Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

    783rows

    Download complete answers (CSV)

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

    2,227rows

    Download answers included in each comparison (CSV)

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

    37,859rows

    Download party names found in answers (CSV)

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

    783rows

    Download sources recorded with each answer (CSV)

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

    31rows

    Download what the voting-guidance answers did (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

    11rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

    11rows

    Download statements selected for checking (CSV)

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

    10rows

    Download research findings (CSV)

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

    10rows

    Download evidence behind the findings (CSV)

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

    32rows

    Download what changed for each voter (CSV)

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

    63rows

    Download answers read in detail (CSV)

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

    510rows

    Download party counts by edition (CSV)

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

    60rows

    Download answer length by assistant (CSV)

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

    248rows

    Download location comparisons by edition (CSV)

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

    20rows

    Download changes by topic (CSV)

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

    783rows

    Download links visible in answers (CSV)

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

    716rows

    Download separate website reference totals (CSV)

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

    780rows

    Download answers compared with 23 october (CSV)

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

    9rows

    Download checks across editions (CSV)

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

    21,110rows

    Download statements and sentiment assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

    26,774rows

    Download original saved statement assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

    8,656rows

    Download original saved source records (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

    4,767rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

    118rows

    Download national and location answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address flexible work and leave for people with substantial caring responsibilities?

For your situation, the key distinction is between policies that help you keep working while providing care and policies that recognise unpaid carers or improve the availability of professional care and respite.

For New Zealand's 2026 general election, I would compare parties on four practical questions:

  • Flexible work: Would you have stronger rights to request adjusted hours or work arrangements when your family member needs daily help?
  • Carer's leave: Would you get paid or unpaid leave specifically to care for an older relative, including for ongoing responsibilities rather than just an emergency?
  • Financial security: Would you receive help to offset lost earnings and the effect of reduced hours on retirement savings?
  • Reliable replacement care: Would there be more accessible home-based support and respite when you need to work or take a break?

The important caveat is that a party supporting workers' leave in general has not necessarily promised a new entitlement for people caring for older relatives. Here is how the published policies compare as of 26 October 2026.

Party-by-party comparison

Based on published 2026 election policies and announcements available on 26 October 2026. “Not identified” means I could not verify a specific commitment in the sources reviewed, not necessarily that a party opposes it.

1. Labour

Employment and leave reforms

Labour proposes to restore a worker-centred employment framework, reinstate leave entitlements removed by recent Holidays Act changes, and restore pay equity legislation. It has also committed to a pay rise for around 65,000 care and support workers. Fairer WorkplacesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

  • Relevant to you: General leave protections and the financial security of the care workforce.
  • Important gap: The published workplace policy does not establish a new, specific entitlement to paid leave for someone caring for an older relative every day.
  • Policy: Labour — Fairer Workplaces

2. Green Party

The Greens have announced a commitment to restore pay equity legislation and fund a settlement for approximately 65,000 care and support workers. Greens commit to pay equity for care workers2026 Election Policy Summaries

  • Relevant to you: Better pay for the professional care workforce could support workforce retention, although better pay alone does not guarantee that replacement carers will be available.
  • Broader employment agenda: The Greens' published industrial policy includes improving leave entitlements and employment conditions.
  • Important gap: I could not verify a specific new paid-carer's-leave entitlement or a guaranteed right to flexible hours for unpaid family carers.
  • Policy: Green Party — pay equity for care workers

3. National Party

National's government announced the ongoing Mahi Aroha Carers' Strategy Action Plan on 2 September 2026. It addresses unpaid carers' health and wellbeing, financial security, and recognition. New roadmap for supporting unpaid carersNew roadmap for supporting unpaid carers

  • Relevant to you: This is a direct acknowledgement of unpaid carers who must balance work, family and caring responsibilities.
  • Additional policy: National proposes extending paid parental leave from 26 to 30 weeks in stages, but this is for new parents, not a general entitlement for people caring for older relatives. Modernising Paid Parental Leave, giving new mums and dads
  • Important gap: The existence of a carers' strategy does not by itself establish an enforceable right to flexible working or paid leave. Check what specific funding and services the action plan delivers.
  • Policy: National — unpaid carers action plan

4. ACT, New Zealand First, Te Pāti Māori and TOP

These parties also merit checking, but I could not verify a specific, current commitment from the sources reviewed that would guarantee paid leave or flexible working arrangements for unpaid carers of older relatives.

There are some relevant broader policy signals:

  • ACT: Its employment approach emphasises workplace flexibility and individual circumstances, but that is not the same as a dedicated carer's-leave entitlement. Party policies, simplified: EmploymentKey insights into 2026 employment election policies in Aotearoa
  • New Zealand First: Its published policy includes increasing the minimum wage annually with inflation and expanding Working for Families support. These are general income policies, not specific carer-leave guarantees. Increasing Working for Families and Minimum Wage
  • Te Pāti Māori: Its disability policy includes resourcing the Enabling Good Lives approach, which emphasises greater choice and control for disabled people and their whānau. The practical implications for older people and unpaid carers would need checking. Party policies, simplified: Employment
  • TOP (The Opportunities Party): I could not verify a specific current proposal for paid leave or flexible work for unpaid family carers.

For these parties, you can check their latest commitments through the 2026 party policy comparison. Treat third-party summaries as a starting point and verify any proposal against the party's own policy.

What to look for before deciding how to vote

For someone working part-time while providing daily care, the most useful commitments would be those that address the following issues directly.

Your concern What to look for in a party's policy
Unpredictable care needs A right to request flexible hours, with safeguards against unfair refusal
Attending appointments or providing daily care Explicit paid or unpaid leave for caring for an adult family member
Needing a break More funded respite and reliable home-based replacement care
Reduced income from part-time work Direct financial support for unpaid carers and protection of retirement savings
Care arrangements breaking down Emergency replacement care and a clear process for accessing support

One important legal distinction: New Zealand's Employment Leave Act 2026 has passed, but its main provisions do not take effect until 6 August 2028. Until then, the existing Holidays Act rules continue to apply. The new Act changes general leave arrangements; it should not be assumed to create a dedicated entitlement to ongoing carer's leave. Employment Leave Act 2026Employment Leave Act 2026

Bottom line

The clearest distinction in the published material is between Labour's proposed workplace and leave reforms, the Greens' focus on care-worker pay equity, and National's explicit unpaid-carers strategy. None of those announcements alone establishes that you would receive paid leave or guaranteed flexible working for your own caring responsibilities.

To make a meaningful comparison, it is worth looking at both employment rights and the availability of respite and home-based care. The latter may determine whether you can actually keep working, regardless of what your employer's leave policy says.

You can explore either of these next:

  • Compare parties on respite and home-based care
  • Compare financial support for unpaid carers
Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address flexible work and leave for people with substantial caring responsibilities?

Balancing part-time work with substantial, daily caring responsibilities is a significant challenge, and finding reliable support systems is a major pressure point for many New Zealand households.

In New Zealand, the current statutory baseline allows any employee to request flexible working arrangements from their first day on the job (covering reasons such as caring responsibilities), and employers are legally required to consider these requests in good faith. However, political parties hold different philosophies on whether to expand statutory leave, mandate further workplace accommodations, or rely on market flexibility and economic settings to support workers.

Overview of Party Positions on Carer Support, Leave, and Flexibility

  • New Zealand Labour Party:

    • Approach: Generally favours strengthening worker protections, collective bargaining, and expanding public entitlements. While historically focused heavily on parental leave and broader worker welfare, Labour aligns with a rights-based framework for support systems (such as disability and carer support frameworks).
    • Focus: Labour's broader platform leans toward bolstering public health access, enhancing financial support structures, and safeguarding workplace standards rather than introducing separate, standalone mandatory carer-leave buckets, though they generally support expanding leave allowances and protections that help working people balance their lives.

  • Green Party:

    • Approach: The Greens place a strong emphasis on systemic equity, structural workplace barriers, and income security.
    • Focus: Their welfare and employment policies strongly advocate for removing rigid workplace barriers, supporting fair pay, and moving toward a Guaranteed Minimum Income or substantial benefit reforms. This approach aims to ease the financial penalty often experienced by those who must reduce paid hours to provide unpaid care.

  • Te Pāti Māori:

    • Approach: Centres whānau-first (extended family) wellbeing and collective support models.
    • Focus: They advocate for recognizing and properly resourcing whānau caregivers, viewing caregiving not just as an individual employment or welfare issue, but as a collective community obligation that requires dedicated state resourcing and structural economic support for whānau-based care.

  • New Zealand National Party:

    • Approach: National's philosophy centres on economic growth, business flexibility, and targeted funding models rather than heavy-handed employment regulation mandates.
    • Focus: Regarding care and support systems, National emphasizes stability, consistency, and flexibility within funding frameworks (such as disability and support funding) to give families more choice over how they procure or manage care, while aiming to keep compliance costs low for businesses to protect part-time and flexible job availability.

  • ACT New Zealand:

    • Approach: ACT focuses heavily on reducing red tape, lowering regulations on businesses, and encouraging individualised, direct funding models.
    • Focus: ACT generally opposes expanding rigid mandates on employers (arguing that strict employment regulations can inadvertently discourage businesses from offering flexible or part-time roles). Instead, they favour streamlined, individualised funding systems that allow people to directly purchase the specific support services they need.

  • New Zealand First:

    • Approach: NZ First focuses strongly on seniors, superannuation protection, and regional health access.
    • Focus: While they heavily champion support networks for older New Zealanders and retirees, their specific employment policy framework typically addresses broad workforce conditions and national infrastructure rather than dedicated, new statutory carer-leave categories.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address flexible work and leave for people with substantial caring responsibilities?

Navigating part-time work alongside daily, substantial caregiving responsibilities is a significant pressure point, and the intersection of unpaid care, flexible work, and leave provisions is a key consideration for the

2026 General Election

.

In the current 2026 election landscape, major party platforms have focused heavily on the broader cost of living, general employment conditions, and support for paid care or working parents, but explicit, targeted policies specifically expanding statutory leave or flexible work rights explicitly tailored for adult/family unpaid carers have not been a central feature of mainstream party manifestos.

To evaluate where the parties stand on your specific challenges, it helps to look at how their general approaches to workplace relations, welfare, and employment law affect carers:

  • Labour: Generally emphasizes worker protections, strengthening industrial relations, and expanding state support or income security. While some recent policy discussions have looked at flexibility and financial breathing room for caregivers (such as options around working hours or support for working parents), their broader focus remains on bolstering the public health and care sectors (including funding for formal care and support workers) rather than a specific new statutory leave entitlement for informal family carers.

  • National & ACT: Focus predominantly on economic growth, business productivity, and flexibility driven through market and employer-employee negotiation rather than new centralized mandates. Their employment policies generally resist adding heavy regulatory burdens or new compulsory leave requirements on businesses, aiming instead to manage living costs through tax and economic settings rather than targeted welfare/leave expansions for informal carers.

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Traditionally advocate for stronger social safety nets, improvements to baseline incomes (such as through income support or exploring universal basic income concepts), and enhanced worker rights. They are more receptive to expanding welfare and recognizing the economic value of unpaid work, though specific structured leave entitlements for elder/family care have not headlined their primary tier of advertised 2026 campaign rollouts.

  • New Zealand First: Tends to focus on seniors, Superannuation, and family-centred policies through a traditional lens (such as Working for Families adjustments), but does not typically campaign on expanding workplace leave mandates for general adult caregiving.

How to Compare Further

Because party manifestos evolve and specific localized or niche policy adjustments can be found in detailed platform breakdowns, you can cross-reference specific proposals using neutral voter comparison tools:

  • Compare candidate and party stances across health, welfare, and employment on

Policy.nz

.

  • Review comprehensive policy summaries via the

RNZ Election Policy Guide

. [RNZ]

Note: Advance voting for the 2026 general election is underway, with election day concluding on Saturday, 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address flexible work and leave for people with substantial caring responsibilities?

AI Overview

The 2026 New Zealand general election features distinct party approaches to employment protections, leave, and financial support for unpaid family carers.

Advocacy groups note that mainstream election debates heavily focus on parental leave rather than statutory leave specifically earmarked for adult eldercare. However, broad differences exist regarding workplace flexibility, the minimum wage, and targeted financial support for informal carers.

Political Party Positions on Carers, Leave, and Flexible Work

Political Party Leave & Flexible Work Stance Financial & System Support for Carers
National Party Focuses flexible leave expansions on paid parental leave (extending it to 30 weeks with shared/overlapping allocation options). Supports the whole-of-government Mahi Aroha Carers’ Strategy Action Plan launched in late 2026 to framework carer recognition. Prefers a model that establishes family/whānau as primary caregivers where appropriate. Aimed to lower administrative overlays by reshaping the Disability Support Services framework, while adjusting flexible funding protocols to give individuals more care discretion.
Labour Party Strongly advocates for statutory protections for workers and opposes the removal of strict state employment/leave oversight for family care hours. Focuses heavily on the professional workforce by pledging to restore pay equity legislation and fund a $2.5 billion pay rise for 65,000 professional care and support workers to help stabilize the wider sector. Opposes limits placed on the legal classification of extended family care hours. Aims to build out formal sector support networks so that part-time or unpaid family caregivers are backed by a more reliable, better-paid professional workforce.
Green Party The most explicit platform addressing the financial gap for informal carers. Formally proposes contributing to the KiwiSaver accounts of informal carers on low incomes, regardless of their individual employee contributions, to protect their retirement equity. Supports a rights-based framework. Advocates for higher direct income support, opposes legislation that restricts the legal minimum wage entitlements for unallocated family care hours, and pushes for enforceable accessibility and carer rights.
ACT Party Does not have a standalone manifesto for structural carer leave. Prefers a free-market approach with localized individual choice. Favors minimizing public sector bureaucracy and shifting toward direct individual funding structures over state-mandated employment requirements. Promotes limiting state intervention in employment relations. Supports giving funding recipients autonomous choice over who they hire (including family members) via deregulated individual allocation.

System Dynamics to Keep in Mind

  • Flexible Funding Shifts: Across the board, changes implemented in early 2026 under the current framework altered purchasing rules for individualised and flexible funding. This allows eligible individuals to hire qualified family members aged 16+ as paid carers, though structural barriers regarding minimum wage limits for unallocated hours remain a point of legislative debate.

  • Workforce Pressures: While the formal system offers a Carer Support Subsidy for respite breaks, severe workforce shortages mean that finding an available, reliable worker to cover those hours remains a practical challenge regardless of the funding model.

If you would like to explore specific mechanisms further, let me know:

  • If you want to look closely at the eligibility criteria for the Carer Support Subsidy or Individualised Funding.

  • Whether you want to compare how parties plan to change the Employment Relations Act regarding general flexible work requests.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account