Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties say about disability rights and fair treatment when dealing with government services?

If you are comparing parties for the 2026 New Zealand general election, disability rights and fair treatment in government services are issues where the details often sit across several areas: disability support funding, income support, health access, accessibility, complaints/appeals processes, and how agencies treat people. I’ll summarise the publicly available positions and actions rather than suggest how you should vote. DRNZ

Key questions that may matter for someone relying on support services

You may want to compare parties on questions such as:

  • Will disability support decisions be transparent and consistent?
  • Will disabled people have choice and control over supports?
  • How will benefit recipients be treated by government agencies?
  • Will there be accessible ways to challenge decisions or make complaints?
  • Will healthcare access and regular appointments be supported?
  • Will policies recognise that some people cannot work full-time or at all because of disability?

Major party themes and positions

The following is a high-level summary of published disability-related positions and records available ahead of the 2026 election. Some parties have more detailed standalone disability policies than others, so absence of a standalone document does not necessarily mean absence of related policies. DRNZ

Party Disability rights / government service themes
National Party of New Zealand The National-led Government has focused on creating a legislative framework for Disability Support Services, including principles around consistency, fairness and transparency of decision-making. It has highlighted choice, control and clearer rules for disability support services. Disability Support Services
New Zealand Labour Party Labour has generally emphasised disability inclusion, public services, and social support approaches. Its disability-related positions include themes around participation, accessibility and support for disabled people. DRNZ
Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand The Greens have emphasised rights-based approaches, inclusion, accessibility, and stronger social protections in their disability-related policies and wider social policy platform. DRNZ
ACT New Zealand ACT has generally focused on government efficiency, individual choice, and reducing what it sees as unnecessary bureaucracy. Its disability-related approach should be considered alongside its broader positions on welfare and public services. DRNZ
New Zealand First NZ First’s disability-related positions have appeared through broader social policy and coalition government priorities; available comparisons note its relevant positions rather than a single comprehensive disability policy document. DRNZ
Te Pāti Māori Te Pāti Māori has emphasised equity, Māori rights, and addressing barriers faced by Māori, including Māori with disabilities. Policy.nz
The Opportunities Party TOP’s positions include wider social policy reforms; disability-related comparisons examine its proposals affecting inclusion and public services. DRNZ

Current disability support issue to watch

A major issue before the 2026 election has been the future of Disability Support Services (DSS). The Government introduced and passed the Disability Support Services Act 2026, which establishes a framework for DSS-funded services. The Government says the law is intended to improve consistency, fairness and transparency; critics and disability advocates have raised questions about how funding decisions, safeguards and accountability will work in practice. Disability Support Services

A practical way to compare parties

For your situation, you may find it useful to look at each party’s answers to these specific points:

  1. Income support

    • Are people with long-term health conditions recognised as needing stable support?
    • Are benefit systems designed around dignity and realistic capacity?

  2. Medical evidence and assessments

    • How often must people prove eligibility?
    • Are assessments fair, accessible and based on lived reality?

  3. Government agency treatment

    • Are there commitments to respectful, accessible services?
    • Are complaints and appeals easy to use?

  4. Health access

    • What are the party’s plans for timely appointments, primary care, specialist care and disability-related health needs?

  5. Disabled people’s involvement

    • Are disabled people and organisations involved in designing policy?

Independent comparisons such as Disability Responsiveness New Zealand’s party policy summary and disability-sector election resources can help check party claims against published commitments. DRNZ

If you want, I can also make a side-by-side comparison focused specifically on people receiving benefits, NZ health services, and interactions with MSD/WINZ.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties say about disability rights and fair treatment when dealing with government services?

Navigating life with a long-term health condition while relying on income support and medical services is a significant daily balancing act. As New Zealand heads toward the 2026 general election, disability rights, the structure of government support, and the management of services like the newly enacted Disability Support Services Act are key areas of distinction between the political parties.

Different parties approach disability rights, welfare adequacy, and government agency interactions through distinct lenses:

1. Income Support and Welfare Adequacy

How parties view main benefits, supplementary assistance, and eligibility criteria directly shapes financial security for those unable to work:

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Generally advocate for substantial increases to main benefit levels to guarantee a livable income. They propose overhauling the Social Security Act to remove punitive benefit sanctions, decouple support from relationship status, and introduce broader structural mechanisms (such as a guaranteed baseline income or specific disability allowances) to cover extra living and medical costs without complex bureaucratic hurdles.
  • Labour Party: Typically focuses on targeted increases to main benefits and working-for-families or disability-specific support, emphasizing safety nets and protection against cost-of-living pressures while maintaining standard welfare structures with managed adjustments.
  • National, ACT & NZ First: Tend to center welfare policy around work-incentive frameworks, active employment assistance, and strict fiscal management. Their approach to benefits usually emphasizes moving people into sustainable work where capable, alongside targeted support for those with high health needs, while closely scrutinizing welfare spending and eligibility boundaries.

2. Dealing with Government Services and Bureaucracy

Interacting with agencies like Work and Income (MSD) or health and disability support coordinators can be exhausting. Party philosophies differ on how these services should operate:

  • Rights-Based Frameworks & "Enabling Good Lives": Progressive and opposition parties frequently press for government services to fully embed the Enabling Good Lives (EGL) approach—giving disabled people and those with long-term conditions genuine choice, control, and flexible funding rather than top-down bureaucratic rationing.
  • System Accountability & Legislation: Following the recent implementation of the Disability Support Services Act, community advocacy groups (such as the Disabled Persons Assembly and Blind Low Vision NZ) are closely tracking how parties commit to meaningful consultation, transparency, and upholding the principle of "Nothing about us without us" when administering support systems. Center-left and minor parties generally emphasize legally enforceable obligations on government agencies to consult and protect service standards, whereas center-right parties emphasize administrative efficiency, delivery streamlining, and sustainable long-term government spending.

3. Healthcare, Medications, and Medical Access

Regular medical appointments mean the cost of primary care, prescriptions, and specialist access are critical election issues:

  • Primary Care Support: Parties across the political spectrum acknowledge pressures on the health system, but differ sharply on solutions. Left-of-centre parties often campaign on expanding free or low-cost primary visits (such as targeted community card schemes or free GP visits for specific high-need groups) and lowering prescription barriers.
  • ACC and Injury/Illness Distinction: Some advocacy groups and progressive parties advocate for structural reviews—such as expanding ACC-style comprehensive support to cover illnesses and non-accidental disabilities equitably, reducing the historical divide between how injuries and chronic health conditions are funded.

Important Voting Reminders for 2026

  • Enrolment Deadline: Note that enrolment rules have changed for this election cycle; updates and enrolments close at midnight on 25 October 2026.
  • Accessibility: The Electoral Commission’s Access 2026 plan and the Election Access Fund exist to support disabled voters and candidates to ensure the voting process itself is barrier-free.

To explore specific party manifestos in detail, resources compiled by the Disabled Persons Assembly NZ (DPA) and Blind Low Vision NZ offer comprehensive breakdowns of each party's official commitments.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties say about disability rights and fair treatment when dealing with government services?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined contrasting approaches to disability rights, income support, and interactions with government services. Reviews from advocacy groups like Disabled Rights NZ (DRNZ) and community breakdowns highlight the following positions across the political spectrum:

  • National Party : Focuses on mainstreamed or general health and welfare settings rather than distinct, sweeping disability income overhauls. The party has overseen structural updates like the refreshed New Zealand Disability Strategy (2026–2030) and the New Zealand Sign Language Strategy (2026–2036), but has generally not proposed enforceable mandatory accessibility standards or major structural income support expansions.

  • Labour Party : Emphasises maintaining and protecting core welfare safety nets and previously adjusted main benefit settings while in government. However, feedback from disability advocates points out that they have not delivered a full overhaul of disability-specific income support or completely removed partnered means-testing mechanisms. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • Green Party : Proposes significant welfare and income support reforms. Their platform includes moving toward a Guaranteed Minimum Income, abolishing benefit sanctions, reforming or removing partnered means-testing to uphold individual dignity, and expanding broader accident and illness coverage systems.

  • ACT New Zealand : Emphasises tightening work and benefit obligations, reducing overall government spending on welfare, and streamlining or scaling back specific bureaucratic spending [3.2], arguing for lower reliance on state income support. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP) : Proposes a structural shift through a universal basic income (citizen's income) of up to $370 a week for adults over 18, which would replace standard main benefits (such as the Supported Living Payment), paired with an additional universal disability allowance and needs-based top-ups. [The Spinoff]

  • New Zealand First & Te Pāti Māori: NZ First centers much of its welfare attention on superannuation and general economic cost-of-living measures without a distinct disability income overhaul, whereas Te Pāti Māori approaches income support through structural poverty-reduction frameworks and guaranteed baseline standards. [Disability Responsiveness New Zealand]

For a deeper dive into candidate meetings or detailed comparative tables, you can read the breakdown on The Spinoff or review the analysis by Disabled Rights NZ.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties say about disability rights and fair treatment when dealing with government services?

AI Overview

In the context of the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties present distinct platforms on disability rights, income support, and interaction with government services. Key issues for voters with long-term health conditions center around recent administrative overhauls, the Disability Support Services Act passed in late 2026, and proposed adjustments to social welfare settings.

A comparison of the major parties' public policy positions and overall legislative philosophies outlines these differences:

🏛️ Government & Coalition Parties

  • National Party

  • Focus: Financial stability, national consistency, and administrative reform.

  • Services: National defends the Disability Support Services Act passed under its leadership, framing it as a necessary measure to bring clarity, fairness, and structural sustainability to the sector. Rather than a standalone rights-based manifesto, National emphasizes structural improvements to the Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) system, standardizing the evaluation process across regions while allowing for personalized support plans.

  • Income Support: Relies on existing general welfare frameworks and cost-of-living adjustments rather than systemic disability-specific welfare changes.

  • ACT Party

  • Focus: Direct individualized funding, smaller government, and tightening welfare expenditure.

  • Services: ACT favors reducing bureaucratic layers in government interactions, advocating for individuals to have direct oversight of their funding allocations.

  • Income Support: ACT’s 2026 fiscal plan proposes saving $653 million by curbing spending on disability and health benefits. To ensure services go strictly to those unable to work, ACT proposes implementing clearer criteria and requiring independent medical certifications.

  • New Zealand First

  • Focus: Senior care, mainstream health system capacity, and targeted support.

  • Services: The party treats disability services as an integrated branch of broader public healthcare and seniors’ policies rather than putting forward an isolated, rights-focused platform.

⚖️ Opposition Parties

  • Labour Party

  • Focus: A partnership-driven, rights-based approach.

  • Services: Labour has pledged to repeal and replace the Government's Disability Support Services legislation if elected. They critique recent reforms for concentrating too much discretionary power with ministers and bypassing the disability sector's core maxim of "nothing about us without us". Labour promises to co-draft replacement laws alongside disabled communities to secure choice and self-determination.

  • Income Support: Backs strengthening existing welfare safety nets to shield disabled households from financial strain.

  • Green Party

  • Focus: Comprehensive rights legislation and systemic welfare overhaul.

  • Services: The Greens heavily opposed the 2026 legislative changes, citing a lack of meaningful community consultation. They propose introducing a standalone disability rights law anchored in Te Tiriti o Waitangi that guarantees legally enforceable accessibility and universal design standards across public spaces and housing.

  • Income Support: Advocates for elevating benefit levels to a livable baseline. They champion accessible, timely income support that covers all disability-related living and medical costs without penalties linked to relationship status or the origin of the disability.

  • Te Pāti Māori

  • Focus: Tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) for tāngata whaikaha Māori (disabled Māori) and whānau hauā.

  • Services: Focuses on shifting administration toward Māori-led, community-centered delivery systems.

  • Income Support: Supports structural changes to the welfare state, including income-guarantee programs, to fundamentally alleviate poverty and systemic inequities.

🗳️ Voting Resources & Accessibility

If you require accommodations or assistance during the voting process, the Electoral Commission operates under the Access 2026 Accessibility Action Plan. Information and voting resources are available in alternative formats, including Easy Read and New Zealand Sign Language, to ensure independent access at voting places. (Note: In a change for this election cycle, voters must complete or update their enrolment details at least 13 days prior to Election Day.)

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account