Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

New Zealand 2026 election: Education policy comparison

The key issues to compare across parties are childcare affordability, school funding and curriculum, support for students with additional learning needs, and the cost and accessibility of tertiary education.

One important distinction: an election promise is not the same as an existing government policy. For the 2026 New Zealand general election, it's worth separating measures already in place from new commitments, proposed spending and longer-term goals.

I'll focus on nationwide policies rather than local electorate candidates, and cover the main parliamentary parties where their policies can be verified. I can't assume that every party has published a complete 2026 manifesto, so gaps in the available policy information should not be mistaken for a lack of policy.

1. At a glance: the main parties

Party Overall direction on education
National Stronger academic basics, standardised assessment, new qualifications and earlier identification of learning needs. Teaching the basics brilliantlyNational will lift school leaving requirements
Labour More classroom support, lower costs for families and students, and a different approach to curriculum and assessment. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingLabour's 2026 Election Policies
Green Party Free early childhood education, stronger inclusion, more public investment and wider access to tertiary study. Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for EveryoneManifesto 2026Party policies, simplified: Education
ACT Clear academic standards, school choice, more vocational pathways and greater parental choice. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
New Zealand First A family-cost focus includes its proposed Kiwi Kids Grant; its detailed education commitments need to be checked individually. NZFirst Announces Policy to Encourage Kiwis To Have More KidsElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising
Te Pāti Māori Māori-led education, te reo Māori and mātauranga Māori, alongside expanded support for students and whānau. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingParty policies, simplified: Education
The Opportunities Party (TOP) A long-term, cross-party education plan and reform of curriculum and assessment. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingParty policies, simplified: Education

These are broad policy directions, not a claim that every item listed is a newly announced 2026 pledge. The sections below distinguish specific commitments where the available sources provide them.

2. Childcare and early childhood education

About Co Kids - Dedicated Childcare and Preschool in New Zealand — CoKids

Greens — make ECE free

The Greens announced a plan for free early childhood education, aiming to reduce the cost barrier for families. Their wider approach places emphasis on universal access and the public value of early learning. Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for EveryoneManifesto 2026

Labour — strengthen the ECE system

Labour says it will affirm Te Whāriki, work towards pay parity for ECE teachers and strengthen oversight of services, including community and language-based provision. This is not the same as promising fully free childcare. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

  • National: Its education plan emphasises developmental milestones during early childhood, reporting progress to parents, school-readiness checks and expanded early intervention for children who need extra help. It also proposes no screens or individual device use in ECE settings. Teaching the basics brilliantly
  • ACT: Its approach includes simplifying ECE regulation and reviewing funding to make it simpler and fairer, with a stated commitment not to reduce overall funding. ACT New Zealand
  • New Zealand First: Its proposed Kiwi Kids Grant would support eligible New Zealand citizens raising their first three children during each child's first three years. It is a family-cost measure rather than a commitment to make childcare free. NZFirst Announces Policy to Encourage Kiwis To Have More Kids

The key difference: the Greens' proposal directly targets fees; Labour focuses on the workforce and quality of provision; National emphasises readiness and early identification of developmental needs.

3. Schools: teaching, curriculum and costs

An hour a day of reading, writing, and maths

National — more time on core learning

National proposes a School Start Check before children begin school, tighter limits on screens in primary classrooms, paper-based writing assessments, consistent school dates and replacement of NCEA from 2028 with new qualifications. It also proposes requiring students to remain at school until they complete Year 11 or turn 16, whichever comes later. Teaching the basics brilliantlyNational will lift school leaving requirements

  • Labour — reduce costs and change course on reforms. Labour has proposed pausing the current government's curriculum overhaul and NCEA changes. Its 2026 commitments include cheaper school uniforms, restoring healthy school lunches from Term 1 2028, restoring rural school buses and funding school improvements. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingLabour's 2026 Election Policies
  • Greens — inclusion and language revitalisation. Their education approach emphasises inclusive learning and greater support for te reo Māori. The 2026 policy tracker also identifies a commitment to restore and extend the school lunch programme to another 400 schools. Manifesto 2026Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising
  • ACT — choice, accountability and vocational options. ACT supports charter schools, clear academic standards and transparent reporting. It has also proposed more affordable school uniforms, making better use of empty seats on rural school buses, and industry-led vocational subjects for secondary students. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
  • Te Pāti Māori — Māori-led education. Its stated direction includes embedding mātauranga Māori, normalising te reo Māori and expanding school lunches and student transport. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising
  • TOP — a long-term plan. TOP proposes a 10-year, cross-party education plan and an independent curriculum and assessment council, aiming to give education more continuity across changes of government. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

What this means for families

The biggest differences are over how schools should improve achievement and who should shape learning:

  • National and ACT place greater emphasis on measurable academic progress, clear standards and accountability.
  • Labour proposes reversing or pausing some current reforms and prioritising practical help with school costs.
  • The Greens and Te Pāti Māori put greater emphasis on inclusion, te reo Māori and Māori educational aspirations.
  • TOP focuses on longer-term system stability.

These are differences in emphasis, not mutually exclusive goals: parties can support literacy and numeracy while disagreeing about assessment, curriculum, school governance and funding.

4. Learning support, disability and neurodiversity

Learning from the MacLean Centre’s approach to inclusion – Education Gazette

National — expand support within schools

National proposes Learning Support Coordinators for all schools with Year 1–8 students from 2028, plus additional teacher-aide hours and training, building to two million extra hours annually. It also plans to expand early intervention and deliver more specialist classrooms and school facilities. Teaching the basics brilliantlyParty policies, simplified: Education

  • Labour: Has committed to $80 million over four years for an additional 1,000 teacher aides, according to the 2026 election policy tracker. Labour also opposes ACT's proposal to allow teachers to use reasonable force against students. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingParty policies, simplified: Education
  • Greens: Propose expanding eligibility for learning support, establishing a single agency to coordinate and resource specialist supports for learners with health and disability needs, and implementing the Ministry of Education's Framework for Action: A Quality Education for All. Party policies, simplified: Education
  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes a Māori-led taskforce to transform support for disabled, neurodivergent and learning-different students, with better-resourced teachers, accessible learning environments and professional development grounded in mātauranga Māori. Party policies, simplified: Education
  • ACT: Emphasises school choice, classroom order and parental options. It proposes allowing reasonable and proportionate physical intervention to prevent harm or serious property damage, with safeguards. Labour and the Greens oppose allowing teachers to use force under this approach. Party policies, simplified: Education

The important distinction

For families of children with autism, ADHD, dyslexia, intellectual disabilities or complex learning needs, the crucial questions are not just whether a party supports inclusion, but:

  • Will there be more teacher-aide hours and specialist staff?
  • Will support begin sooner, with fewer delays for assessment?
  • Will eligibility criteria change?
  • Will specialist schools and accessible facilities expand?
  • How much additional funding is committed, and when will it arrive?

National's proposed staffing hours and coordinators, Labour's teacher-aide funding and the Greens' proposed changes to eligibility and service coordination are particularly relevant to compare. The announcements do not, by themselves, establish how quickly every child will receive support.

5. Tertiary education, apprenticeships and student debt

Help with study | University of Waikato

Greens — broader financial support for students

The Greens propose a universal student income, including for postgraduate students; at least the living wage for courses requiring work placements; more sustainable funding for universities and polytechnics; expanded free apprenticeships; reduced student-loan repayments; and working towards fees-free tertiary education and a student-debt write-off. Tertiary Education

  • Labour — cut existing student debt. Labour proposes a 10% reduction in eligible student-loan balances, with balances of $2,000 or less written off completely. Eligibility for current and future students is linked to remaining in New Zealand for three years after study. Labour also proposes extending Apprenticeship Boost, a $1,000 toolbox grant and support for five additional trades. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies
  • ACT — reduce compulsory student fees and expand vocational choices. ACT proposes making university Student Services Fees voluntary, letting students choose which services to pay for. It also wants industry-led school subjects, Industry Awards and stronger links between vocational study and apprenticeships. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
  • National — new school qualifications and employment pathways. National's education programme focuses on replacing NCEA from 2028 and strengthening the transition from school into further study, training and employment. Its school-leaving proposal would require students to complete Year 11 or turn 16, whichever comes later. Teaching the basics brilliantlyNational will lift school leaving requirements
  • Labour — support vocational training. Beyond student debt relief, its Māori-led skilled-work programme proposes $21 million annually, and its apprenticeship measures aim to help employers take on and retain more apprentices. Labour's 2026 Election Policies
  • Greens — protect polytechnics and widen access. The party explicitly proposes protecting courses, campuses and staff from cuts, giving polytechnics stronger local control, and expanding Māori and Pasifika Trades Training. Tertiary Education

What is the difference for students?

If your priority is… Policies worth comparing
Lowering an existing student loan Labour's proposed 10% balance reduction
More help with living costs while studying The Greens' proposed universal student income
Reducing compulsory university charges ACT's proposed voluntary Student Services Fees
Free or lower-cost tertiary study The Greens' longer-term fees-free goal and student-debt proposal
Trades and apprenticeships Labour's Apprenticeship Boost and ACT's industry-led vocational pathways
Keeping regional polytechnic courses available The Greens' proposal to protect courses, campuses and staff

These proposals are not directly interchangeable. For example, a reduction in an existing loan balance does not help with rent next week in the same way a weekly student income might.

6. Where to check the full policies

For the latest details, eligibility rules, funding and implementation dates, start with the parties' own policy pages and the independent election tracker.

The Beehive Parliament Building in Wellington, New Zealand

Independent comparison

Policy.nz provides a topic-by-topic comparison of party commitments.

Policy.nz — 2026 education policies Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

How Te Mata School Builds Reading Fluency for Thriving Learners

National

Teaching the basics brilliantly Teaching the basics brilliantly

Kindergarten Spreydon Christchurch | Te Whare Rama

Labour

Labour's 2026 policies · Early childhood education policy Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesEarly Childhood Education

The University of Otago | Courses, Rankings, Expenses, Scholarships & Intakes

Greens

2026 manifesto · Tertiary education policy Manifesto 2026Tertiary Education

Video and Photo Gallery - Tauranga Boys' College

ACT

Education policy · Student Services Fees ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

Bottom line

Across these four areas, the clearest policy differences are:

  • Childcare: the Greens' free-ECE proposal versus Labour's focus on teacher pay, ratios, quality and oversight.
  • Schools: National's emphasis on academic standards and assessment versus Labour's proposed changes to the current reforms, with different priorities around inclusion and school choice across the other parties.
  • Learning support: National's proposed additional support hours and coordinators, Labour's extra teacher aides, and the Greens' and Te Pāti Māori's proposals for more inclusive and coordinated services.
  • Tertiary education: Labour's targeted student-debt reduction, the Greens' more extensive student-income and fees-free ambitions, and ACT's focus on reducing compulsory charges and expanding vocational pathways.

When evaluating any of these promises, the three most useful tests are how much extra funding is committed, who qualifies, and when the change would actually take effect.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined distinct approaches across early childhood education (ECE), schools, learning support, and tertiary education.


1. Early Childhood Education (ECE) and Childcare

  • National: Focuses on pre-school preparation by introducing a School Start Check in ECE, establishing developmental milestones, and tracking progress to identify early support needs. They have also proposed rules around limiting screen time and addressing service regulations.
  • Labour / Left-leaning parties (Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Focus more heavily on public and community-provision models. The Green Party, for instance, has advocated moving toward ending public funding for private, for-profit ECE centres by 2028, alongside bolstering kaupapa Māori and community-governed providers.
  • ACT / Right-leaning alignment: Generally prefer mixed models emphasizing parental choice and market-driven provisions, while the government has managed operational funding and fee support structures like FamilyBoost.

2. Schools and Curriculum

  • National: Emphasizes traditional academic basics (the "teach the basics brilliantly" agenda requiring daily reading, writing, and math), maintaining phone bans in schools, supporting the expansion of charter/partnership schools, and replacing NCEA with updated qualification milestones.
  • Labour: Focuses on standard public schooling support, opposing charter schools, and introducing measures to curb device/screen distractions in classrooms.
  • ACT: Strongly champions school choice, charter schools, and innovative funding mechanisms like Student Education Accounts, which would give parents public funding allowances to spend at registered schools of choice.
  • Green Party & The Opportunity Party (TOP): Advocate for broader structural reforms, such as removing political interference from curriculum design via independent bodies, embedding te Tiriti and Aotearoa history deeply into learning, and reducing standardized-testing pressures.

3. Learning Support

  • National: Pledges the continued deployment and presence of Learning Support Coordinators across all schools alongside increases in teacher aide workforces to assist neurodivergent students and those with high behavioral or learning needs.
  • Opposition Parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Frequently criticize current funding models as under-resourced, advocating instead for a centrally-resourced, demand-driven model where schools do not have to "compete" for learning support allocations or waitlists for educational psychologists and specialist therapists.

4. Tertiary Education, Trades, and Student Support

  • The Fees-Free Debate & Student Debt:
    • The Greens & Te Pāti Māori: Push for expanded, universal policies—the Greens support working toward universal fees-free tertiary education and student debt write-offs, while Te Pāti Māori advocates for writing off student loans for those working locally and establishing a universal student allowance.
    • Labour: Implemented the original fees-free scheme and for 2026 campaigned on writing off 10% of student loan balances for New Zealand-based graduates who missed out on fees-free (clearing balances under $2,000 entirely).
    • National / ACT: National supports keeping loan repayment obligations while lowering the repayment rate to 10% (from April 2027) and raising interest rates for overseas-based borrowers. ACT has historically opposed fees-free as inefficient and favors shifting focus toward targeted industry and trades training.
  • Trades and Vocational Training: Right-leaning and centrist parties strongly emphasize redirection of funds into targeted trades and apprenticeship incentives to fill immediate industry skill shortages, whereas left-leaning parties emphasize a balance between academic university funding and robust polytechnic (Te Pūkenga structure reforms) networks.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What do parties propose for childcare, schools, learning support and tertiary education?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have outlined distinct approaches across early childhood education (ECE/childcare), school operations, learning support, and tertiary education.


Childcare and Early Childhood Education (ECE)

  • National: Proposes restrictions on screen and device use in ECE settings, a School Start Check , and a greater focus on developmental milestones and progress reporting. [The Office of ECE]

  • Green Party: Aims to end for-profit funding by 2028 , cap fees at $10 per day immediately, and transition to completely free ECE (35 hours) by 2029, alongside direct teacher funding. [The Office of ECE]

  • New Zealand First: Proposes a Kiwi Kids Grant , offering a $5,000 per year tax-free grant for the first three years per child. [The Office of ECE]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Proposes replacing standard licensing with quality contracting, co-locating ECE services with retirement villages, adjusting home-based ratios to 2:8 , and increasing core and Playcentre funding (with targeted ratios of 1:3, 1:5, and 1:8). [The Office of ECE]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on strengthening the Te Kōhanga Reo Act , backed by a $20 million annual capital fund and a $50 million build and refurbishment investment. [The Office of ECE]

  • Labour & ACT: Labour’s comprehensive ECE manifesto details focus on a qualified and paid workforce/network management; ACT emphasizes reducing regulatory compliance and supporting workforce participation rather than new market interventions. [The Office of ECE]


Schools and Curriculum

  • National: Emphasizes stricter controls on digital device and screen usage in classrooms, financial literacy requirements, and expanded tracking of student progress.

  • Infrastructure & Funding (Labour): Pledges $4 billion in broader capital and building allocations, including direct improvements and upgrades to school facilities nationwide.

  • Discipline & Classroom Management: Right-leaning parties (such as ACT and National) strongly feature policies giving teachers and schools enhanced authority to address classroom disruption and manage attendance rules.

  • Māori Education: Te Pāti Māori continues to advocate for a dedicated Māori Education Authority to govern and resource indigenous schooling pathways.


Learning Support and Special Needs

  • Parties have generally framed learning support around workforce training, resourcing teacher aides, and early intervention checks.

  • National and center-right parties lean toward early developmental screening (such as the School Start Check at entry points) to catch learning and developmental delays sooner.

  • Green and progressive parties emphasize direct, needs-based funding models tied to public/non-profit service delivery rather than contestable or commercially operated provider models. [The Office of ECE]


Tertiary Education, Apprenticeships, and Student Support

  • Apprenticeships & Vocational Training:

  • Labour: Commits $226 million toward the Apprenticeship Boost scheme and $84 million for Māori trades training initiatives. [The Conversation]

  • Fees, Student Allowances, and Loans:

  • Parties across the spectrum offer varying packages around fees-free tertiary study , universal student allowances, paid placements for student teachers, and adjustments to student loan repayment rules or overseas-based borrower enforcement (tracked via platform guides like Policy.nz). [Policy.nz]

  • Governance and Ethnicity-Based Support:

  • Debates span proposals to alter or restrict how tertiary institutions allocate targeted or ethnicity-based student support services, alongside tighter constraints on international student visa work rights. [Policy.nz]


Tip: You can compare specific line-item pledges across all registered contenders using the interactiveRNZ Election Policy Guide 2026 or Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account