Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about Māori health outcomes and access to care, and how do their approaches differ?

For a Māori parent weighing the 2026 New Zealand general election, the main differences between parties on Māori health are less about whether Māori health matters (most parties acknowledge unequal outcomes) and more about how to achieve better outcomes: through Māori-specific leadership and services, through broader universal services targeted by need, or through system-wide access and workforce changes. Policy.nz

A useful way to compare them is to look at four questions:

  1. Who makes decisions about Māori health?
  2. Should services be specifically designed for Māori, or mainly based on individual need?
  3. How should access problems (GP costs, rural care, workforce shortages) be fixed?
  4. What role should Te Tiriti o Waitangi play in health governance?

Māori health and Te Tiriti: the main party differences

Party approach Māori health governance Access to care Te Tiriti approach
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises Māori-led decision-making, tino rangatiratanga, and Māori-designed health services Focuses on whānau-centred care, kaupapa Māori providers, prevention, and addressing wider drivers of health Treats Te Tiriti partnership and Māori authority in decision-making as central to health equity
Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Supports Māori participation in designing and delivering health services and stronger equity settings Proposes expanding publicly funded care, including greater access to primary and dental care, and strengthening community services Supports Treaty-based approaches and co-governance models
New Zealand Labour Party Has historically supported Māori-specific health structures and Māori participation in health decision-making Emphasises reducing cost barriers, including primary care access policies Supports Te Tiriti-informed approaches and Māori participation in public services
New Zealand National Party Emphasises improving outcomes through the wider health system, targets, workforce, and service delivery Focuses on frontline capacity, faster treatment, workforce, and using both public and private capacity Generally frames services around equal citizenship and needs-based provision rather than separate Māori governance structures
ACT New Zealand Emphasises equal treatment under common rules and is critical of ethnicity-based approaches Focuses on system efficiency, choice, and reducing government barriers Supports a narrower interpretation of Treaty principles and opposes some forms of co-governance
New Zealand First Emphasises public services based on need rather than ethnicity-based structures Focuses on general service delivery and access Supports a more limited role for Treaty-based distinctions in public policy

Sources comparing party positions note that the largest disagreement is around whether Māori health inequities are best addressed through Māori-specific authority and structures, or through a universal system that targets need without separate Māori governance arrangements. WhichParty NZ

What this could mean for a working whānau thinking about household costs and access

GP visits, prescriptions, and everyday healthcare costs

Parties differ on whether the priority should be:

  • Reducing direct costs for everyone:
    • Labour and Greens have proposed broader free or lower-cost primary care approaches. Policy.nz
  • Improving capacity so people can get seen faster:
    • National has focused on workforce, health targets, treatment capacity, and expanding service capacity. NZ Medical Journal
  • Changing the structure of the system:
    • Some parties place more emphasis on governance reform and Māori-led models rather than only increasing universal services. NZ Medical Journal

For a household budget, practical questions to compare are:

  • Will GP visits become cheaper?
  • Are after-hours and rural services easier to access?
  • Are prescription costs changing?
  • Will services be available locally, or require more travel?

Māori providers, whānau care, and decision-making

The current health system direction includes a Māori Health Strategy, Māori Health Strategy 2026 – Whiria Te Ora, which identifies priorities including prevention, workforce, accountability, and Māori health leadership. It also recognises the role of whānau, hapū, iwi and communities in improving wellbeing. Ministry of Health

The political difference is over how much authority Māori should have in shaping and governing services:

  • Some parties argue Māori leadership and kaupapa Māori services are necessary because existing systems have not closed health gaps.
  • Others argue health services should primarily be organised around individual need and equal access rather than ethnicity-based structures. WhichParty NZ

Questions you might use when comparing party policies

For your whānau, these may be useful:

  • “Will my whānau be able to see a GP, nurse, dentist, or mental health provider without cost being the barrier?”
  • “How will this party measure whether Māori health outcomes are improving?”
  • “Who has decision-making power — central government, health agencies, iwi/hapū, Māori providers, or local communities?”
  • “How will rural and smaller communities get enough health workers?”
  • “Does this approach reflect the Te Tiriti principles of partnership, participation, protection, and tino rangatiratanga?” The Ministry of Health’s Te Tiriti framework describes these principles as including Māori self-determination, equitable outcomes, culturally appropriate services, and partnership in design and monitoring. Ministry of Health

Because election policies can change before voting day, it is worth checking each party’s final health and Māori policy releases closer to the election. Policy.nz

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about Māori health outcomes and access to care, and how do their approaches differ?

Navigating the 2026 General Election as a working Māori parent involves weighing how different political parties plan to manage household costs, fund local health services, and honor Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Parties hold fundamentally different views on whether healthcare funding and delivery should be universal or explicitly targeted to address equity and Māori leadership (tino rangatiratanga).

Political Parties and Their Approaches to Māori Health

1. Te Pāti Māori

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Places Te Tiriti o Waitangi, tino rangatiratanga, and structural equity at the center of its health policy.
  • Key Policies: Rebuilding and heavily funding an independent Māori health authority, introducing a Māori Health Card to link funding directly to patients, lowering the starting age for cancer screening (such as for bowel and breast cancer) for Māori to account for earlier onset, and providing free primary care and dental for low-to-middle income whānau.

2. The Green Party

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Focuses heavily on preventative health, the social determinants of health (such as housing and income), and kaupapa Māori health provisions.
  • Key Policies: Expanding publicly funded healthcare with a strong emphasis on community care clinics in high-need areas first, increasing Māori participation in service design and delivery, and universal measures like free dental care for everyone funded through a wealth tax.

3. The Labour Party

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Focuses on reducing the cost barriers of accessing universal primary care to lift general health access, alongside targeted support.
  • Key Policies: Implementing a "Medicard" providing three free GP visits per year for all New Zealanders (funded by a capital gains tax on investment property), retaining free prescriptions, and investing in primary care workforce schemes. While Labour previously established the Māori Health Authority (Te Aka Whai Ora), its current platform centers more heavily on universal affordability and primary capacity.

4. The National Party

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Focuses on mainstream system performance, clinical targets, and continuity rather than separate ethnic-based structures (having previously disestablished Te Aka Whai Ora).
  • Key Policies: Directing resources toward mainstream capacity building, expanding primary care and workforce training (such as supporting a third medical school), partnering with private providers to cut surgical waitlists via contracts, and increasing funding for specific cancer treatments.

5. The ACT Party

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Strictly opposes ethnicity-based targeting or separate public entities, advocating for universal allocation based strictly on individual clinical need.
  • Key Policies: Moving the government toward a "purchaser, not provider" model, utilizing private sector involvement to clear elective surgery waitlists, and exploring alternative health savings models.

6. New Zealand First (NZ First)

  • Approach to Māori Health & Te Tiriti: Supports the delivery of health services based on individual clinical need rather than separate ethnicity-based structures, having supported the removal of Te Aka Whai Ora.
  • Key Policies: Prioritizing a large waitlist reduction fund for public hospitals, reviewing Pharmac to increase funding and access to medicines more rapidly, and focusing heavily on regional health infrastructure.

Core Philosophical Differences

  • Targeted Equity vs. Universal Universalism: Parties on the left (Te Pāti Māori, Greens) argue that because Māori face systemic barriers and poorer health outcomes (such as dying on average a decade earlier), funding must be specifically targeted and structurally co-designed through kaupapa Māori services. Parties on the right (National, ACT, NZ First) argue that public healthcare should treat all citizens equally based on clinical need, warning that separate structures risk creating division rather than solving health backlogs.
  • Service Delivery Models: Left-leaning and Māori parties emphasize community-led, iwi-backed, or kaupapa Māori providers. Right-leaning parties lean more on mainstream capacity, clinical targets, and leveraging the private sector to reduce waitlists.

As a working parent balancing household expenses, you will likely weigh whether you prefer policies that lower immediate family costs via universal tax-funded schemes (like free GP visits) or policies that direct specific resources into culturally tailored, localized services designed to close the equity gap for whānau.

Are there specific household cost pressures—such as GP fees, prescription charges, or local dental access—that are weighing most heavily on your family's decisions this election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about Māori health outcomes and access to care, and how do their approaches differ?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties present sharply contrasting views on how to address Māori health outcomes, funding distribution, and the application of Te Tiriti o Waitangi in public services. For a working Māori household balancing household costs and local service access, understanding these differing philosophies helps clarify what each party brings to the table.

1. Te Pāti Māori

  • Approach to Te Tiriti & Participation: Places Māori health equity, tino rangatiratanga (self-determination), and Te Tiriti o Waitangi at the absolute centre of its framework. They champion a by-Māori, for-Māori approach where decisions and resource allocation are determined by whānau and hapū communities.

  • Māori Health & Access: Focuses on rebuilding and legally strengthening an independent, Māori-led health authority alongside autonomous Māori-led health service delivery, arguing that mainstream systems structurally fail whānau. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]

  • Cost & Services Context: Aligns health initiatives with broader whānau needs like housing affordability, local resource protection, and cost-of-living relief. [Waatea News]

2. Labour Party

  • Approach to Te Tiriti & Participation: Supports structured public service obligations under Te Tiriti, favoring targeted universalism and specific ethnic/equity metrics to address systemic gaps.

  • Māori Health & Access: Focuses on universal-access measures that disproportionately benefit working and lower-income families, alongside targeted workforce provisions. Policies include free GP visits (up to three visits yearly via a "Medicard" scheme), free prescriptions, free maternity scans, free cervical screening, and a $21 million annual investment in Māori-led training to build the indigenous health workforce.

  • Cost & Services Context: Combines health access with cost-of-living relief, such as grocery market reforms, a $20 weekly public transport cap, and support for household budgets. [NZ Labour Party]

3. Green Party

  • Approach to Te Tiriti & Participation: Embeds Te Tiriti partnership across all public infrastructure and decision-making, emphasizing ecological wellbeing and social justice alongside health equity.

  • Māori Health & Access: Advocates for a transition to fully funded, publicly owned health services. Their plan includes making primary health, dental care, mental health counseling, and GP clinics universally free, with specific emphasis on scaling up the Māori health workforce and culturally safe care pathways.

  • Cost & Services Context: Pushes for comprehensive public ownership of essential services to permanently remove cost barriers for working households.

4. National Party & ACT (Current/Recent Government Direction)

  • Approach to Te Tiriti & Participation: Favors the removal of ethnicity-based criteria or statutory race-based co-governance mechanisms in public service delivery, arguing instead for clinical need and socioeconomic baselines rather than race as a determining metric for funding.

  • Māori Health & Access: Reflects the prior abolition of Te Aka Whai Ora (the Māori Health Authority) in favor of an integrated national health system managed centrally. Their focus is on measurable clinical outcomes, reducing administrative bloat, expanding capacity (such as aged-care and mental health strategies), and leveraging mainstream delivery models to narrow disparities.

  • Cost & Services Context: Prioritizes making existing public funding go further by expanding the scope of pharmacists and physician associates, alongside broader economic management aimed at inflation control and tax relief.

5. New Zealand First

  • Approach to Te Tiriti & Participation: Strongly opposes separate public service structures based on ethnicity, emphasizing formal constitutional equality ("one law for all").

  • Māori Health & Access: Supported the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora. They argue that healthcare access should be strictly dictated by individual clinical need rather than ethnicity-based frameworks.

  • Cost & Services Context: Focuses on frontline service delivery, economic nationalism, and cost-of-living pressures for working-class families through traditional economic levers. [The New Zealand Medical Journal]

Summary of Differences

  • The Left / Te Pāti Māori / Greens: View equity through a Tiriti-centric, structural lens—arguing that specific Māori-led authorities, free primary care (GP visits, prescriptions, scans), and targeted workforce investments are necessary to fix distinct inequities.

  • The Right / National / ACT / NZ First: View equity through a clinical-need and universal lens—arguing that separate ethnic structures divide the system, and that equity is better achieved via an integrated, color-blind or need-based public health engine focused strictly on clinical outcomes.

To help narrow down your decision further, would you like to explore:

  • Specific Policy.nz breakdowns on cost-of-living and income policies for these parties?
  • How each party's education or tamariki policies align with your household goals?
Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about Māori health outcomes and access to care, and how do their approaches differ?

AI Overview

For the upcoming 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are presenting fundamentally different approaches to Māori health outcomes, access to care, and the role of Te Tiriti o Waitangi in healthcare governance.

A clear political divide exists between parties advocating for universal, need-based health funding without ethnic targeting, and those pushing for targeted, Māori-led health services and systemic structural reform.

Comparison of Party Healthcare Policies

Party / Coalition Core Approach to Māori Health Access & Cost of Care Proposals Stance on Te Tiriti & Decision-Making
National Party (Current Coalition) Focuses on need-based funding rather than ethnicity-targeted models. Invested $447M in primary care capacity. Aims to clear surgery waitlists via 10-year private hospital contracts and establish a new medical school in Waikato. Opposes ethnicity-based health structures (such as Te Aka Whai Ora) and rejects using ethnicity as a clinical prioritization factor for surgeries.
ACT & NZ First (Current Coalition Partners) ACT favours a "government-as-purchaser" model with private incentives. NZ First focuses on a $925M waitlist reduction fund. ACT proposes compulsory health savings accounts. Both parties generally align with National on removing targeted racial categories in healthcare delivery. Aligned with National in dismantling separate Māori healthcare bureaucracies and prioritizing mainstream public health infrastructure.
Labour Party Focuses on addressing equity through lowering universal frontline costs and increasing primary care capacity. Flagship Medicard policy offering 3 free GP visits per year, free prescriptions, and free maternity/cervical screening. Also proposes a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to open new clinics. While having a track record of implementing the Māori Health Authority, Labour's 2026 platform shifts focus significantly toward broader cost-of-living health relief. Supports strict public health regulations on tobacco/alcohol.
Te Pāti Māori Advocates for absolute Māori self-determination (mana motuhake) in healthcare delivery. Free primary and dental care for whānau earning under $60,000. Proposes a Māori Health Card that links healthcare funding directly to the individual patient. Demands the restoration of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority) with an allocation of 20% of the total national health budget. Pushes for heavily decentralized, whānau-led, and iwi-led health systems.
Green Party Champions systemic, well-funded public health with structural Te Tiriti partnership at its core. Unlimited free GP visits and universal free dental care for everyone, funded via a wealth tax. Puts community care clinics in the highest-need areas first. Strongly supports embedding Te Tiriti into healthcare management. Completely opposes outsourcing public health surgeries to private entities. Strongly backs strict commercial regulations on tobacco, alcohol, and junk food to protect Māori health outcomes.

Key Points of Difference for Working Whānau

  • Cost of Day-to-Day Care: If reducing out-of-pocket costs immediately is your primary concern, Labour (3 free visits) and the Greens (unlimited free GP/dental) target the wallet directly. Te Pāti Māori targets free care specifically to households earning under $60,000. National focuses on expanding general system capacity so it is easier to book an appointment when needed.

  • Who Makes the Decisions: If you value seeing Māori organizations hold the pen on health funding and design, Te Pāti Māori and the Greens offer the most direct pathways for rangatiratanga and a restored Māori Health Authority. If you prefer a unified health system where resources are distributed purely by clinical urgency and socioeconomic need without identity-specific agencies, the National-led coalition aligns with that view.

  • Preventative Health: Left-leaning parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) are campaigning on strict public health restrictions to limit tobacco, alcohol, and junk food marketing, which they argue disproportionately harm Māori whānau.

To help you explore how these health options pair with your budget, would you like to look into how these parties' income tax or working family tax credit changes might affect your household costs, or how they propose managing local council services?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account