Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party fuel and energy policies mean for farms and people driving long rural distances?

New Zealand’s 2026 election: what fuel and energy policies could mean for rural farms

For a farm well outside a main centre, fuel and energy policy affects much more than the price at the pump. It can influence the cost of running tractors and farm machinery, moving stock and produce, heating water, operating irrigation and refrigeration, and driving to medical appointments, schools, suppliers and other essential services.

The key distinction when comparing parties is between the cost of fuel you use today, the cost and reliability of energy for your farm, and the longer-term cost of changing to lower-emission technology. A policy that reduces one cost may increase another, and the effect can differ considerably between a farm with high diesel consumption and a household that mainly buys petrol.

I'll compare the main policy differences using publicly documented positions and announcements available for the 2026 election, distinguishing policies already in place from proposals that would still require implementation. The practical effects below are implications to assess, not promises that a particular price will result.

1. The main policy differences to understand

The 2026 general election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, with advance voting from 26 October. These are campaign positions, so some proposals may still change before voting day. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The comparison below focuses on National, Labour, the Greens, ACT and New Zealand First, with Te Pāti Māori and The Opportunity Party included where their energy positions are documented.

National

National's October 2026 energy plan, Electrify NZ 2.0, proposes faster electricity connections, more renewable generation, changes to electricity-line charges, greater competition and long-term low-interest loans for household energy upgrades. It also supports oil and gas exploration and is pursuing an LNG import facility for electricity security. Affordable power Kiwis can rely onNZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026

Potential farm implications

  • Electricity: Faster connections and more generation could help farms that want to add irrigation, refrigeration, workshops, solar or other electrical equipment. Actual savings depend on local network charges, installation costs and wholesale-to-retail pricing.
  • Fuel security: Supporting domestic exploration and imported LNG is intended to improve energy supply. It does not guarantee cheaper diesel or petrol, which are also affected by international oil prices, exchange rates and refining and distribution costs.
  • Farm investment: The emphasis is on expanding supply and reducing barriers to investment rather than a broad programme of subsidising farm electrification.

Labour

Labour has announced SolarSaver, proposing government-backed, long-term low-interest finance for household solar and batteries, subsidies of up to $3,000 for eligible low- and middle-income households, and a $30 million community-battery fund. It has also proposed public-transport fare caps and says it would restore the ban on new oil and gas exploration while honouring existing permits. Election 2026: Political polarisation on energy and climate, except solarNZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026

Potential farm implications

  • Electricity: Solar finance could be relevant to a farmhouse or eligible household, but household assistance should not be mistaken for a subsidy covering an entire commercial farm.
  • Rural driving: Public-transport fare caps are of limited direct value where there is no practical bus service. Labour's broader approach to electrification may help over time, but it is not a direct solution to high diesel consumption.
  • Long-term supply: Restricting new exploration changes the direction of domestic fossil-fuel development. The effect on future prices and security depends on existing production, imports, electricity investment and market conditions; a ban alone does not establish that pump prices will rise or fall.

Green Party

The Greens propose faster renewable-energy development, interest-free solar loans, public investment in renewable generation and electricity storage, EV incentives, more charging stations, and a phase-out date for importing fossil-fuel-powered vehicles. They also propose funding interregional rural bus services. Election 2026: Political polarisation on energy and climate, except solarNZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026

Potential farm implications

  • Electricity: Solar and storage support could help reduce grid purchases and provide some resilience during outages, provided the system is properly sized and the economics work.
  • Transport: More charging infrastructure and EV incentives could help with suitable light vehicles, but would be less immediately useful for heavy diesel machinery, remote routes without reliable chargers, or long trips requiring towing.
  • Environmental obligations: A stronger shift away from fossil fuels could mean more pressure and incentives to reduce emissions over time. The practical effect on your farm depends on the specific rules adopted, their timing and any exemptions or support.

ACT

ACT favours market-led energy investment, less regulatory intervention, domestic oil and gas exploration, and LNG as a possible source of backup electricity. It opposes major structural intervention in the electricity market and has argued for removing regulatory barriers to energy development. Energy Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026NZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026

Potential farm implications

  • Electricity: The emphasis is on increasing supply and allowing private investment, rather than relying primarily on public subsidies. Whether that translates into lower bills for a rural connection is uncertain.
  • Fuel and machinery: Its approach is broadly consistent with retaining access to conventional fossil-fuel energy rather than accelerating a compulsory transition away from it.
  • Compliance: ACT's approach to climate policy is less interventionist, but you would need to check its specific agricultural-emissions and environmental proposals rather than assume every existing farm obligation would disappear.

New Zealand First

NZ First supports domestic oil and gas development, more New Zealand control of strategic energy infrastructure, greater fuel security and separating electricity generation from retail supply to increase competition. It also emphasises road maintenance and regional transport infrastructure. Energy Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026Election 2026: Political polarisation on energy and climate, except solar

Potential farm implications

  • Fuel security: Domestic energy development and strategic reserves are intended to improve resilience, but neither guarantees lower retail prices.
  • Rural roads: Its emphasis on road maintenance and regional infrastructure is directly relevant to farms dependent on freight routes and long drives to services. The benefit depends on which projects are funded and how funding is allocated.
  • Electricity: The proposed separation of electricity generation and retailing is intended to improve competition and reduce power prices. The extent of any reduction is not yet guaranteed.

Te Pāti Māori and The Opportunity Party

These summaries describe the parties' stated directions, not a guarantee that the policies will be enacted or produce their intended results.

2. What matters most for a farm and a rural household?

The party announcements are only part of the picture. Four practical issues could make a greater difference to your annual budget than the headline energy policy.

Diesel and petrol costs

Your exposure depends on litres used, the share used on public roads, and how much flexibility you have to change vehicles or machinery. Domestic oil exploration is a long-term supply policy, not a guaranteed short-term fuel discount. Global oil prices and the New Zealand dollar remain important.

Road charges and rural distances

New Zealand currently uses fuel excise duty for petrol vehicles and road user charges (RUC) for diesel and electric vehicles. The Government is working towards moving petrol vehicles into the RUC system too. Road User Charges systemRoad User Charges system

For someone who drives long distances, the crucial questions are the eventual per-kilometre rate, vehicle-weight rules, administration costs and how off-road farm use is treated. A change in the payment mechanism does not automatically mean a reduction in the total cost.

Power prices and reliability

Solar, batteries and more generation could help with farm electricity bills, but a remote property's economics depend on connection charges, network capacity, battery requirements and the ability to export surplus power. A cheaper wholesale electricity market does not necessarily mean a proportionately cheaper retail bill.

Environmental obligations

Energy policy and farm environmental rules overlap, but they are not the same thing. Look separately at agricultural emissions pricing, freshwater and land-use rules, climate targets, and incentives to adopt lower-emission equipment. A party's support for fossil fuels does not itself remove environmental obligations, just as a renewable-energy target does not specify exactly what your farm must do.

One practical detail worth checking now: NZTA allows qualifying refunds for off-road RUC use and fuel-excise-duty refunds for eligible off-road commercial petrol use. The rules differ by fuel and vehicle, and records are important. These existing provisions may affect your costs regardless of which party wins. RUC refundsRUC exemptionsFuel excise duty refunds

3. How to compare the policies against your own costs

Rather than treating any party's stated objective as a guaranteed outcome, use your farm's actual expenditure to test what matters.

Your priority Policy detail to investigate
Lower annual fuel spending Any explicit fuel-tax changes, relief measures and their duration
Affordable farm electricity Network charges, connection costs, new generation and solar-finance eligibility
Reliable access to services Rural road maintenance, regional transport and practical charging coverage
Predictable farm compliance Specific agricultural-emissions and freshwater proposals, including commencement dates
Energy security Fuel reserves, domestic production, import dependence and backup electricity
Lower long-term operating costs Total ownership costs for machinery and vehicles, not just purchase incentives

For the emissions and energy-policy comparison, the Public Health Communication Centre's September 2026 briefing is a useful independent starting point, although its analysis is framed around public health and climate as well as energy affordability. The official party announcements should be consulted alongside it. Election 2026: Political polarisation on energy and climate, except solarAffordable power Kiwis can rely on

4. A useful next step: quantify your exposure

If you want to go beyond party descriptions, you can estimate how sensitive your farm and household are to changes in fuel and electricity costs.

Your annual energy-cost sensitivity

Enter approximate annual spending in NZ dollars. This is a budgeting calculator, not a forecast of what any party's policy will deliver.

Diesel spending per year ($)

Petrol spending per year ($)

Electricity spending per year ($)

Change in fuel costs

+20%

−30%

No change

+50%

−30%

No change

+50%

−30%

No change

+50%

Change in electricity costs

+10%

−30%

No change

+50%

−30%

No change

+50%

−30%

No change

+50%

Estimated annual change in spending

$6,200

This holds usage constant and excludes taxes, RUC changes, capital costs and any behavioural changes.

The most useful final comparison is between each party's actual commitments and your own biggest exposures—not an overall ranking of parties.

One question to help make this more relevant: is your farm's biggest energy cost diesel for machinery and freight, petrol for long-distance household driving, or electricity for irrigation, refrigeration and other farm operations? That determines which policy details are worth examining most closely.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party fuel and energy policies mean for farms and people driving long rural distances?

Living well outside a main center means fuel and energy costs hit your bottom line and household budget much harder than they do for urban dwellers. For remote rural households and farmers, long distances, heavy reliance on diesel and petrol, and exposure to electricity pricing directly shape your operational viability and cost of living.

The major political parties offer distinct approaches to these challenges for the 2026 general election.

1. Fossil Fuels, Refining, and Long-Distance Driving

For people driving long rural distances, transport fuel is a non-negotiable overhead. Parties differ sharply on how to manage fuel security, exploration, and supply chain costs:

  • National and ACT: Focus heavily on boosting energy supply and reducing regulatory barriers. ACT strongly supports lifting oil and gas exploration bans to drive down energy costs, arguing that offshore production restrictions only shift emissions rather than reducing them. National prioritizes infrastructure resilience, private investment in generation, and securing backup supply chains (such as supporting gas development and LNG import options) to prevent price shocks.
  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy emphasis on national fuel security and regional infrastructure. They have pushed aggressively for domestic energy security—including proposed large-scale subsurface resource surveys and establishing a Special Economic Zone at Marsden Point to secure local refining, maritime, and fuel capability and shield the country from volatile international shipping and fuel supply chains.
  • Labour, the Greens, and Te Pāti Māori: Prioritize transitioning away from fossil fuels. Labour and the Greens intend to reinstate or strengthen bans on new oil and gas exploration, aiming to position New Zealand as a renewable energy leader. While they offer support for transitioning vehicles (such as EV and e-bike incentives or charging networks), their long-term framework creates an upward cost pressure on traditional internal combustion engines, which presents a challenge for heavy rural work and high-mileage driving where heavy-duty EVs are not yet practical.

2. Electricity, On-Farm Power, and Market Structure

With electricity and rural utility costs rising significantly, power generation policies directly affect irrigation, farm buildings, and homesteads:

  • National (Electrify NZ 2.0 plan): Aims to fast-track renewable generation and transmission infrastructure, remove planning bottlenecks for small-scale renewables, and introduce financial support (like a Home Energy Fund offering long-term loans for solar and batteries). They also want to explicitly add "affordability" as a core objective for the Electricity Authority.
  • New Zealand First and ACT (Diverging Market Interventions): NZ First has campaigned on a major structural split of the major gentailers (akin to a Telecom-style breakup) to force down household and commercial power bills. ACT generally opposes structural market breakups, preferring to rely on deregulation and opening up supply to drive competition.
  • Labour and the Greens: Focus heavily on decentralized power generation to protect consumers. Labour’s SolarSaver policy and the Greens' clean-energy loan proposals offer government-backed financing, grants, and community-battery funding to help households and rural properties adopt solar and storage, bypassing expensive commercial grid markups.

Summary for Rural Voters

  • If your primary concern is immediate relief on liquid fuel prices and safeguarding traditional energy supply lines (diesel/petrol security and traditional exploration), right-of-centre and nationalist parties (National, ACT, NZ First) align more closely with maintaining and expanding traditional resource access.
  • If you are looking to insulate your property from grid volatility through self-generation (such as localized solar, battery setups, and electrification subsidies), there is broad cross-party support—with National, Labour, and the Greens all offering various loan, solar installation, or funding mechanisms to lower upfront capital barriers for decentralized power.

Are you more concerned with immediate relief at the pump for transport, or are you looking to invest in on-farm energy independence (like solar and storage) to hedge against future power price spikes?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party fuel and energy policies mean for farms and people driving long rural distances?

Living well outside a main centre on a farm means transport, energy, and road costs hit your bottom line and daily logistics harder than most. For the November 2026 general election, the political parties offer distinctly different approaches to fuel taxation, road user charges (RUC), infrastructure, and energy transition support for the rural sector.

Key Fuel, Transport, and RUC Directions by Party

  • National (Incumbent Coalition / Current Direction): Focuses heavily on road maintenance, economic productivity, and supply security. They have rolled out assurances protecting core farming inputs (such as looking into long-term fertiliser and fuel/energy security and resilience) while advancing a broader transition to an electronic road-user-charge system. For rural drivers, their emphasis is on maintaining regional highways and freight efficiency rather than adding broad new climate-related regional fuel taxes, though user-pays models and road maintenance prioritization remain central.

  • Labour: Proposes direct cost-of-living relief targeting transport. They have campaigned on freezing fuel taxes and road-user charges for a multi-year period (funded through the National Land Transport Fund), which directly buffers the per-litre or per-1,000km cost for diesel utes, tractors, and heavy transport running long rural distances.

  • ACT: Strongly champions a "user-pays" philosophy, advocating for electronic road-user charges, tolling arrangements, and leveraging private capital for infrastructure. They also propose cutting regulatory "anti-car rules" and extraneous spending. For remote operators, this means a clean shift toward universal RUC systems where everyone pays directly for the roads they use, potentially paired with toll roads for major new builds.

  • New Zealand First: Places a heavy emphasis on regional development, domestic fuel security, and strategic public ownership of transport links (including rail and ports). They focus less on carbon taxes or punitive transport charges for the regions, prioritizing instead stable domestic supply chains and keeping regional economic lifelines affordable. [Kiwi Coaches]

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Focus their transport and energy investments heavily into subsidized or free public transport in urban centers, active transport, and shifting freight from road to regional rail. While their broader environmental policies seek a rapid transition away from fossil fuels, it can mean fewer direct road-funding subsidies for remote rural vehicle networks, as capital is funneled toward public transport and lower-emission alternatives. [RNZ]

What This Means for Your Farm and Long Distances

  1. Direct Running Costs (Fuel Taxes & RUC):
  • If your primary concern is the immediate cash-flow cost at the pump or logging heavy distances in diesel farm vehicles, Labour’s policy of freezing fuel taxes/RUCs offers a direct, short-term shield against rising transport costs.
  • Conversely, parties like ACT lean into universal electronic RUC alignment, meaning all vehicles (regardless of fuel type) transition cleanly to paying based on distance travelled to sustainably fund infrastructure, which can increase predictable baseline costs for high-mileage rural properties.
  1. Infrastructure & Rural Access:
  • There is broad cross-party agreement on the necessity of prioritizing crumbling road maintenance over aesthetic or urban-only projects, which is vital for rural access to local services. However, National and ACT favour private partnerships, tolling, and structural funding overhauls to fix regional roads, whereas NZ First leans toward direct regional development and public asset backing.
  1. On-Farm Energy and Input Security:
  • Beyond vehicle fuel, the broader energy conversation includes security of supply for diesel, natural gas, and electricity required for irrigation, dairy sheds, or heavy machinery. Policies that target domestic energy resilience and supply contracts (notably emphasized by National and NZ First) aim to insulate productive land from sudden geopolitical or shipping shocks in the Middle East or global markets.

You can review a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of party commitments via the RNZ 2026 Transport Policy Guide or track the debate on funding models through TransportTalk to see which approach best balances your operational costs with the reality of rural isolation.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

We run a farm and live well outside a main centre. We are weighing operating costs, environmental obligations and access to local services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would party fuel and energy policies mean for farms and people driving long rural distances?

AI Overview

For a rural family managing a farm and driving long distances, the fuel and energy policies of the political parties ahead of the 7 November 2026 General Election represent very different paths for your operating costs and environmental targets.

The primary divide sits between the governing National-led coalition , which focuses on boosting fossil fuel exploration and technology-driven exceptions for agriculture, and the Labour/Green opposition , which emphasizes strict renewable energy development, international climate compliance, and reviewing emissions schemes.

🚜 Impact on Farm Operations & Environmental Obligations

┌───────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Feature │ National / ACT / NZ First Coalition │ Labour / Green Opposition │
├───────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Agricultural Emissions │ "Tools first, then price." No farm closures. │ Review the ETS; Greens want agriculture priced by 2027. │
│ On-Farm Energy & Inputs │ Electrifying inputs (e.g., $10m Critical Inputs Fund). │ Direct subsidies/loans for renewable transitions. │
│ Resource Exploration │ Overturned offshore oil/gas ban to drop baseline costs. │ Reinstating the offshore oil and gas exploration ban. │
└───────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

National / ACT / NZ First Coalition

  • Agricultural Emissions: The current coalition maintains a strict policy of "tools first, then price". They guarantee that no climate policies will force farm closures or risk sending production overseas. They reject using economic penalties on farmers before tech-driven solutions (like methane-reducing feeds) are widely viable.

  • Fertiliser & Inputs: National recently introduced a $10 million Critical Inputs Fund designed to partner with domestic manufacturers to transition nitrogen production from natural gas to electrification, aiming to shield farmers from global supply shocks.

  • Fossil Fuel Focus: The government overturned the 2018 offshore oil and gas exploration ban to bolster energy security. New Zealand First has also proposed a $1 billion subsurface survey to find domestic oil, gas, and geothermal opportunities to keep baseline industrial costs lower.

Labour / Green Opposition

  • Agricultural Emissions: Labour has pledged to urgently review the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) to ensure it functions effectively. While Labour has stepped away from immediately pricing agriculture directly, the Greens strongly push to bring agriculture into the ETS by mid-2027 and reform forestry offsetting.

  • Renewable Energy Transition: They view climate action as economic action, arguing that delaying the transition leaves farms vulnerable to international trade penalties. Their policies center on heavily funding a fully renewable grid, which would restrict fossil fuels but aim to provide long-term stable electricity.

⛽ Impact on Long-Distance Driving & Fuel Costs

For rural families dealing with long commutes outside main centers, current high fuel prices driven by global conflicts are a major pressure point.

  • The Coalition (National / NZ First / ACT): National has ruled out several new wealth and property taxes but has notably kept a fuel excise tax increase on the table. To balance current pump pressures, they passed temporary relief via a $50-a-week boost to the in-work tax credit for low-to-middle income families during the fuel crisis. NZ First is campaigning to make this temporary boost permanent and increase it to $120 a week if petrol prices stay high.

  • Labour & The Greens: Both parties oppose expanding fossil-fuel infrastructure, focusing instead on rapid transport electrification. For rural drivers where EVs may not yet be practical due to range and local infrastructure, their policies mean relying on an ETS framework that will inherently drive up fossil-fuel fuel prices over time to disincentivize their use.

☀️ On-Farm & Home Energy Access

A major point of bipartisan consensus in this election is decentralizing solar power, which is highly beneficial for rural properties looking to reduce their reliance on the main grid.

  • National’s Home Energy Fund: Offers long-term, low-interest loans for rooftop solar setups, requiring no council consents and paid back through regional property rates. They are also pushing to cut red tape for lines companies to make selling power back to the grid easier.

  • Labour’s SolarSaver Scheme: Similarly offers long-term, low-interest energy loans but adds the flexibility of paying the loan back directly through your power bill rather than just property rates.

  • The Green Party’s Kiwipower: Promises a publicly owned energy company to fix the "dry-year" electricity problem, alongside zero-interest loans covering up to 90% of household clean-energy investments.

If you would like to look closer at specific parts of their platforms, please let me know:

  • Which farming sector you are in (e.g., dairy, sheep & beef, horticulture), as emissions policies impact them differently.

  • Your thoughts on local infrastructure , such as whether grid reliability or EV charging access is a priority for your long drives.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account