Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would parties change income support and work obligations for people who cannot work because of illness?

New Zealand 2026 election: income support and illness-related work obligations

If a long-term health condition limits your ability to work, two issues are especially important when comparing parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election:

  • Financial security: whether benefit rates, additional assistance and medical-related costs are likely to change.
  • Work obligations: whether you would need to attend employment appointments, look for work, provide medical evidence or meet other requirements while your condition limits your capacity.

A key distinction is that being unable to work because of illness is not necessarily treated the same as being unemployed and available for work. New Zealand's existing benefit system distinguishes between people whose health prevents them from working and people who can work in some capacity. The details of your medical assessment and benefit category matter.

I'll separate policies already in force from party proposals for the 2026 election. That matters because a policy announcement or campaign promise is not the same as a change to the support you can actually receive.

1. What the main parties are proposing

As of 11 October 2026, the clearest published proposals I could verify include the following. This is a comparison of relevant policy positions, not a ranking of parties.

National

Stronger expectations for long-term Jobseeker recipients

National's announced welfare plan includes more intensive employment support for 30,000 work-ready, long-term jobseekers; a lower payment rate for people who have received Jobseeker Support for two of the previous three years, starting 1 April 2028; random drug testing for jobseekers; and a longer stand-down for repeated voluntary unemployment. A firm, fair and affordable welfare systemFirm, fair, affordable welfare

What this could mean for you: The crucial question is how any long-term payment reduction would apply to people whose health prevents them from working. National's published summary specifically targets Jobseeker recipients; it does not establish that every person receiving health-related support would face the same change.

Labour

Healthcare affordability and disability rights

Labour's published 2026 policies include three free GP visits each year for everyone and removing the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027. Labour has also promised to repeal the Government's Disability Support Services Bill and replace it with legislation developed alongside disabled people and carers. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesRelease: Labour will scrap harmful disability Bill

What this could mean for you: The healthcare proposals are relevant if you have regular appointments or prescription costs. The disability legislation pledge concerns disability support, rights and choice; it should not automatically be interpreted as a promise to raise benefit rates or remove Jobseeker work-preparation obligations.

Green Party

Opposition to the Government's disability support changes

The Greens have opposed the Disability Support Services Bill, arguing that disabled people and their families should be involved in decisions affecting their lives. Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes

What this could mean for you: Their published position signals a different approach to disability support and consultation. I could not verify a sufficiently specific current election commitment on the exact benefit-rate increases or exemptions from illness-related work obligations, so those details should be checked against their full manifesto.

ACT

Tighter medical certification and reassessment

ACT proposes that health and disability benefits be certified by doctors from an MSD-approved pool, using defined criteria. It also proposes phased reassessments of existing Jobseeker Support recipients with health conditions or disabilities and Supported Living Payment recipients, while allowing long-term arrangements for people with enduring conditions. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand

What this could mean for you: Medical eligibility and reassessment procedures could change, including who certifies your condition. ACT's stated intention to retain long-term arrangements for enduring conditions is relevant, but the practical effect would depend on the criteria, reassessment process and implementation.

New Zealand First

Accessibility and participation

New Zealand First has introduced an Accessibility Standards Bill intended to identify and remove avoidable barriers to participation, independence and access to services. Establishing an Accessible New Zealand for everyoneThe Accessibility Standards Bill

What this could mean for you: Accessibility standards could affect access to services and participation, but this announcement alone does not establish a change to your benefit rate, medical eligibility or employment obligations.

Important limitation: These are the relevant published commitments I could substantiate, not a complete inventory of every party's policies. Where I could not verify a specific promise on benefit rates or work exemptions, I have left that point open rather than assuming the party has no policy.

2. The most important distinction: which benefit you receive

The impact of a party's policies can differ significantly depending on your current benefit.

Current support Existing rules that matter
Supported Living Payment (SLP) For people whose condition or disability severely and permanently restricts their ability to work, subject to eligibility rules. Work preparation is required only if assessed as having that capacity and discussed with you. Supported Living Payment obligationsStopping work because of health condition or disability
Jobseeker Support — health condition or disability If your condition means you cannot work or can work fewer than 15 hours a week, your obligations generally concern preparing for work rather than actively seeking a job. Medical evidence helps determine your obligations. Jobseeker Support obligationsStopping work because of health condition or disability
Disability Allowance Can help with ongoing additional costs associated with disability, including eligible medical fees, prescriptions and travel. It is income-tested and can be paid to people who are not receiving a main benefit. Disability AllowancePrescriptions and health practitioner costs

These are the current rules, not promises about what a future government would retain.

3. How to assess the policies against your circumstances

For someone who relies on income support and needs regular medical appointments, I would examine five specific questions when reading each party's full policies.

Benefit adequacy

Does the party promise to increase the base rate, change how benefits are adjusted for inflation, or alter supplementary payments? A promise to help people into work is different from a commitment to improve income for people who cannot work.

Medical eligibility and reassessment

Would you need new certificates, assessments by a different doctor, or more frequent reviews? ACT's proposal makes this an especially relevant question.

Work obligations and sanctions

Would your existing exemption or work-preparation requirements remain? Would a party change the consequences of missed appointments or failure to meet an obligation? Check whether a policy explicitly covers people with long-term, medically documented limitations.

Healthcare expenses

Consider GP fees, specialist appointments, prescriptions, treatment and travel. Labour's proposed free GP visits and prescriptions are relevant here, although three free GP visits would not necessarily cover all your ongoing appointments.

Security and continuity of support

Would the party protect existing eligibility, offer longer-term medical exemptions, or provide safeguards if your condition fluctuates? Ask whether these protections are specific, funded commitments or broader statements of principle.

4. What you can check now

You don't need to wait for the election to investigate your existing entitlements.

These may be particularly useful if your regular appointments are creating financial pressure.

5. One detail would help me make the comparison more precise

Which benefit do you currently receive? The distinction matters because a party's proposed changes to Jobseeker Support may not apply in the same way to someone receiving Supported Living Payment.

I can then focus the comparison on the rules and proposals most likely to affect your circumstances, without assuming that you are able to work or that your health needs are temporary.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would parties change income support and work obligations for people who cannot work because of illness?

For someone managing a long-term health condition that limits your ability to work, navigating income support (such as Jobseeker Support with a Health Condition or Disability, or the Supported Living Payment) and medical requirements is a critical issue.

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties hold distinct philosophies and proposed approaches regarding benefit settings, medical assessments, and work obligations for disabled people and those facing chronic illness.


Centre-Right Parties (National, ACT, NZ First)

Focus: Stronger work expectations, tighter independent medical verification, and targeted welfare controls.

  • ACT Party: ACT has placed a major focus on welfare reform for the 2026 election cycle. They propose tightening medical certification for health-related benefits by shifting to independent medical assessments. Under their policy, rather than relying solely on a regular General Practitioner, health-related benefits would be assessed against objective criteria by a pool of Ministry of Social Development (MSD)-approved designated doctors. Existing recipients (particularly those on health-related Jobseeker benefits or the Supported Living Payment) would face phased reassessments, though ACT has stated that long-term arrangements would remain for those with genuine, enduring conditions.
  • National Party & New Zealand First: The broader governing/centre-right alignment generally emphasises active work-test obligations for beneficiaries where medically feasible, increased case management, and moving people off welfare and into employment. While acknowledging exemptions for those with severe, long-term health incapacity, their policy framework leans toward strict verification, sanctions for non-compliance with work-preparation plans, and mutual-obligation frameworks designed to encourage a transition back to the workforce.

Centre-Left & Left Parties (Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori)

Focus: Adequacy of benefit levels, reducing administrative hurdles, and supporting health access rather than enforcing punitive work tests.

  • Labour Party: Labour focuses primarily on reducing the overall cost of living and making healthcare more affordable (such as introducing free GP visits and prescriptions), which directly impacts people managing long-term illnesses. On welfare, Labour generally opposes punitive work sanctions for those who are genuinely sick or disabled, preferring supportive employment services, flexible part-time work pathways, and protecting the baseline adequacy of benefit levels without aggressive administrative crackdowns on medical certificates.
  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: The Greens and Te Pāti Māori advocate for fundamental structural changes to the welfare system. They propose significantly increasing benefit levels above the MSD baseline to match the actual cost of living and eradicating poverty. Their approach to illness and disability focuses on removing coercive work tests entirely for those whose health prevents consistent employment, reducing bureaucratic friction with Work and Income, and viewing income support as a guaranteed human right.

What This Means For You

When evaluating your vote, look closely at how each party balances two competing priorities:

  1. Support and Adequacy: Whether they want to raise benefit levels and reduce the stress of proving your illness.
  2. Obligations and Verification: Whether they want tighter medical checks, independent second opinions, or structured pathways back into work.

Are there specific aspects of your current support—such as how your medical certificates are reviewed or what work expectations are placed on you—that you are most hoping to see protected or changed?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would parties change income support and work obligations for people who cannot work because of illness?

In the context of the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have drawn distinct lines regarding income support, benefit levels, and work obligations for people who are unable to work due to sickness, health conditions, or disabilities (currently managed primarily through Jobseeker Support with a medical deferral or exemption, or related disability allowances).

The primary approaches of the major political blocs shape up across the political spectrum as follows:

Parties on the Right / Current Government Components

  • National Party: National’s approach emphasizes stricter mutual obligations, active work-reconnection where health permits, and tighter fiscal controls. While recent policy announcements (such as expanded obligations or random drug-testing frameworks) primarily target work-ready jobseekers, the party generally maintains a stringent compliance and sanctions regime for benefit management, aiming to move people into any feasible work or compliant status while tightening overall welfare spending growth.

  • ACT Party: ACT advocates for significant expenditure restraint across the welfare system. In its fiscal and election platform, ACT has proposed specific spending reductions targeting disability and related support entitlements (such as a planned $653 million reduction framework over time) alongside raising the superannuation age and scaling back specific demographic or supplementary budgets, signaling a contraction in the scope of state-provided supplementary entitlements.

  • New Zealand First: NZF focuses heavily on economic relief for low- and fixed-income working households (such as proposing a tax-free threshold on the first $14,000 of income) rather than broad benefit expansions, generally aligning with a conservative fiscal approach to social spending while prioritizing support for seniors and working-class families.

Parties on the Left / Opposition

  • Labour Party: Labour opposes cuts to welfare and disability entitlements, criticizing measures from the right as punitive toward vulnerable New Zealanders. Labour generally favors maintaining or increasing baseline adequacy for low-income households, improving access to healthcare (such as policies supporting low-cost or free GP access), and easing rigid compliance barriers within Work and Income.

  • Green Party: The Greens advocate for substantial welfare and tax reform, proposing to overhaul the income support system to guarantee that all benefit levels sit above the official poverty line. Their platform emphasizes removing harsh sanction regimes, reducing administrative and medical proof barriers at Work and Income, and funding increases to baseline core benefits through progressive wealth and income taxes. [Public Health Communication Centre]

  • Te Pāti Māori: Te Pāti Māori supports structural welfare reform aimed at eliminating poverty and honoring Te Tiriti-based social responsibilities. They advocate for raising baseline benefit incomes significantly and removing punitive obligations for disabled, chronically ill, and vulnerable beneficiaries.

If you'd like, I can provide more details on:

  • Specific policy manifestos or voter guides via Policy.nz
  • How Work and Income medical exemptions currently operate under different legislative frameworks

Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How would parties change income support and work obligations for people who cannot work because of illness?

AI Overview

As you consider your vote for the 2026 New Zealand general election , the major political parties offer distinctly different visions for how the welfare system treats individuals with long-term illnesses or disabilities. The core differences center on how welfare eligibility is determined, the level of financial support provided, and the introduction of stricter obligations or oversight.

Here is how the main parties approach income support, work obligations, and healthcare access for people who are limited in their ability to work due to health conditions:

1. National Party (Current Lead Coalition Partner)

  • Welfare Settings & Obligations: National focuses on keeping the welfare system "firm, fair, and affordable". They emphasize employment wherever possible, recently announcing policies like random drug testing for Jobseeker recipients. While this targets work-ready beneficiaries, National maintains general welfare settings without broad increases to main disability or sickness benefit rates.

  • Healthcare Access: National is focusing its health platform on expanding frontline resources, introducing a $600 million injection into the medicines budget to provide access to serious illness medications, and opening a new medical school.

2. ACT Party (Coalition Partner)

  • Medical Assessment Overhaul: ACT has proposed the most significant shake-up for health-related benefits. They plan to remove the power to assess welfare eligibility from a person's general practitioner (GP). Instead, all health and disability benefits would be independently assessed by a pool of government-approved, designated doctors against strict, objective criteria.

  • Income & Spending Oversight: ACT's fiscal plan proposes cutting disability benefits by $653 million over four years. They also advocate for an electronic money management system (plastic payment cards) for long-term recipients to control spending on essentials like rent, utilities, and groceries while blocking cash withdrawals. Long-term exceptions would apply only to those with an enduring, permanent disability.

3. Labour Party (Opposition)

  • Welfare & Job Creation: Labour opposes the recent tightening of welfare rules and benefit cuts, describing them as "punching down". Their policy emphasizes creating sustainable jobs rather than introducing harsher sanctions on beneficiaries. While they have previously raised main benefit levels, their 2026 platform prioritizes job creation and addressing cost-of-living issues over a complete structural overhaul of disability income support.

  • Healthcare Support: To reduce the financial burden of regular medical appointments, Labour's headline health policy offers three free doctor’s visits per year for every New Zealander, alongside free prescriptions and free maternity scans. They also plan a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to increase primary care GP appointments across communities.

4. Green Party & Te Pāti Māori (Opposition)

  • Income Guarantees: Both parties advocate for a major structural transformation of the welfare system. The Greens support shifting toward a Guaranteed Minimum Income and removing partnered means-testing so that an individual's benefit is not reduced or cut based on their partner’s income.

  • Obligations: Both parties seek to entirely remove punitive work obligations and sanctions, framing adequate income support as a basic human right.


Policy Comparison Summary

Party Sickness/Disability Income Reform Medical Assessment & Work Obligations Healthcare Changes Relevant to Illness
National No specific benefit increases; focuses on keeping baseline spending controlled. Increased sanctions and drug testing for general Jobseekers; focuses on work readiness. Extra $600 million for public medicines/Pharmac budget.
ACT Proposes cutting disability benefit funding; introduces electronic payment cards for long-term beneficiaries. Eligibility determined by government-appointed independent doctors, not your personal GP. Stated goal to move more people off health benefits and back into employment.
Labour Opposes welfare cuts and sanctions; focuses on standard cost-of-living relief. Rejects punitive welfare rules; emphasizes job creation over benefit penalties. Three free GP visits per year and free prescriptions for all.
Green Party Advocates for a Guaranteed Minimum Income and eliminating partnered means-testing. Seeks to eliminate punitive work obligations and welfare sanctions. Supports making all primary GP visits free.
Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account