Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. If rent security and having enough money left each week are my biggest priorities, which party would you recommend I vote for, and what are the trade-offs?

For your situation, I’d compare New Zealand’s 2026 election parties on two separate questions:

  • Rent security: What would protect you from unaffordable rent increases, unexpected tenancy changes, or having to move?
  • Weekly financial security: What would leave you and your partner with enough money for rent, food, power, transport and other essentials when your rostered hours drop?

Those priorities overlap, but they aren't identical. A party could propose stronger renter protections without doing much to increase your weekly income, while another could emphasise tax relief or economic growth without offering the same protections against rent increases.

The key is to look at the policies that would affect your actual household budget, rather than relying on party slogans.

How the main policy differences affect you

The 2026 election is scheduled for 7 November, and parties have published policies on both renting and household finances. Here are the key differences to examine, based on current published positions. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026New Zealand election scheduled for Nov. 7 with the costs of living and housing the top issues

The Green Party

Rent increases and income support

The Greens' 2026 manifesto focuses on affordable housing, stronger renter protections and liveable incomes. Their published policy programme includes a proposed limit of 2% on annual rent increases, alongside wider income and tax reforms. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisisManifesto 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

  • Potential benefit: A rent-increase limit could make budgeting more predictable if it applies to your tenancy.
  • Trade-off: The details, implementation and funding of income-support proposals matter. A cap would not necessarily reduce your current rent, and it would not replace income lost when your shifts are cut.

The Labour Party

Housing supply and everyday costs

Labour has committed to getting Kāinga Ora building social housing again, with $2.9 billion in capital funding in its housing plan. Its other announced measures include a $20 weekly public-transport fare cap in major centres and free prescriptions from July 2027. Start Work NowLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Fiscal Plan 2026

  • Potential benefit: More social housing could help eligible households access a more affordable home; lower transport and healthcare costs could leave more money available for rent.
  • Trade-off: Building homes takes time, and transport or healthcare savings won't necessarily help with a sudden shortfall in wages. Check Labour's detailed renting policies before deciding how much weight to give it on rent security.

The National Party

Tax settings and housing-system reform

National has promised no new taxes if re-elected. Its government has also announced reforms to focus social housing on people with the greatest needs, while using subsidies such as the Accommodation Supplement to help some households facing affordability problems. No new taxes under NationalDelivering fairer social housing

  • Potential benefit: Its approach prioritises existing tax settings and targeted assistance, which may matter if you prefer that economic model.
  • Trade-off: The proposed social-housing reforms include increasing minimum income-related rent contributions from 25% to 30% for affected tenants from April 2027. That change is relevant if you ever depend on social housing, although it would not directly set the rent for a typical private tenancy. Delivering fairer social housingNo new taxes under National

You can also compare the other parties' proposals through the independent election guide, Policy.nz — housing and Policy.nz — incomes and employment. These include proposals on rent regulation, income taxes, universal income and wages. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The trade-offs that matter most for your household

Your priority Policy to examine Important limitation
Predictable rent Limits on rent increases and tenancy protections A limit may not lower today's rent.
Enough money in low-pay weeks Income support, tax thresholds and benefit eligibility Tax relief may provide little help if your earnings are already low.
Lower essential bills Transport, healthcare and other cost-of-living policies Savings may be indirect or arrive later.
Avoiding a forced move Tenancy security and affordable public housing Additional housing supply takes time.
Coping with reduced shifts Support for workers with fluctuating earnings Check eligibility, payment timing and any income tests.

One especially important distinction: a higher annual income is not the same as a reliable weekly income. For rostered workers, the timing and eligibility rules for financial assistance can matter just as much as its headline amount.

How to make the decision

Rather than treating one party as the automatic answer, decide which of these two outcomes is more important to you:

  • Keeping rent predictable, even if your weekly income remains variable.
  • Having a stronger financial safety net when your hours and pay fall unexpectedly, even if rent protections are less extensive.

Then check the exact policies, who qualifies, when they start and how they are funded. Also consider coalition arrangements, because the policies ultimately implemented may differ from a party's standalone promises.

For your two votes under MMP, you can assess the party vote against the national policies above and assess the electorate vote against your local candidates' records and commitments. The party vote determines each party's share of parliamentary seats. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The most useful next step is to compare the parties on one practical question: when your pay falls for a week, which policies would actually help you cover rent and essentials that week? That is a more concrete test than a general promise to make housing or living costs more affordable.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. If rent security and having enough money left each week are my biggest priorities, which party would you recommend I vote for, and what are the trade-offs?

Navigating fluctuating rostered hours while facing fixed costs like rent and bills is a challenging position, making income volatility and housing security central to your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

Different political parties offer contrasting pathways to address these pressures. Rather than recommending a single party, the following breakdown maps out how the major political blocs approach rent security and income smoothing, along with the inherent trade-offs of each approach.

1. Left Bloc (Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori)

Focus: Direct market intervention, stronger tenant rights, and expanded income support to cushion low and fluctuating earnings.

  • Rent Security & Tenancy: These parties generally advocate for stronger renter protections (such as restricting no-cause terminations or introducing forms of rent regulation/stabilization) and scaling up public and affordable housing supply to reduce reliance on private landlords.
  • Income Protection: They favour bolstering social safety nets, increasing targeted financial assistance for lower-income households, and implementing broad cost-of-living relief measures (e.g., expanded public services or tax-free thresholds).
  • The Trade-Offs:
    • Economic/Supply Risk: Critics and property sector groups argue that heavy regulation and new taxes on investment properties can discourage private landlords, potentially shrinking the overall private rental pool and making finding a rental harder.
    • Taxation: Funding expanded social services and safety nets often requires higher taxes (such as wealth or land taxes proposed by the Greens or Te Pāti Māori), which may impact take-home pay for some workers.

2. Center-Right Bloc (National, ACT)

Focus: Supply-side market solutions, economic productivity, and broad-based tax relief.

  • Rent Security & Tenancy: Their approach relies on increasing housing supply through planning and consenting reforms. The argument is that freeing up land and development barriers creates more housing choice, which theoretically curbs rent inflation through market competition. They generally favour landlord-friendly policies to keep private rental stock healthy.
  • Income Protection: They emphasize individual tax cuts, streamlining government spending, and incentivizing work. Support for fluctuating incomes relies heavily on existing mechanisms like the Accommodation Supplement or Working for Families adjustments rather than heavy market interventions.
  • The Trade-Offs:
    • Vulnerability to Volatility: With fewer regulatory controls on rents and fewer tenant protections (e.g., more flexible rules for landlords), your rent could rise more sharply if market demand shifts, leaving you with less protection during weeks when your rostered hours drop.
    • Safety Net Limitations: Tighter controls on welfare spending or reluctance to expand direct income-smoothing subsidies mean that sudden drops in weekly pay rely more heavily on personal savings or fast-moving employer adjustments.

3. Center/National-Populist (NZ First)

Focus: Balancing homeownership pathways, targeted cost-of-living relief, and regional/infrastructure focus.

  • Rent Security & Income: NZ First tends to focus heavily on promoting homeownership, supporting private rental supply without heavy tenancy regulations, and utilizing targeted cost-of-living tools (such as removing GST from basic foods or specific tax credits).
  • The Trade-Offs: While targeted relief can help with weekly grocery bills, their policies offer fewer direct structural protections for private renters experiencing sudden income drops compared to the progressive left.

Summary Checklist for Your Decision

  • If your priority is immediate protection against sudden pay drops and rigid rent spikes: Parties on the left offer stronger safety nets and regulatory controls on renting, balanced against the risk of tighter rental supply or broader tax changes.
  • If your priority is long-term affordability via market supply and keeping more gross pay through tax cuts: Center-right parties offer lower taxes and pro-development policies, balanced against fewer tenancy regulations and less cushioned support when your hours unexpectedly drop.

Would you like to explore how specific welfare or Accommodation Supplement policies apply to households with fluctuating rostered hours?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. If rent security and having enough money left each week are my biggest priorities, which party would you recommend I vote for, and what are the trade-offs?

Deciding how to vote when facing fluctuating rostered income and rigid housing costs involves weighing different political philosophies on market regulation, tenant rights, and income support. In New Zealand’s political landscape, parties approach these challenges through contrasting economic and social lenses.

Rather than recommending a specific party—which depends on how you weigh competing risks—here is an overview of how the major political blocs approach rent security and variable income, along with their associated trade-offs.

1. Left/Green Bloc (e.g., Green Party, Labour Party)

These parties generally advocate for stronger market interventions to protect tenants and more robust public safety nets for lower or fluctuating incomes.

  • Approach to Rent Security: Favours increased regulation of the rental market. Policies often include limiting the frequency or percentage cap on rent increases, strengthening tenant protections to make terminations harder for landlords without explicit cause, and establishing enforceable rental standards (such as Warrants of Fitness). The aim is to make renting more stable and predictable long-term.

  • Approach to Variable Income & Cost of Living: Tends to support expanding income-support safety nets, working-for-families or targeted abatements, and broader public service funding. The philosophy relies on government transfers and baseline income guarantees to cushion drops in private sector wages or hours.

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Economic/Supply Impact: Critics and property-sector groups argue that heavy market regulations and rent controls can disincentivise private landlords from staying in or entering the market, potentially constricting rental supply over time.

  • Taxation/Government Spending: Funding expansive social support and public housing typically requires higher government spending, borrowing, or shifts in taxation (such as capital gains or wealth-associated taxes), which opponents argue can slow broader economic growth or increase the cost of living elsewhere.

2. Centre-Right/Right Bloc (e.g., National Party, ACT New Zealand)

These parties generally look to market-based solutions, supply-side economics, and individual property rights to manage affordability and economic opportunity.

  • Approach to Rent Security: Focuses heavily on increasing overall housing supply (through planning and zoning reform) rather than capping rents. The theory is that when rental supply increases relative to demand, market competition naturally keeps rent increases flatter without needing price controls. They also tend to favour maintaining a balanced regulatory environment where both landlords and tenants have clear, flexible termination and contract rights.

  • Approach to Variable Income & Cost of Living: Focuses on tax relief, economic growth, and incentivising employment rather than expanding direct benefit dependencies. They often target the drivers of inflation and business costs to stimulate job security and higher take-home pay through broad tax settings. Targeted assistance via mechanisms like the Accommodation Supplement is used to assist low-income households rather than sweeping price controls.

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Short-Term Vulnerability: If your hours drop this week, market-based supply reforms take years to lower structural costs. Relying on the private market offers less immediate protection against a sudden, sharp drop in weekly income or an unexpected rent hike.

  • Tenant Power: With fewer restrictions on landlords ending tenancies or adjusting market rates, tenants may feel less secure or experience higher anxiety around lease renewals during personal financial downturns.

How to Compare Your Options

To explore where individual parties stand on these exact issues ahead of casting your vote, you can use independent non-partisan tools like Policy.nz, which lets you filter manifestos specifically by housing, welfare, and cost-of-living policies. [Policy.nz]

Core Decision Matrix:

  • If you prefer immediate certainty through government intervention, price regulation, and stronger legal backing for tenants—accepting the risk of tighter rental supply—a left-leaning or green vote aligns closer with those mechanisms. [RNZ]

  • If you prefer broader economic settings aimed at supply growth, tax relief, and individual contract flexibility—accepting the risk of short-term volatility in your personal weekly margins—a right-leaning vote aligns closer with those principles.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. If rent security and having enough money left each week are my biggest priorities, which party would you recommend I vote for, and what are the trade-offs?

AI Overview

Choosing a political party for the 2026 New Zealand general election depends on how you want to balance rent security against financial predictability. Because your weekly pay fluctuates due to changing rostered hours, the major political parties offer vastly different approaches to relieving financial stress for renters.

There are two primary philosophies competing in the 2026 election: direct intervention to protect tenants and increasing overall housing supply to lower costs market-wide.

Comparison of Party Approaches

Party Core Strategy for Renters Financial Predictability Potential Trade-offs
Green Party Direct Intervention
• Cap rent increases at 2% a year.
• Ban no-cause evictions.
• Implement a Rental Warrant of Fitness. High Rent Security
Your largest fixed cost becomes highly predictable, matching your fluctuating income better. Market Friction
Landlords may pull out of the market or get stricter with applicant background checks, making it harder to move flats.
Labour Party Balanced Regulation & Support
• Reverse the current government's "no-cause" eviction laws.
• Oppose raising social housing rent costs. Moderate Security
Protects against sudden unfair evictions and focuses on reducing broad living costs (like transport and medical). Indirect Relief
Does not directly limit how much your landlord can increase your rent, leaving you vulnerable to market spikes.
National & ACT Supply-Side & Target Support
• Retain 90-day no-cause terminations to encourage landlord market entry.
• Reinvest social housing savings into higher Accommodation Supplement rates. Market Flexibility
Aims to keep overall rent prices flat by introducing more properties into the market. Low Security
You face the risk of sudden 90-day eviction notices without a reason given, adding stress during low-income weeks.

Detailed Breakdown of Options

1. Direct Renter Protections: The Green Party

If your priority is knowing your rent won't suddenly skyrocket when your work hours drop, the Green Party offers the most direct protections.

  • The Policies: Capping rent hikes at 2% annually , ending no-cause evictions, and creating a landlord register to police rental quality.

  • The Trade-off: Economists note that strict rent caps can disincentivize property maintenance or cause landlords to sell. If landlords exit the private market, finding a new flat could become much harder and more competitive.

2. The Middle Ground: The Labour Party

If you want stronger tenant rights but worry that extreme rent controls might dry up the rental market, the Labour Party offers an intermediate option.

  • The Policies: Labour has pledged to fix the residential tenancy laws by scrapping no-cause evictions to give you peace of mind that you can't be suddenly pushed out. They prefer to target your wallet via living costs, proposing policies like capped transport fares and cheaper healthcare.

  • The Trade-off: Because Labour does not support capping rent prices directly, landlords can still raise your rent to match market rates, meaning your largest bill could still go up even if your rostered hours go down.

3. Supply and Subsidies: National and ACT

If you believe the best way to keep rent cheap is to make sure there are plenty of houses available, the National Party and ACT coalitions focus on market supply.

  • The Policies: They prefer to keep rules flexible for landlords (such as maintaining the 90-day no-cause eviction notice) to encourage more people to offer rental properties, which they argue naturally flattens rent prices. They have also adjusted the Accommodation Supplement to provide a bit more weekly cash support for low-income earners.

  • The Trade-off: This provides the least amount of personal security. If your relationship with a landlord sours, or if they decide to repurpose the property, you can be asked to leave with 90 days' notice without any reason provided.

To help narrow down what matters most to your specific situation, you might want to consider:

  • Would you feel safer with strict legal limits on rent increases , or do you prefer direct cash subsidies like the Accommodation Supplement?

  • How important is tenancy longevity (knowing you can't be evicted without a reason) to your peace of mind?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account