Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

You are asking about an issue that affects many households: how the state supports people who provide unpaid care while also working. For the 2026 New Zealand general election, parties’ detailed policies on home-based support, aged residential care, and respite care are still developing, and not every party has released a dedicated aged-care package. The comparison below focuses on publicly stated directions and relevant health/social-care positions available so far. National Party

At a glance

Party Home-based care & support Aged care / residential care Respite & support for unpaid carers
National Party of New Zealand Emphasises health-system performance, earlier access to care, and managing public spending. Its health policies include improving access to services, but a specific nationwide expansion of home support/respite has not been a major announced 2026 headline policy. National Party Focuses on health delivery and system management; specific aged-care funding reforms would need to be checked against further announcements. National Party No major new national respite package identified in current published policy material. National Party
New Zealand Labour Party Emphasises improving affordability and access in health services, including broader primary and community care measures. Labour Party Has generally supported stronger public health services; a detailed aged-care reform package should be checked against later announcements. Labour Party Labour has historically supported stronger public services, but a specific 2026 caregiver-respite commitment was not identified in the published policy summary reviewed. Labour Party
Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Places strong emphasis on publicly funded services, community wellbeing, and reducing inequities. Its 2026 manifesto outlines a broad social-support approach. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Supports expanded public provision and stronger social protections; specific aged-care mechanisms should be checked in the manifesto details. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand The Greens have generally highlighted unpaid carers and social supports, though exact respite-service commitments require checking the detailed policy documents. Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
ACT New Zealand Generally approaches services through choice, efficiency, and limiting government costs; proposals may differ from parties favouring expanded state provision. PartyMap Would typically emphasise system efficiency and individual choice rather than large state expansion. PartyMap No specific major respite expansion identified in the material reviewed. PartyMap
New Zealand First Has historically focused on seniors’ issues and public services, but a specific 2026 home-care package was not identified in the sources reviewed. PartyMap Often places emphasis on older New Zealanders’ interests; details for 2026 aged-care policy need checking as announcements are made. PartyMap
Te Pāti Māori Focuses on equity, whānau-centred approaches, and services designed around communities. Democracy Action Has advocated for approaches that recognise Māori health needs and whānau care responsibilities. Democracy Action Likely to place emphasis on whānau support models; specific respite funding commitments should be checked against its election policies. Democracy Action

Issues you may want to compare between parties

Because your situation involves both employment and unpaid caring, the most relevant differences may not just be “aged care” policies. Consider looking at:

  • Eligibility rules for home support

    • How easy is it to get help with showering, meals, transport, medication support, or household tasks?
    • Are assessments flexible enough for people whose needs fluctuate?

  • Respite care

    • Is there guaranteed access to short breaks for carers?
    • Are respite options available outside standard weekday hours?
    • Are there options for emergency respite?

  • Support for unpaid carers

    • Recognition of the time and financial impact of caring.
    • Whether carers receive practical assistance, counselling, training, or financial support.
    • Whether employment protections or flexible-work policies are strengthened.

  • Aged residential care

    • Staffing levels and workforce shortages.
    • Funding for facilities.
    • Whether the system prioritises staying at home longer versus residential care.

  • Māori and whānau care models

    • Whether policies recognise that care is often provided within extended family networks rather than only through formal services. Democracy Action

How to check before voting

Because parties may release further aged-care commitments during the campaign, useful places to compare updated policies include party policy pages and neutral election policy trackers. National Party

If you would like, I can also make a carer-focused comparison table (for example: “Which parties propose more help for someone working part time while caring for an elderly relative?”) using only confirmed 2026 election commitments.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Balancing part-time work with daily, unpaid caregiving is a significant load, and finding reliable home-based support, aged care, and respite services is a widespread challenge across New Zealand.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election, major political parties have outlined different approaches to addressing the systemic pressures in health, aged care, and support for older New Zealanders and their families.

How the Major Parties Approach Aged Care, Home-Based Care, and Respite

1. National Party (Current Government)

  • Focus & Priorities: National’s broader platform centers on growing the economy, keeping the cost of living down, and rebuilding core public health infrastructure.
  • Aged Care Approach: The government implemented funding uplifts for aged residential care (such as the 4% funding increase for providers) to try and offset cost pressures and workforce shortages. However, critics and sector advocates note that systemic underfunding in home and community support services (HCSS) and residential care remains a major hurdle.
  • Carer Impact: National generally emphasizes economic management and targeted public service delivery to ease wait times, but relies heavily on private providers and community sector contracting to deliver aged and home-based care.

2. Labour Party

  • Focus & Priorities: Labour focuses heavily on strengthening public healthcare access, making health services more affordable, and protecting public service delivery.
  • Aged Care Approach: Labour historically champions state-backed funding models and improving pay parity for health, care, and support workers to combat workforce drain into other sectors.
  • Carer Impact: Their policy framework typically targets workforce retention and direct funding to community health networks, aiming to reduce the administrative and financial barriers families face when navigating home-based support and respite care.

3. New Zealand First

  • Focus & Priorities: New Zealand First has identified aged-care reform as one of its top election priorities, having previously pushed for and supported parliamentary select committee inquiries into the aged care sector.
  • Aged Care Approach: They advocate for a comprehensive "Seniors Housing Plan", better integration and coordination between primary, community, and aged care, and expanded options to support "ageing in place" (keeping older people safely in their homes longer).
  • Carer Impact: NZ First’s focus on streamlining community and aged-care frameworks directly targets the fragmented navigation systems that caregivers often struggle with.

4. Green Party & The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Green Party: Emphasize robust public funding for health and disability support systems, advocating for systemic uplifts in community care wages, guaranteed access to health support, and dedicated funding structures that recognize the value of unpaid carers.
  • TOP: Focus on structural economic reforms (such as housing and income support adjustments), aiming to alleviate financial strain on older homeowners and families through broader social payment overhauls.

Key Issues Facing Caregivers to Consider

When evaluating where parties stand, sector advocates (such as Grey Power, Alzheimers NZ, and social service providers) emphasize a few critical pinch points that you may want to look for in detailed party manifestos:

  • Workforce Shortages & Pay Parity: Home-based support services and aged residential facilities face severe staffing shortages driven by wage disparities with public hospitals. Parties differ on how aggressively they plan to fund provider contracts to ensure reliable, high-retention staffing.
  • Respite Availability: Access to reliable respite care varies wildly depending on your region. Carer support subsidies often fail to cover the actual cost or availability of a relief worker, leaving working caregivers with few options for a genuine break.
  • Funding Models for Ageing in Place: While "ageing in place" is a goal shared by most parties, the practical delivery—such as funded home modifications, reliable daily home-care visits, and accessible day programs—depends heavily on how health funding is decentralized or prioritized.

Are you looking for specific details on how a particular party's regional or tax policies might affect your household budget while caregiving?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

Navigating part-time work alongside daily, unpaid caregiving is a massive juggling act, and it is completely understandable that you are looking closely at how the political parties plan to support older New Zealanders and their whānau.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election , major political parties have outlined distinct approaches to healthcare, ageing in place, and workforce support in responses to organizations like Grey Power Magazine. While broad consensus exists around protecting New Zealand Superannuation and acknowledging workforce pressures, their emphasis on home-based care, respite, and family carer support varies:

  • Labour: Focuses heavily on strengthening public health infrastructure and making healthcare more affordable. Labour's approach leans toward bolstering state-funded health delivery, addressing cost-of-living pressures affecting families, and supporting general access to community health services. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • National: Emphasizes broader economic management, growing the economy to fund public services, and keeping housing affordable. Their healthcare framework addresses aged and home-based care within overall health system targets and delivery rather than distinct structural overhauls, while maintaining recent adjustments to flexible funding rules that impact how families access allocated support.

  • Green Party: Places a strong, explicit emphasis on "ageing in place"—enabling older people to remain in their homes safely. The Greens prioritize expanding community-based health services, investing more heavily in localized support structures, and providing tangible recognition and support for unpaid family and whānau carers. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • New Zealand First: Has identified aged-care reform as a core priority. They have proposed a specific Seniors Housing Plan and targeted measures to enhance options for ageing in place, aiming to reduce systemic fragmentation in the aged care sector. [greypowermag.co.nz]

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Focuses on systemic income and support redesign, including a universal basic income approach and enhanced community-level integration. They place a high emphasis on supporting older individuals to stay in their homes and bolstering aid for family carers alongside housing/rates relief for older homeowners.

  • ACT & Te Pāti Māori: ACT did not participate in the recent comprehensive Grey Power Election Policy 2026 round due to capacity, but generally champions market-based choice, regulatory streamlining, and individual funding models. Te Pāti Māori did not respond to the specific 2026 questionnaire, though their broader health policies typically emphasize whānau-centred, kaupapa Māori community care models. [greypowermag.co.nz]

Note: Following recent sector pressures, the government has moved to ease some purchasing restrictions on flexible funding to give families more localized say over respite and daily support allocations, though finding a workforce and securing reliable hours remains a cross-party challenge.

If you'd like to narrow this down, tell me:

  • What is your biggest daily bottleneck (e.g., finding respite care, funding, or home support worker availability)?
  • Are you more interested in direct financial allowances for carers or increased funding for external services?

I can help you dig deeper into the specific party manifestos that address your primary concern.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties compare on home-based care, aged care and respite services?

AI Overview

In the 2026 New Zealand general election , major political parties differ significantly on their plans for home-based support, aged care, and workforce funding. The debate is heavily informed by the August 2026 release of the independent Aged Care Ministerial Advisory Group report , A place to grow old , which called for major systemic overhauls to address bed shortages and caregiver burnout.

Here is how the main parties compare on these issues:

Party Policies Comparison

Political Party Focus on Home-Based Care & "Aging in Place" Stance on Care Workers & Pay Equity Aged Care & Respite Commitments
National Focuses on healthcare efficiencies, digital health access, and expanding GP/Nurse Practitioner recruitment to support seniors at home. Emphasizes overall economic management while backing the 2026 Budget settings for frontline health funding. Pledges to address system sustainability following the Aged Care review; recently proposed retirement village reforms to give operators up to 12 months to repay departing residents' equity.
Labour Prioritizes making baseline healthcare more affordable to reduce household stress, including free GP visits and prescriptions. Promises an immediate $2.5 billion pay rise over four years for 65,000 care and support workers to help stabilize the workforce. Vows to introduce a law requiring retirement villages to repay departing residents or their estates within a much tighter three-month window.
Green Party Places heavy emphasis on helping seniors age in place through highly localized, community-based health networks. Pledges to reverse the coalition's pay equity reforms and fully fund a settlement for care workers within their first 100 days. Proposes systemic changes including a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village scheme to diversify care options.
NZ First Strongly advocates for expanding options that allow older New Zealanders to stay safely in their homes. Supports general pay equity initiatives to attract and retain critical care staff. Identifies broader aged-care sector reform as a headline election priority, including a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan.
ACT Focuses on reducing overall government spending and debt. Intends to reduce regulatory barriers and return per-capita public spending to 2017 levels. Advocates for private-sector efficiency rather than introducing state-mandated funding uplifts.

Key Takeaways for Unpaid Carers

  • Workforce Stability vs. Living Costs: Parties on the left (Labour and the Greens) focus heavily on boosting the wages and pay equity of professional home-care workers, arguing this will make booking reliable respite and daily support easier for families. National and NZ First focus on broader systemic health reforms and housing changes to help seniors age in place safely.

  • System Reform: Most parties agree that the underfunding highlighted in the August 2026 A place to grow old report needs addressing, but they disagree on whether the state or private sector should drive that change.

To help narrow down what matters most to your situation, would you like to look closer at financial support or allowances directly available to unpaid family carers, or would you prefer more details on a specific party's health budget?

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account