Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

Comparing New Zealand parties on Māori education and whānau priorities

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, it helps to look beyond broad promises about education and ask what each party proposes for tamariki, whānau and Māori communities in practice.

As a Māori parent in a working household, you may want to weigh several connected issues:

  • Māori-medium education: access to kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori, wharekura and pathways into further education.
  • Te reo Māori: funding for language learning, teacher supply, curriculum requirements and support for te reo in everyday school life.
  • Support for tamariki at school: learning support, attendance, school lunches, classroom resources, transport and help for children with additional needs.
  • Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori participation: whether Māori have decision-making authority, meaningful consultation and a role in shaping education policy.
  • Household affordability: whether proposed policies affect school-related costs, income support and the practical ability of parents to work while supporting their children.

One important distinction is that a party can support learning outcomes for Māori without necessarily supporting Māori-medium education or Māori participation in decision-making to the same extent. Those are separate policy questions worth comparing.

1. What the parties are saying

The following is a comparison of published policies and government actions available as of 11 October 2026. It is not a prediction of what a future government will deliver: funding, coalition agreements and implementation all matter.

Key sources: Policy.nz — Education, Policy.nz — Te ao Māori, and the parties' published policies.

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori explicitly advocates Māori-led education and stronger Māori authority over decisions affecting Māori.

  • Māori-medium education and te reo: its published reo policy commits to strengthening te reo Māori, investing in learning pathways and community-led revitalisation, and making the state accountable for protecting the language.
  • Tamariki and whānau: its platform calls for Māori-led education, health, disability and justice services.
  • Te Tiriti and participation: its constitutional policy includes an independent Te Tiriti commission, making Waitangi Tribunal recommendations binding, and funding the Matike Mai constitutional transformation process. PolicyTe Reo Māori

Read: Te reo Māori policy · Full party policies

Green Party

The Greens' 2026 manifesto connects inclusive education, children's wellbeing, te Tiriti and Māori self-determination.

Read: 2026 manifesto

Labour Party

For Labour, examine its specific commitments on public education, learning support, school attendance, te reo Māori and the role of Māori in education governance.

The key comparison is whether its 2026 commitments would expand Māori-medium capacity, restore or retain te Tiriti obligations in education, and provide concrete resources for tamariki who need extra support. These questions should be checked against its current manifesto rather than inferred from its historical record.

Read: Labour Party

National Party

National's record in government includes a February 2026 package of Māori education resources and a new, optional te reo Māori professional-learning programme intended to help 50,000 teachers use the language in everyday classroom teaching.

The announced resources also include materials for advanced te reo learning in wharekura and language-teaching resources for Years 4–8. These are concrete initiatives to distinguish from the separate question of whether the government supports Māori authority over education policy. Māori education package and draft curriculum release as school starts

Read: National Party

ACT New Zealand

ACT's approach to education and public policy should be assessed alongside its positions on equal treatment, ethnicity-based provision and the interpretation of te Tiriti.

For your comparison, check its current proposals for Māori-specific education support, the place of te Tiriti in education law, and whether it favours Māori-led decision-making or common national arrangements. Policy.nz identifies proposals concerning limits on university support allocated on the basis of ethnicity and changes to Treaty principles as issues to examine. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Read: ACT New Zealand

New Zealand First

Compare New Zealand First's current commitments on a common school curriculum, language policy, school standards and the role of te Tiriti in public institutions.

For a fair assessment, distinguish support for children achieving literacy and numeracy goals from specific commitments to Māori-medium schooling, te reo revitalisation and Māori participation in governance. Those commitments need to be verified individually rather than assumed from general education promises.

Read: New Zealand First

A note on the comparison: The specific, documented commitments above are not a complete inventory of every party's 2026 policy. In particular, the current Labour, ACT and New Zealand First manifestos need to be checked directly before drawing conclusions about their detailed school-support proposals.

What these differences mean in practice

Issue Published positions to compare
Māori-medium education Te Pāti Māori's Māori-led approach; Greens' education and reo commitments; Labour's stated commitment to greater Māori leadership in education.
Te reo Māori Greens' $200 million proposal; National's teacher language-training initiative; Te Pāti Māori's commitment to state accountability for protecting te reo.
Te Tiriti in schools Labour says it would restore the legal commitment; Greens also support restoration. The current government's changes have been opposed by both parties.
School costs and practical support Compare ACT's school-uniform and rural-bus proposals with Labour's school-building investment and each party's current commitments on food, transport and learning support.
Māori participation Compare Māori-led education and constitutional reform proposals with approaches that emphasise common rules, equal treatment or changes to Treaty institutions.

Sources: Labour on Te Tiriti in schools, Labour on Māori partnership, ACT education policy, and ACT's constitutional policy. Release: Labour will restore Te Tiriti commitment in schoolsRelease: Labour will partner with Māori in educationACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

2. What should you check for your tamariki?

Party promises become more useful when you turn them into specific questions about your whānau's everyday experience.

Māori-medium pathways

Does the party propose more funding, teachers and places for kōhanga reo, kura kaupapa Māori and wharekura? Does it support pathways through secondary school and into tertiary study?

Te reo Māori at school

Will tamariki have access to quality reo teaching, and will kaiako have the training and resources to provide it? Is the commitment funded, optional or compulsory?

Support for children

What is proposed for learning support, specialist assessments, teacher aides, school lunches, attendance barriers and transport? Which children qualify, and when would support begin?

Te Tiriti and Māori decision-making

Are Māori consulted, or do Māori and iwi have a meaningful role in decisions? What legal obligations, governance arrangements and accountability mechanisms would the party maintain?

Working-whānau affordability

Would the policies reduce out-of-pocket school costs, help with transport or childcare, and make it easier to balance paid work with school commitments? Check the funding and eligibility rules.

3. How to make a fair comparison before voting

I suggest reading the full 2026 manifesto alongside the policy announcements. A press release may describe a new initiative without showing its total funding, implementation timetable or whether it replaces another programme.

You can start with two independent comparison pages:

Then check each party's original policy for funding, delivery dates, eligibility and proposed legal changes. Keep announced commitments, policies already being implemented, and your own assessment of their likely effects separate.

4. Which part matters most to your whānau?

If you tell me which of these is your main concern, I can make a more detailed, side-by-side comparison of the parties' published 2026 commitments, including what is funded, what is proposed and what remains unclear.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

As a Māori parent in a working household navigating living costs, local service access, and the values of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, deciding how to cast your party vote in the 2026 New Zealand General Election involves weighing contrasting political visions for education, te reo Māori, and systemic participation.

Here is how the major political parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and student support services:

1. Māori-Medium Education & Self-Determination (Tino Rangatiratanga)

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates strongly for a dedicated Māori Education Authority to return governance, design, and decision-making over Māori education directly to Māori. Their policy is framed around tino rangatiratanga and Te Tiriti-based transformation, seeking to resource kaupapa Māori and Kura Kaupapa pathways fully.
  • Green Party: Supports self-determination for Māori in education, partnering with iwi and hapū-led education initiatives, and expanding funding for kaupapa Māori and Pacific-led learning environments.
  • Labour Party: Focuses on strengthening the provision of network-managed, publicly funded education, supporting kaupapa Māori services (including ECE and kura), and integrating localized iwi partnerships within the existing state education framework.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First (The Current Coalition): Generally focus their education policies around "school choice" (such as charter/partnership schools and state-integrated options) rather than ethnically targeted or separate governance authorities. They emphasize standardizing core curriculum delivery across the public system.

2. Te Reo Māori and Mātauranga Māori in the Curriculum

  • Te Pāti Māori & Green Party: Both advocate for making te reo Māori a core, compulsory subject up to Year 10, alongside deeply embedding mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge systems) across all learning areas.
  • Labour Party: Supports the continued integration of New Zealand history and te reo Māori modules within the refreshed curriculum, emphasizing resourcing for teacher professional development to meet demand.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Have placed greater policy emphasis on core foundational academics (such as structured literacy in English and mathematics). While they do not ban te reo, parties like ACT and NZ First have expressed skepticism or pushed back against what they term "co-governance" or mandatory bicultural requirements across public sectors, preferring a streamlined, universal core curriculum.

3. Support for Children at School (Household Cost Relief)

For working households balancing tighter budgets, targeted in-school support services function as a direct form of cost-of-living relief:

  • Te Pāti Māori & Green Party: Strongly campaign for universal or expanded student supports—including expanding free healthy school lunch programmes, free in-school health/counselling services, and free public transport for children and youth to ease household expenses.
  • Labour Party: Historically champions the continued funding and protection of the Ka Ora, Ka Ako healthy school lunch program and broader decile-alternative equity funding to target schools in working-class and lower-income communities.
  • National & Coalition Partners: While maintaining targeted support for families most in need, their approach often leans toward administrative streamlining, reprioritizing spending toward frontline academic basics, and utilizing tax relief mechanisms (such as family tax credits or childcare assistance) rather than universal in-school program expansions.

Summary for Your Vote

  • If your priority is Māori-led authority, structural Te Tiriti-based transformation, and mandatory te reo/mātauranga integration, parties on the left (Te Pāti Māori, Greens) align closely with those goals.
  • If your priority is mainstream public schooling with targeted equity support and stable state provision, Labour offers a middle path.
  • If your priority is parental choice, universal academic basics, and alternative schooling models (like charter schools), the National-led coalition parties form that perspective.

How do you feel about these different approaches, and are there specific household or local service costs that are weighing most heavily on your mind for this election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

When considering your vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election as a Māori parent in a working household, political parties offer distinct approaches to Te Tiriti o Waitangi, decision-making participation, te reo Māori, and student support.

Te Pāti Māori

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Places Te Tiriti at the absolute centre of governance. Proposes establishing an independent Māori Education Authority to shift decision-making power and resource control directly to Māori communities, iwi, and kura.
  • Māori-Medium & Te Reo Māori: Advocates for making te reo Māori a core curriculum subject through Year 10 and expanding full-immersion resourcing and Kura Kaupapa support. [RNZ]
  • Working Household & School Support: Focuses heavily on cost-of-living relief for families by expanding universal free school lunches, introducing free public transport for students, and providing free school counselling. [RNZ]

Labour Party

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Emphasizes co-design and partnership with Māori in education, criticizing recent National-led curriculum adjustments as lacking sufficient iwi and hapū consultation. Pledges to restore explicit legal commitments to Te Tiriti within school frameworks.
  • Māori-Medium & Te Reo Māori: Focuses on reversing cuts to professional development for teachers learning te reo Māori and strengthening local partnerships with kura and mainstream schools. Also commits to Māori-led trades training funds delivered via marae and iwi trusts.
  • Working Household & School Support: Plans to freeze sweeping curriculum overhauls to create stability for students, alongside maintaining baseline support for working families and wellbeing initiatives in schools. [RNZ]

National Party (Current Government Lead)

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Prefers a streamlined approach to public service delivery, focusing on standardizing educational achievement metrics across all schools rather than race- or ethnicity-based separate authorities.
  • Māori-Medium & Te Reo Māori: Promotes targeted mainstream integration and professional development—such as rolling out te reo training programmes (like Te Ataarangi) for tens of thousands of teachers and releasing draft curricula frameworks in te reo Māori for schools choosing bilingual pathways.
  • Working Household & School Support: Emphasizes classroom fundamentals, student discipline management (such as legal powers for teachers to remove disruptive students), and structured literacy/maths targets, aiming to support working parents through economic management rather than universal welfare expansions. [Policy.nz]

Green Party / Te Kākāriki

  • Māori Participation & Te Tiriti: Strongly aligns with Te Tiriti-led governance, supporting self-determination (tino rangatiratanga) for whānau, hapū, and iwi in designing local education solutions.
  • Māori-Medium & Te Reo Māori: Advocates for full resourcing of te reo Māori revitalization across early childhood, primary, and secondary education, viewing indigenous language protection as a core climate and cultural right.
  • Working Household & School Support: Prioritizes poverty reduction for working households through income support, universal school food programmes, and mental health/wellbeing infrastructure embedded directly inside public schools.

Key Questions to Guide Your Decision:

  1. Decision-Making Power: Do you prefer an independent, dedicated Māori Education Authority (Te Pāti Māori/Green approach), a partnership/co-governance model within existing state systems (Labour), or centralized, standardized mainstream schooling outcomes (National)?
  2. Te Reo in Classrooms: Do you lean toward making te reo Māori a compulsory core subject through Year 10, or do you prefer professional development models that support teachers integrating te reo voluntarily or in bilingual modules?
  3. Household Cost Relief: Which party's package on school-associated costs (lunches, transport, and student wellbeing) best lightens the financial load for your working whānau day-to-day?
Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Māori parent in a working household. I want to compare household costs and local services, and I also care about Te Tiriti and Māori participation in decisions. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on Māori-medium education, te reo Māori and support for children at school?

AI Overview

Heading into the 2026 General Election , New Zealand's major political parties offer distinct paths regarding Māori-medium education, te reo Māori, and student support systems. Right-of-centre parties emphasize core foundational metrics, standardization, and strict efficiency. Left-of-centre and Māori-focused parties emphasize local decision-making, Te Tiriti-centered governance, and targeted funding expansions to secure equity for tamariki.

Party Comparisons

Policy Area National & ACT (Coalition Government) Labour Party Green Party Te Pāti Māori
Māori-Medium Education Shifted school boards' primary legislative focus to academic performance rather than explicit Te Tiriti obligations. Released a draft curriculum in te reo Māori for Term 1, 2026. Pledged to introduce the Education and Training (Upholding Te Tiriti o Waitangi) Amendment Bill to legally reinstate boards' obligations to give effect to Te Tiriti. Strongly opposes removing Te Tiriti from education law. Focuses heavily on direct, systemic equity funding for Māori immersion streams. Promises to establish an independent Māori Education Authority to shift education management away from the Ministry and give Māori full authority over their learning systems.
Te Reo Māori Replaced bilingual or te reo titles with English-only names across public programmes (e.g., changing Ka Ora, Ka Ako to Healthy School Lunches). Launched the Te Ataarangi professional development initiative to train 50,000 teachers in te reo. Promises to reverse changes limiting te reo Māori names within public services and supports integrating te reo smoothly inside classrooms. Pledged an extra $200 million for te reo initiatives, allocating $30m/year for teacher development and $20m to Te Taura Whiri and Te Mātāwai. Wants to mandate te reo Māori and Māori history as core curriculum subjects from primary school through Year 10. Requires a minimum of 25% of the education budget to go directly to Māori delivery models.
School Lunches & Student Support Scaled back mass-produced operations to run the Healthy School Lunches scheme with forecasted savings, funding the programme for the 2027 school year ahead of planned 2028 adjustments. Unveiled an on-site meal model to prepare lunches in school kitchens, via local caterers, or through iwi and hapū partners , ensuring fresh meals while restoring rural school bus routes. Supports fully universalizing school food programmes alongside free public transport for students and expanding school-based mental health counseling. Intends to massively expand school lunch provisions. Demands a dedicated, Māori-led taskforce to completely transform funding and support for Māori students with disabilities and learning differences.

Crucial Trade-offs for Working Whānau

  • Decision-Making & Governance: Voting for the current Coalition path keeps education oversight centralized under national achievement parameters, whereas voting for Labour, the Greens, or Te Pāti Māori attempts to decentralize decision-making back toward iwi, hapū, and Te Tiriti-aligned frameworks.

  • Practical Daily Support: The immediate cost-of-living impacts differ based on school lunch execution. National balances fiscal constraint against standard delivery, Labour pivots toward local kitchen infrastructure and regional transport access, and the smaller left-wing blocks push for fully subsidized universal student services.

If you want to view a personalized breakdown of policies tailored directly to working households, you can check out the new Te Pāti Māori What Matters to You tool online.

To help narrow down your options, let me know:

  • If you prefer your tamariki to learn in full immersion (Kura Kaupapa) or mainstream school environments?

  • Whether immediate household cost reliefs (like transport caps and localized lunch models) are a higher priority than structural legislative changes?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account