Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

For your situation, the key distinction is between financial support for parents who provide unpaid care and support that enables your child to get help at school so you can keep working. These are related, but parties' policies do not always address both.

For the 7 November 2026 New Zealand general election, the most useful things to compare are whether a party proposes to increase financial assistance for carers, make benefits less dependent on a partner's income, fund respite care, and improve access to learning support in mainstream schools.

One important caveat: a promise to support disabled people and their families does not necessarily mean a parent will qualify for a payment because they have reduced their working hours. Eligibility rules and the detail of each proposal matter. Disability Policies of NZ Political PartiesDisability Scorecard for 2026 General Election » Disabled Persons Assembly NZOpportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026

How the parties compare

The following comparison focuses on unpaid caring, household finances and practical support. It distinguishes explicit election commitments from broader policy directions.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Income support and reducing financial barriers

The Greens propose accessible, timely income support for disability-related living and medical costs regardless of relationship status. They also support stronger disability rights and accessibility, and have pledged to restore pay equity for care and support workers.

Why it matters: Their approach could help families facing extra disability-related costs, including those affected by a loss of earnings. However, the general disability income proposal is not automatically a wage-replacement payment for a parent who reduces their hours. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Greens commit to pay equity for care workersManifesto 2026

Sources: 2026 manifesto · Care-worker pay equity commitment

Te Pāti Māori (@Maori_Party) on X

Te Pāti Māori

Whānau-centred support and recognition of unpaid care

The party proposes Māori-led disability services, whānau-based support and recognition of unpaid care as valuable labour. Its wider welfare proposals include higher baseline benefits, removing work-test obligations and making benefit eligibility less dependent on relationship status.

Why it matters: These proposals speak directly to the financial pressures and time demands on families providing substantial care. The exact payment a non-Māori or Māori parent could receive for reducing work would depend on the final eligibility and implementation rules. Know Your VoteParty policies, simplified: Disability fundingHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Source: Know Your Vote — 2026 party policies

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Citizens' income and flexibility for carers

TOP's October 2026 disability statement explicitly says it wants to improve financial security for unpaid carers, make it easier to combine paid employment with caring, improve respite care and avoid benefit rules that penalise people for working. Its wider proposal includes a Citizens' Income and Disability Allowance.

Why it matters: This is one of the clearest published statements about the particular problem you describe. TOP still needs to be assessed on the proposed payment levels, eligibility, and how the system would work for parents of school-age children. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Source: TOP disability position statement, October 2026

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Rights-based disability support and care-sector pay

Labour has committed to repealing the current government's disability support legislation and replacing it with rights-based legislation developed with disabled people and their communities. Its election platform also includes restoring pay equity for care and support workers.

Why it matters: Labour's proposals focus on the disability support system and the paid care workforce, rather than a clearly specified new payment to compensate parents for reducing their hours to care for a child. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Labour's 2026 Election Policies

Source: Labour's 2026 policies

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Existing disability services and financial stability

National's approach has emphasised funding the disability support system, more consistent assessments and some flexibility in how disability support funding is used. Its 2026 election platform also emphasises employment, financial stability and support for parents generally.

Why it matters: These measures may benefit families accessing disability services, but the published material does not establish a new, dedicated payment for parents who cut back paid work to provide care. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?2026 Election PolicyDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

Source: National's 2026 election policies

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

Tighter eligibility and an emphasis on work

ACT's approach emphasises work where possible and tighter, independently certified eligibility for health-related and disability benefits. It says long-term support should remain available for people with enduring disabilities.

Why it matters: ACT's stated direction does not offer a clear new payment for parents who reduce working hours to provide care. Its proposed benefit assessments and wider disability-funding approach are important to examine if your household relies on existing support. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Party policies, simplified: Disability funding

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Less specific published detail on unpaid carers

The party has not set out a comparably clear disability-focused election package for unpaid parents in the material reviewed. It has previously raised accessibility standards, but that is different from promising income support for carers.

Why it matters: Ask the party specifically about payments for parents providing care, respite services and support for children with additional needs in mainstream schools. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Disability Policies of NZ Political Parties

What support can you access now?

You do not have to wait for the election to check whether your family qualifies for existing assistance.

These payments can help with extra costs, but they are not necessarily compensation for earnings lost through caring.

What I would prioritise when comparing parties

Given that your main concern is getting suitable help at school, I would assess each party against these four questions:

  1. Income: Will they introduce or increase financial support for parents who reduce paid work to provide care?
  2. Eligibility: Will support depend on household or partner income, the child's formal diagnosis, or a particular level of care needs?
  3. School support: Will they guarantee more reliable access to teacher aides, learning support coordinators, specialist assessments and other services?
  4. Respite and flexibility: Will they fund services that let parents return to work or maintain their hours?

The Disabled Persons Assembly and other disability organisations have also asked parties specifically about predictable, needs-based funding for disabled students in mainstream schools, as well as increases to the Child Disability Allowance and Disability Allowance. Their 2026 disability election scorecard is worth checking as responses become available. Disability Scorecard for 2026 General Election » Disabled Persons Assembly NZ

My overall reading: TOP has made a particularly explicit commitment to supporting unpaid carers and helping them balance work with caring. The Greens and Te Pāti Māori have broader proposals addressing disability-related financial hardship and family support. Labour focuses on rights-based reform, while National and ACT have different approaches to existing disability services and benefit eligibility. New Zealand First's published commitments in this specific area are less clear.

These are policy differences, not guarantees of what a future government will deliver. Because school support is your main concern, I would weigh each party's concrete commitments on both school-based learning support and the financial consequences of caring, rather than relying on general promises to support families.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

For parents of school-age children needing additional learning support—and who face the heavy choice of reducing paid work to care for them—the major political parties approach the issue through two main lenses: school-based learning support (addressing the root cause of needing to cut back) and financial/systemic support for carers and disability services.

How the key parties position their policies regarding these concerns involves several distinct approaches:


1. Parties Focusing on Expanding School and Learning Support

These parties center their policies on strengthening resources directly inside schools so that children can thrive independently, reducing the pressure on parents to stay home or cut hours.

  • The Green Party: Advocates for fully funded, inclusive education and an expansion of formal learning support programs, including the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS). Their framework emphasizes removing structural barriers so children receive proper, specialized accommodation within the public school system.
  • The Labour Party: Historically and in its current platform, Labour supports expanding learning support and increasing resources like ORS funding, aiming to build up early intervention and inclusive education structures within state schools. They also emphasize a rights-based framework aligned with the Enabling Good Lives principles.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Supports increased targeted funding for teacher aides and specialist learning support within schools, alongside faster access to formal assessment pathways (such as for neurodivergence), which can help families secure school funding earlier.

2. Parties Focusing on Systemic Consistency, Choice, and Efficiency

These parties prioritize fiscal management, consistent national service delivery, and streamlined individual funding models rather than broad public spending expansions.

  • The National Party: Focuses heavily on the financial stability of the disability and support systems, aiming for national consistency and restored flexibility within funding allocations. While managing broader public service constraints, their approach relies on a refreshed national disability strategy to address cross-sector needs, including education and family support.
  • ACT New Zealand: Generally addresses learning assistance within broader, mainstream educational reform focused on core standards and outcomes. On the support side, ACT favors individualised, direct funding models (giving families more direct control over how resources are spent) alongside a strong emphasis on cutting bureaucratic overhead.

3. Broad Carer and Income Support Considerations

When parents reduce paid work, financial strain is a primary reality. While specific universal "carer's wages" for parents of school-aged children vary across party platforms, parties differ in how they structure broader financial safety nets:

  • Left-bloc parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) tend to favor strengthening income-support thresholds, expanding welfare safety nets, and increasing funding to community advocacy and respite services.
  • Centre-and-right-bloc parties (National, ACT) tend to focus on tax relief, economic management to lower the cost of living, and providing flexible, individualized funding that allows families to purchase specific care solutions that fit their household's work-life balance.

What to Look For When Deciding Your Vote

When evaluating your vote on this issue, it can help to look closely at whether a party's policy targets prevention (putting more specialist teachers, ORS funding, and teacher aides into your child's school so they can attend full-time) versus mitigation (providing financial flexibility, tax relief, or direct carer support if you are forced to step back from your career).

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

Navigating the landscape of learning support and balancing paid work while caring for a child is a significant challenge. For the 2026 New Zealand General Election , the major political parties have outlined various approaches concerning education/learning support systems, caregiver support, and welfare settings.

An overview of how different political parties approach these intersecting issues includes:

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on direct school-based learning support resources, such as a pledge to fund and hire 1,000 additional teacher aides using a stable, needs-based funding model for schools rather than relying on piecemeal fundraising. For family support and welfare, Labour has also emphasized reinstating specific disability advisory structures (like the Lottery Individuals with Disabilities Committee) and opposing cuts to disability and social support services.

  • National Party: Emphasizes overall educational reforms—such as refocusing classroom environments, limiting digital/screen distractions in primary schools, and emphasizing structured literacy and foundational milestones. On the carer and disability front, the party implemented the Disability Support Services legislative changes to streamline funding, though it has faced criticism from advocacy groups over family carer pay rules.

  • Green Party / Te Pāti Māori: Both parties advocate for broader structural welfare overhauls. Te Pāti Māori proposes individualising benefits, removing punitive work-test obligations for primary caregivers, and lifting baseline benefit levels. The Greens similarly focus on strengthening income-support safety nets for disabled people, carers, and low-income families to reduce the financial penalty of stepping back from paid employment. [The D*List]

  • ACT New Zealand: Focuses on fiscal restraint and stricter welfare management, including requiring independent medical certifications for health and disability support benefits, alongside an emphasis on targeted government spending rather than broad-based benefit expansions. [The D*List]

To help me narrow down specific party manifestos for you, could you share:

  • Whether your primary focus is on direct school funding and teacher aide resources or direct financial/income support for caregivers?
  • If you are looking for policies affecting a specific type of learning support or disability classification?
Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have offered contrasting approaches regarding disability services, education, and financial relief for family carers.

The policy landscape is heavily shaped by debates surrounding the Disability Support Services Bill introduced earlier in the year by the National-led coalition government, which critics argue increases the burden on "natural" family supports.


📋 Overview of Party Proposals for Carers & Learning Support

Political Party Main Income & Carer Proposals Approach to Education & Learning Support
Labour Party • Pledges to repeal the Disability Support Services Bill.
• Focuses financial support on the professional care workforce with a $4/hour pay rise. • Focuses on working collectively with schools to manage in-class learning environments.
• Proposes a "kids off screens" strategy to fund alternative activities.
Green Party • Advocates for an explicitly rights-based platform with timely income support for informal carers.
• Proposes contributing to KiwiSaver for informal carers regardless of their employee contributions. • Strongly supports fully inclusive education models and expanding allowances to help families balance work and care.
National Party • Focuses on financial stabilization of the existing disability and care framework.
• Emphasizes choice and consistent delivery through the new legislation. • Retains focus on the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) and standard targeted education frameworks.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) • Proposes a Universal Basic Income (UBI) up to $370/week to replace current benefits.
• Adds a $6,000 annual universal disability allowance to directly relieve family financial pressure. • Strongly supports boosting school wrap-around services, including Learning Support Coordinators, RTLBs, and speech-language therapists.
Te Pāti Māori • Supports Māori-led services and self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) for whānau hauā (disabled individuals and their families). • Focuses on expanding funding for indigenous and community-led educational support systems.
ACT Party • Favors individual choice and reducing bureaucracy through direct, individualized funding rather than standalone state carer programs. • Emphasizes structural choices in schools and reducing compliance burdens for educators.

🔍 Key Areas Impacting Your Situation

  • Direct Cash Support vs. Universal Income: If you are seeking immediate direct financial compensation for reducing work hours, TOP’s $6,000 disability supplement and UBI model offer the most direct targeted income shift. The Greens focus heavily on long-term financial equity, such as paying into your retirement fund while you act as an informal caregiver.

  • The Legislative Battle over Care: The Labour and Green parties are actively campaigning on tearing down the current coalition's framework, which they argue places an unfair financial and emotional burden on families by relying too heavily on unpaid "natural supports". National maintains that their changes provide necessary stability and long-term sustainability to the funding pool.

  • In-School Support Resources: While parties like National favor keeping current structures tightly managed, TOP and the Greens explicitly campaign on scaling up the number of in-class specialists (like Learning Support Coordinators and speech therapists) to ensure children do not require as much intensive intervention from parents at home.

To review how these policies directly match your family's needs, you can track real-time updates and compare manifestos via the independent community hub Inclusive World NZ Disability Issues Guide or view comprehensive side-by-side breakdowns on Policy.nz.


If you want to narrow down which party aligns best with your needs, let me know:

  • Does your child currently receive or qualify for ORS (Ongoing Resourcing Scheme) funding?

  • Are you more interested in direct financial payments to you as a carer, or more funding for staff inside the classroom so you don't have to cut back work?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account