Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

2026 New Zealand election: Māori education, te reo Māori and support for tamariki

For a Māori parent in a working household, I’d compare parties on three practical questions:

  • Can our tamariki learn as Māori? This includes access to kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori, Māori-medium pathways and strong te reo Māori teaching in English-medium schools.
  • Will our children get the support they need? Think teacher aides, learning support, school lunches, transport, counselling and help with learning differences.
  • Who gets a say in their education? This means the role of whānau, hapū, iwi and Māori education leaders, and whether parties intend to uphold Te Tiriti o Waitangi in education law and decision-making.

The important distinction is between supporting Māori children to succeed within the existing education system and giving Māori greater authority to shape the system itself. Those are different political choices.

The comparison below reflects published policies and campaign commitments available as of 26 October 2026. The general election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, so some positions may still change. These are promises, not guarantees of implementation.

1. How the main parties compare

This is a comparison of published policy direction, not an endorsement or an overall party ranking. “Not confirmed” means I could not verify a specific commitment in the sources checked.

Party Māori-medium education and te reo Support for tamariki at school Te Tiriti and Māori decision-making
Te Pāti Māori Strong emphasis on Māori-led education, mātauranga Māori and normalising te reo. Proposes more Māori-led solutions, school lunches, transport and counselling. Strong emphasis on tino rangatiratanga, Māori governance and constitutional change.
Green Party Supports te reo revitalisation and Māori aspirations through a Te Tiriti-centred approach. Proposes restoring and expanding free school lunches and more inclusive learning support. Strong commitment to Te Tiriti partnership and Māori authority over whānau, hapū and iwi aspirations.
Labour Party Has committed to genuine partnership with Māori in education; its detailed 2026 language commitments need checking. Proposes more teacher aides, school lunches and help with school transport costs. Says it will restore genuine partnership and greater Māori leadership in Māori education.
National Party Has announced teacher te reo training, Māori-medium curriculum resources and support for kura. Emphasises foundational literacy and numeracy, curriculum changes and school readiness. Has backed practical Māori education initiatives, but its approach to Te Tiriti and curriculum decision-making differs from parties advocating stronger Māori authority.
ACT New Zealand Emphasises core academic learning, parental choice and school autonomy; a specific new Māori-medium expansion commitment was not confirmed in the sources checked. Has proposed more affordable uniforms and allowing children to use suitable rural school buses. Generally favours a more limited role for Treaty principles in law and public policy.
New Zealand First A specific 2026 commitment to expand Māori-medium education was not confirmed in the sources checked. Check its detailed education proposals for your child's particular needs. Has favoured limiting the role of Treaty principles and has promoted English-first naming in government.

Sources: party policy statements, election policy trackers and published education commitments. PolicyEducation & TrainingManifesto 2026Green Party announces plan for free and nutritious school lunchesRelease: Labour will partner with Māori in educationMāori education package and draft curriculum release as school startsACT New ZealandElection policy tracker: what the parties are promisingNZ Political Parties 2026

What stands out?

  • For Māori authority over education: Te Pāti Māori makes the clearest structural commitment to Māori-led education and governance. The Greens also put rangatiratanga and Te Tiriti partnership at the centre of their approach.
  • For partnership within the existing system: Labour has explicitly committed to genuine partnership with Māori in education, including greater Māori leadership. National has announced concrete resources for Māori-medium and mainstream settings, although resourcing a pathway is different from transferring decision-making authority.
  • For household costs and practical school support: Labour and the Greens have specific school-lunch commitments, while ACT has focused on uniform affordability and rural school-bus access. Te Pāti Māori also proposes broader student support.

These distinctions matter because a party can support te reo Māori resources without agreeing that Māori should have greater authority over education policy.

2. Māori-medium education and te reo Māori

Tau 2 – Te Marautanga o Aotearoa - Ministry of Education

Te Pāti Māori — Māori-led education

Its published policy proposes a Māori-led education authority, embedding mātauranga Māori in learning, removing barriers to education and strengthening Māori governance. Its te reo policy also emphasises language revitalisation led by communities and whānau. PolicyEducation & Training

Best fit to investigate if tino rangatiratanga, kaupapa Māori schooling and whānau authority are your priorities.

Principal helps kura get back its mana | Otago Daily Times Online News

Greens — Te Tiriti-centred language revitalisation

The Greens' 2026 manifesto places Māori aspirations and Te Tiriti partnership within its wider programme. Its published direction supports Māori communities shaping their own futures. Check the full manifesto for the precise funding and delivery commitments relevant to kura and reo. Manifesto 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

Worth examining if you want Māori language and rangatiratanga commitments alongside wider public-service investment.

Te Marautanga o Aotearoa | Māori education – mātauranga | Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand

National — resources for Māori-medium and mainstream education

National announced a te reo Māori training programme for up to 50,000 teachers, new resources for te reo rangatira and pāngarau, and a refreshed Te Marautanga o Aotearoa. These are specific measures already announced by the government, rather than just general expressions of support. Māori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts

Worth examining if you prioritise curriculum materials and teacher capability. Ask how the programme will be evaluated and how Māori will influence future curriculum decisions.

Principal helps kura get back its mana | Otago Daily Times Online News

Labour — partnership and Māori leadership

Labour has publicly committed to genuine partnership with Māori in education and greater Māori leadership. It has also criticised the current government's curriculum changes over consultation and Te Tiriti concerns. Release: Labour will partner with Māori in education

Ask for the detailed commitments on kura funding, teacher supply, reo pathways and how Māori participation will be built into decisions.

One important distinction: funding te reo Māori in English-medium schools is not the same as ensuring sufficient places, teachers, resources and progression through Māori-medium education. If your tamariki attend, or may attend, kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori or wharekura, ask parties specifically about the full pathway from early childhood through secondary schooling.

3. What would make a difference to your household budget?

Education policy isn't just about what's taught. It also affects the cost of getting tamariki to school, feeding them, buying uniforms and accessing specialist support.

Party Relevant school support commitments What to check
Te Pāti Māori Expanded school lunches, free school counselling and Māori education investment. How quickly support would be introduced and how it would be funded.
Greens Restore and permanently fund Ka Ora, Ka Ako; extend lunches to around 400 additional schools, reaching 150,000 more children. Which schools qualify and when expansion would begin.
Labour Bring back fresh, locally made school lunches from Term 1 2028; reduce public transport costs and work to restore cut rural school bus routes. Whether your school and transport route would be covered.
National Additional learning support, Learning Support Coordinators for Years 1–8 schools from 2028, and extra teacher-aide hours for children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs. How support would be allocated and whether your school would have enough staff.
ACT More affordable school uniforms and an Open Seat Rule for rural school buses. Whether the uniform changes and existing bus routes would help your whānau.

Sources: Know Your VoteGreen Party announces plan for free and nutritious school lunchesLabour's Cost of Living PlanTeaching the basics brilliantlyACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

Two things are particularly worth noting:

  • School lunches: The Greens and Labour have published specific proposals to restore the current programme's earlier approach, while Te Pāti Māori has called for wider coverage. Labour's announced start date is Term 1 2028; don't assume every proposal would take effect immediately.
  • Learning support: National has made specific commitments around teacher-aide hours and Learning Support Coordinators. Labour has also proposed funding an additional 1,000 teacher aides over four years. These proposals are not directly equivalent, so compare the timing, eligibility and actual support available to your child. Teaching the basics brilliantlyElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

4. Te Tiriti and Māori participation: questions worth asking

If Māori participation in decisions is a major priority for you, look beyond whether a party says it supports Māori education.

Ask each candidate:

  • Will you restore or strengthen the obligation for school boards and the Ministry of Education to uphold Te Tiriti?
  • Will whānau, hapū and iwi have a meaningful role in setting education priorities, or will they mainly be consulted after decisions have been made?
  • Will Māori-medium education have secure, long-term funding for teachers, buildings, learning resources and transitions between kura and wharekura?
  • What authority would any proposed Māori Education Authority actually have over funding, curriculum and accountability?
  • How will the party measure progress in te reo Māori proficiency, attendance, achievement and access to learning support?

The Greens and Te Pāti Māori put rangatiratanga and Te Tiriti-centred decision-making at the heart of their stated approach. Labour has explicitly committed to genuine partnership and greater Māori leadership in education. National has announced concrete Māori education resources, but you may want to weigh those against your expectations for Māori involvement in curriculum decisions. Manifesto 2026Education & TrainingRelease: Labour will partner with Māori in educationMāori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts

5. Compare the policies against your own priorities

There isn't one party that will necessarily be the best fit on every issue. A useful way to decide is to rank what matters most to your whānau.

My bottom line

For your three central concerns, I'd start by comparing Te Pāti Māori, the Greens and Labour on the strength of their commitments to Māori authority, Te Tiriti partnership and practical support for tamariki. Then compare those commitments with National's specific investments in Māori education resources and learning support, and with ACT's proposals on uniforms and rural transport.

Before deciding, verify the details against the parties' latest published policies and ask what is funded, when it starts, and who has the authority to make decisions. Those details matter just as much as the headline promises.

You can also compare the full published positions at Policy.nz's 2026 education policies and Te ao Māori policies.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

As a Māori parent in a working household looking toward the 2026 New Zealand general election, balancing everyday costs and local services with your commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) involves looking at distinct political philosophies.

The political parties offer sharply contrasting visions for Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and school support systems (such as lunches, counselling, and local funding).


1. Māori-Medium Education & Decision-Making Power

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates heavily for structural self-determination. Their flagship education policy includes establishing an independent Māori Education Authority to shift decision-making and resourcing back to Māori. They view this as a core application of Te Tiriti, ensuring whānau-led and kaupapa Māori immersion pathways are designed and governed by Māori.
  • The Green Party: Supports Māori-led education initiatives, resourcing for Kura Kaupapa and immersion education, and embedding Te Tiriti and local indigenous history deeply across the state education system.
  • Labour Party: Generally supports the growth of Māori-medium education (Kura and Wharekura) and regional funding integration, emphasizing partnerships through existing public education frameworks.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Generally focus their education policies around universal choice, standardized curricula, and school autonomy (such as charter/partnership schools supported by ACT and National). They generally oppose race-based separate governance structures or authorities, arguing that public education administration should be unified rather than split by ethnicity.

2. Te Reo Māori and Curriculum Integration

  • Te Pāti Māori & The Greens:
    • Te Pāti Māori campaigns to make te reo Māori a core, compulsory subject up to Year 10 and heavily integrate mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge systems) into the curriculum.
    • The Greens strongly support embedding te reo and Te Tiriti principles across all learning environments as a matter of cultural equity and bicultural commitment.
  • Labour: Supports the ongoing integration of New Zealand history and foundational te reo Māori within the public curriculum, viewing it as vital for national identity.
  • National & NZ First: Emphasize a "back-to-basics" approach focusing heavily on core academic subjects (reading, writing, and mathematics in English). While they do not ban te reo, parties like NZ First and ACT are critical of what they term "co-governance" or heavy emphasis on indigenous frameworks in core public services, preferring that cultural learning remain a matter of parental or individual choice rather than a political mandate.

3. Support for Children at School (Cost of Living & Wellbeing)

For working households dealing with cost-of-living pressures, school support services are a major point of difference:

  • Te Pāti Māori, The Greens & Labour:
    • Te Pāti Māori and The Greens advocate for expanding universal student support—pledging support for free school lunches, expanded free public transport for youth, and free in-school mental health counselling to alleviate household budgets.
    • Labour has traditionally championed universal in-school support packages (such as Ka Ora, Ka Ako / school lunches) to ease household grocery pressures, arguing that fed children learn better.
  • National, ACT & NZ First:
    • Focus more strongly on fiscal restraint, targeted rather than universal welfare, and parental choice. While current settings have seen adjustments to programs like school lunches to target areas of highest need more efficiently, these parties generally argue that easing cost-of-living pressures is best achieved through broad economic management, income tax relief, and cutting government waste rather than expanding universal state-funded services.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

  • If you want Māori-led authorities, compulsory te reo, and universal support to lower household costs: Look toward Te Pāti Māori or The Greens.
  • If you want public education partnerships with an emphasis on standard core subjects and targeted rather than universal assistance: Look toward Labour.
  • If you prefer a focus on standard academic basics, school choice (such as charter schools), and unified public systems without separate ethnic governance: Look toward National, ACT, or NZ First.

Note: Advance voting for the 2026 general election begins soon, with election day on Saturday, 7 November 2026. Make sure you are enrolled to vote at vote.nz.


Would you like to explore how these parties compare on cost-of-living economic policies or housing support for working families?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

As a Māori parent balancing household costs while keeping Te Tiriti and self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) at heart, evaluating the political landscape for the 2026 general election involves looking at starkly contrasting visions for education, te reo Māori, and decision-making authority.

Political parties generally fall into distinct approaches regarding Māori-medium education, language integration, and support for tamariki.


1. Te Pāti Māori

  • Māori-Medium Education & Decision-Making: Proposes establishing an independent Māori Education Authority as the cornerstone of its policy. This model aims to shift decision-making power and leadership directly back to Māori, increasing investment across kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori, wharekura, and wānanga while deeply embedding mātauranga Māori into the national framework.
  • Te Reo Māori: Advocates for making te reo Māori a core curriculum subject through Year 10 across the schooling system. [RNZ]
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Focuses heavily on cost-of-living relief for families by pushing for the expansion of free school lunches, free public transport for students, and free school counselling. [RNZ]

2. The Labour Party

  • Māori-Medium Education & Decision-Making: Focuses on partnership approaches and targeted funding through community and iwi pathways. For older tamariki and school leavers, Labour’s policy includes investing in Māori-led trades training via a contestable grant-based fund delivered through marae and iwi trusts. [RNZ]
  • Te Reo Māori & Curriculum: Generally supports the preservation and resourcing of te reo Māori and culturally responsive education within public schooling, contrasting with the rollback of Māori-focused initiatives by the political right. [Policy.nz]
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Emphasises broad cost-of-living and family support policies—such as apprenticeship boosts, public transport caps, and healthcare support—which indirectly ease household financial pressure for working families.

3. National, ACT, and New Zealand First (The Coalition Government Parties)

  • Māori-Medium Education & Decision-Making: Parties on the right generally favor a universal approach to public education rather than race- or Tiriti-specific structural authorities. Their recent curriculum and policy reforms have emphasized foundational basics (reading, writing, maths) in English, shifting away from specific co-governance or separate authority models in public service delivery.
  • Te Reo Māori: Have pursued policies limiting the official use of te reo Māori names within certain public service and government departments, viewing public institutions through a monocultural or strictly English-primary lens, which has drawn criticism from advocates of Te Tiriti partnership. [Policy.nz]
  • Support for Tamariki & Household Costs: Focus on classroom management and reducing direct out-of-pocket school expenses via practical measures (e.g., ACT's proposals to cap compulsory branded school uniform items) rather than broad universal welfare expansions. [RNZ]

Key Questions to Weigh for Your Whānau

  • Self-Determination vs. Mainstream Delivery: Do you believe your tamariki are best served by independent Māori-led authorities (Te Pāti Māori), integrated public system support (Labour), or a standardized national curriculum focused tightly on core basics (National/ACT)?
  • Language as a Core Right: Do you prefer parties pushing to make te reo Māori compulsory through Year 10, or those maintaining the status quo where it remains largely optional or secondary in mainstream settings?
  • Household Relief: Weigh which party's economic and cost-of-living package (such as school lunches and transport support vs. broader tax and inflation strategies) best relieves pressure on your working household budget.

You can review detailed, side-by-side party manifestos on Policy.nz to see how individual candidates and groups break down their commitments to Te Ao Māori and Education. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

AI Overview

As you consider your vote for the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties present starkly different pathways for Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and school-level support. For a working Māori household balancing household costs and values around Te Tiriti and local decision-making, the major policy platforms break down across three distinct approaches: systemic Māori self-determination, strengthening existing Crown partnerships, and a focus on centralized core achievement.

Māori-Medium Education & Decision-Making Authority

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for complete educational self-determination by establishing an independent Māori Education Authority. This authority would hand governance and decision-making over Māori education back to Māori communities. Their platform includes introducing a Kōhanga Reo Act , allocating an annual $250 million fund for kōhanga reo refurbishments, and building 20 new kōhanga reo over three years.

  • Green Party: Strongly supports the establishment of a Māori Education Authority alongside Te Pāti Māori. They advocate for a system that actively honors Te Tiriti o Waitangi by centering power and funding within local Māori communities rather than centralized Crown structures.

  • Labour Party: Commits to returning to a "genuine partnership" model in education following a Waitangi Tribunal report detailing Treaty breaches in recent curriculum structural changes. Labour promises greater Māori leadership over Māori education by reversing structural cuts and supporting iwi, hapū, and marae trusts with $21 million annually to deliver Māori-led trades and vocational training. They also pledge to pass an amendment bill legally requiring school boards to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

  • National & ACT: Focus on a centralized, universal education system rather than separate Māori-led authorities. ACT advocates for educational choice through charter schools —noting that eight out of twenty newly approved charter schools are iwi-led kaupapa Māori—but they frame this as parental choice within a market model rather than institutionalized co-governance. They also oppose university or public sector support allocated explicitly by ethnicity.

Te Reo Māori & Indigenous Knowledge

  • Green Party: Pledging a landmark $200 million package dedicated to te reo Māori initiatives over four years ($50m annually). This includes $30 million per year for continuous professional development to upskill teachers in te reo Māori across the entire education sector, and $20 million per year split between Te Taura Whiri (The Māori Language Commission) and Te Mātāwai to boost community-led reo revitalization.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Pledges to make te reo Māori a core compulsory subject through Year 10. They aim to fully embed mātauranga Māori (indigenous knowledge) seamlessly throughout the national curriculum and would immediately reinstate the $30 million in funding for Te Ahu o te reo Māori (the teacher reo program).

  • Labour Party: Pledges to reverse the current government's cuts to te reo Māori teacher training and school resources. They support keeping te reo Māori and Aotearoa history fundamentally integrated within the universal curriculum.

  • National & ACT: Support a core curriculum heavily focused on traditional literacy, numeracy, and science. The current coalition previously repurposed Te Ahu o te reo Māori funds into primary school mathematics resources, arguing that funding must strictly prioritize direct student achievement metrics. ACT actively opposes compulsory te reo Māori in mainstream schools, characterizing mandatory language requirements as "social engineering".

Support for Tamariki & Working Household Costs

  • Labour Party: Directly targets back-to-school expenses for working households by reinstating the previous free school lunch model (charging $5 for primary, $6.50 for high school meals using school kitchens, local caterers, and iwi/hapū partners). They also pledge to lower household bills by legislating to make school uniforms cheaper through affordable, generic alternatives, capping public transport costs at $20, and wiping 10% off eligible student loan balances.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on the student safety net by offering fully expanded free school lunches, free public transport for all students , and free, universally accessible school counseling services. To alleviate debt pressures on families, they pledge to write off the student loans of graduates who stay to work in New Zealand for five years.

  • Green Party: Proposes a universal student allowance and paid placements for trainee teachers and social support workers to ease living costs. They also seek to expand the Ka Ora, Ka Ako school lunch program and introduce a $2,000 equipment grant to cover uniforms and course materials for those entering trades training.

  • National Party: Focuses on learning focus and boundaries, introducing policies that ban screens in early childhood centres and highly restrict devices/screen time in Years 1 to 3. National requires students to remain legally enrolled in school until they fully complete Year 11.

  • ACT Party: Tackles household school costs by introducing policies to limit state schools to a maximum of three compulsory branded uniform items , forcing schools to allow generic, cheaper clothing lines to ease the burden on working families. They also prioritize classroom environment by granting teachers enhanced legal powers to immediately remove persistently disruptive students from classrooms.

If you would like to explore these impacts further, let me know:

  • Whether your children are currently in Early Childhood, Primary, or Secondary school
  • If you want to view a side-by-side comparison of household tax/cost-of-living policies (like minimum wage, family tax credits, or transport subsidies) among specific parties

I can tailor the exact dollar figures and policy trade-offs to your household setup.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account