Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would you help me choose a party while weighing both household finances and Te Tiriti, without assuming my ethnicity tells you my political views?

I’d help you make this decision by treating household affordability, access to local services, Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and Māori participation in decision-making as distinct but connected issues — without assuming that being Māori determines how you should vote.

As a Māori parent in a working household, you may want to understand both what a party's policies could mean for your whānau's everyday budget and how its approach to Te Tiriti could affect the institutions and communities you care about. You might weigh those issues equally, prioritise one over another, or have other considerations that matter more. That's for you to decide.

The goal would be to give you a clear, evidence-based comparison of the parties contesting the 2026 New Zealand general election, rather than tell you which party to support.

1. Start with the things that matter to your household

I'd examine policies in four areas.

Could more community-led supermarkets work in New Zealand?

Household finances

  • Income tax, take-home pay and benefit entitlements.
  • GST, grocery prices and other everyday costs.
  • Rent or mortgage costs, rates, power and transport.
  • Childcare costs, Working for Families and paid parental leave.
  • Wages, employment security and support for working parents.

I'd distinguish announced tax cuts or payments from their likely effect on your total weekly budget, including any eligibility rules.

Contact — Te Piki Oranga | Māori Wellness Services

Local services

  • GP visits, prescription costs and access to healthcare.
  • School funding, learning support and early childhood education.
  • Public transport, roads, housing and council services.
  • Access to Māori health providers and kaupapa Māori services.

I'd separate nationwide policy from services delivered locally, where availability can vary by region.

Waitangi Treaty Grounds - Bay of Islands Travel Guide - New Zealand

Te Tiriti o Waitangi

  • How parties interpret and give effect to Te Tiriti.
  • Their positions on Treaty principles in legislation and public services.
  • Māori health, education, housing and development policies.
  • Their approach to Treaty settlements and the Crown–Māori relationship.

I'd distinguish a party's stated principles from the legislation it proposes, the decisions it has made and the practical consequences of those decisions.

Te Hui Oranga 2024 revives Pacific solidarity against threats to moana – Te Ao Māori News

Māori participation and decision-making

  • The role of iwi, hapū and Māori communities in decisions.
  • Māori representation in local and central government.
  • Consultation, co-governance and Māori decision-making authority.
  • Support for te reo Māori, tikanga and Māori-led organisations.

I'd examine the actual powers, responsibilities and accountability arrangements involved, not just whether a party uses the word “partnership”.

2. Compare what parties propose, not just what they promise

For the 2026 election, I'd use current party policies, voting records, coalition agreements and independent reporting. One important starting point is that parties can have different positions on household economics and Te Tiriti; those positions shouldn't be collapsed into a single political label.

For example, National's published 2026 policy platform includes commitments on tax, grocery competition, power costs, rates and paid parental leave. Those are proposals to examine against your circumstances, rather than assume they will produce a particular saving for every household. 2026 Election Policy

A September 2026 analysis by Te Ao Māori News examined parties' published Te Tiriti positions and reported differences in their approaches, including Labour's stated commitments and the positions of ACT and New Zealand First on Treaty-related institutions. Because this is an analysis of party policies, I'd check the underlying party documents and distinguish the author's interpretation from the parties' own statements. Opinion: Where do political parties stand on te tiriti?

I'd build a comparison like this:

Question What I'd check
Will we have more money left each week? Tax changes, entitlements, price effects and eligibility
Will essential services be more accessible? Funding, fees, staffing, eligibility and delivery plans
How will Te Tiriti be given effect? Specific policy, proposed legislation and existing commitments
Who has a say in decisions? Māori representation, authority, consultation and accountability
Can the party deliver? Costings, implementation plans, past record and coalition arrangements

Where a policy is unclear, I'd mark it as unclear rather than fill the gap with assumptions. I'd also separate a party's promises from its record in government.

3. Make the comparison reflect your own priorities

Rather than assign importance to issues on your behalf, I'd let you decide what matters most. You can try the following optional exercise.

Your decision priorities

Rate each area from 0 (not a priority for my vote) to 5 (essential to my decision). These are prompts for reflection, not a party score or voting recommendation.

Household finances

5/5

0

3

5

0

3

5

0

3

5

Local services

4/5

0

3

5

0

3

5

0

3

5

Te Tiriti commitments

5/5

0

3

5

0

3

5

0

3

5

Māori participation in decisions

4/5

0

3

5

0

3

5

0

3

5

Build my comparison framework

You don't have to treat these ratings as fixed weights. You might also have a firm requirement, such as a particular position on Te Tiriti, that you don't want offset by a tax saving elsewhere.

4. Keep the decision practical

Once we've identified your priorities, I'd examine the policies in more detail:

  • Translate financial policies into dollars. Use a hypothetical or your chosen household figures to compare weekly and annual effects, stating assumptions and distinguishing direct effects from uncertain price changes.
  • Check local delivery. Look at who funds and provides the service, whether the policy is national or local, and what evidence exists that access would change.
  • Read Te Tiriti policies in context. Check the proposed legal changes, Māori decision-making arrangements and implications for existing commitments, rather than relying on slogans.
  • Check feasibility. Review fiscal costings, implementation timelines, parliamentary support and coalition agreements. A party's policy is not automatically government policy.
  • Use more than one source. Compare official party material with independent reporting, parliamentary records and relevant public-service information.

You can also use the official Vote NZ 2026 election guide to understand the voting process. Advance voting begins on 26 October and election day is 7 November 2026. The Electoral Commission explains that your electorate-roll choice determines which electorate candidate you vote for, but does not change your party vote. 2026 General ElectionKey dates for 2026 General Election

Where I'd begin with you

I'd start with one question: what would make the biggest difference to your whānau over the next three years?

It could be having more money left after bills, getting timely healthcare and education support, strengthening Te Tiriti in public decision-making, ensuring Māori have meaningful authority over decisions affecting them, or some combination of these.

Your answer would help determine which policies we investigate first — not which party you ought to support. The final choice should remain yours, informed by evidence about both the material effects of policy and the values you want represented in Parliament.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would you help me choose a party while weighing both household finances and Te Tiriti, without assuming my ethnicity tells you my political views?

Navigating a general election involves balancing competing priorities. For a working Māori parent, this often means weighing the immediate needs of household finances—such as the cost of living, housing, healthcare, and education—alongside constitutional values like Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori participation in decision-making.

To help you choose a party that aligns with your values without making assumptions about your perspective, a structured approach can break down where the major political parties stand across these two core areas.


Step 1: Assessing Household Finances and Local Services

Different parties propose distinct economic paths to ease cost-of-living pressures and support working households, generally falling into two philosophies: cutting taxes/spending or expanding public services.

  • Fiscal Discipline & Tax Relief (e.g., National, ACT):
    • Focus: Lowering or keeping taxes flat, reining in government spending, and streamlining regulatory or consenting processes to stimulate business growth and private-sector jobs.
    • Household impact: Appeals to families looking to keep more of their take-home pay, though critics argue it can result in reduced funding for public services.
  • Targeted Relief & National Infrastructure (e.g., New Zealand First):
    • Focus: Focusing on cost-of-living measures through specific adjustments (such as removing GST from basic foods), restricting certain government costs, and supporting regional industries and infrastructure.
  • Public Investment & Service Expansion (e.g., Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori, The Opportunity Party):
    • Focus: Expanding access to free or subsidized public services (such as healthcare, dental, or public transport), strengthening workers' rights, and implementing progressive tax reforms (like wealth or land taxes) to fund social support.
    • Household impact: Appeals to families who rely heavily on public health, education, and social infrastructure, though opponents caution against the tax structures or government borrowing required to fund them.

Step 2: Evaluating Te Tiriti and Māori Participation

The constitutional future of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, co-governance, and public sector obligations are among the most distinct dividing lines in New Zealand politics.

  • Re-evaluating or Limiting Treaty Frameworks (e.g., ACT, New Zealand First):
    • Focus: Advocating for "one law for all," narrowing the legal scope of the Treaty principles, removing specific race-based or co-governance provisions from public entities, and reviewing mechanisms like Māori wards or elements of the Waitangi Tribunal.
    • Rationale: Argue for individual civic equality and parliamentary sovereignty above structural partnership.
  • Maintaining Status Quo / Moderate Engagement (e.g., National, Labour):
    • Focus: National generally favors decentralized public service delivery focused on socioeconomic need rather than race-specific co-governance. Labour campaigns on restoring explicit Treaty obligations in sectors like education and maintaining standard consultation, while steering clear of more radical constitutional overhauls.
  • Strengthening Rangatiratanga and Treaty-Centric Governance (e.g., Green Party, Te Pāti Māori):
    • Focus: Advancing constitutional transformation based on Te Tiriti, strengthening hapū and iwi self-determination, increasing Māori political power, resourcing the Waitangi Tribunal with binding powers, and embedding te reo and tikanga across public structures.
    • Rationale: Argue that true equity and community well-being require honoring partnership and self-determination at a structural level.

A Framework to Help You Decide

To narrow down your party vote, you can weigh these dimensions using a personal matrix:

  1. Rank Your Pressing Realities: What impacts your whānau most acutely this week? Is it grocery and housing costs, the quality of your local school and healthcare access, or ensuring your tamariki grow up in a system that honors their identity?
  2. Look Beyond the Rhetoric: Read the specific policy manifestos rather than headline debates. Check how a party's economic policy matches your financial reality, and how their constitutional policy matches your view of Te Tiriti.
  3. Consider Coalition Realities: Under New Zealand's MMP system, single parties rarely govern alone. Think about which potential governing coalitions or partnerships you would be comfortable seeing formed after election night.

To help tailor this, which of these issues—easing household expenses, strengthening public services, or advancing Te Tiriti-based decision-making—feels most critical for your whānau right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would you help me choose a party while weighing both household finances and Te Tiriti, without assuming my ethnicity tells you my political views?

Choosing a political party when balancing household economics, community services, and constitutional commitments like Te Tiriti o Waitangi involves untangling a wide array of contrasting approaches. Every household's financial reality and perspective on partnership with the Crown is unique, and ethnicity does not dictate political priorities.

To help evaluate the options for the 2026 general election objectively, a structured framework can map how different parties approach both household finances/local services and Te Tiriti o Waitangi.


Step 1: Clarify Your Household and Community Priorities

Before looking at party platforms, pinpoint what matters most for your whānau and rohe:

  • Household Finances: Are you most focused on income tax thresholds, relief on high grocery/energy prices, family support grants, or housing affordability?

  • Local Services: Do you prioritize funding for local public healthcare, regional infrastructure, public transport, or education and te reo Māori pathways?

  • Te Tiriti and Decision-Making: What does meaningful participation look like to you? This ranges from strong Crown-Māori co-governance and self-determination (rangatiratanga) to a focus on equal individual citizenship and public service delivery without race-based distinction.


Step 2: Compare the Policy Spectrum

New Zealand political parties offer distinct ideological packages combining economic management with views on Te Tiriti.

Parties Emphasizing Co-Governance, Partnership, and Targeted Economic Support

  • Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand: Focuses heavily on systemic economic reform (such as wealth taxes on high earners to fund income supports and tax-free thresholds for lower earners) alongside a dedicated Māori-centred and Te Tiriti framework emphasizing environmental guardianship (whenua and moana) and indigenous self-determination.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Centers its entire platform on absolute tino rangatiratanga and the restoration of Te Tiriti as the supreme constitutional framework. Economically, they advocate for radical redistribution, removing GST off food, and building state housing to directly relieve working-class and Māori household costs.

  • New Zealand Labour Party: Positions cost-of-living relief, housing, and public health/education at the center of household affordability, while supporting public service equity and partnership models grounded in Te Tiriti, though generally less radically than the Greens or Te Pāti Māori. [Waatea News]

Parties Emphasizing Market-Led Economy and Equal Citizenship / Reform of Te Tiriti

  • New Zealand National Party / ACT New Zealand: Generally focus on broad-based tax relief, reducing regulatory constraints on business to lower consumer costs, and streamlining public spending. On constitutional matters, they advocate for defining or limiting the application of Te Tiriti principles in legislation, arguing for equal treatment of all citizens and scaling back race-based co-governance mechanisms in public institutions.

  • New Zealand First: Combines populist economic interventions (such as investigating market competition in banking and energy or supporting regional manufacturing/mining royalties) with a strong stance against race-based public policy, advocating instead for universal public service delivery based on individual need rather than ethnicity. [The Conversation]


Step 3: Utilize Evaluation Tools

To read direct source text, cross-examine specific policy proposals, and see where every registered group stands on these exact intersections, consult the following independent resources:

  • Compare side-by-side stances on local services, financial assistance, and indigenous rights using the Policy.nz Party Vote Guide.

  • Review structural and economic manifestos directly via party platforms, such as the Green Party Manifesto or tracking ongoing campaign announcements through independent public interest journalism like The Conversation's Policy Tracker and Waatea News. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would you help me choose a party while weighing both household finances and Te Tiriti, without assuming my ethnicity tells you my political views?

AI Overview

Choosing a party in the 2026 New Zealand general election means looking at how different political visions directly affect your wallet, your kids, and the constitutional future of Aotearoa. Because political views vary widely across every community, the best approach is to look at where the parties stand on both fronts so you can weigh what matters most to your whānau.

Here is a neutral, direct comparison of how the major parties plan to balance household finances and Te Tiriti o Waitangi / Māori participation.

Policy Comparison for the 2026 Election

Political Party Household Finances & Costs Te Tiriti & Decision Making
National Focuses on "fixing the basics" by controlling government spending to curb inflation. Pledges no new taxes, expanding KiwiSaver contributions for children, and lowering red tape to split the supermarket duopoly. Focuses on equal citizenship under the law. Generally opposes co-governance models in public services, prioritising streamlined, centralized delivery over distinct Māori crown entities.
Labour Promotes targeted relief: three free GP visits annually via "Medicard" , free prescriptions, and a public transport fare cap. Funds these via a 28% capital gains tax on investment properties (exempting the family home). Positions Te Tiriti as central to public policy. Pledges to reinstate school boards' Treaty obligations, back Māori into skilled vocational training, and support targeted Māori health initiatives.
Green Party Advocates for systemic wealth redistribution. Pledges a wealth tax on net assets over $10m to fund universal services like free dental, free public transport, and free early childhood education. Strong emphasis on tino rangatiratanga and Treaty rights. Supports embedding Te Tiriti deeply within public sector decisions, climate planning, and environmental protection.
ACT Campaigns on aggressive tax and spending cuts to lower costs. Pledges a simplified two-rate income tax (top rate 28%) and cutting red tape in grocery, electricity, and rental markets to drive down prices. Focuses heavily on individual liberty and equal legal rights. Pledges to scale back the use of Treaty principles in legislation and downsize government departments that divide services by ethnicity.
Te Pāti Māori Pledges a $30,000 tax-free income threshold , removing GST from all food, and a wealth tax to fund massive investments in whānau-led services and housing developments. Demands sweeping constitutional reform. Bottom-line policies include making Waitangi Tribunal recommendations binding, creating an independent Te Tiriti Commission, and establishing a Parliamentary Commissioner for Te Tiriti.
NZ First Pledges to lower company tax for small-to-medium businesses to 20%, introduce a "Kiwi Kids Grant" of $5,000 annually for the first three years of a child's life, and break up wholesale energy companies. Strongly opposes separate Māori systems. Pledges to abolish the Waitangi Tribunal once historical claims are resolved and introduce a binding referendum on the future of the Māori electoral seats.

Questions to Help You Choose

To weigh these platforms against your own values and household needs, it can help to ask yourself a few key questions:

  • What is your immediate financial priority? Do you prefer a party that offers direct, universal services (like free healthcare or transport caps), tax cuts to keep more money in your pay packet, or structural wealth taxes to fund community infrastructure?

  • How do you define fair participation? Do you believe Māori interests are best protected by embedding Te Tiriti explicitly into law and state co-governance, or do you believe a single, colorblind system for all New Zealanders delivers fairer public outcomes?

  • Which coalition dynamic sits right with you? Under MMP, minor parties heavily shape the government. Are you more comfortable with the policies of a potential National/ACT/NZ First coalition, or a Labour/Green/Te Pāti Māori arrangement?

To explore detailed policies further as the election approaches, you can check the comprehensive interactives on Policy.nz or view the independent values-based breakdowns provided by platforms like Common Grace Aotearoa.

If you would like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • Which specific household cost (e.g., childcare, rent, groceries, or transport) strains your budget the most?

  • What level of decision-making matters most to you (e.g., local council representation, health system delivery, or national constitutional changes)?

I can then provide a deeper dive into the specific party rules on those issues.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account