Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing that could help a working whānau with household costs?

2026 New Zealand election: household costs, services and Māori participation

For a working whānau, the cost of living is about more than grocery prices. It can include rent or mortgage payments, power, petrol, public transport, childcare, school costs, GP visits and the time and money needed to access local services.

When comparing parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election, it is also worth looking at Te Tiriti o Waitangi, Māori decision-making authority, and whether whānau can access services that work for them.

I’ll compare the main policy areas to investigate, distinguish announced policies from proposals that still need checking, and explain what each could mean for a working household. No party's claims about savings should be treated as guaranteed outcomes: the actual effect depends on eligibility, implementation, funding and wider economic conditions.

1. What the parties are proposing

The policies below reflect announcements and policy trackers available as of 26 October 2026. The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, so some details may still change. The key sources are the parties' own policies and independent election policy comparisons. Election 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising2026 Election Policy

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour Party

Focus: transport, healthcare, fuel and consumer costs

Labour proposes a weekly public transport fare cap of $20 in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, and $10 elsewhere; a three-year fuel-tax freeze; three free GP visits a year; removing the $5 prescription charge; and government-backed solar loans. It also proposes action against supermarket and energy-sector overcharging, plus restoring locally made school lunches from 2028. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Cost of Living Plan

Potential household benefit: Particularly relevant if your whānau pays for regular public transport, GP visits, prescriptions or school lunches.

Check carefully: The fare cap and fuel-tax freeze do not eliminate the underlying costs, and several health and school policies have start dates in 2027 or 2028. Labour proposes funding its health commitments through a targeted capital gains tax on investment and commercial property, excluding the family home. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National Party

Focus: lower taxes, economic growth and competition

National promises no new taxes, aims to return the books to surplus in 2028/29, and proposes separating New World and PAK'nSAVE ownership to increase grocery competition. Other proposals include expanding eligibility for 5% first-home deposits, a home-energy fund, and changes to KiwiSaver and paid parental leave. 2026 Election PolicyElection 2026

Potential household benefit: Relevant if you want to preserve your take-home pay, are saving for a first home, or could benefit from energy-efficiency support.

Check carefully: A commitment not to introduce new taxes is not the same as a guaranteed reduction in your tax bill. Grocery savings and home-energy benefits depend on how the proposals work in practice and whether you qualify.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

Focus: housing affordability, income support and workers' rights

Green proposals include building more public housing, limiting annual rent increases to 2%, strengthening Healthy Homes standards, increasing Best Start payments and extending them to all children under three. The party also proposes stronger worker bargaining rights and restoring pay-equity protections. Its Te Tiriti programme includes Treaty-system reform, increased Waitangi Tribunal resourcing and facilitating the return of whenua outside Treaty settlements. Election 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

Potential household benefit: Relevant if rent, insecure work, low wages, childcare costs or housing quality put pressure on your budget.

Check carefully: Rent-increase limits would not automatically reduce existing rent. Consider how the proposals would be funded, the effect on housing supply, and whether your household would qualify for particular payments.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

Te Pāti Māori

Focus: Māori economic wellbeing, tino rangatiratanga and whānau-led services

Announced proposals include a tax credit for kai for people earning up to $60,000, worth up to the equivalent of eight weeks of kai a year; removing income tax for people earning up to $30,000; more affordable public housing; and making it easier to build homes on Māori and ancestral land. The party also proposes Māori-led health and education solutions, Te Tiriti-based constitutional change, and an independent Te Tiriti commission. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026

Potential household benefit: Relevant if food costs, housing access, Māori-led services, whenua development and Māori authority in public decisions are central concerns.

Check carefully: The detailed eligibility rules, implementation timetable and funding for each proposal matter. A tax credit is not necessarily a direct weekly payment, and a proposal for housing on Māori land may not assist a household that cannot access that land.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Focus: family payments, fuel relief and market competition

NZ First proposes making temporary Working for Families in-work tax-credit increases permanent, with a further $70 a week increase, and making temporary fuel relief permanent with another $70 increase. It also proposes a $5,000 annual Kiwi Kids Grant for each of a family's first three children during their first three years. The party has separately proposed breaking up power-company and supermarket dominance. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026

Potential household benefit: Relevant if you have dependent children, qualify for Working for Families, or spend heavily on fuel and essential goods.

Check carefully: Establish whether each amount is additional to existing payments, who qualifies, and whether the proposals are fully costed. NZ First also proposes a referendum on Māori seats and changes to Treaty institutions, which are important to consider separately from its household-cost policies. Election 2026

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT New Zealand

Focus: smaller government, competition and individual choice

ACT proposes increasing supermarket competition through a streamlined approval process for new competitors. It also advocates smaller government and has proposed winding up the Waitangi Tribunal after outstanding historical Treaty settlements are completed. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026

Potential household benefit: Its competition and regulatory approach is relevant if you expect easier market entry to improve grocery prices and choice.

Check carefully: The supermarket proposal is not a guaranteed reduction in prices. Consider how its approach to public services and Treaty institutions aligns with your expectations for Māori participation and accountability.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Focus: income security and structural reform

TOP proposes a citizen's income of up to $370 a week for nearly all adults, replacing most existing benefits, alongside additional support for some groups. It also proposes free public transport and stronger competition enforcement against dominant businesses. TOP says the Crown should take its responsibilities as a Treaty partner seriously. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026

Potential household benefit: Relevant if you want to compare a broad income-support model with targeted family payments or fare subsidies.

Check carefully: The citizen's income would replace most benefits, so the important comparison is your household's net position after accounting for lost entitlements, taxes, housing support and other assistance.

2. Compare the costs that affect your whānau directly

Here is a practical way to turn those announcements into a household comparison.

Household pressure Policies worth examining What to verify
Kai and groceries Te Pāti Māori's kai tax credit; Labour's grocery competition and price-gouging proposals; NZ First's competition proposals Actual eligibility, supermarket prices and net savings
Rent and housing Green public housing and rent proposals; Te Pāti Māori's affordable housing and whenua policies; National's first-home deposit changes Your tenure, income limits, housing availability and eligibility
Petrol and commuting Labour's fuel-tax freeze and transport fare cap; NZ First's fuel-relief proposal; TOP's free public transport Your weekly travel costs, route availability and whether support applies to you
Power bills Labour's SolarSaver; National's Home Energy Fund; proposals to increase electricity-market competition Whether you rent or own, upfront costs and ongoing savings
Tamariki and childcare NZ First's Kiwi Kids Grant; Green Best Start changes; Labour's school-lunch and transport proposals Your children's ages, payment interactions and start dates
Healthcare Labour's free GP visits and prescriptions; each party's proposed health-service and medicine changes Access to local providers, waiting times and out-of-pocket costs
Wages and job security Labour's Māori-led training and apprenticeship support; Green worker protections; NZ First's wage proposals Whether your job or industry is covered and whether the policy changes your actual take-home pay

The proposals and distinctions in this table are documented in the 2026 election policy tracker and the parties' published announcements. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026Labour's Cost of Living Plan

3. How do the parties differ on Te Tiriti and Māori participation?

This is a separate but important part of the decision, because household affordability and who has authority over services can affect the same whānau.

Party Documented direction on Te Tiriti and Māori participation
Green Party Proposes recognising Te Tiriti as the authoritative text in Treaty legislation, resourcing the Waitangi Tribunal and facilitating whenua return.
Te Pāti Māori Proposes entrenching Te Tiriti, constitutional change based on tino rangatiratanga, and an independent Te Tiriti commission with stronger accountability.
Labour Its current election programme includes Māori-led vocational training and other employment initiatives. The policy tracker lists no specific new Te Tiriti policy, so ask what further commitments it would make.
National Its election platform emphasises economic growth, public-service delivery and fiscal restraint. The policy tracker lists no specific new Te Tiriti policy.
ACT Proposes winding up the Waitangi Tribunal after outstanding historical settlements and reducing race-based approaches in public services.
New Zealand First Proposes abolishing and replacing the Waitangi Tribunal, a referendum on Māori parliamentary seats, and removing Auckland's Independent Māori Statutory Board.
TOP Says the Crown should take its Treaty-partner responsibilities seriously; examine its detailed proposals to understand what this means for decision-making in practice.

Sources: Election 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection 2026

For your comparison, it may help to distinguish three things:

  • Recognition: What does a party say Te Tiriti requires of the Crown?
  • Participation and authority: Will iwi, hapū and Māori communities have meaningful influence over decisions, or will government agencies make the final decisions?
  • Delivery and accountability: Will Māori-led health, education and social services be funded, accessible and accountable to the whānau they serve?

These are not identical questions. A party can propose more spending on services without proposing greater Māori decision-making authority, or support Treaty principles while taking a different position on how they should operate in law.

4. Work out which promises would make a real difference

Before comparing campaign savings claims, look at your actual household budget. You don't need to share private financial details to do this.

Whānau policy comparison

Choose the circumstances that fit your household to identify which policies to investigate first. This is a comparison aid, not a voting recommendation.

5. Where to verify the promises before voting

My suggestion is to compare net household benefit, practical access to services, and Māori decision-making authority as three separate measures. Then check how each party would fund and implement its commitments, rather than relying only on campaign slogans or headline dollar figures.

You can use your party vote to support the party whose overall direction you want represented in Parliament, and your electorate vote to choose your local representative. Under MMP, both votes matter.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing that could help a working whānau with household costs?

Navigating the 2026 general election as a working Māori parent involves weighing how different political parties plan to ease household budgets while simultaneously upholding Te Tiriti o Waitangi and protecting Māori self-determination in decision-making.

The major political parties offer distinct approaches to these priorities:

Relief for Working Whānau and Household Costs

  • Labour Party: Focuses on expanding public services and targeted cost-of-living relief. Their platform includes introducing free primary care initiatives (such as three free GP visits per year via a Medicard system) and removing prescription fees to directly lower everyday health expenses. They also propose structural changes to KiwiSaver and student loans to build long-term working family wealth.
  • National Party: Emphasizes fiscal discipline, business growth, and tax management to support working households. Their approach relies on streamlining regulations to spur economic productivity and managing public spending rather than introducing broad new social service expansions.
  • Green Party: Proposes significant public investments funded by wealth taxes on high-income brackets. For households, their policies feature large-scale investments in free public transport, dental care, and early childhood education to cut down fundamental weekly expenses.
  • New Zealand First: Centers heavily on direct financial support for working families, featuring prominent proposals such as substantial weekly boosts to Working for Families payments alongside minimum wage protections.
  • ACT New Zealand: Advocates for lowering income tax rates through a simplified tax structure and radically downsizing government spending, arguing that reduced state intervention and lower taxes are the most effective ways to combat the cost of living.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on structural economic redistribution for lower- and middle-income whānau. Their proposals include a $30,000 tax-free income threshold, removing GST from all food, and implementing wealth taxes to fund community and whānau services.

Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori Participation in Decisions

  • Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party: Strongly emphasize constitutional transformation, honoring Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and protecting Māori rights. Te Pāti Māori specifically champions Māori-led solutions, the rebuilding of independent Māori health authorities, and localized self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) across housing, health, and social services. The Greens similarly incorporate explicit Treaty-based co-governance and environmental protection frameworks into their policy platform.
  • Labour: Supports honoring Te Tiriti through public service delivery, strengthening Māori health workforce pipelines, and maintaining channels for Māori participation in regional and national decision-making structures.
  • National, ACT, and New Zealand First: Generally favor a universalist approach to public policy, often expressing skepticism toward race-based co-governance models and distinct Māori institutional authorities. Their platforms emphasize equal legal rights for all citizens and mainstreaming public service delivery over separate Māori-led administrative bodies.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing that could help a working whānau with household costs?

Navigating the 2026 general election as a working Māori parent means balancing the immediate pressures of household costs against enduring commitments to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and local community voice.

New Zealand’s political parties offer distinct approaches to cost-of-living relief, public services, and constitutional relationships with Māori. Here is how the major parties' platforms compare on these fronts:


1. Cost-of-Living & Whānau Household Support

  • Labour Party

  • Household Costs: Proposes a cost-of-living package featuring a weekly public transport fare cap ($20 in major urban centres, $10 elsewhere), a three-year fuel tax freeze, and targeted grocery/price-gouging regulations. Introduces three free GP visits per year via a "Medicard," free prescriptions, and home solar financing schemes (SolarSaver).

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Focuses on reversing previous public sector cuts, rebuilding workforce equity, and backing targeted employment/apprenticeship initiatives for Māori in skilled work.

  • Te Pāti Māori

  • Household Costs: Focuses heavily on structural income relief, proposing a tax-free income threshold of $30,000 and removing GST entirely from all food to address kai sovereignty and family budgets.

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Proposes a foundational constitutional shift via a $220 million Mātike Mai Fund for Māori-led constitutional transformation, an independent Te Tiriti Commission with enforcement and compliance powers, and the rebuilding of a dedicated Māori Health Authority.

  • Green Party

  • Household Costs: Proposes sweeping investments funded by a wealth tax and mega-corporation levy, cutting income taxes for lower- and middle-earning households (claiming to benefit 96% of earners). Policies include moves toward state-backed/nationalised supermarket options to drive down food prices, and expanded free public services.

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Strongly anchored in Te Tiriti-based partnership, expanding te reo Māori pathways, increasing support for localized rangatiratanga, and embedding indigenous biodiversity and land management.

  • National Party

  • Household Costs: Centers its approach on economic management through reduced government spending, adjustments to first-home loan assistance, and targeted boosts to Pharmac rather than broad state-service expansion. Focuses on supermarket competition reforms (like splitting major supermarket duopolies).

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Emphasizes local economic development and housing delivery (such as supporting papakāinga and building consents), while opposing broad co-governance models or separate institutional structures, occasionally calling for referenda on constitutional matters.

  • ACT New Zealand

  • Household Costs: Advocates for a two-rate income tax system and downsizing the public sector to lower the overall cost of living through broad economic productivity and spending cuts.

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Proposes to strictly redefine or remove specific references to the "Principles of the Treaty" from legislation, arguing against race-based or co-governance public service delivery. [WhichParty NZ]

  • New Zealand First

  • Household Costs: Proposes removing GST from basic food items and offering targeted regional fuel relief alongside infrastructure investments.

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Takes a populist stance that includes abolishing the Waitangi Tribunal and removing co-governance arrangements across local and central government.


Key Questions for Your Whānau at the Ballot Box

When weighing your vote as a working parent, you may want to ask yourself:

  1. Direct Relief vs. Systemic Change: Do you prefer immediate, targeted price/service caps (like Labour or the Greens' public transport and health subsidies) or broad tax-threshold overhauls and GST removal on food (favored by Te Pāti Māori and NZ First)?
  2. Te Tiriti Enforcement: Do you align with parties seeking to entrench Te Tiriti via independent oversight commissions and constitutional frameworks (Te Pāti Māori, Greens), or those seeking to streamline or remove Treaty principles from public administration (ACT, NZ First)?
  3. Local Services and Voice: Consider which party’s local government and regional development policies best empower your hapū, iwi, or urban Māori authority to make decisions that directly affect your whānau’s daily environment.
Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing that could help a working whānau with household costs?

AI Overview

Heading into the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties are taking fundamentally different approaches to tackling the cost of living. For a working Māori whānau, these policies directly impact your wallet, local services, and how your voice—under the umbrella of Te Tiriti o Waitangi —is represented in government decision-making.

The main dividing line is between targeted services and tax reforms (proposed by Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori) and tax relief via spending restraint (proposed by National and ACT).


Direct Comparison of 2026 Cost-of-Living & Service Policies

Political Party Tax & Direct Income Proposals Housing & Utilities Help Local Services & Health Changes
Labour Party • No tax increases on personal income.
• Imposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax on investment properties (exempts family homes). • SolarSaver scheme to subsidize household solar setups.
• Subsidies for hot water heat pumps. • Medicard provides 3 free GP visits per year for everyone.
• Free prescriptions and maternity scans.
• $20/week cap on public transport.
Green Party • Income tax cuts for 96% of New Zealanders.
• First $10,000 of income is tax-free.
• Funded by a new Wealth Tax on the super-rich. • Up to $3,000 solar subsidy for low/middle-income homes.
• Introduces plug-in solar panels for renters. • Free public transport for low-income earners and young people.
• Massive funding boost for public health, dental, and early childhood education.
Te Pāti Māori • $30,000 tax-free threshold (saving working whānau up to $9k/year).
• Removes GST from all food.
• Funded by a wealth tax starting at $4M. • 5% stamp duty on residential sales over $1M.
• Major funding redistribution into Māori-led housing developments. • Directs funding away from centralized ministries into Māori-led public services.
• Free public transport for children, students, and community cardholders.
National Party • Focuses on no new taxes and fiscal restraint to curb inflation.
• Boosts the In-Work Tax Credit by up to $50/week instead of broad subsidies. • Expands First Home Loan deposit and income limits for buyers.
• Relies on infrastructure development to fast-track housing. • Focuses on performance-based health and education targets.
• Rejects untargeted public transport subsidies to reduce government debt.
ACT New Zealand • Implements a simplified two-rate income tax with a top rate of 28%.
• Removes taxes on KiwiSaver earnings. • Slashes red tape and building regulations to lower housing construction costs. • Radically downsizes the public service to stop wasteful spending.
• Opposes all public transport subsidies.

Te Tiriti and Māori Participation in Decisions

If representation and Māori leadership are high priorities for your vote, the parties offer stark choices:

  • Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party advocate strongly for Tino Rangatiratanga (Māori self-determination). They propose transitioning funding away from mainstream bureaucracies into by-Māori, for-Māori healthcare, housing, and social services.

  • Labour focuses on protecting existing partnership models and plans to reinstate school boards' Te Tiriti obligations that were altered by the previous government.

  • National and ACT actively oppose co-governance models and race-based policies. They advocate for a single standard of equal citizenship where services are delivered based strictly on economic need rather than ethnicity.

Evaluating the Best Path Forward

You can read through the full policy breakdowns on the official party platforms or interactive tools like Policy.nz and the Green Party Manifesto 2026 to see how they align with your whānau's situation.

If you want to look closely at a specific area, let me know:

  • Which specific cost is hurting your household budget the most right now (rent/mortgage , groceries , power , or childcare)?

  • Whether your priority is having more cash in your weekly pay packet (via tax cuts) or lower out-of-pocket costs for community services (like free doctors and buses)?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account