Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 6

Every question and original answer

All 174 questions and the 783 complete answers recorded on 26 October 2026. Source lists and sentiment assessments are included, alongside the unchanged original answers.

questions
174
answers saved
783
collected
26 October 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom, text, words

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, with its recorded websites, source-list status and visible links.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    answerId, draft_id, platform, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, rationale, evidence, review_provenance

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, statement, summary, caveat, value, denominator, evidence

  • Evidence behind the findings

    findings-evidence.csv

    One row per finding, with the records supporting it.

    findingId, rows

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, transition, quote, assessment, draft_id, scenario, earlier_result_id, result_id, earlier_quote, earlier_assessment, earlier_review_provenance, current_review_provenance

  • Answers read in detail

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per answer included in the detailed research readings.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    panel, edition, platform, party, numerator, denominator

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    panel, edition, platform, answers, median_words, total_words

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, prompt_id, platform, city, draft_id, block, scenario_id, scenario, issue, priority, common_5_6, complete, national_result_id, city_result_id, same_text, same_party_set, same_displayed_party_set

  • Changes by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic, showing answer totals and changes in party names.

    issue, current_answers, matched, changed_party_sets, changed_displayed_party_sets

  • Links visible in answers

    literal-source-evidence.csv

    One row per answer, with the web links present in its text.

    edition, result_id, literal_urls, literal_domains, associated_capture

  • Separate website reference totals

    aggregate-references.csv

    One row per website in the separate reference summary; these totals do not identify which answer used it.

    domain, citationCount, referenceCount, promptCount, urlTotal, trendTotal, platforms

  • Answers compared with 23 October

    pairs.csv

    One row per answer with an earlier counterpart to the same question, assistant and location.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    The saved assessments of statements about tracked parties, with their answer references and verified extracts where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    quote, brands, stance, claimId, claimText, sourceResultId

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

New Zealand 2026 election: How the parties differ on housing

Policy snapshot: October 2026 · General election: 7 November 2026

The main divide is between parties that emphasise making it easier to build and buy homes, protecting property owners' returns, and changing the tax system, and parties that put greater weight on renters' security, affordable public housing and limiting housing costs.

Housing policy isn't just about house prices. The differences affect three distinct groups: renters who want secure, affordable homes; first-home buyers trying to get onto the property ladder; and existing homeowners, including people with mortgages, mortgage-free owners and landlords.

The comparison below reflects policies reported or announced by 16–19 October 2026. Some details may change before election day. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upElection Policy Comparison

1. Renters: Who prioritises security and keeping rent down?

303 Roscommon road, Clendon Park, Manukau City, Auckland

Green Party

The Greens propose capping rent increases at 2% a year, ending no-cause evictions, requiring long-term or permanent tenancy options, strengthening Healthy Homes standards and building tens of thousands of public homes. Their plan also includes reversing landlord tax changes. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up

Delivering more housing when it’s needed most :: Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities

Labour Party

Labour has pledged at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years, supported by $2.9 billion in Kāinga Ora capital funding. It would retain landlords' interest deductibility and introduce a capital gains tax on future investment-property profits, excluding the family home. Its housing approach combines public provision with private rental investment. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities Waterview Court Development Case Study | Dulux

National Party

National's emphasis is on enabling housing development, infrastructure and private-sector supply rather than introducing new rent caps. It has restored landlord interest deductibility and is campaigning on wider access to low-deposit home loans. Its housing measures also include planning and energy initiatives. 2026 Election PolicyNational is backing first home buyersThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up

The Rent Shop

ACT New Zealand

ACT's approach is more landlord- and investment-oriented: it proposes abolishing rental loss ring-fencing and opposes capital gains and wealth taxes. It places greater emphasis on incentives for property investment and making development easier than on rent controls. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked

Big news for community housing: Govt loan guarantee to speed up affordable builds

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori proposes universal rent control, ending no-cause evictions, increased support for tenants at risk of losing their homes, and allocating half of all new social housing to Māori. It also proposes building 2,000 homes on ancestral Māori land over four years. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up

Aerial view Housing Development in New Zealand

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

TOP combines planning reform and support for affordable housing with a proposed land-value tax. It also wants stronger rental standards and to extend home-warming support to eligible rental properties. Its tax proposal would affect landowners, not just landlords. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked

The key difference for renters: the Greens and Te Pāti Māori propose direct controls on rent increases and stronger tenancy protections. Labour emphasises expanding social housing. National and ACT put more emphasis on supply and private investment, while TOP combines supply reform with a tax-based approach to land use.

One important distinction: a rent cap could give existing tenants more predictability, but its overall effects on rental supply, maintenance and future rents depend on how it is designed and implemented.

2. First-home buyers: Deposits, house prices and access to ownership

The central question is whether a party helps buyers finance a purchase, changes the tax incentives facing investors, or makes more homes available.

Party Main approach What it could mean for first-home buyers
National Extend access to 5% deposit First Home Loans by raising the income cap to $300,000 for all applicants. National is backing first home buyers More eligible buyers could purchase with a smaller deposit, although they would still need to qualify for a mortgage and afford repayments.
Labour Introduce a 28% capital gains tax on investment-property profits accruing after 1 July 2027, excluding the family home; expand social housing. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up Changes the tax treatment of investment properties, potentially affecting investor demand and housing-market dynamics. It is not a direct first-home deposit grant.
Greens Reverse landlord tax changes and build tens of thousands of public homes; strengthen renters' rights. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis Seeks to reduce competition from property investors and increase the supply of affordable housing. The eventual effect on purchase prices is uncertain.
ACT Remove rental loss ring-fencing and make development easier; oppose capital gains and wealth taxes. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked Focuses on investment incentives and housing supply rather than a new first-home buyer subsidy.
Te Pāti Māori Exempt first-home buyers purchasing homes under $1 million from its proposed 5% stamp duty on residential sales. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up The proposed exemption would protect qualifying first-home buyers from that particular transaction tax.
TOP Reform planning rules, support affordable construction and introduce a land-value tax alongside a citizens' income. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked Its proposed tax could change the economics of owning land and potentially influence land prices, but the net effect would depend on the wider policy package.

What separates these approaches?

  • Help with the deposit: National has the clearest specific new proposal in this comparison. A 5% deposit reduces the amount needed upfront, but it doesn't reduce the purchase price or the total interest paid automatically.
  • Change investor incentives: Labour and the Greens propose different tax changes that could affect the relative attractiveness of investment properties versus owner-occupied homes.
  • Change the supply of homes: The Greens and Labour have explicit public-housing expansion commitments, while National and ACT emphasise enabling private development.
  • Change transaction or land taxes: Te Pāti Māori proposes a first-home exemption from its stamp duty; TOP proposes a recurring tax on land value rather than simply taxing a property sale.

These are different mechanisms. A deposit scheme can help a buyer get started sooner, whereas increased supply or a change in investor demand could affect prices across the market. Neither guarantees that a particular buyer will find an affordable home.

3. Existing homeowners: Mortgage costs, tax and the value of property

This group isn't uniform. A homeowner with a large mortgage may care most about household expenses and interest rates. A mortgage-free retiree may care about rates and the value of their home. A landlord faces a different set of tax and regulatory decisions.

Party Policy direction Who is most directly affected?
National No new taxes; retain existing landlord interest-deductibility settings; offer a Home Energy Fund for measures such as solar, batteries and insulation. 2026 Election PolicyThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up Homeowners wanting energy upgrades, and landlords who benefit from the current tax settings.
Labour A 28% tax on qualifying investment-property gains accruing after 1 July 2027, with the family home excluded; retain landlord interest deductibility. Also proposes government-backed finance and subsidies for solar. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesThe property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up Investors selling qualifying properties; owner-occupiers are excluded from the capital gains tax on their family home.
Greens Reverse landlord tax changes, including restoring restrictions on interest deductibility, and expand rental and public-housing protections. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked Landlords and property investors would face different tax settings; ordinary owner-occupiers would be affected differently from owners of investment properties.
ACT Oppose capital gains and wealth taxes and abolish rental loss ring-fencing. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line upNZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked Property investors and landlords, particularly those whose rental expenses exceed rental income.
Te Pāti Māori Propose a 2% annual tax on the capital value of homes left vacant for more than three months in a year, alongside a 33% land-banking tax and repeal of interest deductibility. The property policies: How election 2026 housing promises line up Owners of qualifying vacant homes and landholders, as well as landlords affected by the proposed tax changes.
TOP Propose an annual land-value tax of up to 1.75% on urban land, with possible exemptions for farmers and retirees, plus a citizens' income. NZ election 2026: What every party plans for housing, ranked Potentially all urban landowners, including people living in their own homes, rather than only property investors.

The big homeowner tax distinction

Three proposals are particularly different:

  • Labour's capital gains tax: A tax on qualifying gains when an investment property is sold. It would not tax the family home under the announced policy.
  • TOP's land-value tax: A recurring tax based on the value of land, rather than waiting until a property is sold. Owner-occupiers could be liable too, subject to the proposed exemptions and final design.
  • Greens', ACT's and Te Pāti Māori's landlord tax proposals: These change how investment-property income or expenses are treated, with different consequences for landlords depending on their finances.

For an owner-occupier, it is important not to confuse a tax on investment gains with a recurring tax on the land under their home. They work in fundamentally different ways.

4. Other parties worth comparing

5. How to compare the policies for your circumstances

Here is a neutral way to narrow down which policy details matter most to you:

Bottom line: The 2026 housing debate is about more than whether house prices rise or fall. It is also about who bears housing costs, whether renters receive stronger protections, how much government should invest in public housing, and whether property ownership should attract different tax treatment depending on how a home is used. The effects will depend on implementation, housing supply, market conditions and the wider policies adopted by whichever government takes office.

For further detail, the Property Council's 2026 election policy comparison and interest.co.nz's housing-policy overview provide useful cross-party references.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, housing policy is a central battleground, with the major and minor parties offering distinct approaches that impact renters, first-home buyers, and existing homeowners/investors differently.

The primary differences in how the main political parties plan to reshape the housing market focus on tax settings, supply regulations, tenancy laws, and direct financial support.


1. Renters & The Rental Market

The approaches to renters highlight a sharp ideological divide between parties focusing on increased tenant regulation/public housing versus those favoring private market supply.

  • Labour: Focuses heavily on expanding supply by funding at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years (including billions for Kāinga Ora). It also proposes green-energy initiatives for renters, such as plug-in solar options and community battery funds.
  • The Green Party: Advocates the most interventionist stance for tenants through its proposed Renters’ Rights Bill, which features a 2% annual cap on rent increases, banning no-cause evictions, introducing a mandatory Rental Warrant of Fitness, and establishing a national register for landlords and property managers.
  • National & ACT: Generally oppose rent controls, arguing that artificial caps can contract rental supply. Instead, they focus on boosting private rental availability by easing land-use rules, abolishing minimum car parking requirements, and streamlining consenting to encourage more private development.
  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes that public and social housing should be prioritized for New Zealand citizens first.

2. First-Home Buyers

Policies targeting first-home buyers generally revolve around lowering entry barriers, adjusting deposit/income caps, and shifting market competition away from property investors.

  • National: Focuses on helping first-home buyers enter the market by significantly expanding access to First Home Loans with 5% deposits—specifically by dramatically lifting the scheme's income thresholds (e.g., from $95,000 to $300,000 for couples/individuals, depending on precise structuring). They also promote wider zoning reforms to moderate long-term price growth.
  • Labour & The Greens: Propose policies (such as Labour's capital gains tax) explicitly designed to cool investor demand at the lower-to-middle end of the housing market, aiming to give first-home buyers less competition when bidding against landlords.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes a broad land value tax (1.75%) designed to reduce overall land banking and lower housing and land prices by an estimated 10% to 15%, theoretically making outright purchase much more achievable for first-time buyers.

3. Existing Homeowners & Residential Landlords

Existing homeowners (occupying their family homes) are generally shielded from direct property taxes across most mainstream platforms, but residential property investors and landlords face drastically different futures depending on who wins office.

  • National & ACT:
    • Favourable to landlords: National has maintained full mortgage interest deductibility for rental properties and opposes new capital gains taxes.
    • ACT similarly opposes capital gains or wealth taxes, supports property rights, and pushes to ease compliance and red tape for building and development.
  • Labour:
    • Targeted taxation: Proposes a 28% Capital Gains Tax on profits made from selling commercial and residential investment properties (excluding the family home and farms) on gains accumulated after 1 July 2027. Labour maintains its position on keeping interest deductibility settings as they are.
  • The Green Party:
    • Proposes a much stricter environment for investors, including extending the bright-line test out to 10 years and reversing interest deductibility rules.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) & Te Pāti Māori:
    • Advocate structural tax overhauls. TOP pushes for an annual land value tax, while Te Pāti Māori supports a wealth tax alongside a specific penalty tax on residential homes left empty for extended periods.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined distinct approaches to the housing market, targeting renters, first-home buyers, and existing homeowners through varying lenses of supply deregulation, tax settings, and state support.

Based on reporting and policy trackers from outlets such as The Conversation, Interest.co.nz, and Wolfbrook Property Updates, the major parties approach these groups with the following key differences:

1. Renters and State Housing

  • The Green Party: According to Interest.co.nz, the Greens are campaigning heavily on renter-centric policies, including a comprehensive Renters’ Rights Bill and an enforced rental warrant of fitness scheme to lift habitability standards. They also advocate for an expanded state and public housing build programme. [Wolfbrook]
  • The Labour Party: Labour has pledged to reverse recent policy shifts regarding state housing settings and introduce SolarSaver , an initiative aimed at lowering utility costs, which can indirectly benefit residential households. [Wolfbrook]
  • National, ACT, and New Zealand First: Current settings under the coalition framework have adjusted state and community housing income-related rent calculations (moving from 25% to 30% of tenant income for certain brackets). Their broader focus for rental availability leans heavily on private landlord incentives, such as the previously restored interest deductibility and shortened bright-line test, arguing that supporting private investors encourages rental supply.

2. First-Home Buyers

  • The National Party: National’s primary new housing platform targeting entry into the market focuses on expanding the First Home Loan scheme. They propose lifting the income caps to allow more high-earning individuals and couples (raising thresholds significantly up to $300,000 for couples) to secure government-backed low-deposit (5%) mortgages.
  • The Green Party & Labour: These parties place more emphasis on direct public construction and market intervention to curb runaway price appreciation rather than expanding debt-financed purchasing power for individuals.
  • ACT Party: ACT focuses primarily on supply-side deregulation, supporting the replacement of the Resource Management Act (RMA) to free up land and reduce red tape, aiming to structurally lower construction costs for new market entrants. [Wolfbrook]

3. Existing Homeowners and Property Investors

  • National and ACT: These parties align on a deregulation philosophy. National highlights ongoing planning reforms via RMA replacement, a performance turnaround plan for Kāinga Ora, and homeowner-centric grants or funds like the Home Energy Fund. ACT has proposed changes such as abolishing loss ring-fencing for rental properties and continuing pro-investor tax settings like interest deductibility.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): TOP is proposing a broader structural shift via a 1.75% annual land value tax paired with streamlined, nationally consistent planning zones to drive a private building boom.
  • New Zealand First: NZ First’s approach centers heavily on demand-side management through tighter immigration policy settings, framed as a "handbrake" on population-driven pressure on existing housing stock and infrastructure.
Ask anything

Captured 26 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account