younger demographics.

2. Reducing Hospital Wait Times and Surgery Backlogs

Parties diverge on whether to clear hospital waitlists by utilizing the private sector or by exclusively resourcing the public system:

  • National / Government Approach: Relies heavily on public-private partnerships and outsourcing. Health New Zealand has utilized multi-year contracts with private providers (such as the "Elective Boost" program) to clear thousands of overdue surgeries and reduce elective waiting lists.
  • Labour & The Green Party: Strongly oppose long-term reliance on private outsourcing. They argue that funnelling public funds into private hospitals "cherry-picks" easier cases and starves the public system of vital resources. Instead, they argue for building up internal public hospital capacity.
  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy emphasis on a dedicated waitlist reduction fund and rapid diagnostic provisioning to clear bottlenecks within the public framework.

3. Staffing, Workforce Retention, and Training

Workforce burnout, retention, and recruitment of doctors and nurses remain critical pressure points across the country:

  • Labour: Proposes guaranteeing employment for eligible New Zealand-trained graduate nurses starting from 2027 and supports expanding medical training pathways.
  • Sector Advocacy (e.g., GenPro / Medical Associations): Ahead of the election, primary care sector groups have lobbied parties to introduce targeted financial incentives for GPs and nurses to enter and stay in community practice, align primary-care pay scales with hospital roles to stop the brain-drain to secondary care, and cover the recruitment costs of overseas-trained clinicians.
  • Broader Alignment: Most parties agree that New Zealand faces severe structural shortages, but differ on solutions—ranging from streamlined international recruitment and bonded schemes to overhauling long-term educational pipelines across a multi-year horizon rather than short electoral cycles.

4. Funding Models and Fiscal Sources

How to sustainably fund the health system highlights a fundamental economic dividing line between the left and right blocs:

  • Labour: Proposes ring-fencing new revenue streams for health, notably funding its headline primary care packages through a capital gains tax (such as a 28% CGT on specified residential investment and commercial property profits).
  • National / ACT: Prefer strict fiscal restraint and targeted spending within existing baselines, or structural shifts toward alternative models (such as ACT’s long-term proposals encouraging private health savings options or viewing government primarily as a health "purchaser" rather than a direct provider).
  • The Greens / Te Pāti Māori: Propose sweeping wealth and progressive tax reforms to fundamentally lift overall Vote Health allocations to meet international OECD benchmarks.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve GP access and hospital waiting times, and what have they said about staffing and funding?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, health sector performance, primary care access, and hospital waiting times have emerged as major focal points. The approaches and statements from the major political parties outline distinct strategies regarding funding, workforce staffing, and operational delivery:

New Zealand Labour Party

  • GP Access and Cost: Labour's primary care and emergency department strategy centers on cost-of-living relief and boosting appointment availability. Labour (via health spokesperson Dr Ayesha Verrall) has pledged to introduce three free GP visits (which may include consultations with nurse practitioners) and free prescriptions. The party claims this will unlock roughly 4.5 million more GP appointments.

  • Staffing: Labour has committed to guaranteeing a job for every graduate nurse entering the workforce to combat retention and recruitment shortages.

  • Funding: Labour intends to fund these primary care and emergency department recovery policies through a targeted capital gains tax. Labour has also stated it will retain the established health performance targets.

The National Party (Incumbent Coalition Lead)

  • GP Access and Wait Times: National relies on its track record and ongoing delivery under its $30 billion annual health sector investment. Rather than universal free visits, National's approach to primary and urgent care expansion includes online general practice care and broadened after-hours services. To address hospital waiting times and backlogs, National has utilized the Elective Boost programme—combining public and private capacity—which it states has delivered tens of thousands of extra elective procedures.

  • Staffing and Training: To address long-term workforce shortages in general practice, National points to structural solutions like supporting the establishment of the new Waikato Medical School, which is projected to train an additional 120 doctors per year starting in 2028. While the government defends its progress, health spokespeople like Simeon Brown have conceded that the system remains under pressure and that some patients still face extended wait times.

  • Funding: National has emphasized ongoing funding injections through budget allocations (such as Budget 2026 targets aimed at expanding planned care, inpatient episodes, emergency department events, and general practice enrolments) alongside a committed $604 million uplift to Pharmac’s medicines budget. National has also re-instituted explicit health targets to actively measure system performance.

(Note: Broader cross-party debates during the 2026 campaign continue to scrutinize the pace of delivery on emergency department wait times and specialist assessments, with critics from opposition parties arguing that workforce constraints and localized underfunding require more aggressive direct intervention).

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account