Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

2026 New Zealand election: healthcare, household costs and Pacific families

For a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household, comparing parties means looking beyond headline promises. The practical questions are whether your family can afford GP visits and prescriptions, get timely hospital care, find suitable housing, and access services that work for children, parents and older relatives.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I'd separate the comparison into four areas:

  • Affordable healthcare: GP fees, prescription costs, dental care and eligibility for subsidies.
  • Access to care: waiting times, local services, after-hours care, disability support and care for older people.
  • Pacific-focused services: Pacific health providers, culturally safe care, language support and outreach for families who face barriers to treatment.
  • Household security: housing affordability and overcrowding, income support, childcare and other everyday expenses.

One important distinction is between a policy a party has already implemented, a proposal it has formally announced for 2026, and a broader campaign statement. Those aren't equivalent, and election promises may change before polling day.

1. How the main parties compare on healthcare

The table below summarises published 2026 election policies and the Government's existing approach, using the New Zealand Resident Doctors’ Association's policy comparison, updated 9 October 2026, and the New Zealand Medical Journal's election analysis. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

Party Published healthcare approach What it could mean for your household
National More treatment capacity, health targets, expanded urgent and after-hours care, and increased use of public and private providers. It has also announced increased Pharmac funding and expanded screening. Relevant if timely appointments, hospital treatment and access to medicines are priorities. Check whether local services and any new funding will reduce your family's actual waiting times and fees.
Labour Three free GP or nurse visits a year through a proposed Medicard; removal of the $5 prescription charge from July 2027; free referred maternity scans from July 2028; and measures to expand GP capacity. Directly addresses the cost of routine consultations and prescriptions, particularly where several family members need regular care.
Green Party Proposes moving towards fully publicly funded healthcare, including GP, dental, ambulance, mental health and aged-care services, alongside more health workers. Relevant if your family faces dental bills, ongoing care costs, mental-health needs or expenses for older relatives.
ACT Proposes increasing the share of the health budget spent on medicines and allowing pharmacists to provide more services, including treatment for everyday conditions and some long-term conditions. Relevant if prescription access and convenient treatment without a GP appointment are important.
New Zealand First Emphasises prevention, health coaches in primary care, professional autonomy in general practice and changes intended to improve access to medicines. Relevant if your family values early intervention, prevention and support for managing long-term conditions.
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises prevention, whānau wellbeing, Māori-led health solutions and culturally safe, accountable services. Some principles around whānau-centred care may be relevant to your family, but Māori-specific policies should not be assumed to be Pacific-specific commitments.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Proposes a cross-party, 10-year health plan, increased health funding as a share of GDP and a larger focus on primary and preventive care. Relevant if you prioritise long-term investment in local services over frequent changes in health policy.

Sources: 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

These are different policy approaches, not a ranking. A proposal to make treatment free is different from a commitment to employ enough clinicians to deliver it. Equally, increasing hospital capacity does not automatically make everyday GP visits affordable.

The key differences in practical terms

  • Paying less at the point of care: Labour's proposed free visits and prescription changes are explicit commitments to reduce particular costs. The Greens propose a broader move towards free public healthcare, including dental care.
  • Getting care sooner: National emphasises treatment targets and additional capacity. Labour proposes measures to increase GP appointments, while ACT proposes expanding what pharmacists can do. The Greens and TOP emphasise broader investment in accessible primary care.
  • Medicines: National has announced an additional $604 million for Pharmac, funded through savings from reduced foreign aid outside the Pacific. ACT proposes increasing medicines spending as a share of the health budget. Labour's prescription proposal addresses the $5 charge rather than the full cost of every medicine.
  • Long-term care: The Greens explicitly include aged care and palliative care in their proposed publicly funded service model. This is worth examining if older family members rely on regular support.

The policy descriptions above are proposals or announced measures, not guarantees of future outcomes. The New Zealand Medical Journal cautions that workforce availability, funding and implementation all affect whether promises translate into better access. 2026 Election Policy SummariesElection 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

2. What matters specifically for Pacific families?

New Zealand already has a statutory Pacific Health Strategy, Te Mana Ola, which sets a 10-year direction for improving Pacific health outcomes. It focuses on prevention, community leadership, timely services and a health workforce that reflects Pacific communities. The Ministry of Health also identifies unequal access to timely, quality care as a contributor to health inequities. Te Mana Ola: The Pacific Health StrategyPacific health

The election question is how parties will turn those goals into services your family can actually use.

Pacific-led and culturally appropriate healthcare

Look for specific commitments to fund Pacific health providers, employ Pacific health professionals, provide language support, and deliver services through community clinics or outreach. Ask parties how they will measure whether Pacific families receive care earlier, rather than simply announcing more funding.

Care that works across generations

For children and older relatives, examine GP availability, after-hours care, prescriptions, dental services, specialist waiting times, home-based support and respite for family carers. A free appointment has less value if it is difficult to book or requires expensive travel.

Enough room and a healthy home

Compare housing policies on affordable larger homes, social housing supply, overcrowding, insulation, dampness and rental costs. Housing conditions affect respiratory illness, children's wellbeing and the financial pressure on households supporting relatives.

A caution on the evidence: the published party comparison documents several health commitments, but it does not establish that every party has a fully specified, funded 2026 plan for Pacific-led healthcare. Ask for the actual policy, funding allocation and delivery targets before treating a general promise about equity as a Pacific-specific commitment.

3. Household costs and space: what else to compare

Healthcare is only one part of the budget. These are useful additional policy tests for your household.

Issue What to check in each party's policy
Housing and space New supply of family-sized homes, social housing, rental affordability and action on overcrowding.
Food, power and transport The effect of tax, income-support and public-transport proposals on weekly disposable income.
Children Childcare affordability, school costs, access to school health services and support for families on lower incomes.
Older relatives Aged-care funding, home support, respite care, pension settings and access to local medical services.
Pacific communities Explicit funding for Pacific providers, culturally safe services, community consultation and Pacific workforce development.

For example, Labour's published platform includes a proposed $20 weekly cap for bus and train fares, alongside its healthcare measures. The Greens' 2026 manifesto addresses both accessible healthcare and affordable, warm housing. These are relevant policies to examine, but the effect on your family depends on eligibility, implementation and the housing or transport options available where you live. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesManifesto 2026

4. A practical way to assess the promises

Rather than relying on party slogans, ask the same questions of each party:

  • How much will an ordinary family save each year on GP visits and prescriptions?
  • Will dental care and routine care for older relatives become more affordable?
  • What will reduce waiting times, and how many additional clinicians will be available?
  • What funding will go directly to Pacific providers and community-based services?
  • How will the party increase access to homes with enough bedrooms for larger families?
  • When will the policy start, who qualifies, and how will progress be measured?

For an independent comparison, the New Zealand Resident Doctors’ Association's 2026 health policy guide sets out published commitments from National, Labour, the Greens, ACT, New Zealand First, TOP and Te Pāti Māori. You can also consult the Ministry of Health's Te Mana Ola Pacific Health Strategy to compare party proposals against established Pacific health priorities.

5. How to make your own comparison

There isn't one policy that answers all your concerns. The most useful comparison will depend on which costs and access barriers affect your family most.

Build your election comparison

Choose the issues you want to examine. You can leave the defaults or change any answer.

The aim is to make it easier to see which commitments address your family's actual costs and care needs, which depend on future funding, and which still need clearer answers before election day on 7 November 2026.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Navigating the 2026 general election in a multigenerational Pacific household brings core household pressures—balancing the rising cost of living, securing adequate housing space, and ensuring older relatives and children can access affordable, timely healthcare.

Political parties approach the intersection of household economics, healthcare access, and Pacific community needs through distinct ideological lenses.

How Parties Compare on Affordable Healthcare & Services

1. Labour Party

  • Primary Care & Cost: Proposes the Medicard flagship policy, which gives every New Zealander three free general practitioner (GP) consultations per year, alongside a plan to restore universally free prescriptions.
  • Multigenerational Focus: Aims to reduce immediate out-of-pocket costs for families visiting the doctor. It also includes a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to boost GP capacity in high-need areas, and targeted investments like free maternity scans.
  • Funding: Backed by a proposed 28% capital gains tax on specified property investments, ring-fenced for health.

2. National-led Government (Current Administration / National Party)

  • Service Delivery & Waitlists: Focuses heavily on infrastructure capacity, emergency department waitlist reduction (such as targeted funding in districts like Counties Manukau), and expanding public-private partnerships (e.g., contracting private hospitals for elective surgeries to clear backlogs).
  • Multigenerational Focus: Rather than universal free GP visits (which National has criticized as untargeted), their approach relies on direct funding into primary care infrastructure, boosting frontline workforce capability, and managing wait times through specialized service delivery.

3. Green Party

  • Primary Care & Cost: Advocates for comprehensive, universal coverage—proposing unlimited free GP visits, free dental care for everyone, and free mental health services, funded via a wealth tax.
  • Multigenerational Focus: Prioritizes community-led care clinics in highest-need areas first, which directly aligns with the geographical and localized health access needs of many urban Pacific communities.

4. ACT Party

  • System Structure: Prefers a "government-as-purchaser rather than provider" model, encouraging private sector involvement and individual health savings options (modelled on systems like Singapore's).
  • Multigenerational Focus: Focuses less on universal state-provided subsidies and more on structural economic changes, choice, and increasing the overall efficiency and medicine-buying power of PHARMAC.

5. Te Pāti Māori & NZ First

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for whānau-centered, culturally safe care, proposing free primary care and dental for whānau under specific income thresholds, alongside targeted structures and funding models (such as a Māori Health Card or restored independent health authorities) designed to address equity gaps for indigenous and Pacific communities.
  • NZ First: Focuses heavily on resource allocation within the public health system, supporting substantial funds for waitlist reduction and regional service accessibility rather than restructuring via separate ethnic health authorities.

Connecting Healthcare to Wider Household Pressures

For a Pacific household balancing space, older relatives, and younger children, political choices on health intersect closely with the wider cost of living:

  • Direct Cost Relief vs. System Capacity: Parties offering universal or targeted fee reductions (like Labour or the Greens) target immediate household savings at the clinic door. Conversely, parties focusing on capacity and outsourcing (like National) emphasize clearing diagnostic and surgical waitlists so older relatives spend less time waiting for critical treatment.
  • Culturally Tailored Services: Pacific health advisors frequently stress that affordability is only part of the equation; families also need services that account for language, transport, working hours, and chronic conditions (such as diabetes or gout management) that disproportionately impact Pasifika communities.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

Navigating the 2026 general election with a multigenerational Pacific household means balancing the immediate squeeze of household costs with the long-term wellbeing of both young children and older relatives. Different political parties approach the intersections of cost of living, housing space, and accessible healthcare through distinct ideological lenses.

You can explore comprehensive, side-by-side policy comparisons using the non-partisan Policy.nz 2026 Health Policies tool or read the RNZ Election Policy Guide. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026RNZ Election Policy Guide 2026 | RNZ

A breakdown of how the major political blocs generally compare on your core concerns highlights key distinctions:

1. Affordable Healthcare and Medicines

  • Labour and the Green Party: Focus heavily on strengthening the public health system, reducing direct costs at the point of care, and targeting health equity. They generally support lowering or removing cost barriers like prescription fees and expanding access to community-based and culturally-tailored health services (such as Pacific-led health providers) which serve multigenerational needs. [Policy.nz]

  • National and ACT: Emphasize reducing wait times and increasing clinical capacity through target funding, such as boosting Pharmac’s budget or partnering with private providers for specific treatments (like cancer care). ACT specifically advocates for expanding the scope of pharmacists to treat everyday conditions and prescribe within limits to ease GP bottlenecks. National has emphasized practical frontline delivery and screening investments.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses heavily on self-determination and resourcing for Māori and Pacific community health providers, advocating for structural redesigns to eliminate ethnic health inequities and address institutional barriers.

  • New Zealand First and The Opportunities Party (TOP): NZ First generally emphasizes regional healthcare access and a strong universal public system, while TOP’s "Healthy People" framework proposes a 10-year cross-party health plan and major investments in preventative care and nutrition.

2. Household Costs and the Cost of Living

  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Focus on tax relief, adjustments to tax thresholds, and reducing government spending or red tape to lower the cost of living for families. They argue that boosting the private economy and reducing regulatory costs are the best ways to help households afford daily expenses.

  • Labour, the Green Party, and Te Pāti Māori: Tend to favor targeted financial support, such as working-for-families enhancements, income support, and cost-of-living payments or free/cheaper public services (public transport, school lunches, or health access) to directly relieve pressure on lower-to-middle-income households.

3. Space and Housing

  • Multigenerational living requires larger or flexible housing stock. Parties across the spectrum address housing differently: centre-right parties often focus on boosting property supply through RMA reform, infrastructure funding for greenfields, and supporting first-home buyers into the market. Centre-left and minor progressive parties lean more toward increasing public and social housing stock, renter protections, and supporting community housing providers who cater to diverse or large whānau/aiga living arrangements. [RNZ]

Next Steps for Your Vote

To weigh which approach best fits your family:

  • Check out the candidate and party stances on Vote.nz to understand local electorate options.

  • Review community-specific analyses or debates from Pacific-focused media and platforms to see how directly each party's localized service delivery addresses Pacific health provider funding.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on affordable healthcare and services accessible to Pacific families?

AI Overview

For multigenerational Pacific families in New Zealand, balancing household costs, finding enough space, and ensuring reliable access to healthcare are major priorities. In the 2026 New Zealand General Election , political parties offer fundamentally different approaches to making primary healthcare affordable and accessible.

The core debate centers on direct cost-reductions for GP visits and prescriptions (favored by the left) versus expanding funding for frontline capacities, targeted treatments, and medicines (favored by the center-right).

Comparison of Key Party Healthcare Policies

Political Party Primary Care & GP Costs Medicines & Specialist Care Healthcare Workforce & Support
Labour Party Medicard: 3 free GP visits per year for everyone. Free prescriptions , free maternity scans, and free cervical screenings. Guaranteed job for every graduate nurse; immediate pay rise for 65,000 care/support workers.
National Party Focuses on expanding general practice capacity and 24/7 digital health services. $604M Pharmac boost for 66 medicines/33 cancer therapies; expanded breast/bowel screening. Opens the new Waikato medical school; trains 2,000+ new nurses and 120 nurse practitioners.
Green Party Unlimited free GP visits and universal free dental care for everyone. Expanded cancer screening and increased Pharmac funding for medicines. Vows to restore the pay equity regime to resolve claims for 65,000 care workers.
ACT Party Promotes a government-as-purchaser model ; supports expanding private sector options. Focuses on reducing wait times by funding treatments through public and private providers. Emphasizes reducing health system bureaucracy and streamlining efficiencies.
NZ First Focuses on a $925M waitlist reduction fund and funding regional infrastructure. Prioritizes a shift toward preventative healthcare and funding rapid diagnostics. Focuses on adequately resourcing existing public health pipelines.
Te Pāti Māori Free primary care and dental for all whānau/families earning under $60,000. Introduces a Māori Health Card linking funding directly to the patient. Restores Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority) with 20% of the health budget.

How These Policies Impact Multigenerational Pacific Households

1. Managing Household Costs & Everyday Access

For households with both children and older relatives, everyday healthcare costs add up quickly.

  • If you prefer immediate relief on daily bills , the Labour Party’s Medicard (3 free GP visits and zero prescription charges) or the Green Party’s push for universal free dental care aim to lower out-of-pocket expenses directly.

  • If you believe the main issue is getting an appointment when you need one , the National Party’s strategy focuses on funding 53,000 additional general practice enrolments and 24/7 digital telehealth consultations to ease pressure on clinics.

2. Care for Older Relatives

Older family members often rely heavily on prescription medications and specialist treatments.

  • National has targeted funding toward lowering the bowel screening age to 58, extending free breast screening to ages 70–74, and heavily subsidizing dozens of new cancer therapies and life-saving medicines via Pharmac.

  • Labour and the Greens focus on supporting the people who look after elders, pledging to reverse coalition changes to pay equity to heavily boost the wages of 65,000 frontline care and support workers.

3. Culturally Responsive and Local Services

Pacific families often experience better health outcomes when services are delivered by community-based providers who understand their language and household dynamics.

  • Left-leaning parties (Greens, Te Pāti Māori, Labour) favor boosting funding directly into localized community health hubs and Pacific/Māori-led health providers.

  • Right-leaning parties (National, ACT) favor a centralized, needs-based system that utilizes both public clinics and private hospital contracts to clear surgery waitlists quickly for all New Zealanders.

Voting Information

To have your say on these policies, make sure your household is ready for the upcoming election:

  • Election Day: Saturday, 7 November 2026.

  • Enrolment Deadline: You must enrol or update your household's address details by midnight, Sunday 25 October 2026. You can check your status or enrol online at the Vote NZ Official Website.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account