Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party tax and family-support plans change the finances of a two-income family?

New Zealand 2026 election: what could each party mean for your household budget?

For a two-income household with a mortgage, school-age children and little money left over each payday, the key question is not simply which party promises tax cuts. It is how much more money your family would actually have after tax, housing costs, childcare and school expenses, and essential bills.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I'd compare party policies across five areas:

  • Take-home pay: changes to income-tax brackets, thresholds and other taxes that affect working households.
  • Family support: Working for Families, the FamilyBoost childcare rebate, Best Start and other payments.
  • Housing: mortgage interest rates are not set by the government, but tax policy, housing supply and government spending can affect household finances indirectly.
  • Children and education: school costs, school lunches, healthcare and childcare.
  • The cost of public services: whether proposed tax cuts or spending changes could affect services your family uses or require other costs to rise.

One important distinction: a policy announcement is not necessarily an enacted policy, and a campaign promise is not the same as a fully costed, funded measure. The comparison below needs to distinguish what is in force now from what parties propose for the next parliamentary term.

1. What the parties are proposing

As of late October 2026, election day is scheduled for 7 November 2026. The parties differ not just on tax cuts, but on whether household relief should come through lower income tax, more family support, lower everyday costs, or a broader shift towards taxing wealth and land. PwC's 2026 election tax-policy comparison summarises the announced tax packages. Tax Tips: 2026 General Election2026 Election Policy

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

National

National is campaigning on no new taxes, alongside a focus on lower public debt, economic growth and keeping taxes low. It has also indicated it wants to address bracket creep, but a specific new personal-tax package had not been formally announced in the tax-policy review published on 7 October.

Potential household effect: the direct benefit depends on whether further income-tax changes are announced. Do not assume another tax cut on top of existing settings without a published proposal. 2026 Election PolicyTax Tips: 2026 General Election

South Island Election Conference 2026

Labour

Labour's published cost-of-living plan includes a fuel-tax freeze for three years, capped public-transport fares, three free GP visits a year, free prescriptions and measures aimed at grocery competition and hidden fees. It proposes a 28% tax on gains from selling residential and commercial investment property, excluding the family home, to fund health measures.

Potential household effect: savings could come through fuel, medical and transport spending rather than a new personal income-tax cut. The value depends on how much you drive, use public transport and spend on healthcare. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party

The Greens propose a $10,000 tax-free income threshold, revised tax rates including a higher rate on income above $160,000, a 2.5% annual tax on net assets above $10 million, and taxes on very large gifts and inheritances. They would also reverse landlord tax changes.

Potential household effect: each earner could benefit from the proposed lower-end income-tax settings, but the actual result depends on both salaries and the full rate schedule. The wealth tax is aimed at very high net assets, and the proposed inheritance tax has exemptions including family homes. A tax system for all of usTax Tips: 2026 General Election

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

Te Pāti Māori

Its tax package proposes a $30,000 tax-free threshold, a targeted Kai Credit for people earning $60,000 or less, and taxes on wealth, land banking and vacant houses, among other changes.

Potential household effect: the larger tax-free threshold could materially change take-home pay for eligible earners, but the outcome depends on the proposed rates above the threshold and eligibility for the Kai Credit. Other proposed property taxes need to be assessed separately. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionTax Tips: 2026 General Election

Current party and logo applications  | Elections NZ

Opportunity

Opportunity proposes a Citizen's Income of $19,400 a year for eligible adults, alongside a redesigned income-tax scale and an annual land-value tax of 1.75% on urban land and 0.5% on rural land, subject to its proposed exemptions and deferrals.

Potential household effect: the adult payments could be substantial, but the land-value tax could also be a significant recurring expense for an owner-occupier. You would need to calculate both sides, using the land value rather than the whole property's market value. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionTax Tips: 2026 General Election

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

ACT

ACT's published election tax measures have focused on targeted changes rather than the broad tax-and-transfer restructuring proposed by some other parties.

Potential household effect: look for a fully specified personal-tax and family-support package before estimating any extra weekly income. Do not treat a general commitment to lower taxes as a quantified household saving. Tax Tips: 2026 General Election2026 Election Policy

New Zealand First also has announced specific tax measures, but the central comparison for your budget is whether its published policies change your personal tax, family payments or recurring housing costs. For the latest policy details, see the KPMG election tax tracker. Summary of 2026 election tax policiesTax Tips: 2026 General Election

These are proposed policies, not guaranteed outcomes. Coalition negotiations, implementation dates, eligibility rules and funding decisions could change the eventual package.

2. The family payments that matter now

Before comparing promises, check what your family is entitled to under existing rules. These payments can make a meaningful difference even if neither parent qualifies for a large income-tax cut.

Support What it means for your household
Working for Families Depending on combined income, number and ages of children, and work circumstances, you may qualify for Family Tax Credit and In-work Tax Credit payments.
In-work Tax Credit From 1 April 2026, the maximum is scheduled to increase from $97 to $147 a week for eligible families. The increase is conditional: the maximum can revert if petrol prices fall below $3 a litre for four weeks, and the maximum is scheduled to return to $97 a week after 31 March 2027. In-work tax creditIncrease to the in-work tax credit
FamilyBoost This is a rebate for eligible early-childhood education fees. If your children are all school-age and no longer use qualifying ECE, it probably will not help your household. How much FamilyBoost can you claim
Best Start Generally relevant to families with babies and young children, rather than families whose children are all school-age.

You can check your eligibility using the official Inland Revenue Working for Families information and its payment calculators.

One particularly important detail: a family can earn too much to qualify for some payments while still feeling financially stretched by mortgage costs. That is why the income thresholds and abatement rates matter as much as the headline maximum payment.

3. How the proposals could affect your mortgage-owning household

For your circumstances, I would separate the financial impact into three categories.

Money arriving in your bank account

Personal income-tax cuts and family payments are usually the easiest benefits to estimate. Calculate them separately for each earner, then add any change in family support. A tax-free threshold does not mean the whole threshold is paid to you; it means income within that band is not taxed.

Costs associated with owning your home

Your mortgage repayments are driven by your loan balance, interest rate and repayment term. A change in the Official Cash Rate or mortgage rates may matter more to your budget than a modest tax cut, but parties cannot guarantee a particular mortgage rate.

Pay particular attention to Opportunity's proposed land-value tax and to whether a party proposes any new recurring charges. A tax based on land value is not the same as a tax on the whole house's market value.

Money saved on essential spending

Fuel-tax freezes, lower healthcare charges, transport concessions and measures affecting grocery competition may reduce costs without increasing your pay packet. But savings advertised for an “average family” are not automatically your savings. Count only the benefits relevant to your actual spending.

4. A fair way to compare the parties in dollars

Your household's result should be measured as:

Annual net benefit=extra take-home pay+extra family support+costs avoided−new taxes and charges\begin{aligned}
\text{Annual net benefit}={}&\text{extra take-home pay}\
&+\text{extra family support}\
&+\text{costs avoided}\
&-\text{new taxes and charges}
\end{aligned}Annual net benefit=​extra take-home pay+extra family support+costs avoided−new taxes and charges​

For example, if a proposal saved you $20 a week in income tax but added a recurring $1,000 annual cost, the net gain would be only $40 a year, or about 77 cents a week. This is an illustration, not an estimate of any party's actual policy.

A proper comparison should also show whether benefits begin immediately or only in later years. That matters when you're trying to cover bills now rather than in three years.

5. Let's estimate the effect on your family

I can make a more meaningful, approximate comparison of the announced policies if you share a few household figures. You don't need to provide exact details.

Optional household calculator inputs — all amounts in NZ dollars.

Your mortgage balance and exact interest rate aren't necessary for the first comparison, and you don't need to disclose your address. The most important missing information is your two gross incomes and the ages of your children: those determine how personal tax changes and family-payment rules could interact.

The aim is to give you a like-for-like estimate of the policies' possible effects on your budget, rather than a recommendation about how to vote.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party tax and family-support plans change the finances of a two-income family?

For a two-income, mortgage-paying family with school-age children and little financial buffer, the 2026 New Zealand general election presents sharply contrasting approaches.

Political parties differ fundamentally on whether to relieve cost-of-living pressures through targeted family support and spending restraint (coalition/centre-right approach) or broader tax restructuring, wealth/capital taxes, and public service expansions (centre-left/opposition approach).


1. The Incumbent / Centre-Right Approach (National, ACT, NZ First)

Focus: Protecting existing household disposable income, avoiding broad new taxes, and targeting specific cost pressures like grocery prices and family support.

  • Tax Policy: The National-led coalition has emphasized fiscal discipline and a general stance of no new broad-based taxes, aiming to avoid adding tax burdens to working households. They have also signaled intentions to address "bracket creep" (where inflation pushes workers into higher tax brackets) over time. ACT generally supports simpler, flatter taxation systems.
  • Family Support & Cost of Living:
    • NZ First has campaigned on targeted cost-of-living assistance, including a prominent policy to boost Working for Families payments by up to $120 a week for eligible working families.
    • National has focused on parental and household support initiatives, such as the "Baby Boost" (a $1,500 automatic KiwiSaver contribution for newborns), alongside efforts to increase supermarket competition to lower grocery bills.
  • Impact on Your Finances: If your household income qualifies you for Working for Families tax credits, policies like NZ First's proposed weekly increases would directly expand your monthly cash buffer. A "no new taxes" environment protects your two wages from being eroded by new capital gains or wealth levies, though you rely more heavily on market-driven relief (such as grocery or power price changes) for daily cost-of-living relief.

2. The Centre-Left & Progressive Approach (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori)

Focus: Restructuring the tax system to shift the burden onto higher wealth/corporate brackets, funding free public services, and increasing direct social support.

  • Tax Policy:
    • Labour has proposed measures including capital gains taxation (excluding the family home) to address wealth inequality and fund public infrastructure.
    • The Green Party proposes structural income tax reform, including a tax-free threshold for the first $10,000 of income (which would put money back into the pockets of all earners), offset by higher top tax brackets (a 45% rate on income over $160,000) and wealth/asset taxes on high-net-worth individuals.
    • Te Pāti Māori similarly proposes higher tax-free income thresholds (e.g., up to $30,000) alongside progressive increases for higher earners and removing GST off food.
  • Family Support & Cost of Living:
    • Parties like Labour emphasize expanding public service access to relieve household out-of-pocket spending—for instance, policies targeting healthcare costs, such as free primary care/GP visits through structured systems.
  • Impact on Your Finances: Lower-to-middle income earners under a tax-free threshold or restructured tax brackets would see immediate income tax relief on your two wages. Furthermore, policies removing GST from essentials (like food) or lowering healthcare/GP costs would directly target major line items in a tight household budget. However, critics of these packages argue that broader economic shifts or new taxes on investments/property could indirectly affect housing and broader market costs.

Summary Checklist for Your Household

When evaluating where to cast your vote given your tight buffer after mortgage, rates, power, and groceries, consider:

  1. Direct Cash Flow vs. Public Services: Do you benefit more from direct cash injections (like Working for Families expansions) or structural tax-free thresholds on your wages?
  2. Cost-of-Living Targets: Look closely at whether a party focuses on subsidizing/capping essential costs (food, healthcare, energy) versus cutting income tax rates.
  3. Asset/Property Impacts: If you own your home with a mortgage, evaluate how proposed changes to property tax rules, interest deductibility, or capital gains might affect your long-term housing stability versus immediate weekly survival.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party tax and family-support plans change the finances of a two-income family?

For a tight-budget, two-income household with a mortgage and school-age children in New Zealand, the major political parties approach the 2026 general election with distinct philosophies. Because your family relies purely on wages and owns a home (rather than holding large commercial or residential investment portfolios), the impact of these policies largely hinges on everyday income tax settings, cost-of-living adjustments, and family support packages rather than capital or wealth taxes.

The main party approaches break down as follows:

  • National and ACT: Focus primarily on maintaining a "no new taxes" environment and opposing broad asset or capital taxes. For a wage-reliant household, their approach generally seeks to avoid adding structural costs or new compliance burdens to your take-home pay, relying instead on broader economic management to ease cost-of-living pressures. They have not pitched broad new income tax cuts or sweeping changes targeting your specific demographic in this cycle, but emphasize leaving existing wage structures untaxed by new levies.
  • New Zealand First: Has targeted direct relief for working parents by proposing to make temporary Working for Families in-work tax credit boosts permanent and significantly scaling them up (proposing to raise the in-work tax credit boost substantially to ease weekly pressures for working households). For a two-income family relying heavily on wages, this specific policy is designed to put a direct, tangible cash buffer into weekly family finances if you qualify under Working for Families thresholds.
  • Labour: Proposes structural shifts centered around a 28% capital gains tax on residential investment and commercial property (ring-fencing revenue for health) alongside small business/cash-flow measures, rather than cutting everyday personal income tax rates for wage earners. For owner-occupiers who do not own secondary rental properties, a capital gains tax on investments does not directly tax your family home, but Labour's platform focuses public funding shifts toward public services (like health) rather than direct personal tax cuts for dual-income earners.
  • Green Party and Te Pāti Māori: Advocate for comprehensive tax overhauls that shift the tax burden away from ordinary work/consumption and onto capital and wealth, proposing measures like wealth taxes, top-bracket increases for large corporations, and inheritance taxes. While these target high-net-worth individuals and large entities rather than average wage brackets, they are paired with significant expansions in public services and income support frameworks which could indirectly benefit families through public spending.

What this means for your family buffer:

  • Direct Weekly Cashflow: If you are looking for an immediate change to your weekly household ledger via family support schemes, parties like NZ First have put forward explicit proposals to increase and make permanent specific in-work tax credits for working parents. [1News]
  • Protection from New Taxes: Parties like National and ACT offer a status-quo guarantee on personal taxation with a pledge against new taxes, ensuring your current wage-dependent income isn't subject to new asset or wealth levies. [Nexia NZ]
  • Public Service vs. Direct Relief: Parties on the left (Labour, Greens) focus revenue changes on capital and property investments, meaning your direct weekly take-home pay from your two wages remains largely driven by existing tax tables, with any financial relief arriving indirectly via funded public services rather than personal tax cuts.

To see how individual wage levels interact with these distinct frameworks, you can model your precise household income using the interactive comparison tool on YourTax.nz. NZ 2026 election: every party’s tax plan, compared

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We own a home with a mortgage, have school-age children and rely on two wages. After mortgage payments, rates, power and groceries, there is little buffer. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would party tax and family-support plans change the finances of a two-income family?

AI Overview

For a dual-income household with children, a mortgage, and a tight weekly buffer, the tax and family-support policies ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election present two completely different financial trajectories. The election highlights a strict division between maintaining the status quo with no new taxes or adopting structural changes aimed at reducing personal income tax or funding targeted public services.

The specific impact on your household finances under the primary political blocs is outlined below.

Policy Comparison for Middle-Income Families

Political Party / Bloc Personal Income Tax Impact Housing & Mortgage Impact Family & Cost of Living Relief
National Party No new personal income taxes or tax cuts. Focuses on keeping current thresholds steady. Prioritises returning to a budget surplus to keep interest rates low and reduce mortgage pressure. Commits to modernising Paid Parental Leave and increasing KiwiSaver participation.
Labour Party No changes to personal income tax brackets. Imposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on residential investment properties, strictly exempting your family home. Funds three free doctor’s visits and free prescriptions annually. Imposes a $20 weekly public transport fare cap and bans grocery/power price gouging.
Green Party Introduces a $10,000 tax-free threshold , resulting in an immediate income tax cut for 96% of New Zealanders. Focuses on a wealth tax for assets over $10 million, exempting your family home. Reverses landlord tax cuts. Offers free public transport for low-income and young people, alongside strategies to lower grocery and power bills.
ACT New Zealand Targets a flatter income-tax system in the future, with no broad income-tax cuts announced immediately. Prioritises spending restraint and a fast path to surplus to ease structural inflation and lower mortgage interest rates. Emphasises general economic growth and lowering national debt rather than specific direct subsidies.

Key Financial Trade-Offs for Your Household

1. Cash In-Hand vs. Direct Services

  • The Green Party and Te Pāti Māori offer the most direct boost to your weekly take-home pay by introducing tax-free thresholds ($10,000 and $30,000 respectively). This shifts the tax burden onto large corporations, big banks, and high-net-worth wealth.

  • The Labour Party leaves your tax brackets unchanged but aims to relieve your buffer through direct cost savings, such as free GP visits, transport caps, and strict regulations on utility and grocery providers.

2. Mortgage Costs vs. Economic Management

  • The National Party and ACT argue that the most effective way to help a stretched household with a mortgage is through macro-economic stability. Their plans focus on avoiding new taxes and slashing government debt to push down core inflation, which in turn helps banks lower mortgage interest rates.

3. Asset Protection

  • Across all major parties—including Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori—your primary family home is completely exempt from any proposed Capital Gains Taxes, wealth taxes, or land taxes.

If you would like to look closer at how your budget might balance, let me know:

  • Your approximate combined household income

  • The ages of your children (to see if they qualify for specific transport or school programs)

  • Your current weekly transport or healthcare costs New Zealanders are in charge now

I can provide a clearer estimate of which policy mix yields the most relief for your specific household budget.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account