Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

New Zealand 2026 election: How parties differ on healthcare

If you're voting for the first time, healthcare is a useful issue to compare because it affects everyday life: how quickly you can get a GP appointment, whether you can afford to see a doctor, and how long you might wait for hospital treatment.

The key thing to understand is that parties can agree that people need better access to healthcare while disagreeing about how to achieve it, how much to spend, and who should provide the services.

I'll explain the main differences in plain English, without telling you which party to vote for. One important caveat: party policies can change during an election campaign, so it's worth distinguishing announced 2026 promises from existing government policy and earlier party commitments.

1. The main parties compared

These are the main differences in their published 2026 health positions. I've focused on what you might notice as a patient, rather than political slogans.

Labour

Focus: making everyday care more affordable

Labour proposes three free GP visits per year for everyone, through a new Medicard, and removing the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027. It also proposes free cervical screening for people aged 25–69 from October 2027 and free maternity scans from July 2028. Its Family Doctor Loan Scheme aims to help GPs stay in their communities and increase appointments. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What this could mean for you: lower costs when you visit your family doctor or collect a prescription. Three free visits would not mean every GP visit is free.

Policy: Labour's 2026 policies

National

Focus: treatment access, medicines and making existing funding go further

National's published 2026 health policy highlights more medicines and earlier care, particularly for people with cancer and serious illnesses. Its approach differs from Labour's offer of a set number of free GP visits: National emphasises using health funding to expand access to treatment and medicines. 2026 Election Policy2026 Election PolicyPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

What this could mean for you: the key questions are which additional medicines become available, how quickly treatment is delivered, and whether GP appointment access improves.

Policy: National's 2026 policies

Green Party

Focus: reducing barriers and strengthening public healthcare

The Greens' 2026 manifesto calls for more accessible and adequately supported healthcare, addressing staff shortages and long waits. Their wider approach emphasises equity, so that access to care is less dependent on income or where someone lives. Manifesto 2026Manifesto 2026

What this could mean for you: look at their specific commitments on GP fees, staffing, hospital capacity and how additional spending would be funded. Their published manifesto sets out the broad direction, but individual proposals need to be checked for detail.

Policy: Greens' 2026 manifesto

ACT

Focus: choice, alternative ways to deliver care and medicines

ACT's approach puts more emphasis on making better use of existing resources, expanding the role of pharmacists and other healthcare professionals, and increasing access to medicines. It does not share Labour's approach of making a set number of GP visits free for everyone. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026NZ Health & Education Policy 2026 Compared

What this could mean for you: more conditions might be treated by a pharmacist or another qualified professional, potentially avoiding a GP appointment. The practical question is what services would be available and whether they would cost you less.

Policy overview: Compare 2026 health policies

New Zealand First

Focus: preventing illness and supporting GPs

NZ First's published health plan emphasises preventing chronic illness, reducing administrative work for GPs, bringing health coaches into primary care and supporting nurses. It also proposes research into particular nutritional interventions. The Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”

What this could mean for you: a greater focus on preventing health problems and giving GPs more time with patients. Check what specific commitments it makes on hospital waiting lists and direct patient costs.

Policy: NZ First's health plan

Te Pāti Māori and smaller parties are also on the ballot. You can compare their published commitments alongside these parties using the independent Policy.nz health comparison. The amount of detail available varies by party and policy.

2. What about hospital waiting times?

Getting a GP appointment and getting hospital treatment are related, but they're not the same problem.

If your priority is… What to look for in party policies
Seeing a GP sooner More doctors and nurses, more appointment slots, and support for rural clinics
Paying less to see a doctor Free or subsidised visits, and whether there are limits on the number of free visits
Getting prescribed medicine More funding for Pharmac, the government agency that decides which medicines it subsidises
Getting a hospital specialist appointment sooner More specialist staff, faster assessments and clear waiting-time targets
Getting surgery sooner More operating theatre time, hospital beds, staff and funded procedures
Getting cancer treatment or other serious care Access to medicines, diagnostic tests and treatment without avoidable delays

The Ministry of Health's national targets include faster GP access, shorter waits for specialist assessments and elective treatment, and faster cancer treatment. These are useful measures to check against parties' promises. Māori Health StrategyHealthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Act 2026

A party promising to spend more on healthcare hasn't necessarily explained how much quicker you will receive treatment. Look for a specific commitment, a deadline and a way to measure whether it has worked.

3. How would the parties pay for their plans?

Funding is an important difference, too.

  • Labour says its healthcare proposals will be funded through a 28% capital gains tax on profits from selling residential and commercial investment property, with exclusions including the family home. It says the money raised will be reserved for health. Labour's 2026 Election Policies
  • The Greens propose funding their wider programme through changes to taxation, including taxes on wealth and large corporations. Manifesto 2026
  • National, ACT and NZ First have different approaches to priorities within healthcare, including medicines, workforce capacity, prevention and how services are delivered. Check each party's detailed funding commitments rather than assuming that a particular proposal has no cost. 2026 Election PolicyThe Plan to “Make NZ Healthy”Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The practical question is whether a party has explained both what it will provide and how it will pay for it.

4. A simple way to decide what matters to you

You don't need to understand every health policy before voting. Start with the problem that would make the biggest difference to your life.

One final practical point: your two votes in New Zealand's MMP system serve different purposes. Your party vote helps determine each party's share of seats in Parliament, while your electorate vote chooses a local representative. You can use them differently if that reflects your views. Candidate and party lists releasedPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The 2026 general election is on Saturday 7 November, and advance voting begins on 26 October. You can check enrolment and voting information at Vote.nz. Key dates for 2026 General ElectionCandidate and party lists released

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Welcome to voting! It is completely normal to find political policies and terminology overwhelming, especially when health system talk gets bogged down in budgets and acronyms.

When it comes to seeing a doctor (primary care) and getting hospital treatment (secondary care), New Zealand’s political parties generally break down into two main philosophies: making public care cheaper and more directly state-funded versus using private sector partnerships and targeting existing funding to cut wait times.


1. Seeing a Doctor (GPs and Primary Care)

The main debate here is how to handle the cost of visiting a family doctor, which many people find too expensive.

  • Labour Party: Focuses on reducing direct costs for everyone. Their headline policy is a "Medicard" which would give every New Zealander three free GP or nurse visits a year, alongside removing the $5 prescription fee. They plan to fund this through a capital gains tax.
  • Green Party: Proposes going further by making unlimited GP visits completely free for everyone, alongside free dental care, funded via a wealth tax.
  • National Party (Current Government): Focuses on capacity and infrastructure rather than universal free visits. Their approach has centered on funding primary care capacity, supporting training, and expanding what other health professionals (like pharmacists) can do to take the pressure off doctors.
  • ACT Party: Opposes universal free GP visits funded by the state. They prefer a model where the government acts as a purchaser and have floated ideas like health savings accounts or financial incentives for people to manage their own private health arrangements.
  • NZ First: Historically sympathetic to lowering GP costs, but their primary 2026 health focus is heavily weighted toward managing surgical waitlists and rapid diagnostics.
  • Te Pāti Māori & The Opportunity Party (TOP): Both favor targeted free primary care based on specific groups—for instance, Te Pāti Māori supports free care for lower-income whānau (under $60,000), while TOP proposes free primary care and mental health services for young people under 30 (via a "Teal Card").

2. Getting Hospital Treatment (Surgeries and Waitlists)

The disagreement here is about whether public hospitals should do all the heavy lifting, or if taxpayer money should be paid to private hospitals to clear public waitlists faster.

  • National Party (Current Government): Actively partners with the private sector. They have directed Health NZ to establish long-term contracts with private hospitals (via programs like the "Elective Boost") to outsource surgeries and clear backlogs.
  • ACT Party: Strongly supports private sector involvement, viewing the government's role as a "purchaser" of health services rather than just a provider, arguing that competition lowers wait times.
  • Labour & The Green Party: Strongly oppose relying on private hospitals. They argue that outsourcing public money to private providers acts as a "band-aid," drains resources from the public system, and leaves public hospitals to deal with the harder, more expensive cases. They want all funding channeled directly into rebuilding public hospital capacity, staffing, and infrastructure.
  • NZ First: Generally focuses on targeted funding injections (such as dedicated waitlist reduction funds) to resource the public system directly.

Summary Checklist to Help You Decide

  • Do you prefer universal subsidies (like free GP visits paid for by higher taxes on investments or wealth)? Look toward Labour or the Greens.
  • Do you prefer working with the private sector to buy surgeries and cut hospital waitlists right now while focusing on workforce growth? Look toward National or ACT.
  • Do you prefer targeted support for specific age groups or lower-income families? Look toward Te Pāti Māori or TOP.

What matters most to you personally when you try to book a doctor's appointment—lower costs upfront or shorter wait times?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment? Keep it clear and practical.

Navigating how political parties plan to handle healthcare—specifically seeing a doctor or getting hospital treatment—comes down to different ideas about how public money should be spent and how the health system should be organised.

According to policy breakdowns on platforms like Policy.nz and WhichParty NZ, the approaches for the 2026 New Zealand general election generally break down into two main directions: parties focusing on direct government-funded free services (often grouped on the political left), and parties focusing on stretching existing funding, boosting workforce capacity, or using private options (often parties in the current government or on the right).

Here is how the main parties generally approach helping people see a doctor or get hospital treatment:

  • Labour proposes direct subsidies for seeing a family doctor. For example, they have put forward a "Medicard" policy aiming to give New Zealanders a set number of free GP visits per year, funded via changes to tax structures. Parties on the left generally advocate for making core primary care and certain medical scans free or heavily subsidised to remove cost barriers.

  • National and the current governing parties focus on strengthening the existing primary care workforce and getting more value out of current health spending rather than universal free visits. Their approach involves investing in primary care capacity, expanding what other health professionals like pharmacists and physician associates can do to ease pressure on doctors, and funding specific waitlist reduction targets for hospitals.

  • The Green Party pushes for broader free healthcare, advocating for unlimited free GP visits as well as free dental care for everyone, backed by wealth-tax funding and prioritized community care clinics in high-need areas. [WhichParty NZ]

  • ACT favours market-oriented solutions and a "government-as-purchaser" model. They have proposed incentives (such as a tax or financial credit) to encourage people to opt out of the public health system and take up private health insurance, aiming to reduce pressure on public hospitals. [WhichParty NZ]

  • New Zealand First tends to place a strong emphasis on funding specifically aimed at cutting hospital and specialist waitlists, focusing resources directly on operational backlogs. [WhichParty NZ]

  • Te Pāti Māori supports free primary healthcare and dental care targeted at lower-income whānau (such as households earning under $60,000), alongside a specific Māori Health Card model to better direct resources to high-need communities. [WhichParty NZ]

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) has proposed programs like a "Teal Card" to deliver free primary healthcare, mental health, and dental care tailored specifically to younger New Zealanders (such as those under 30). [WhichParty NZ]

Summary of the Core Debate

  • More Direct Subsidies vs. Budget Management: Some parties want the government to directly pay for visits (like GP appointments) so they are free or cheaper at the clinic. Other parties argue that making it free for everyone (including higher-income earners) costs too much and prefer putting money into fixing hospital waitlists, training more staff, or letting pharmacists handle minor conditions.

  • Public vs. Private Balance: While most parties want to fix the public system, some lean toward using private insurance incentives to shift people out of public queues, whereas others want the state to fully absorb primary care costs through taxes.

Policy.nz

Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Parties on the left want to make GP visits and pregnancy scans free. Parties currently in government want to make current health f...

WhichParty NZ

Health Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026 - WhichParty NZ

The Greens go further than Labour: unlimited free GP visits plus free dental for everyone, funded through a wealth tax.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account