Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

For your situation, I would focus on three questions when comparing parties ahead of New Zealand’s 2026 general election:

  • Can your child get assessed promptly? This includes access to learning, developmental, speech-language, autism, ADHD and other relevant assessments, without long waits or prohibitive costs.
  • Will an assessment lead to support at school? A diagnosis should not be the only way to qualify for appropriate learning support. The availability of specialists, teacher aides, learning support coordinators and other interventions matters just as much.
  • Will your family get help outside school? Access to child development services, occupational therapy, speech-language therapy, mental health care and financial support for parents who reduce paid work can all affect your family's wellbeing.

One important distinction: education support, health assessments and financial assistance are different policy areas. A party might promise more learning support in schools without addressing diagnostic waiting lists, or improve health services without guaranteeing that schools have the staff to act on an assessment.

What the parties are emphasising in 2026

The clearest comparison is between the current government's focus on expanding existing services, Labour's emphasis on reducing everyday healthcare costs, the Greens' inclusive and rights-based approach, and Opportunity's more explicit proposals for coordinating education, health and disability support.

These are policy commitments and announced initiatives, not guarantees that every child will receive an assessment or service within a particular timeframe.

1. School learning support and access to specialists

National

The government's approach is to expand existing services and increase capacity. It has funded Learning Support Coordinator access across primary and intermediate schools over three years, and announced additional early-intervention capacity for young children with high and complex developmental needs. The latter expansion provides for up to 1,000 placements nationwide at any one time from September 2026. 101,000 students to start benefitting from Learning Support CoordinatorsGovernment delivers more support for children with complex educational needs

What to check: Whether this translates into more support hours, specialist access and shorter waits for a child already at school.

Labour

Labour's published 2026 headline policies include free GP visits and prescriptions, but the material reviewed here does not establish a specific new nationwide guarantee for faster developmental assessments or a particular level of school-based learning support. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What to check: Its detailed education commitments on specialist staffing, learning support funding, and access to assessments for school-age children.

Green Party

The Greens' 2026 manifesto commits to inclusive education and a disability system that supports disabled people and whānau with dignity and autonomy. The party has also opposed disability-support law changes it says were developed without adequate involvement of disabled people and carers. Manifesto 2026Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes

What to check: The precise funding and staffing commitments behind its inclusive-education promises, including how they would reduce waiting times.

Opportunity Party

Opportunity's October 2026 disability statement explicitly identifies learning support coordinators, Resource Teachers: Learning and Behaviour (RTLBs), speech-language therapists, psychologists and mental health services as important forms of educational support for neurodivergent learners. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026

What to check: How many additional specialists it would fund, what eligibility rules would apply, and how soon children would receive help.

For ACT, its published education position emphasises clear achievement standards, school accountability, greater school choice and charter schools. Those priorities may matter if you are considering a different school environment, but they do not by themselves establish a commitment to faster specialist assessments. ACT New Zealand

2. Access to assessments and children's health services

This is where the differences matter most if your child needs a developmental or behavioural assessment before the right help can be arranged.

Party Relevant direction in 2026 What it could mean for your family
National Expanding early-intervention services and implementing more consistent assessments for disability support funding. Government delivers more support for children with complex educational needsDisability support improvements begin More service capacity is promising, but disability-support assessments are not the same as a clinical diagnosis or a school learning assessment.
Labour Three free GP visits per year for everyone, plus removal of the $5 prescription charge from July 2027. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies Could reduce routine healthcare costs, but a free GP visit does not automatically provide a funded specialist assessment for ADHD, autism or other developmental needs.
Greens A broader commitment to disability rights, accessible services and inclusive systems, with opposition to the government's approach to disability-support law changes. Manifesto 2026Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes Relevant if you prioritise accessible public services and the involvement of disabled people and families in decisions. Check the specific assessment and treatment funding commitments.
ACT Emphasises timely healthcare, measurable health targets, greater use of private providers to reduce waiting lists, and expanding the role of pharmacies. ACT New Zealand The key question is whether its proposed changes would cover the particular child-development specialists your child needs, rather than mainly general healthcare.
Opportunity Proposes a more connected health, education and disability system, including a chosen navigator and a “Tell Us Once” approach to reduce repeated assessments and paperwork. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026 Particularly relevant if you are repeatedly explaining your child's needs to different agencies or struggling to coordinate services.

This is a comparison of the clearest relevant commitments I could verify, rather than an exhaustive account of every party's manifesto. I could not verify a specific nationwide promise from each party to fund ADHD or autism assessments for all children, so I would not assume that any party has made that guarantee.

3. Support if you have to reduce paid work

Because caring affects your income, I would compare each party's policies on carers and disability-related financial support as well as education and health.

  • Opportunity: Its October 2026 disability statement proposes a Citizens’ Income and Disability Allowance, more flexibility for unpaid carers who also work, and improved respite care. These are proposals; the eligibility criteria and actual financial value would be important to examine. Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026
  • National: The government has introduced a consistent assessment approach for Disability Support Services funding, including consideration of carers' needs. This may help eligible families, but it is not a universal payment for every parent who reduces their hours. Disability support improvements beginImproving assessment and allocation
  • Labour: Its published headline commitments include measures to reduce healthcare costs and changes to care-worker pay equity. Those are relevant to the wider care system, but they should not be confused with a direct payment to a parent providing unpaid care. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesLabour's 2026 Election Policies
  • Greens: Their disability policy places emphasis on disabled people's rights, family wellbeing and involving disabled people and carers in decisions. Check their detailed proposals for income support and respite care before assuming a particular benefit is available. Manifesto 2026Greens oppose rushed disability support law changes

4. The questions I would use to decide

Given that your main concern is getting appropriate help at school, I would rank the policies using these five tests:

Tick the priorities that matter most to you.

More learning support staff and specialist services in schools

Faster, publicly funded developmental and behavioural assessments

Access to speech-language therapy, occupational therapy and child mental health services

Support at school based on a child's needs, not solely on having a diagnosis

Financial assistance, respite and flexibility for parents who reduce paid work

Compare parties against my priorities

One particularly important question to ask every party is: Will my child receive timely, appropriate support at school while we wait for any formal diagnosis? That is a more useful test than a general promise to improve services.

For a broader, current comparison, the independent election guide Policy.nz — Education, Health and Community and inclusion lets you explore the parties' published policies. You can also check each party's own manifesto for the precise funding, eligibility and implementation details.

My overall advice is to give the greatest weight to specific, funded commitments that shorten assessment waits and provide actual specialist support in schools, followed by policies that make caring financially sustainable. A promise to improve healthcare generally is less directly relevant to your situation than a clear commitment to the particular assessment or learning support your child needs.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

Navigating the school system and health services while balancing paid work for a child with additional needs is a significant responsibility, and it is completely understandable that this is your main concern.

While specific platforms and finalized manifestos continue to evolve leading into the 2026 New Zealand General Election, the major political parties approach learning support, early identification, and child health services through distinct philosophies.


Key Policy Differences Among Parties

1. National Party (Current Government)

  • Education & Basics Focus: National heavily emphasizes foundational basics (such as structured literacy and regular progress checks, e.g., early childhood checks and structured milestones). Their approach prioritizes standard academic measurements alongside targeted interventions.
  • Health & Frontline Services: National’s strategy focuses heavily on reducing wait times through mainstream health infrastructure (such as boosting elective capacities and funding specific health measures). However, families requiring specialized child health or neurodiversity assessments often point to persistent public waitlists, which National aims to tackle via broader health system delivery targets rather than specialized parallel systems.
  • Work & Economy: Their focus centers on economic management, inflation control, and tax relief without introducing new taxes, aiming to lower the overall cost of living rather than expanding targeted direct benefit payments for caring parents.

2. Labour Party

  • Inclusive Education & Resourcing: Historically, Labour favors centralized planning, network management in education, and strengthening the public sector workforce. Their approach to learning support typically emphasizes expanding school-based resources, funding professional development for teachers to handle diverse needs, and integrating wellbeing frameworks.
  • Health Access: Labour generally advocates for strengthening public health infrastructure (Te Whatu Ora) and reducing barriers to primary care, which impacts how easily families can access publicly funded pediatric assessments, child mental health support, and allied health professionals (like speech language therapists or occupational therapists).
  • Carer Support: Labour’s policies often lean toward bolstering public services and income support safety nets, which can align more closely with supporting caregivers who reduce their work hours.

3. ACT New Zealand

  • School Autonomy & Choice: ACT generally supports greater autonomy and flexibility for schools, empowering individual communities and boards to manage resources. They emphasize core academic achievement and fiscal restraint in public spending.
  • Targeted vs. Universal Delivery: ACT tends to favor streamlined or market-driven solutions rather than large centralized bureaucracies, which can mean a preference for targeted funding models for high-needs students rather than blanket universal programs.

4. Green Party & Te Pāti Māori

  • Holistic & Equity-Driven Support: Both parties strongly advocate for increased funding for disability support services, specialized learning support, and integrated health-in-schools models.
  • Assessments & Health: They emphasize removing barriers to healthcare access, arguing for free or low-cost access to mental health, dental, and disability support services directly within communities and schools.
  • Support for Caregivers: Their policies frequently feature proposals to better financially recognize and support full-time carers and parents who have to step back from paid employment to care for disabled or neurodivergent children.

What to Look for When Evaluating Your Vote

As the election approaches and parties release their detailed sector manifestos, you may want to measure their policies against the specific pressure points you face:

  • Assessment Bottlenecks: Do they commit specific funding to cut public waiting lists educational psychology, child development teams, or pediatric assessments?
  • School-Level Resourcing: Do their policies provide schools with flexible, immediate funding for teacher aides and specialist interventions, or do they rely on rigid criteria that leave children waiting?
  • Support for Reducing Work Hours: Look at income support, carer tax credits, or disability allowances that help offset the financial sacrifice of stepping back from paid work.

Would you like to explore how specific work-and-care support structures or carer benefits currently compare under existing policy settings?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

Navigating the education and health systems for a child with additional learning needs while balancing work and care is a significant and demanding journey.

In New Zealand's political landscape, the major parties approach learning support, wait times for assessments, and integrated health services through different philosophical lenses. While specific, detailed manifesto line items shift with each election cycle, the core ideological divides and policy approaches break down along these general lines:

1. National and Governing/Centre-Right Perspectives

  • Focus on Core Basics & Targeted Resourcing: Centre-right parties generally emphasise core academic achievement, structured curricula (such as mandatory minimum times for reading, writing, and mathematics), and operational accountability within mainstream schools.

  • Delivery Mechanism: Resourcing for learning support is typically managed through existing funding pools like the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) , Learning Support Coordinators (LSCs) in schools, and specialist services via the Ministry of Education. Rather than sweeping structural overhauls of the health-education interface, their emphasis tends to be on measurable classroom outcomes, attendance, and administrative efficiency.

  • Assessments: Access to formal needs assessments relies heavily on state-funded specialist waitlists (such as Ministry of Education learning support specialists or Health NZ Child Development services), with less emphasis on private-sector subsidies and a stronger focus on managing public service delivery pipelines.

2. Labour and Centre-Left Perspectives

  • Systemic Capacity & Expansion: Centre-left parties typically focus on increasing direct operational funding to the public education and health sectors, aiming to reduce bottlenecks that cause families to wait months or years for specialist educational psychologists or needs assessments.

  • Delivery Mechanism: Labour has historically championed the scaling up of Learning Support Coordinators embedded directly within schools to act as a bridge for families. Policy platforms often focus on increasing the overall number of trained specialists (speech language therapists, educational psychologists) employed directly by the state.

  • Welfare and Income Support: Recognising that parents often reduce paid work to care for children with high needs, centre-left and left-wing parties (such as the Labour Party and the Green Party) are generally more receptive to broader welfare reforms, higher baseline benefit adequacy, or changes to caregiver support structures—though immediate, fully costed universal carer income overhauls remain heavily debated and constrained by fiscal policy.

3. Green Party and Te Pāti Māori (Progressive/Kaupapa Māori Perspectives)

  • Holistic & Community-Centric Hubs: The Green Party and Te Pāti Māori strongly advocate for integrated public services. For instance, the Greens have historically promoted school hubs that bring health, mental health, and social services directly onto school grounds, removing the friction of navigating fragmented health and education agencies separately.

  • Equity and Indigenous Approach: Te Pāti Māori emphasises tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and kaupapa Māori-led disability and health support, arguing that state systems fail neurodivergent and disabled tamariki Māori because they are not culturally responsive or locally empowered.

  • Income Protection: Parties on the left (Greens) advocate for structural income guarantees (like a Student Income Guarantee or Guaranteed Minimum Income) to alleviate the financial penalty placed on parents who must step back from paid employment to provide full-time care.


Key Areas to Watch When Deciding Your Vote:

  • Waitlists for Assessments: Ask whether a party’s policy commits specific funding to slash wait times for Educational Psychologists and Needs Assessment Service Coordination (NASC) or Child Development Teams.

  • In-School Support Models: Look closely at whether parties support expanding Learning Support Coordinators (LSCs) or tying funding strictly to individual ORS labels versus a flexible, school-wide equity model.

  • Support for Caregivers: Check party stances on caregiver allowances, disability support restructuring, and flexible workplace legislation that protects parents who reduce hours.

To see how individual candidates and parties precisely articulate their current manifestos and pledge commitments on disability, health, and learning support, you can explore the interactive comparisons on Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do party policies differ on access to assessments and health services for children with additional needs?

AI Overview

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have presented distinctly different structural approaches to addressing the delays, funding bottlenecks, and agency silos affecting children with additional learning and health needs.

Because your situation involves balancing reduced work hours with managing school support and healthcare, the differences generally split between government-led early interventions and structural streamlining (National and ACT) and broader universal welfare, financial boosts, and on-site school services (Labour, Green, and the Opportunity Party).

National and ACT (Current Coalition Approach)

The current government parties place their focus on early detection milestones, structural integration, and public service efficiency.

  • Early Childhood Screening: The National Party's 2026 ECE Policy introduces structured developmental milestones and a formal School Start Check before a child transitions to primary school. The objective is to utilize the expanded Early Intervention Service (EIS) to flag and address learning and health needs before they compound in older years.

  • Streamlining & "Tell Us Once": The coalition emphasizes cross-agency integration to link disability support, health, education, and ACC systems so families do not have to repeat assessments or duplicate stories across multiple government entities.

  • Welfare Settings: Neither National nor ACT proposes an overhaul of disability income support or specific financial compensations for family carers who reduce hours, relying instead on targeted public health workforce expansions (e.g., maximizing the scope of pharmacists and physician associates) to clear regional assessment backlogs.

Labour Party

Labour targets the immediate financial barriers to accessing frontline primary healthcare, which is often the first step in securement of a formal diagnosis.

  • Primary Health Access: Their flagship platform includes three free doctor visits annually alongside free prescriptions. To reduce wait times for developmental and health assessments, they propose a Family Doctor Loan Scheme aimed at funding and placing low-interest setup loans for GPs and nurse practitioners in high-demand areas.

  • Mainstream Integration: Labour supports direct advocacy against recent legislative limits placed on flexible disability funding allocations, arguing for more robust support frameworks for regional diagnostics.

Green Party

The Green Party focuses heavily on shifting the financial burden off unpaid family carers and integrating healthcare directly into the school grounds.

  • Integrated School Hubs: The Greens advocate for building on-site health and social service hubs directly within schools , creating centralized locations where children can access mental health, behavioral, and occupational therapies without parents needing to commute to external clinics.

  • Financial Care Integration: Recognizing the financial hit taken by parents reducing paid hours, the Greens propose a Guaranteed Minimum Income and a total overhaul of the system to transform ACC into an Agency for Comprehensive Care , which would cover disability support and living costs regardless of whether a condition stems from a birth defect, long-term illness, or an accident.

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

TOP approaches the issue through the lens of strict financial security for the household and specialized navigators.

  • Universal Income Protections: To address the income loss experienced by parents reducing work, TOP proposes a Universal Citizen's Income ($370/week for adults over 18) paired with a distinct Universal Disability Allowance projected to provide roughly $6,000 extra annually, without eliminating existing targeted transport or assistive equipment pools.

  • System Navigators: Their healthcare plan explicitly empowers families to appoint their own navigator to guide them through the complex assessment bureaucracies across the healthcare and education sectors, removing the administrative burden from the parent.


If you would like to explore how these decisions directly impact your area, let me know:

  • Would you like to review the specific Ministry of Education complaints process regarding learning support?

  • Should we look into the eligibility criteria for the current Carer Support allowance or childcare subsidies?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account