Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

NZ election 2026: Which parties could help lower your café's power bill?

For a small café, electricity is a cost you cannot easily avoid. You need refrigeration running around the clock, ovens, coffee machines, dishwashers, lighting and hot water — even when customers are spending less.

The key distinction in the 2026 New Zealand general election is that some parties want to change how electricity is priced, while others want to make electricity cheaper over time by increasing supply and competition. A few also propose ways for businesses to generate their own power.

There is a strong reason to pay attention: electricity prices for small businesses rose by an average of 7.2% among businesses whose prices increased in the first half of 2026. Higher network charges were the biggest driver of the overall price increases. Data shows 6.8% increase to power bills across households and small businesses

The election is on 7 November 2026. Here's how the main parties' published energy policies could affect a café like yours.

What each major party is proposing

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

1. National Party

More direct business relevance

National's Electrify NZ 2.0 plan focuses on building more electricity generation, encouraging competition and tackling network charges. It proposes reviewing lines-charge regulation, speeding up solar approvals for small businesses, and making affordability a formal objective for the Electricity Authority. Its Home Energy Fund would offer long-term, low-interest financing for energy-resilience investments. Affordable power Kiwis can rely onHome Energy Fund, Our Plan to Electrify NZ

What it could mean for your café: potentially lower costs over time, more options to install solar and batteries, and easier connections. The financing details and eligibility for a leased café premises would matter.

South Island Election Conference 2026

2. Labour Party

Labour proposes government-backed, low-interest SolarSaver loans for solar panels and batteries, with subsidies of up to $3,000 for eligible low- and middle-income households. It would also make electricity price gouging illegal and require companies found to have overcharged customers to pay them back. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

What it could mean for your café: stronger action against excessive electricity pricing could help if you are being unfairly charged. However, the advertised solar subsidies are household-focused, not a general grant for café owners. The policy does not promise every small business a cheaper bill.

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

3. Green Party

The Greens propose establishing Kiwipower, a publicly owned electricity company that would invest in renewable generation and backup capacity to address supply shortages and dry-year price pressures. They also support clean-energy loans, community-owned power and solar generation. Green Party launches plan to cut power bills and take power back from the big energy companiesThe politics of power: Comparing energy policies ahead of Election 2026

What it could mean for your café: more public investment in generation could help make electricity more affordable and reliable over time. The important caveat is that this is a structural, longer-term solution, rather than a guaranteed immediate discount on your business tariff.

New Zealand Legislative Election Winner 2026 Odds | Polymarket

4. ACT New Zealand

ACT wants more private investment in electricity generation and transmission, fewer regulatory barriers, and greater competition in network connections. It would also require lines companies to test lower-cost alternatives before passing on the cost of major network upgrades. It opposes breaking up the major generator-retailers. assets.nationbuilder.com

What it could mean for your café: the aim is to reduce unnecessary network costs and increase supply through competition. Any benefit to your bill would depend on how successfully these changes lower the charges your retailer passes on.

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

5. New Zealand First

NZ First proposes separating the generation and retail arms of the major electricity companies, arguing that this would improve competition. It also advocates a national energy strategy and measures to encourage new supply and reduce generators' ability to withhold electricity. Breaking up the GentailersPower Prices for 2026

What it could mean for your café: if restructuring leads to more competitive retail prices, your power costs could benefit. But restructuring is not the same as an immediate reduction in your bill, and the outcome would depend on how the new market operates.

The broad approaches above are based on published party policies available as of October 2026. For a wider comparison, see the independent Election 2026 energy policy overview. The politics of power: Comparing energy policies ahead of Election 2026

Which approach best fits your situation?

Your main concern Policies worth examining
Lowering electricity costs over time National, ACT and the Greens, with different approaches to supply and network costs
Preventing excessive electricity pricing Labour's proposed price-gouging law
Installing solar or batteries National's business-oriented financing approach; check the eligibility of your premises
Changing the structure of the electricity market NZ First and the Greens, through different forms of structural reform
Getting immediate help with this month's power bill None of these headline policies guarantees a direct, immediate payment to a café

One important distinction: the Electricity Authority says network charges accounted for 54% of the average increase in electricity prices across households and small businesses in the first half of 2026. Those charges pay for the electricity infrastructure that delivers power to your premises. So a party's plans for network costs may matter just as much as its plans for generating more electricity. Data shows 6.8% increase to power bills across households and small businesses

What I would check before deciding how much weight to give these promises

Given your squeezed margins, I would look beyond claims about cheaper electricity and ask three practical questions:

  • When would savings arrive? More generation and market restructuring can take years to affect retail bills.
  • Would your business qualify? A café renting its premises may face different barriers to solar installation or financing than a property owner.
  • Would your actual bill fall? Ask whether a policy addresses the energy rate, daily fixed charges, network charges or all three.

You can compare the published positions and explore other small-business policies through Policy.nz's 2026 election guide.

My bottom line: National's proposals are particularly relevant to business connections and network charges; Labour's are relevant to excessive pricing; and the Greens and NZ First offer more substantial changes to how electricity is supplied or sold. ACT shares National's emphasis on competition and investment, with a stronger focus on testing network spending and opening infrastructure to competition. None guarantees that your café's bill will fall by a particular amount.

And because you've also experienced a break-in and weaker customer spending, electricity policy is only one part of your decision. It is worth comparing parties' small-business support and crime-prevention policies alongside their energy plans, rather than assuming lower wholesale electricity prices alone will restore your margins.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

Running a small café under the combined pressure of tight margins, softer consumer spending, and the extra blow of a break-in is a tough spot to be in. Electricity costs are a major fixed overhead for hospitality businesses, and energy policy is a heavily contested arena in the 2026 general election.

The political parties offer distinct approaches to tackling electricity prices, network costs, and energy security:

  • National Party: National’s approach leans heavily on increasing overall supply, boosting market competition, and streamlining infrastructure. Their Electrify NZ 2.0 plan focuses on making it faster and easier to build renewable generation and transmission, encouraging private investment, and opening up electricity connections. They also want affordability to be an explicit objective for the Electricity Authority alongside competition and reliability, and have pushed for additional backup supply (including domestic gas and LNG import options) to ease dry-year price spikes. For businesses looking at energy efficiency, their focus is on regulatory and network streamlining rather than direct subsidies.
  • Labour Party: Labour places a stronger emphasis on direct consumer protection and expanding decentralized renewable energy (such as their SolarSaver scheme and support for business electrification). While much of their headline residential solar policy is targeted at homes and renters, Labour has also backed energy performance standards for commercial/office buildings and broader measures to crack down on excessive pricing. They propose giving the Commerce Commission stronger powers to investigate and take action against large companies with significant market power.
  • ACT Party: ACT firmly opposes state subsidies, price controls, or structural breakups, arguing instead that the best way to lower costs is through deregulation and boosting supply. They support cutting resource-management red tape to fast-track new energy generation and restarting oil and gas exploration, contending that market competition driven by fewer regulatory hurdles will naturally lower prices over the long term without requiring government intervention.
  • New Zealand First: NZ First advocates for a structural shake-up of the electricity market, proposing a Telecom-style split of the major "gentailers" (separating generation arms from retail arms). They argue that separating these functions is necessary to prevent corporate power from driving up spot and retail prices. They are also generally more open to targeted assistance and accelerated depreciation measures to help businesses transition and manage equipment costs.
  • Green Party: The Greens emphasize public intervention and a rapid transition to renewables. They propose establishing a publicly owned generation company (Kiwipower) to increase supply and help stabilize prices, alongside zero-interest loans for clean energy and community-owned renewable projects. Their focus is heavily weighted toward long-term decarbonization and community energy sovereignty.

For a hospitality business facing immediate cost-of-doing-business pressures, the choice largely comes down to whether you favor market-led supply expansion (National, ACT), structural regulation and gentailer breakups to rein in corporate pricing (NZ First, Labour), or direct investments in alternative generation and efficiency standards (Greens, Labour).

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

The major political parties competing in the 2026 New Zealand general election propose distinct approaches to small business and commercial electricity costs, ranging from market deregulation and faster solar/grid connections to price regulation, lines-charge reviews, and state-backed energy financing.

Summary of Party Energy & Small Business Policies

Political Party Key Approach to Power Costs & Small Businesses
National Party Off-the-shelf plug-in solar approval (within first 6 months), Home Energy Fund for long-term resilience loans, and streamlining small-scale renewable consenting.
Labour Party Reviewing lines charge rules, mandating 2-working-day approval for small business/residential solar connections, writing affordability into Electricity Authority laws, and restricting large data center impact.
ACT Party Market competition reforms, breaking generation/retail dominance, opening transmission to private investment, and letting private/qualified providers handle grid-connection work faster.
Green Party Establishing a state-owned entity ("Kiwipower") to fill market gaps, lower power bills, and provide zero-interest clean energy loans for solar and storage.
New Zealand First Criticising high energy costs under past net-zero settings, pushing for homegrown energy, and supporting small-scale/community-led renewable and battery rollouts.

Breakdown by Party Proposals

  • National Party:

  • Focuses on energy independence and self-generation for small operators.

  • Promises to allow small businesses and shops to buy and install plug-in solar panels off-the-shelf within six months of taking office.

  • Proposes the Home Energy Fund (a central government and council-backed financing platform) to provide long-term loans for energy resilience upgrades.

  • Labour Party:

  • Targets the structural side of power bills by launching a review of lines charges rules.

  • Proposes a rule requiring small business and residential solar connections to be approved within two working days.

  • Aims to make affordability a primary legal objective for the Electricity Authority and requires high-demand AI data centers to build or bring their own firmed power rather than driving up commercial grid prices. [NZ Herald]

  • ACT Party:

  • Emphasizes market competition and dismantling barriers in the electricity supply chain.

  • Advocates for ending the dominance of the "big four" power companies, opening transmission lines to private investment, and letting qualified private providers handle customer-funded grid connections faster and cheaper.

  • Favors letting batteries and smart-grid technology compete directly with expensive new transmission poles and wires. [NZ Herald]

  • Green Party:

  • Proposes creating a New Zealand-owned public entity named Kiwipower to address market failures and speed up affordable clean energy.

  • Offers targeted financial tools, including zero-interest clean energy loans to help small-scale operators install solar power and battery storage. [NZ Herald]

  • New Zealand First:

  • Argues that current energy market structures have pushed up costs and hurt domestic industry.

  • Supports shifting toward cheaper homegrown energy and making local, small-scale and community-led renewable and battery projects easier to consent and deploy.

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

AI Overview

Running a small café with mounting costs and security anxieties is incredibly challenging right now. As you head toward the 7 November 2026 General Election , electricity prices have become a dominant campaign issue, driven by an annual spike of roughly 12%.

Political parties are proposing vastly different solutions to address energy costs for small businesses. Their strategies generally fall into two categories: market deregulation to increase supply vs. direct market intervention to break up corporate structures.


🏛️ The Center-Right Approach: Deregulation and Fast Connections

These parties focus on cutting red tape to build new infrastructure faster and allowing small businesses to bypass traditional hurdles.

  • National: The party recently unveiled its "Electrify NZ 2.0" plan. For a café owner, the most direct impact is a policy mandating lines companies to approve small-business solar connections within two working days. If they miss this window, they must pay automatic compensation. It also allows you to choose an accredited contractor to speed up connection times, opens up grid transmission to private investment, and requires new massive AI data centres to bring or build their own power source so they don't drive up the general grid price.

  • ACT: Opposes structural interventions or government subsidies. Instead, ACT seeks to lower power costs by slashing regulatory hurdles under the Resource Management Act (RMA) and reviving oil and gas exploration to maximize overall energy supply.

⚖️ The Center-Left & Minor Party Approach: Market Interventions and Structural Splits

These parties believe the underlying "gentailer" model (where the same large companies generate and retail electricity) is broken and needs state-driven changes.

  • New Zealand First: Takes a highly aggressive stance, proposing a "Telecom-style" forced separation to completely break up the big four power companies into distinct generation and retail entities. They aim to drive down the baseline cost of power through forced competition. They also propose that any business generating solar must be legally allowed to sell excess power back to the grid at the exact same price they buy it for.

  • The Green Party: Shares NZ First's goal of separating generation and retail arms via a member's bill, arguing that the current structure rewards large companies for keeping spot prices high rather than investing in cheap generation. They also propose establishing "Kiwipower" , a state-owned enterprise to build and manage community-level renewable assets.

  • Labour: Is "leaving the door open" to breaking up the gentailers but has not formally committed to it. Instead, Labour focuses on Business Electrification Support to partner with businesses transitioning away from gas, and supporting member bills that introduce energy performance standards to reduce commercial building bills. They have heavily promoted their "SolarSaver" fund , which includes targeted subsidies and low-interest loans for solar and battery installations.


📊 Summary Comparison for Small Businesses

Party Core Strategy for Power Costs Key Benefit for Your Café
National Deregulation ("Electrify NZ 2.0") 2-day fast-tracked solar hookups; private transmission options.
Labour Targeted transition partnerships State-backed loans/subsidies for solar and energy efficiency upgrades.
NZ First Structural breakup & grid pricing rules Splits big power companies; guarantees retail-rate solar buybacks.
Greens Forced separation & State energy Splits gentailers; establishes a state-owned renewable provider.
ACT Deregulation & exploration Relies on broader supply side changes and cutting red tape.

Note: Since you also mentioned retail crime and security worries, it’s worth noting that National and ACT are campaigning heavily on stricter sentencing and increased frontline police funding, while NZ First has raised SME-specific tax cuts to leave more cash in your business.

If you would like to explore how these party platforms intersect with your other worries, I can break down what they are proposing specifically regarding retail crime/security support or small business tax relief. Which of those would be most helpful to look at next?

Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account