Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Who should I vote for if my main aim is to keep a secure, affordable home on NZ Super? Explain the reasons and uncertainties.

If your main concern is keeping a secure, affordable home while living on NZ Super, I would assess the 2026 election around three practical questions:

  • Can you afford the rent? Look at help with rent, limits on rent increases and whether your income will keep pace with housing costs.
  • Can you stay in your home? Look at tenancy protections, rules around ending tenancies and access to longer-term rental or social housing.
  • What happens if your current rental becomes unaffordable? Look at access to public housing, the Accommodation Supplement and other support for older people on fixed incomes.

These are related but different issues. A party might promise to build more houses without protecting existing renters from rent increases. Another might strengthen tenant protections without making enough affordable homes available.

I’ll compare the relevant policy differences rather than assume that any one party is automatically the right choice for you. The important distinction is between policies that are already in force, policies announced for the future, and election promises that would still need to be implemented.

The clearest documented policy differences

One notable difference in the current 2026 policy material is that the Green Party has proposed a specific limit on annual rent increases, alongside stronger tenancy security. The current government's housing policy, by contrast, includes changes to social housing rents and increases to the maximum Accommodation Supplement. These policies affect renters in different ways. A home forDelivering fairer social housingAS – Increasing maximum rate factsheet Budget 2026

Green Party

Its 2026 housing plan proposes capping annual rent increases at 2%, ending no-cause evictions and introducing an independently certified Rental Warrant of Fitness. These proposals directly address rent predictability, the risk of having to move, and housing quality. A home forManifesto 2026

Uncertainty: These are proposals, not guarantees that your rent would rise by no more than 2% in every circumstance. Legislation, implementation details and the response of the rental market would matter.

Labour Party

Labour has published its 2026 election policy programme and is worth comparing on housing supply, income support and renting rules. Its published policy overview emphasises cost-of-living measures, but I could not verify from the material retrieved a specific Labour rent cap or a complete set of renter-security commitments. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Uncertainty: Check Labour's detailed housing and social-housing policies before drawing conclusions about what would change for a pensioner renting privately.

National Party

National's government has announced a housing-support package that raises maximum Accommodation Supplement rates by $10–$30 a week from 1 April 2027. However, it is also increasing the minimum income-related rent contribution for social housing tenants from 25% to 30% of income, phased in from April 2027. Delivering fairer social housingAS – Increasing maximum rate factsheet Budget 20262026 Election Policy

Uncertainty: If you rent privately and qualify for the supplement, the higher maximum may help, but you will not necessarily receive the full increase. If you live in social housing, the rent contribution change may instead increase your costs.

ACT New Zealand

Housing affordability is also addressed through policies intended to increase supply and make development easier. These are relevant to the longer-term availability of homes, but building more homes does not itself guarantee an individual tenant a stable tenancy or affordable rent. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Uncertainty: I could not verify a specific 2026 ACT commitment to cap rent increases or provide a comparable new protection against no-cause eviction in the sources retrieved.

New Zealand First

NZ First has a history of supporting older New Zealanders, including introducing the SuperGold Card. That is relevant to the wider retirement-cost picture, but it does not by itself establish what the party would do about private rent increases or long-term tenancy security. NZ First - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Uncertainty: Its detailed 2026 rental and public-housing commitments need to be checked before assessing the likely effect on your housing costs.

For an independent side-by-side check, use Policy.nz's 2026 housing policy comparison. It lists specific proposals on renting, housing affordability and social housing. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

What matters most if NZ Super is your main income?

The most important distinction is whether you rent privately or live in social housing. Your options and exposure to policy changes differ.

Housing issue What to examine before voting
Rent increases Is there a proposed cap, and how would it work?
Staying in your home Would the party strengthen protection against termination of a tenancy?
Help with rent Would you qualify for more Accommodation Supplement, and when would it start?
Public housing Would more homes be built, and how would older renters qualify and retain their tenancies?
Living costs Would your income keep up with rent, power, food and other essential costs?

Current tenancy rules already limit how often rent can be increased: generally, no more frequently than every 12 months, with at least 60 days' written notice. That does not prevent a substantial increase when the rules are met. Rent increases and reductions » Tenancy Services

How to weigh the uncertainties

Three cautions are especially important for someone relying on NZ Super.

  • A rent cap is not the same as a low rent. A cap can make increases more predictable, but it does not necessarily reduce your current rent or ensure that suitable homes are available.
  • More housing takes time. New social and affordable homes can improve choice, but announced funding and planned construction do not mean a home will be available when you need it.
  • Government formation matters. Under MMP, a party's proposals may be negotiated or changed when parties form a government. A manifesto commitment is not a guarantee of the final policy.

You can check the official 2026 Green Party manifesto, Labour's 2026 policy programme, and National's 2026 election policies. For each party, look for concrete commitments, start dates, eligibility rules and funding rather than relying on general promises about affordability.

One question that would make this comparison much more useful

Are you renting privately from a landlord, or do you live in a Kāinga Ora or community-housing property?

That distinction matters because the policies most relevant to your security may be different: private renters may be more concerned about rent increases and tenancy termination, while social housing tenants also need to consider income-related rent settings and eligibility. I can then narrow the comparison to the policies most relevant to your circumstances without choosing your vote for you.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Who should I vote for if my main aim is to keep a secure, affordable home on NZ Super? Explain the reasons and uncertainties.

Deciding how to vote when you are retired, renting, and relying on New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super) involves weighing different political philosophies on how to best manage the rental market, protect fixed incomes, and support older citizens.

Because choosing a political party depends on which risks you want to prioritize, there is no single "correct" party. Instead, the major parties offer sharply contrasting approaches to addressing renter security and housing affordability.

Key Party Approaches for Renters and Seniors

1. Labour, the Green Party, and Te Pāti Māori (Focus on Renter Protections and Public Housing)

  • The Approach: These parties generally advocate for increased government intervention in the housing market. This includes expanding public and social housing stock so that older renters on low fixed incomes have secure, non-market housing options. They also tend to support stronger regulatory protections for tenants (such as tighter controls on rent increases or tenancy terminations).
  • Why it might appeal to you: If your primary fear is a sudden, unaffordable rent hike or being forced to move by a private landlord selling up, these parties prioritize policies designed to insulate tenants from market volatility and expand state-backed housing safety nets.
  • The Uncertainties: Critics argue that heavier regulation and taxes on property investors can sometimes discourage private landlords, potentially contracting the overall supply of private rentals and making it harder to find a place. Furthermore, social housing waitlists are long, and securing a state or community home is not guaranteed.

2. National, ACT, and New Zealand First (Focus on Market Supply and Economic Stability)

  • The Approach: These parties lean towards market-led solutions, emphasizing that the best way to control rents and housing costs is to stimulate housing supply through planning and zoning reforms, while maintaining an economic environment that encourages private landlords to stay in the market. New Zealand First also specifically highlights options like Seniors Housing Plans and supporting ageing in place.
  • Why it might appeal to you: If you believe that a healthy private rental market relies on private landlords having confidence and incentives to provide rental properties, these parties aim to avoid policies that might trigger landlords to exit the market. Their focus on broader economic management is also tied to keeping inflation low, which protects the purchasing power of NZ Super.
  • The Uncertainties: Relying heavily on the private market means that if market rents rise faster than NZ Super adjustments, private renters remain vulnerable. These parties generally offer fewer direct regulatory controls on how much a private landlord can raise rent year-on-year.

Main Uncertainties to Keep in Mind

  • The Accommodation Supplement vs. Direct Supply: Parties differ on whether to help renters primarily through income support (like adjustments to the Accommodation Supplement) or by building more physical homes. Income support can be eaten up quickly if market rents keep climbing, whereas building more affordable or senior-specific public housing takes considerable time.
  • The Indexation of NZ Super: All major parties generally express a commitment to protecting the baseline structure of NZ Super (tied to the average wage), but broader cost-of-living pressures—particularly rates, insurance, and energy costs that indirectly filter into rent—can still outpace yearly adjustments.

Summary

  • Vote toward Labour or the Greens if you favor direct market interventions, strict tenant protections, and a strong expansion of public housing to shield you from private sector shifts.
  • Vote toward National, ACT, or NZ First if you favor supply-side economic policies, maintaining incentives for private landlords to keep rental stock available, and targeted senior housing initiatives.

Are you more inclined to lean towards increased government regulation for tenant protection, or do you prefer market-driven solutions focused on housing supply?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Who should I vote for if my main aim is to keep a secure, affordable home on NZ Super? Explain the reasons and uncertainties.

Choosing who to vote for depends on which political philosophy you trust more to balance rental security, housing supply, and the economic sustainability of New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super), as no single party offers a guaranteed solution for low-income retired renters.

Under New Zealand's MMP voting system, different parties emphasize contrasting mechanisms to address housing affordability and security for tenants. Because your main income is NZ Super and your core anxiety is housing stability, evaluating the major political blocs highlights distinct trade-offs and uncertainties.

Left-Bloc Parties (e.g., Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori)

These parties generally advocate for stronger tenant rights, increased public and social housing stock, and direct market interventions.

  • Potential Benefits for Renters:

  • Tenant Protections: Historically and programmatically, parties on the left favor tighter regulations on rent increases (such as limiting frequency or capping rises) and restricting no-cause or regular terminations to give tenants long-term security.

  • Income Support and Supplements: They typically favor higher baseline welfare and accommodation support adjustments, which can buffer increases in the cost of living for those reliant entirely on NZ Super.

  • Uncertainties and Trade-offs:

  • Landlord Incentives: Stronger regulations and potential tax changes (like interest deductibility removals or capital gains discussions) can prompt some private landlords to exit the market or raise initial rents to cover perceived risks, potentially reducing total private rental supply in the short term.

  • Superannuation Settings: While major parties historically commit to keeping NZ Super at 66% of the average wage, broader fiscal debates around government spending create ongoing debate on long-term eligibility or indexing adjustments.

Center-Right and Right-Bloc Parties (e.g., National, ACT, New Zealand First)

These parties generally emphasize market-led solutions, boosting overall housing supply through regulatory and zoning reform, and supporting private property owners and landlords.

  • Potential Benefits for Renters:

  • Supply-Side Dynamics: By incentivizing private residential property investment and reducing red tape for developers, right-leaning policies aim to increase the overall supply of housing, which theoretically cools rent inflation over the medium-to-long term.

  • Economic Stability: Policies focused on fiscal restraint and business growth are framed as protecting the value of the currency and ensuring the long-term tax base required to fund universal entitlements like NZ Super without sudden cuts.

  • Uncertainties and Trade-offs:

  • Tenant Security: Recent legislative changes under center-right leadership have restored mechanisms like 90-day no-cause terminations and reinstated full interest deductibility for landlords. While intended to keep landlords in the market, these rules can leave older tenants feeling more vulnerable to displacement if a landlord decides to sell or end a tenancy.

  • Direct Affordability: Reliance on private market supply means immediate, direct relief for current high rents is less pronounced, leaving lower-income renters heavily dependent on the Accommodation Supplement rather than direct price controls.

Key Uncertainties to Weigh

  1. The Private Rental Market Balance: Stricter tenant laws can make you feel safer once inside a property, but they may shrink the pool of available rentals if landlords sell up. Conversely, looser regulations keep landlords active, but offer fewer safeguards against having to move.
  2. The Adequacy of NZ Super vs. Rents: NZ Super is adjusted annually against inflation and average wages, but rental inflation in specific regions frequently outpaces standard Super adjustments. No party has proposed tying NZ Super directly to localized rental costs.
  3. Your Vote Choice: You can explore detailed, non-partisan breakdowns of each party's current commitments via Policy.nz to see how their distinct platforms match your personal tolerance for market versus regulatory approaches.
Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Who should I vote for if my main aim is to keep a secure, affordable home on NZ Super? Explain the reasons and uncertainties.

AI Overview

For a retiree renting on NZ Super , navigating the 2026 New Zealand general election involves choosing between two fundamentally different political approaches to rental security and costs. Because no single party guarantees absolute security, you will need to weigh direct rent controls against market-led policies.

The primary options, along with their distinct protections and risks, are detailed below.

The Options Based on Your Main Priority

1. If Your Priority is Capping Rent Increases & Strict Eviction Protections

The Green Party and the Labour Party offer policies tailored specifically toward strengthening legal rights and limiting costs for tenants.

  • The Green Party: They are campaigning on a "Renters' Rights Bill" that would cap rent increases at 2% per year. They also propose banning "no-cause" evictions, meaning a landlord could not ask you to move out without a legally defined reason. Furthermore, they want to build thousands of new public homes and introduce a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village scheme.

  • The Labour Party: They have committed to opposing recent rental hikes and have vowed to scrap the National-led government's planned social housing rent increase (which raises the tenant income contribution from 25% to 30%). Labour aims to increase state housing stock and focus on general rental fairness.

  • The Uncertainty: Critics and property investor groups argue that strict rent caps, capital gains taxes (proposed by Labour), and heavy regulations could prompt some private landlords to sell their properties. This could potentially shrink the pool of available private rentals and make it harder to find a new place if you do have to move.

2. If Your Priority is Financial Support in the Private Market & Supply Growth

The National Party , along with coalition partners ACT and NZ First , focus on a market-led approach intended to keep landlords in the market and subsidize renters directly.

  • National, ACT, and NZ First: The current government's approach focuses on increasing the Accommodation Supplement , boosting private market support by an average of $15 per week for eligible households to help offset costs. They have also fully restored mortgage interest deductibility for landlords and extended Healthy Homes deadlines, arguing that lowering costs for landlords prevents them from passing massive price hikes onto tenants.

  • The Uncertainty: Under this framework, "no-cause" 90-day eviction notices have been brought back , which reduces long-term tenure security for renters. Additionally, Budget 2026 introduced multi-year social housing overhauls that raise the minimum rent contribution for social housing tenants from 25% to 30% of their income starting in April 2027. Critics also argue that increasing the Accommodation Supplement can simply cause private landlords to raise rents by the same amount.

Core Comparison for Pensioner Renters

Party / Bloc Proposed Rental Protections Financial Strategy for Renters Main Risk to a Pensioner
Greens / Labour High: 2% annual rent cap (Greens); ban on no-cause evictions; reversal of social housing rent hikes. Focuses on capping legal costs and expanding state-built public housing. Landlords may exit the market, reducing private rental supply and increasing competition for remaining flats.
National / ACT / NZ First Low: Retains the 90-day no-cause eviction notice; introduces potential duration limits on social housing. Provides higher Accommodation Supplements for private renters and tax relief for landlords. Higher baseline social housing costs (+5% of income) and less protection against being asked to move.

The Ultimate Election Uncertainty: Coalition Outcomes

In New Zealand’s MMP system, no single party is likely to govern alone. The final housing policies implemented after November 2026 will depend entirely on post-election coalition negotiations. For instance, a Labour-led government might have to compromise with the Greens on the strictness of rent caps, while a National-led government must balance policies with ACT and NZ First. I Ranked Every Party's Property Policy [NZ Election 2026]Where NZ political parties stand on housing ahead of theI Ranked Every Party's Property Policy [NZ Election 2026]

To help narrow down your options, you might consider:

  • Are you currently renting privately or in social/council housing?

  • Would you prefer the peace of mind of a strict legal rent cap , or do you worry that might make landlords sell your current home?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account