Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

If you're voting for the first time, it's completely reasonable to start with something practical: Which parties want to make everyday life more affordable, and how would they try to do it? You don't need to understand every political term to make an informed choice. The important thing is to work out what each party proposes, who would benefit, how it would be paid for, and whether it might make a difference to your household.

First, what can a government do about food and bills?

  • Food prices: A government can influence competition between supermarkets, make it easier for new businesses to compete, change taxes, and help with some costs. It cannot simply set every supermarket price.
  • Power bills: It can change electricity-market rules, support different ways of generating power, and provide assistance to eligible households.
  • Rent and housing costs: It can change housing rules, support house-building, and alter accommodation assistance.
  • Wages and income: It can change minimum-wage rules, taxes, and benefits. These affect how much money people have left after paying bills.

Parties may agree that living costs are a problem but disagree about the cause and the best solution. Some emphasize lowering taxes and business costs; others focus more on government support, stronger competition rules, or public services.

1. What the parties are proposing

The following is a plain-English guide to the main parties' published 2026 campaign policies, checked against election policy trackers and consumer reporting available as of 26 October 2026. These are proposals, not guaranteed outcomes.

  • National Party: Encourages competition and economic growth. Proposes separating PAK'nSAVE from New World, making it easier to develop new energy projects; and keeping taxes down.
  • Labour Party: Wants wholesale businesses separated from retail operations, proposes solar installations with no upfront cost, and removal of prescription charges.
  • Green Party: Proposes creating KiwiMart, a publicly owned supermarket chain, and focuses on a fairer, cleaner energy system, alongside action on essential costs.
  • New Zealand First: Wants to break up the supermarket duopoly and strengthen penalties for competition breaches.
  • ACT: Aims to reduce barriers to business and competition, and promotes a faster approval process for new supermarket competitors.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Emphasizes food sovereignty, proposes a tax credit for food purchases, and focuses on making essentials more affordable.

These approaches can overlap. A party might support both tax reductions and assistance programs or combine new taxes on some groups with extra support for others.

5. Where to check the details before voting:

  1. Policy.nz — A useful starting point for comparing proposals by topic.
  2. Consumer NZ — A more detailed explanation of supermarket policies and their possible trade-offs.
  3. The Conversation — Covers other policy areas as well as the cost of living.

The general election is scheduled for 7 November 2026. One final thought: you don't need to pick a party just because it has the most appealing slogan about affordability. Look at the specific changes it proposes and how those changes might affect your own circumstances. If you'd like, we can narrow this down to your biggest concern.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

It is completely normal to find political jargon confusing, especially when you are voting for the first time. Heading into the 2026 New Zealand general election, the "cost of living"—meaning how hard it is to afford groceries, power, rent, and everyday bills—is one of the biggest topics.

While different parties want to help, they have very different ideas on how to do it. Broadly speaking, they split into two main approaches: cutting government spending and taxes versus introducing new taxes to fund services and relief.


1. National and ACT: "Cut Spending and Keep Taxes Low"

  • The Core Idea: These parties believe the best way to lower the cost of living is to shrink the role of government, cut public spending, and avoid new taxes.
  • What it means for food and bills:
    • They argue that when the government spends less, it helps bring down inflation (which stops prices from rising as fast).
    • They oppose new taxes (like taxes on housing profits or wealth), arguing that extra taxes just get passed on to everyday consumers through higher prices.
    • Their focus is on economic growth and business productivity to create better-paying jobs, rather than government handouts or subsidies.

2. Labour: "Targeted Support and Services"

  • The Core Idea: Labour believes the government should actively step in to lower household bills by making key services cheaper or free, funded by taxing wealth from investments.
  • What it means for food and bills:
    • They propose policies to lower health-related costs (such as free or cheaper doctor visits and prescriptions) so families have more money left over for groceries and power.
    • To pay for these and support public services, they propose a capital gains tax on residential and commercial investment properties (excluding your own family home).
    • They also push for measures to help small businesses, which they argue keeps local goods and services competitive.

3. The Green Party and Te Pāti Māori: "Tax the Wealthy to Fund Relief"

  • The Core Idea: These parties argue that New Zealand’s economic system is unfair and that the wealthiest individuals and large corporations should pay much more tax to directly relieve poverty and lower basic costs.
  • What it means for food and bills:
    • Te Pāti Māori proposes removing GST (the 15% sales tax) entirely from food, introducing a tax-free income threshold (so you don't pay tax on your first earned dollars), and introducing a wealth tax.
    • The Greens propose a wealth tax on multi-million dollar assets, a tax-free personal income threshold, and heavily subsidized or free public services (like public transport) to immediately cut household transport and living bills.

4. New Zealand First: "Cut Waste and Target Essentials"

  • The Core Idea: NZ First focuses on cutting government bureaucracy (like spending on consultants) and targeting specific financial relief.
  • What it means for food and bills:
    • They have expressed openness to targeted relief like removing GST from basic food items, while generally opposing broad new property or wealth taxes.
    • They place a strong emphasis on cutting back government waste to ease pressure on the economy.

What about supermarket prices specifically?

Groceries are a major pinch point for everyone in New Zealand. Because New Zealand essentially has a two-player supermarket duopoly (Foodstuffs and Woolworths), many parties—though differing on the economic details—agree that the government or the Commerce Commission needs to keep strict watch on supermarkets to stop unfair price-hiking, with some minor parties even suggesting breaking up the major chains to force real competition.

Summary: Which approach sounds closer to your view?

  • If you think the government should stay out of your wallet, cut spending, and avoid new taxes to fix the economy, you might lean toward National or ACT.
  • If you think the government should help pay for essentials like healthcare and use investment taxes to fund it, you might lean toward Labour.
  • If you think the system should change radically by taxing the very wealthy to make food tax-free or provide major public discounts, you might lean toward the Greens or Te Pāti Māori.

To help make this more personal for you: Is there a specific bill or cost (like power, rent, or groceries) that is hitting your budget the hardest right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

Deciding how to vote for the first time is a big step, and it is completely normal to find political talk confusing. When it comes to the cost of living—paying for groceries, power, and household bills—New Zealand’s political parties generally approach the problem through different economic philosophies.

To help make sense of it at a glance, here is how the main political perspectives break down regarding food and bills:

1. The Governing / Centre-Right Approach (e.g., National and ACT)

  • The Core Idea: Make the overall economy stronger and reduce costs by cutting government spending, reducing regulations, and changing tax structures so people keep more of what they earn.

  • On Bills and Energy: They tend to focus on increasing supply and competition rather than government control. For instance, they look at easing rules around energy production and business consenting to help bring down infrastructure and power generation costs over time.

  • On Food and Supermarkets: Rather than setting government price controls, their approach focuses on encouraging more competition in the commercial sector (like making it easier for new competitors or more supermarket brands to open and operate) to drive prices down naturally.

2. The Centre-Left / Opposition Approach (e.g., Labour)

  • The Core Idea: Use active government policies, market investigations, and direct financial relief or targeted interventions to lower specific household costs immediately.

  • On Bills and Energy: They tend to propose direct assistance or changes to how essential utilities (like power companies or banking services) operate to prevent high profit-making at consumers' expense. They often support programs or subsidies aimed at helping households transition to cheaper energy options (such as solar or community power funds).

  • On Food and Supermarkets: They lean toward stricter market watchdogs or regulatory crackdowns on major corporate players (like the major supermarket duopoly) to ensure they aren't overcharging families for daily essentials like bread and milk.

3. The Progressive / Green Approach (e.g., the Green Party)

  • The Core Idea: Address the root causes of inequality by shifting taxes away from lower-income earners and placing higher taxes on wealth or large corporations, alongside large-scale public support for everyday essentials.

  • On Bills and Energy: They focus heavily on transitioning households to renewable, independent energy (like government-backed grants for home solar panels and community batteries) to permanently cut household power bills.

  • On Food and Inequality: They often advocate for income support adjustments, tackling poverty directly through welfare or tax-free income thresholds, and supporting community food security initiatives. [NZ Herald]


Where to look next

If you want to explore the specific, up-to-date promises of every individual party without wading through spin or jargon, you can use the non-partisan Policy.nz Guide, which lets you compare what different groups say they will do on specific issues like the economy, housing, and power prices. You can also view official voting arrangements and timelines on the Elections NZ Website.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account