New Zealand 2026 election: Disability rights, income support and fair treatment

If you live with a long-term health condition that limits your ability to work, three issues are particularly important when comparing political parties:

• Financial security: Will your income support cover essential living costs, and will you be treated fairly if your health prevents you from working?
• Access to healthcare and disability support: Will you be able to afford regular medical appointments and get the support you need without unnecessary barriers?
• Your rights when dealing with government: Will government agencies be required to treat you fairly, make reasonable accommodations for your disability, and involve disabled people in decisions that affect them?

As New Zealand's general election approaches on 7 November 2026, parties are taking different approaches to these questions. Some emphasise enforceable disability rights and stronger income support; others focus on the consistency of disability services, individual choice, financial accountability or encouraging employment where possible.

The comparison below draws on disability-policy reporting published in October 2026, including responses from seven political parties. It distinguishes specific commitments from broader policy positions, because a party's general statements about disability do not necessarily guarantee a particular benefit or service. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz, drnz.co.nz

1. Disability rights and fair treatment by government agencies

A major difference between the parties is whether they want stronger, legally enforceable disability rights or prefer to improve services through existing legislation, government strategies and administrative changes.

A central issue in the 2026 campaign is the Disability Support Services legislation, which became law in September 2026. Parties disagree about whether the legislation provides an appropriate framework for disability support. thedlist.co.nz

Party	Position on disability rights and government services
Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand	Proposes disability rights legislation based on Te Tiriti o Waitangi, with enforceable accessibility standards. Opposes the new disability support legislation and has committed to improving legal protections and accessibility. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz
New Zealand Labour Party	Has pledged to repeal and rewrite the disability support legislation in partnership with disabled people, their families, carers and representative organisations. Also supports defining reasonable accommodation in the Human Rights Act and recognising its denial as discrimination. thedlist.co.nz
Te Pāti Māori	Opposed the new legislation, arguing that disability support should take a rights-based approach. Proposes greater investment in the Enabling Good Lives approach and more accessible support and funding. thedlist.co.nz
New Zealand National Party	Supports the new legislation, describing it as a way to improve consistency, fairness, transparency and the sustainability of disability services. It also supports the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2026–2030. thedlist.co.nz
ACT New Zealand	Supports the new legislation, emphasising consistency, individual choice, support according to individual need and the financial sustainability of services. It favours practical accessibility improvements and measurable outcomes. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz
New Zealand First	Supported the new disability support legislation. In the disability-policy comparison, the party did not provide a detailed response on its broader disability rights programme. It has introduced an Accessibility Standards Bill as a member's bill. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz
The Opportunities Party (TOP)	Did not respond to the disability-policy questions in this comparison. Its absence of a response should not be interpreted as opposition to disability rights. thedlist.co.nz

What does this mean for you?

If your main concern is being treated fairly when you apply for support, challenge a decision or ask for adjustments because of your health, look closely at three things:

• Enforceable rights: Would a party introduce legal standards that government agencies must meet, rather than relying primarily on guidance or policy?
• Reasonable accommodation: Would you have clearer rights to accessible communication, appropriate appointment arrangements and services that account for your limitations?
• Involvement in decisions: Would disabled people have a formal role in designing disability services and policies?

The Greens have made particularly explicit commitments to enforceable disability rights and accessibility legislation. Labour has made specific commitments on reasonable accommodation and rewriting the disability support legislation. National and ACT emphasise consistency, transparency and the delivery of support within the existing legislative framework. Te Pāti Māori emphasises a rights-based approach and disabled people's autonomy. These are differences in stated policy direction, not guarantees about how any individual government agency would treat you. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz

Importantly, fair treatment is not only about what a party promises; it is also about whether you can challenge an unfair decision and obtain a remedy.

2. Income support: Who proposes changes that could affect your financial security?

If you cannot work, or can only work to a limited extent, the rules governing benefits are especially important. The differences between parties include benefit levels, financial penalties, medical reassessments and whether a partner's income should affect your entitlement.

Here is what the parties have said about welfare and disability-related financial support, according to the October 2026 policy comparison. thedlist.co.nz

Party	Relevant income-support proposals
Green Party	Proposes increasing benefits to liveable levels, removing benefit sanctions, and making entitlements independent of relationship status. It also proposes support for disability-related living and medical costs and extending ACC coverage to injuries, illnesses and disabilities regardless of their origin.
Labour	Has expressed a commitment to accessible and inclusive support for disabled people and carers who need additional funding. The party's response to the disability-funding questions did not provide detailed new commitments on benefit rates.
Te Pāti Māori	Proposes doubling baseline benefit levels to meet the upper range of the Welfare Expert Advisory Group recommendations, removing financial penalties and work-test obligations, and making benefit entitlements independent of relationship status.
National	Emphasises economic recovery, employment and the sustainability of government spending. Its published welfare proposals include stricter rules for some Jobseeker recipients, although these should not automatically be assumed to apply to every person receiving long-term disability support.
ACT	Supports ongoing assistance for people with enduring disabilities who cannot work, while proposing independent medical certification against clear criteria and phased reassessments of existing health and disability benefit recipients. ACT's fiscal plan proposes reducing disability funding by $653 million between 2028 and 2031.
New Zealand First	The disability-funding comparison did not establish a detailed new programme for long-term disabled beneficiaries. Its broader welfare policies include a proposed 10-year stand-down from benefits for visa holders.
TOP	Proposes a Citizen's Income of up to $370 a week for almost all adults, with additional disability and other targeted support retained. The details of how this would interact with existing entitlements would need careful examination.

Sources: The D*List's disability-funding comparison. thedlist.co.nz

Three particularly important differences

A. Whether your benefit should depend on your partner's income

The Greens and Te Pāti Māori explicitly propose individualising benefit entitlements so that eligibility does not depend on relationship status.

This could matter if you have a partner, or if forming a relationship might affect your financial independence. Before relying on any promise, check whether the proposal applies to your specific payment, such as Supported Living Payment, and whether there are transitional rules.

B. How disability and work capacity should be assessed

ACT proposes independent medical certification and reassessment of existing recipients. Its stated rationale is to distinguish people who cannot work from those who could work with support.

For someone whose condition is long-term or fluctuating, it is worth asking parties how they would account for variable symptoms, medical evidence, the burden of repeated assessments and the risk of inappropriate benefit reductions.

C. Whether existing financial support is sufficient

The Greens and Te Pāti Māori have proposed substantial changes to benefit levels and eligibility rules. National and ACT place greater emphasis on fiscal sustainability and the design of the existing welfare system.

These differences matter, but proposed changes are not the same as enacted policy. The final benefit you would receive would depend on the legislation, eligibility criteria and implementation arrangements adopted by a future government. thedlist.co.nz

---

3. Regular medical appointments and healthcare affordability

For someone managing a long-term health condition, healthcare policy is not just about hospital waiting lists. It is also about the recurring costs of GP visits, prescriptions, specialist appointments and travel.

The parties have made different commitments on these issues. thedlist.co.nz

Party	Relevant healthcare commitments
Labour	Has announced three free doctor's visits a year and free prescriptions, alongside other health measures. The announced package specifies eligibility conditions for some services, so check the final policy for how each measure would apply to you.
Green Party	Proposes working towards publicly delivered, fully free primary and dental care, increasing sustained Pharmac funding and funding mobile health clinics to improve access.
Te Pāti Māori	Proposes investment in free primary healthcare, dental care, medication delivery and mobile and marae-based clinics, alongside Māori-led health services.
National	Has committed to training health workers to make services easier for disabled people to use, as part of its disability strategy.
ACT	Proposes closing the medicines-funding gap with Australia, expanding the conditions pharmacists can treat and introducing secure, round-the-clock prescription collection lockers.
New Zealand First	Says it supports a universal healthcare system in which access is based on clinical need, but provided limited detail in its response to the disability-specific healthcare questions.
TOP	Advocates a cross-party, 10-year plan for health and education, but did not directly answer the disability-specific healthcare questions in this comparison.

Source: The D*List, Healthcare policy comparison. thedlist.co.nz

What should you look for in healthcare policies?

Consider whether a party's proposals would help with:

• Repeated appointments: Would your GP visits and specialist consultations become less expensive?
• Medication: Would prescriptions remain affordable, particularly if you need several medicines over an extended period?
• Access to services: Would you be able to obtain appointments in an accessible setting or through an appropriate alternative?
• Continuity of care: Would changes to healthcare funding improve your ability to maintain treatment for a chronic condition?

One important distinction: a promise of free GP visits does not necessarily mean all specialist consultations, tests or other medical services will be free.

Support you may be able to access now

You do not need to wait for the election to investigate help with ongoing medical expenses.

New Zealand's current Disability Allowance can help eligible people with regular, ongoing disability-related costs, including doctor visits, prescription charges and travel for treatment. It is subject to eligibility rules, and the costs generally need to be verified by a health practitioner.

Find the eligibility requirements and application information through the official Work and Income Disability Allowance page. workandincome.govt.nz

Work and Income also explains available assistance with prescriptions and health practitioner costs. workandincome.govt.nz

---

4. Accessibility and fair treatment in everyday government services

This issue goes beyond healthcare and income support.

You might need to communicate with Work and Income, attend an assessment, submit medical evidence, complete an online application or appeal a decision. A service can technically be available to everyone but still be difficult to use if its processes do not account for disability.

The parties differ on whether accessibility should be reinforced through enforceable legislation, improved through government strategies or addressed through practical changes to services.

What parties propose

• The Greens: Propose enforceable accessibility standards covering areas including transport, education, banking, digital access and public infrastructure.
• Labour: Supports further work on accessibility legislation and has committed to defining reasonable accommodation in the Human Rights Act.
• Te Pāti Māori: Supports the intent of the proposed Accessibility Standards Bill and has committed to implementing recommendations for effective accessibility legislation.
• National: Supports practical accessibility improvements and continuing work under the New Zealand Disability Strategy.
• ACT: Supports removing practical barriers to participation and measuring whether accessibility improvements deliver results.
• New Zealand First: Has introduced the Accessibility Standards Bill as a member's bill, although it did not provide a detailed response to the disability-policy questionnaire on accessibility.
• TOP: Did not directly respond to the accessibility questions in this comparison.

These positions are based on the parties' responses and commitments reported by the D*List in October 2026. The proposed legislation and other commitments should not be confused with accessibility requirements already in force. thedlist.co.nz

What does fair treatment already mean under New Zealand law?

Some protections already exist, regardless of which party wins the election.

• The Human Rights Act 1993 protects against unlawful discrimination on the grounds of disability in specified areas of public life, including employment, education, housing and the provision of goods and services. See the Ministry of Justice's explanation of the Act. justice.govt.nz
• The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights includes rights to freedom from discrimination, dignity and independence, appropriate standards of care, and effective communication. See the relevant New Zealand legislation. legislation.govt.nz
• If you believe a government agency has treated you unfairly, you can raise the issue with the agency first and, if it remains unresolved, consider complaining to the Office of the Ombudsman. govt.nz

The political question is whether these existing protections are sufficient, whether they should be strengthened and how effectively agencies should be held accountable.

For your circumstances, I would pay particular attention to commitments concerning accessible application processes, appropriate medical assessments, reasonable accommodation and meaningful ways to challenge decisions.

---

5. How to compare the parties against your own priorities

Rather than relying on a party's general statements about supporting disabled people, you could use the following questions to assess the policies most relevant to you.

Your priority	Questions to ask each party
Maintaining income support	Would you protect people with enduring health conditions who cannot work? Would benefit rates cover essential living costs?
Avoiding unnecessary reassessments	What evidence would you require from people with established, long-term conditions? How would you avoid unnecessary reassessment or disruption to payments?
Financial independence	Would a partner's income affect eligibility for my payment? Would your proposed rules differ from the current system?
Affording medical care	Would I pay less for regular GP visits, specialist appointments, prescriptions and travel? Which services would remain chargeable?
Fair treatment by agencies	Would you introduce enforceable accessibility and reasonable-accommodation requirements for government services?
Challenging decisions	What independent review or appeal process would be available if an agency made an incorrect decision about my entitlement or support needs?
Having a say	Would disabled people and their representative organisations participate meaningfully in designing policies that affect them?

A useful independent resource is the Disabled Persons Assembly NZ's 2026 Disability Scorecard. It asked seven major parties ten questions about disability rights, benefit-related financial penalties, accessibility legislation, funding and participation in government decisions. The page describes the questions and the scorecard project; check the latest published results for the parties' actual responses. dpa.org.nz

You can also watch or read the transcript of The D*List's 2026 Disability Debate, where party representatives discussed disability support, transport and other issues affecting disabled people. thedlist.co.nz

---

6. The key differences to keep in mind

Based on the policy commitments reported in October 2026, the main distinctions are:

• Greens: Explicit proposals for enforceable disability rights, accessibility standards, higher income support and fewer benefit restrictions.
• Labour: A proposed rights-based rewrite of disability support legislation, stronger reasonable-accommodation provisions and specific healthcare commitments.
• Te Pāti Māori: Proposals centred on disabled people's autonomy, whānau-centred support, higher benefit levels and fewer financial penalties.
• National: An emphasis on the current disability support framework, consistency and transparency, alongside its Disability Strategy.
• ACT: An emphasis on individual choice, targeted support, medical certification, reassessment and fiscal sustainability.
• New Zealand First: Support for the current disability support legislation and a proposed accessibility bill, but less detailed published information in the disability-specific comparisons.
• TOP: A proposed Citizen's Income and additional disability support, but limited responses to the disability-specific policy questionnaires.

These are summaries of policy positions, not rankings of the parties or guarantees of future outcomes. The amount of detail each party has provided also differs. thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz, thedlist.co.nz

One final point: If your ability to work is permanently or substantially limited, the distinction between supporting people who cannot work and encouraging those who can work with assistance is especially relevant. It is worth asking each party how its policies would protect people in your position, rather than assuming that a general promise to help disabled people necessarily covers your circumstances.

Ultimately, the most useful comparison is the one that lets you assess whether a party's actual commitments match your needs for financial stability, reliable healthcare and fair treatment by government agencies.