Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

2026 New Zealand election: roads, broadband and services beyond the cities

For someone living and working in a small town, the key question isn't simply which party promises the biggest infrastructure projects. It's which party's plans would make everyday life outside the main centres easier — getting to appointments, keeping reliable internet for work, maintaining roads, and creating enough local employment that people don't have to leave their community.

The 2026 New Zealand general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. Party policies are still evolving, so it's worth distinguishing announced commitments from older policies, general aspirations and funded projects. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Broadcasting allocation for the 2026 General Election

I'll compare the main parliamentary parties across your concerns, without assuming that living in a small town means you farm or work in agriculture.

What matters for your situation

  1. Roads and travel costs

Look for commitments to maintain existing state highways, repair bridges and local roads, improve safety, and provide reliable connections to hospitals, specialist appointments and larger service towns. New highways are not necessarily the same thing as better everyday access.

  1. Broadband and mobile coverage

Look for commitments to extend fibre, improve rural wireless or satellite options, close mobile black spots and make connections affordable. Coverage maps alone don't tell you whether the service is fast and reliable enough for work, study or video consultations.

  1. Local infrastructure, jobs and healthcare

Check whether plans cover water and wastewater, community facilities, local business investment, regional skills and training, and access to GPs and hospital services. These are separate policy areas, even when they affect the same town.

How the main parties compare

The table below focuses on the direction of policy, not a ranking. A crucial distinction: a party may support regional development in principle without having announced a funded broadband extension or a specific road project for your area.

Party Roads and transport Broadband and local infrastructure
National Its 2026 programme includes named road projects, including Mill Road Stage One and the Belfast–Pegasus and Woodend Bypass. 2026 Election Policy Its published programme also emphasises economic growth, commercial construction and council rates. Check whether your region has a specific funded commitment.
Labour Its current policy programme includes a $20 weekly public-transport fare cap, although this may be less useful where there is no practical bus or train service. Labour's 2026 Election Policies Its programme includes a Future Fund for investment in New Zealand businesses and support for small businesses and apprenticeships. Labour's 2026 Election Policies
ACT Has announced a road-focused approach: protect maintenance funding, prioritise potholes, drainage and bridges, and require major projects to publish the lowest-cost safe option. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand Its infrastructure approach stresses cost control and delivery. Ask what specific commitments it has for rural broadband and town-level infrastructure.
New Zealand First Its published 2023 policy emphasises regional transport connections, local road improvements and links for freight and passengers. 2023 Election Policies Its 2023 platform proposed a Regional Infrastructure Fund and funding smaller internet providers to address remote-area connectivity gaps. These are historical policy commitments, so check what is retained in its 2026 programme. 2023 Election Policies
Green Party Its transport policy emphasises safe, convenient and accessible ways for people to connect with their communities, including alternatives to car travel. Complete Party Policy Its digital policy includes free internet access in appropriate public places, such as libraries, schools and hospitals. That is not the same as a commitment to extend broadband to every home. Complete Party PolicyDigital Policy

Important limitation: these parties have not all published equally detailed or directly comparable 2026 commitments on rural broadband and small-town infrastructure in the sources reviewed. In particular, don't treat a party's older policy as a confirmed election promise. You can compare the latest announcements in Policy.nz's 2026 transport and infrastructure guide and economy guide. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Two issues deserve particular attention

Broadband: who will fix the gaps?

There is a useful difference between the parties' approaches:

  • National: In March 2025, the government announced regulatory changes intended to help smaller fibre providers offer more connectivity options in hard-to-reach areas. This is a measure already announced, rather than a guarantee of a new connection to every underserved property. Boosting rural connectivity and economic growth
  • New Zealand First: Its 2023 policy explicitly proposed funding smaller internet providers to fill remote-area gaps. Verify whether that proposal remains in its 2026 commitments. 2023 Election Policies
  • Green Party: Its published digital policy includes free internet in specified public places. That addresses access in community facilities, rather than directly promising better household coverage. Digital Policy
  • Labour and ACT: Check their latest policy documents for specific household coverage targets, rural network investment and delivery dates before drawing a comparison.

Useful questions for any party: Will it improve service where fibre is unavailable? Will it address mobile black spots? How much will households pay? When will the improvements arrive?

Healthcare and local employment: infrastructure isn't just roads

For your family, a road upgrade may shorten the drive, but it won't necessarily solve the problem of getting a GP appointment or finding work locally.

Two concrete 2026 proposals worth examining are:

  • Labour's Family Doctor Loan Scheme: intended to help local GPs buy into practices and remain in their communities, starting from July 2027. Labour also proposes a programme of school and hospital repairs designed to create work for local firms. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesStart Work Now
  • National's infrastructure programme: includes a 30-year infrastructure plan and a stated emphasis on maintenance, new roads, schools and hospitals. Its published figures include a $2.15 billion allocation for state-highway maintenance and renewals over the 2024–27 National Land Transport Programme. Building infrastructure for the future, roads, schools

These are different types of commitments, and neither automatically guarantees more healthcare staff or permanent jobs in a particular small town.

How to assess the promises before you vote

Use this checklist when reading party policies or asking candidates questions.

My election priorities

0 of 6

Maintenance funding for existing roads, bridges and drainage

A named road project or a clear plan for my region

A funded solution for poor broadband and mobile coverage

Practical access to GPs, hospitals and specialist services

Investment that creates local jobs, apprenticeships or training

Clear costs, delivery dates and public progress reporting

Copy checklist

For a neutral, side-by-side comparison of more parties and their published commitments, start with Policy.nz's 2026 election guide. Then check each relevant party's official policy page for the latest detail.

Remember that New Zealand voters have two votes: the party vote helps determine each party's share of parliamentary seats, while the electorate vote chooses your local representative. You can assess both a party's national programme and what local candidates say they will advocate for.

The most useful final test is whether a promise is specific, funded, timed and relevant to the services your town actually lacks.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

When considering your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election from a small-town or regional perspective, the stark realities of long commutes, limited healthcare access, and distance from major centers bring infrastructure policies into sharp focus.

The major political parties differ significantly in how they propose to fund, build, and maintain roads, digital connectivity, and local services outside the main metropolitan areas.

1. Roads and Transport Resilience

For families driving long distances for services, road safety, maintenance, and resilience against weather disruptions are critical.

  • National & NZ First: Both parties place a heavy emphasis on expanding and upgrading physical roading networks.
    • National prioritizes major regional road corridors and state highway resilience, using funding models that often combine public funds with tools like user-pays, tolling, and higher reliance on the National Land Transport Fund.
    • New Zealand First strongly champions regional infrastructure, focusing on major connecting highways, alternate routes around vulnerable geographic bottlenecks (such as slips and weather-prone hills), and boosting regional supply chain and freight roads.
  • Labour & The Greens: These parties tend to balance roading investments with alternative transport modes.
    • Labour has historically focused on cost-of-living relief, targeted regional road fixes, and integrated public transport models, though they face scrutiny over balancing national transport debt and revenue.
    • The Greens heavily emphasize reducing car dependence through expanded regional, inter-regional, and rural bus networks, alongside nationwide rail connectivity, viewing public transport as a primary lifeline for communities outside major cities.
  • ACT: Advocates for strict infrastructure discipline and user-pays mechanisms (such as electronic Road User Charges and potential private-public partnerships) to ensure that regions generating economic activity or utilizing specific routes contribute directly to their upkeep.

2. Broadband and Digital Connectivity

Reliable high-speed internet is essential for small-town survival—enabling remote work, telehealth consultations to offset distant healthcare services, and local business operations.

  • Cross-Party Continuity with Nuanced Funding: While the foundational ultra-fast broadband (UFB) and rural broadband expansion (RBI) programmes laid down years ago are largely viewed as baseline necessities, parties differ on how to reach the final "hard-to-reach" pockets.
  • Right-Leaning Parties (National, ACT): Generally favor leveraging private-sector competition, public-private partnerships, and reduced regulatory red tape to incentivize telecommunications companies to expand mobile blackspot coverage and wireless broadband upgrades commercially.
  • Left-Leaning and Center Parties (Labour, Greens, NZ First): Tend to support more active government intervention, subsidies, or dedicated public funding pools to ensure remote and lower-density rural areas are not left behind as digital demands (like cloud services and heavy telehealth) increase. They view universal digital access as a core public utility rather than purely a market commodity.

3. Local Infrastructure and Healthcare Access

Small towns often struggle with the rating base required to maintain water, local roads, and community facilities, while also grappling with distant or under-resourced local health services.

  • Local Government Support: Parties like the Greens and independent reform advocates propose more robust long-term funding frameworks for local councils to fix infrastructure deficits without overburdening small-town ratepayers. Conversely, parties emphasizing fiscal restraint look for efficiencies and private capital partnerships.
  • Healthcare Proximity: While health is distinct from civil engineering, local infrastructure policies heavily cross over. Parties focusing on regional development (particularly NZ First and National) emphasize regional economic zones, local resource retention, and transport corridors to ensure residents can physically reach regional hubs safely. Left-leaning parties emphasize public service hubs and expanded localized care infrastructure to reduce the burden of long-distance travel.

Key Questions to Weigh for Your Vote:

  • Do you prefer a market-led, road-centric approach (National/ACT/NZ First) that prioritizes driving corridors, highway resilience, and private-public funding?
  • Or do you favor a public-service and alternative-transport approach (Labour/Greens) that prioritizes public subsidies, expanded regional bus/rail networks, and direct government intervention for remote equity?

Are there specific local routes, internet blackspots, or community services near you that are driving your decision this election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

New Zealand political parties offer distinct approaches to regional roads, connectivity, and local infrastructure outside major centers, balancing state investment, user-pays models, and public-private partnerships.

For residents in small towns who rely heavily on long-distance road travel, digital access, and localized services, party platforms diverge significantly in philosophy and funding mechanisms for the regions.

Roads and Long-Distance Transport

  • National Party : Emphasizes major highway construction, designating several regional routes as Roads of National Significance. Favors a mix of traditional government funding, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and potential tolling to accelerate delivery and maintenance of arterial transport corridors connecting smaller regions.

  • Labour Party : Focuses on balanced regional transport funding with an emphasis on maintaining existing state highway networks, climate resilience for vulnerable rural and provincial roads, and integrated regional public or community transport options where feasible.

  • ACT New Zealand : Strongly advocates for a "user-pays" model, shifting entirely to electronic road user charges (RUC) for all vehicles, increased use of tolling for new capital projects, and opening up infrastructure development and financing to private capital and market discipline. [Kiwi Coaches]

  • New Zealand First : Prioritizes strategic public ownership and regional development funds, emphasizing the protection and enhancement of regional transport links (including both roads and provincial rail/ports), fuel security, and government-led investment in provincial connectivity. [Kiwi Coaches]

  • Green Party : Directs a higher proportion of national transport funding away from highway expansion and toward regional rail, active transport, and local public transport networks, alongside strengthening the climate resilience of rural roading infrastructure.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) : Proposes a long-term 30-year national infrastructure framework to depoliticize project selection, backed by higher overall capital investment in regional and national resilience. [Kiwi Coaches]

Broadband and Digital Connectivity

  • National / ACT : Generally support leveraging commercial market competition and targeted-access subsidies (such as rolling out further rural broadband upgrades via Chorus or wireless providers) with minimal state market distortion, aiming for private-sector efficiency in remote coverage gaps.

  • Labour / Greens / NZ First : Tend to favor direct government intervention and state-backed enhancements (extending public-private initiatives akin to the original Ultra-Fast Broadband and Rural Broadband Initiative rollouts) to guarantee equitable high-speed digital access for remote businesses, remote workers, and telehealth services in small towns.

Local Infrastructure, Healthcare, and Services

  • National : Focuses on economic enablement, local growth incentives, and streamlining resource management laws (replacing the RMA) to lower costs for local councils undertaking infrastructure, while managing central government spending carefully.

  • Labour / Te Pāti Māori / Greens : Focus more heavily on direct central government funding partnerships with local and iwi authorities for community assets, local healthcare access, and regional job creation initiatives. Te Pāti Māori specifically emphasizes localized resource governance and community-led infrastructure resilience.

  • New Zealand First : Focuses on retaining and strengthening regional public services, opposing the centralization of healthcare and policing out of provincial areas, and using dedicated regional development funding to support local economic viability. [Kiwi Coaches]

You can evaluate how your specific personal priorities align with each group using the interactive voter comparison tool at WhichParty NZ, or review official electorate information for the upcoming vote at Vote NZ.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on roads, broadband and local infrastructure outside major cities?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties offer distinctly different approaches to addressing the infrastructure deficit in provincial towns and rural areas. While all major parties agreed during the October 2026 debates that maintaining existing roads must be prioritized over building new projects, they disagree significantly on funding models, regional connectivity expansion, and how to deliver services to small communities.

🛣️ Roads and Local Transport

The state of regional state highways and local roads is a central battleground, especially for families driving long distances for essentials.

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on its Roads of National Significance (RoNS) program and has allocated $400 million for state-highway resilience to combat severe weather impacts on regional networks. National aims to leverage new revenue models, including electronic road-user charges (RUC) and expanded tolling frameworks.

  • Labour Party: Focuses on an integrated transport system. To directly ease transport costs for smaller regions, Labour has pledged a $10 weekly public transport fare cap for all areas outside the three major cities. They have also committed to scrapping planned 2027 fuel-excise increases to relieve pressure on motorists.

  • New Zealand First: Explicitly champions regional development and improving rural roading. The party is strongly against the privatization of roads or rail tracks and advocates for using the Superannuation Fund to bankroll domestic infrastructure alongside upgraded highways leading to regional ports.

  • ACT Party: Pushes for strict user-pays infrastructure discipline, promoting private capital investment and widespread tolling. ACT vows to ring-fence and protect maintenance and renewal allocations within the National Land Transport Fund.

  • Green Party: Advocates for a fundamental shift away from new highways, choosing instead to restrict road funding to completing half-built projects and maintaining existing local roads. They heavily prioritize reviving regional rail to better connect provincial areas.

🌐 Broadband and Digital Connectivity

With local jobs and healthcare limited, high-speed internet is vital for small-town remote work and telehealth. The emergence of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite providers like Starlink has reshaped the policy debate over how to connect the final ~13% of under-served New Zealand homes.

  • National Party: Focuses on regulatory streamlining to improve telecommunications infrastructure. Through amendments to the Telecommunications Act, they have simplified property consents for Ultra-Fast Broadband (UFB) connections and removed resource consent requirements for low-impact regional towers to encourage market competition.

  • Labour Party: Advocates for direct government intervention to close regional digital divides. They have historically supported dedicated regional connectivity funding to upgrade capacity specifically targeting areas with poor coverage (such as Gisborne, the West Coast, and Southland).

  • The Telco & Industry Debate: Telecommunication providers are heavily lobbying the incoming government ahead of the November election to move away from a "fibre-only" approach. They argue that extending fibre to 100% of rural homes is cost-prohibitive and push for a mix of mobile, satellite, and fixed-wireless access (FWA) to efficiently close regional gaps.

🏗️ Summary Comparison for Regional Voters

Party Primary Roading Focus Funding Model Regional Services & Local Support
National Resilience and Roads of National Significance (RoNS). Electronic RUC, tolling, and public-private partnerships. Regulatory relief to boost private telco deployment.
Labour Multi-modal integration; review rather than cancel projects. New NZ Future Fund; scrap 2027 fuel-excise hike. $10/week regional transport cap; expansion of telehealth infrastructure.
NZ First Upgrading provincial highways and regional rail networks. Public ownership; Super Fund loans; tolls as a last resort. Aggressive protection of rural infrastructure funds against "mega city" projects.
ACT Ring-fencing core maintenance and asset renewals. Strict user-pays discipline, tolling, and private capital. Cutting structural spending and "red tape" to stimulate local business growth.
Greens Halting new highways to fund upkeep and regional rail. Congestion and polluter-pays road charges. Heavy focus on climate-resilient local infrastructure.

If you would like to narrow this down, feel free to tell me:

  • Which specific services or healthcare access needs are impacting your family the most?

  • Whether you rely on mobile/satellite internet or are hoping for a physical fibre extension to your area?

  • If you have a preference between user-pays infrastructure (tolls) or publicly funded options?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account