Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supported employment and flexible work for people with health conditions?

New Zealand 2026 election: supported employment and flexible work

If a long-term health condition limits how much you can work, the key policy questions go beyond whether a party promises to create jobs. They include whether you can get suitable work, keep income support while your capacity fluctuates, attend medical appointments without risking your job, and receive practical help from employers and employment services.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I would compare party policies across five areas:

  • Supported employment: help finding and keeping a job, including disability-specific employment services, job coaching and workplace support.
  • Flexible work: part-time hours, remote work, flexible schedules and adjustments for medical appointments or periods of poor health.
  • Income support: what happens to your benefit when you start work, increase your hours or temporarily cannot work.
  • Workplace protections: whether employers must accommodate disability-related needs and how discrimination concerns are handled.
  • Health and employment coordination: whether employment programmes recognise ongoing treatment, fatigue, pain, fluctuating symptoms and other limits on capacity.

One important distinction is that a party may support getting more disabled people into work without necessarily proposing more flexible eligibility rules for benefits or stronger rights to workplace adjustments. Those are separate policy questions.

What the parties are proposing

The following is a comparison of published policies and announcements available as of 11 October 2026. The election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, so parties may still release further commitments. Access 2026: accessibility action plan for the 2026 General Election

National Party

Current government's disability support approach

National's published announcements focus on improving the consistency and administration of disability support. Changes introduced in 2026 include a nationally consistent needs-assessment approach and more choice over flexible disability-support funding. The Disability Support Services legislation passed its final reading on 1 September 2026, according to National, and formal consultation with disabled people's representative organisations is part of the framework. Disability support improvements beginFoundational legislation strengthens support

What to look for: whether National proposes specific new supported-employment places, stronger assistance to negotiate reduced hours or appointment leave, and changes to income-support rules. The announcements cited here do not establish a new election commitment in each of those areas.

Labour Party

Published 2026 election platform

Labour's current election policy list includes a healthcare affordability package, including three free GP visits annually and free prescriptions from 1 July 2027. It also proposes restoring pay equity legislation and raising pay for care and support workers. These measures may affect healthcare costs and the support workforce, but they are not the same as a commitment to expand supported employment for people with health conditions. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's Fiscal Plan 2026

What to look for: a specific commitment on flexible work, workplace adjustments, disability employment services and the interaction between wages and benefits. The published headline policies above do not settle all those questions.

Green Party

Disability rights and social security

The Greens' 2026 manifesto includes a disability policy centred on dignity, autonomy, accessibility and access to necessary services. The party also publishes a separate livelihoods policy focused on ensuring people have enough income and resources to participate fully in society. Manifesto 2026Complete Party Policy

What to look for: the detailed proposals on benefit adequacy, benefit abatement when earnings rise, employment support and enforceable workplace accommodations. The manifesto summary alone does not specify the full practical arrangements for someone whose capacity varies with their health.

ACT New Zealand

Medical eligibility and work expectations

ACT's welfare policy proposes that health-related benefits be supported by assessments from an MSD-approved pool of designated doctors, using defined criteria. It proposes phased reassessment of existing Jobseeker Support – Health Condition or Disability and Supported Living Payment recipients, while allowing long-term arrangements for people with genuine, enduring health conditions or disabilities. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

What to look for: how reassessment would affect people with fluctuating conditions, what evidence would be required, and how people could challenge decisions. The published policy does not, by itself, establish a new entitlement to flexible hours or medical appointment leave.

New Zealand First

Accessibility standards

In July 2026, New Zealand First announced an Accessibility Standards Bill intended to establish practical standards to identify, prevent and remove barriers to participation in public spaces, services, education and employment. Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyone

What to look for: whether the proposed standards would directly cover workplace accessibility, reasonable accommodations and flexible work, and how they would be enforced. Accessibility standards and income-support reform are separate issues.

Opportunity Party

Income security and employment access

Opportunity's October 2026 disability position statement says it will explore ways to prevent benefit rules trapping people in poverty, proposes a Citizens' Income and Disability Allowance, and supports enabling people to work without unfair cuts to income support. It also proposes better support for businesses to hire and retain disabled employees and ending arrangements that allow disabled people to be paid below the minimum wage. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026

What to look for: the precise payment amounts, eligibility criteria, transition arrangements and how its proposals would interact with existing benefits. The statement uses the language of proposed directions and does not, on its own, provide every implementation detail.

A caution when comparing these parties: a published position statement, a bill introduced to Parliament, an existing government programme and a fully costed election promise are different levels of commitment. The details above distinguish those where the available sources allow it.

What matters most for your circumstances

New Zealand already has an employment service specifically for people with long-term health conditions or disabilities. Work and Income says eligible people can receive one-to-one help finding work, assistance negotiating flexible working arrangements, and support for themselves and their employer for up to a year after starting work. You do not have to be receiving a benefit to use this service, although eligibility criteria apply. Employment service for people with a disability or health condition

The election question is therefore partly about whether parties would improve or expand existing support, and partly about whether they would change the rules around benefits and employment.

Policy issue What to check in each party's proposals
Part-time or flexible work Can you work only the hours your health permits?
Medical appointments Would workplace flexibility be encouraged or protected, including time for regular treatment?
Fluctuating health Can you temporarily reduce your hours without triggering a disruptive reassessment?
Benefit and wages How much benefit would you retain as your earnings increase?
Supported employment Would job coaching and ongoing workplace support be expanded and adequately funded?
Workplace adjustments What help or obligations would apply to employers providing accessible work?

These are questions to investigate rather than claims that every party has published a firm policy on each point.

Where to check the detail before voting

A useful way to narrow your comparison

When you weigh up the policies, which of these is your biggest concern?

  • A. Keeping enough income support if I work a few hours a week.
  • B. Finding a job with flexible hours, remote work or time off for medical appointments.
  • C. Keeping my benefit secure when my condition fluctuates or gets worse.
  • D. Getting practical help to find a job and stay employed.
  • E. All of these are equally important.

You can choose more than one. I can then focus the comparison on the relevant published commitments and identify where parties have made concrete proposals versus where their policies leave unanswered questions.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supported employment and flexible work for people with health conditions?

Navigating the intersection of income support, medical needs, and employment is a central theme for several political parties heading into the 2026 New Zealand General Election.

Different parties approach supported employment, flexible work, and benefit structures through distinct economic and social lenses. Below is an overview of how major political parties' platforms address these issues:

1. Welfare Reform and Supported Employment Approaches

  • New Zealand First (NZ First): Focuses on moving away from rigid administrative categories towards functional-need criteria for welfare and support systems. They propose re-establishing Workbridge as a dedicated, leading employment agency specifically for disabled and health-compromised New Zealanders to help bridge the gap into sustainable work.
  • The Green Party: Proposes systemic overhauls to income support for those unable to work due to health conditions. Their platform includes transforming the welfare and accident compensation landscape to guarantee a minimum baseline payment (proposing safety nets aligned with a percentage of the minimum wage) for those out of work due to health or disability, aiming to reduce the financial penalties and complex hurdles historically tied to part-time or flexible earning.
  • Labour Party: Emphasises maintaining alignment with the Enabling Good Lives principles and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Their broader platform focuses heavily on reducing the cost-of-living and healthcare barriers (such as introducing targeted free GP visits via a "Medicard" system and removing prescription fees), which directly impacts people managing ongoing medical expenses while trying to maintain work.
  • National and ACT: Generally focus their welfare policies on active work incentives, obligations, and target-driven welfare-to-work transitions, alongside economic management aimed at growing private-sector job creation and increasing workplace flexibility through general employment law frameworks rather than specialized state-mandated benefits.

2. Healthcare Access and Managing Medical Appointments

For those with long-term conditions, managing frequent medical appointments alongside work is a major hurdle. Party approaches to primary care include:

  • Labour: Proposes three free GP or nurse consultations per year for all New Zealanders via a Medicard, alongside removing the $5 prescription charge from July 2027, reducing out-of-pocket medical costs for those managing chronic conditions.
  • The Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Advocate for deeply expanded public health models, pushing toward fully free primary care, community health access, and specialized support to ensure that medical appointments and necessary treatments do not create financial or geographical barriers.
  • National & ACT: Focus on capacity building within the existing health infrastructure, general workforce expansion, and targeted clinical networks to bring down wait times, rather than universal fee removals.

Key Considerations for Your Vote

When evaluating these platforms against your personal situation, you may want to look closely at:

  1. Abatement Thresholds: How easily you can transition into part-time or flexible work without facing an immediate, sharp reduction in your core benefit or losing access to crucial medical subsidies.
  2. Primary Care Costs: Which party's healthcare policy (such as free GP visits or expanded public funding) best mitigates the financial strain of your regular medical appointments.
  3. Employment Support Agencies: Policies that back specialized employment matching (like NZ First's focus on Workbridge) versus general market-led training.

Are there specific aspects of benefit abatement rules or workplace accommodation policies that are most important for your day-to-day security?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supported employment and flexible work for people with health conditions?

Political parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election offer sharply contrasting approaches to income support, welfare obligations, and work flexibility for people managing long-term health conditions and disabilities.

Different political platforms emphasize varying paths—ranging from tighter benefit controls and spending reductions to rights-based approaches and expanded social support.

Overview of Party Positions and Proposals

  • New Zealand National Party : Operates within its current governance framework, having overseen the refresh of the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2026–2030 , which touches on employment and health integration. National's approach generally integrates disability and health provisions within broader mainstream health and administrative settings rather than issuing a distinct, standalone disability employment package, and it maintains standard work-test expectations for benefit recipients where capable. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]
  • ACT New Zealand : Focuses heavily on reducing public spending and fiscal restraint, proposing significant reductions in baseline benefit allocations—including a plan targeting a reduction in disability-associated benefit spending. ACT's philosophy emphasizes tightening eligibility criteria and moving beneficiaries back toward independent work pathways rather than expanding welfare support. [RNZ]
  • New Zealand Labour Party : Emphasizes a more supportive, public-service-oriented welfare safety net, retaining a focus on protecting core benefit adequacy and aligning support systems with accessibility needs, though explicit standalone structural employment packages vary from their broader social welfare commitments.
  • Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand : Advocates for individual welfare reform that lifts benefit levels above the poverty line, decouples support from punitive work-test obligations for people with chronic illness or disability, and invests directly in community-led and supported employment frameworks that accommodate health-related needs.
  • Te Pāti Māori : Focuses on whānau-centred models of care and support, advocating for income support that accounts for chronic health constraints, self-determination in health and disability resourcing, and removing systemic barriers that penalize individuals unable to maintain traditional full-time employment. [Blind Low Vision NZ]

If you'd like, let me know:

  • Which specific income support or benefit type you currently receive (e.g., Supported Living Payment or Jobseeker Support with a medical deferral)
  • Whether you are more interested in welfare reform/benefit rates or workplace rights and employer flexibility

I can provide a more tailored breakdown of how these policies affect your specific situation.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supported employment and flexible work for people with health conditions?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties offer distinctly different visions regarding welfare obligations, supported employment, and financial security for individuals dealing with long-term health conditions. The major party blocks divide their approach between stricter, employment-focused work obligations and rights-based, income-protected support structures.

Summary of Party Positions

Party Core Employment & Support Position Policy Mechanics
National Work-readiness focus with strict obligations, assuming many can transition to work with intensive coaching. Intends to implement random drug testing for Jobseeker recipients and introduces tougher sanctions or reduced payment rates for long-term benefit reliance.
ACT Fiscal containment and tighter eligibility criteria to limit welfare spend. Proposes a $653 million cut to disability benefits, introducing mandatory independent medical certificates to verify long-term work incapacity.
Labour Co-designed, rights-based approach focused on removing systemic barriers and protecting work standards. Pledges to scrap the current government's controversial Disability Support Services Bill to rebuild framework laws alongside the disabled community.
Green Party Unconditional income security and guaranteed state-backed employment pathways. Opposes welfare sanctions, advocates for a Universal Minimum Income, and proposes a "Jobs for Young People" guarantee for those out of work.
The Opportunity Party (TOP) Decoupled income support , allowing individuals to work flexibly without sudden benefit losses. Proposes a Universal Citizens’ Income ($370/week) paired with a standalone $6,000/year Universal Disability Allowance.

Key Policy Areas Explored

1. Supported Employment vs. Work Mandates

  • National emphasizes moving individuals into the workforce via intensive, work-focused interventions. While they provide programs like Community Job Coaching, they also introduce strict requirements, such as requiring Jobseeker beneficiaries (including those with partial medical exemptions) to remain "work-ready," backed by a plan to roll out 10,000 random drug tests in their first year.

  • ACT argues that welfare settings must be reined in. They support looking after people who "don't have a chance to get to work," but propose tighter gatekeeping using independent medical reviews to enforce who qualifies for long-term health exemptions.

  • The Greens view employment support as a right rather than a mandate. They strongly oppose benefit sanctions or work-readiness mandates for those experiencing physical or psychological health conditions. For youth (ages 16–24), they propose a guaranteed "pathway to a job" in community services or infrastructure.

2. Flexible Work and Income Security

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) focuses heavily on building a system where disabled people or those with health conditions can scale their work hours up or down dynamically. Under their Citizens' Income model, individuals can work part-time without immediate, sharp reductions to their core disability allowances, eliminating the "welfare cliff".

  • Labour and Green platforms prioritize reforming current system structures to provide a financial safety net that accommodates chronic health fluctuations. They focus heavily on maintaining the dignity of applicants and ensuring medical appointments or fluctuating health capacities do not result in sudden benefit cancellations.

3. System Navigation and Legislation

  • The Current Government Framework: The National-led coalition recently advanced the Disability Support Services Bill to establish clearer funding rules for the sector.

  • The Opposition Stance: Both Labour and the Greens have formally pledged to scrap this bill if elected. They argue it was rushed through without proper community consultation and limits the employment and legal rights of disabled people and family carers.

If you would like to explore specific policies further, let me know:

  • Which specific health benefit you currently receive (e.g., Supported Living Payment or Jobseeker Support with a medical deferral)?

  • If you want details on how a specific party's tax plan interacts with income support thresholds?

  • Whether you would like details on legislated minimum wage exemptions for disabled workers?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account