Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

For a renting couple with steady jobs who are trying to build a first-home deposit, the policies that matter most are usually the ones that affect four things:

  1. How much you can save each month (after-tax income and living costs)
  2. How fast rents rise
  3. Whether house prices and deposits become more reachable
  4. Whether the economy creates better wage growth and job security

Different parties may help on one of these while creating trade-offs elsewhere. For the 2026 New Zealand election, the main policy differences being discussed include tax settings, housing supply, rental rules, infrastructure, and cost-of-living measures. New Zealand Times

Policies that could leave renters with more money to save

1. Income tax cuts or targeted tax relief

How it could help you:

  • More take-home pay means a larger automatic deposit contribution each payday.
  • This is the most direct way a policy can increase a working couple’s saving capacity.

Possible trade-offs:

  • Tax cuts reduce government revenue, which may mean less money available for services, infrastructure, or housing programmes unless spending is reduced or other revenue is found.
  • The benefit depends on your income level and how tax changes are structured.

Some parties are emphasising lower-tax approaches, while others propose using new taxes to fund different priorities. KPMG

2. Measures that reduce rent pressure

Examples include:

  • Increasing housing supply
  • Building more social and affordable housing
  • Changing rental market rules
  • Expanding support for lower-income renters

How it could help you:

  • Even a $50–$100 weekly reduction in housing costs can materially speed up a deposit.
  • More rental supply can reduce competition between tenants.

Possible trade-offs:

  • Building homes takes years, so supply policies may not quickly change your current rent.
  • Stronger tenant protections may improve security but some economists argue they could affect landlord behaviour or rental supply, depending on design.
  • More direct rental assistance costs taxpayers.

The government’s 2026 Budget, for example, included changes to Accommodation Supplement settings and funding for additional social housing, illustrating one approach: increasing support rather than relying only on market changes. NZ 2026 Budget

3. Policies aimed at making first-home ownership easier

Possible approaches include:

  • Expanding first-home loan support
  • Changing lending rules
  • Increasing house building
  • Helping with infrastructure so more homes can be developed

How it could help you:

  • A smaller required deposit or easier access to finance could shorten the time before buying.

Possible trade-offs:

  • If demand increases faster than supply, assistance can sometimes push up prices rather than improve affordability.
  • Policies that help buyers can benefit existing owners more than renters if housing supply does not keep pace.

For example, raising first-home loan income limits is one type of policy approach that has been discussed. New Zealand Times

4. Housing supply and planning reform

Policies may include:

  • Faster approvals
  • More intensive housing in suitable areas
  • More infrastructure investment

How it could help you:

  • If more homes are built, the long-run effect could be lower pressure on rents and purchase prices.
  • More construction can also support jobs and economic activity.

Possible trade-offs:

  • Infrastructure costs have to be paid somehow.
  • Faster development can create local concerns about congestion, character changes, or environmental impacts.

5. Tax changes affecting landlords and property investment

Examples include:

  • Capital gains taxes
  • Land taxes
  • Changes to rental property tax treatment

How it could help you:

  • Supporters argue that changing tax settings could reduce incentives to bid up existing houses and could raise revenue for housing investment.
  • If housing becomes less attractive as an investment, some argue it could improve opportunities for first-home buyers.

Possible trade-offs:

  • Investors may respond by selling properties or increasing rents, depending on market conditions.
  • Tax changes can have effects beyond the intended target.

Current party proposals differ significantly: some parties support new taxes on property, wealth, or land; others oppose introducing new taxes and focus more on growth and lower taxes. New Zealand Times

A useful way to compare policies for your situation

You might ask each party:

Question Why it matters for you
“Will this increase our after-tax income?” Direct effect on deposit savings
“Will this reduce rent growth?” Biggest monthly cost for many renters
“Will this increase the number of homes being built?” Affects future affordability
“Could this increase house prices?” Important if you are saving to buy
“How is it paid for?” Determines long-term sustainability

One challenge for renters saving a deposit is that the policy that helps you save faster is not always the same policy that makes houses cheaper. For example, tax cuts may boost your savings rate, while supply reforms may take longer but target the underlying shortage. Policies that increase buyer purchasing power can also have different effects depending on how much new housing is added.

A practical way to evaluate your vote is to estimate your household’s biggest constraint:

  • If your problem is not enough left over each month, income and cost-of-living policies may matter most.
  • If your problem is rents rising faster than savings, rental supply and housing policies may matter most.
  • If your problem is the deposit gap, first-home and housing-market policies may matter most.

For comparing the specific 2026 party policies side-by-side, a policy comparison source such as Policy.nz can help you look at housing, tax, and income positions without reducing the decision to a single issue. policy.nz

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

For a renting couple trying to save a deposit, the "moving target" feeling is very real—rising living costs, rent, and house prices often outpace savings rates. Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, the major political parties are offering sharply contrasting approaches to housing, taxation, and the rental market.

Different policy directions can affect your ability to save money now versus your ability to buy later, each carrying distinct trade-offs.

1. Policies Aimed at Lowering Deposit Barriers & Upfront Costs

  • The Policies: Some parties (such as National) are proposing to expand access to low-deposit schemes, like widening the 5% deposit First Home Loan caps (e.g., removing or lifting income caps to a flat $300,000 threshold for buyers). Others (like NZ First) have floated co-investment or shared-equity models where the government takes a stake in the property to lower the required mortgage.
  • The Benefit for Saving: If eligible, you could enter the housing market sooner with a much smaller cash deposit, reducing the pressure to keep saving an ever-increasing 20% target.
  • The Trade-Offs: Lower deposit requirements don't change the total purchase price. Buying with a 5% deposit means a much larger mortgage, higher interest payments, and strict bank serviceability tests. It can also increase overall buyer competition, potentially driving up house prices.

2. Policies Aimed at Slowing House Prices and Taxing Investment

  • The Policies: Parties on the left and centre-left (such as Labour and the Greens) propose shifting the tax landscape on property. Labour has proposed a flat 28% capital gains tax on residential investment and commercial property (exempting the family home). The Greens propose extending the bright-line test to 10 years, removing mortgage interest deductibility for landlords, and introducing broader wealth taxes. Other minor parties (like The Opportunities Party) have advocated for an annual land value tax designed to reduce overall house prices.
  • The Benefit for Saving: The explicit goal of these policies is to cool speculative investor demand, dampen runaway house price inflation, and make the "target" stop moving so fast—or even bring purchase prices down.
  • The Trade-Offs: While cheaper house prices help buyers, discouraging private property investors can lead to a contraction in rental property supply. If rental stock shrinks, rents may rise, directly cutting into your weekly disposable income and making it harder to save your deposit.

3. Policies Focused on Rental Regulations and Cost of Living

  • The Policies: Parties like the Greens advocate for direct market interventions, such as caps on rent increases and stricter tenancy termination rules, alongside large-scale public housing builds. Other tax shifts (like Labour's proposed Medicard for free GP visits funded by a capital gains tax) aim to lower everyday household medical and living expenses.
  • The Benefit for Saving: Capping rent increases or cutting everyday living costs (like healthcare) directly protects your weekly cash flow, leaving more room at the end of the week to put into your savings account.
  • The Trade-Offs: Landlords often argue that heavy regulations or rent caps make providing rentals economically unviable, which can discourage investment, reduce the quality or maintenance of rental stock, or prompt landlords to exit the market, inadvertently squeezing tenants further.

4. Policies Focused on Deregulation and Supply

  • The Policies: Parties like ACT and National heavily emphasize supply-side solutions—overhauling the Resource Management Act (RMA), easing building consents, and encouraging medium-density and greenfield development to flood the market with houses.
  • The Benefit for Saving: Boosting the overall supply of houses over the long term is widely viewed by economists as a sustainable way to moderate price growth without destabilizing the rental market.
  • The Trade-Offs: Supply-side reform takes a long time to manifest. It offers very little immediate relief for a couple trying to bridge their deposit gap over the next year or two.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When weighing your options, consider which side of the fence your household sits on right now:

  • Do you prefer policies that protect your weekly rental costs and try to lower house prices (with the risk of tightening rental supply)?
  • Or do you prefer policies that make it easier to borrow with smaller deposits and encourage private supply (with the risk of keeping house prices competitive)?

How do you and your partner typically balance the priority between needing immediate relief on your weekly rent versus long-term changes to house prices?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

Saving for a first home while renting in Aotearoa New Zealand can feel like chasing a shifting finish line, especially when balancing steady incomes against high living costs and housing markets. Ahead of the 2026 General Election, different political parties are proposing distinct toolkits to address housing affordability, renting, and the cost of living.

To help weigh up your vote, here is a breakdown of the types of policies that could directly or indirectly leave a renting couple with more money in your pockets to save, alongside the economic and market trade-offs they carry.

1. Direct Rent Control and Tenancy Security Policies

  • What they look like: Policies proposed by parties like the Greens include capping annual rent increases (e.g., limiting hikes to a small percentage like 2% or tied to specific metrics) and further restricting no-cause tenancy terminations.

  • Potential benefit for your deposit: A legal cap on rent increases directly protects your weekly or fortnightly budget from sudden spikes, making your living expenses more predictable and leaving a larger, unmolested portion of your steady income available to funnel into your savings.

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Rental Supply Risks: Critics and economists often argue that strict rent controls reduce landlords' incentives to invest in or maintain rental properties, which can contract the overall supply of rental housing over time.

  • Higher Starting Rents: Landlords might raise initial asking rents higher between tenancies to pre-emptively buffer against future regulatory caps, potentially penalising renters who need to move.

2. Broad Tax Reforms and Capital Gains / Wealth Adjustments

  • What they look like: Proposals from progressive parties feature implementing comprehensive capital gains taxes (excluding the family home), extending bright-line tests, or re-introducing restrictions on mortgage interest deductibility for residential property investors. Conversely, center-right or right-leaning parties generally focus on avoiding new taxes on property investment to encourage private landlord participation.

  • Potential benefit for your deposit: Dampening the speculative appeal of residential property investment can level the playing field for first-home buyers by cooling runaway house price inflation. If house price growth moderates relative to your wage growth, the "moving target" of a required 20% deposit stabilises rather than accelerating out of reach.

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Downward Pressure on Rental Availability: If broad tax changes cause a mass exit of private mom-and-pop landlords from the market without an immediate matching surge in public housing, rental shortages can intensify.

  • Rents Passed On: Some landlords may attempt to pass increased holding costs or tax burdens directly onto tenants through higher rents, squeezing your weekly savings capacity in the short-to-medium term. [www.mymortgage.co.nz]

3. Supply-Side Zoning, Land Release, and Infrastructure Funding

  • What they look like: Broad consensus across many major parties involves streamlining urban planning laws, incentivising or mandating intensive council zoning reforms, and funding local infrastructure to open up land for new residential construction. [Policy.nz]

  • Potential benefit for your deposit: Boosting the overall pipeline of new housing in both public and private sectors helps match supply with population demand. Over time, an abundant supply subdues price appreciation, making entry-level standalone homes or townhouses genuinely more affordable to purchase. [Policy.nz]

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Infrastructure Lag: Infrastructure takes years to fund, consent, and build. This means supply-side policies are a long-term fix rather than an immediate cash-flow booster for your savings account today.

  • Local Amenity and Environment Effects: Fast-tracking intensive development can spark community debates regarding urban sprawl, strain on local stormwater/transport infrastructure, or neighborhood character.

4. First-Home Buyer Support and KiwiSaver Adjustments

  • What they look like: Policies aimed at boosting purchasing power, such as expanding income and price caps for Kainga Ora first-home products, lowering deposit thresholds for targeted groups, or enabling various forms of eased lending or KiwiSaver flexibilities.

  • Potential benefit for your deposit: Directly lowers the mathematical barrier to entry, meaning you might not need to save quite as long before qualifying for government-backed or lower-deposit mortgage finance.

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Demand-Driven Price Inflation: Injecting more purchasing power into the buyer pool without simultaneously increasing the physical number of houses tends to bid up house prices further. In effect, it can accidentally push the purchase target higher again, benefiting early adopters of the scheme while making the market hotter for others.

5. Cost-of-Living and Utility Interventions (Supermarket, Energy, Fuel)

  • What they look like: Policies targeting structural costs in the grocery, petrol, and electricity sectors.

  • Potential benefit for your deposit: While not explicitly "housing policies," reducing household expenditure on essential utilities frees up disposable income directly at the household level. For a working couple, lower grocery or power bills translate dollar-for-dollar into extra savings capacity for your deposit. [RNZ]

  • The Trade-offs:

  • Intervention Efficacy: Regulatory interventions in private markets can be legally complex and slow to deliver visible price relief at the checkout or power meter.

To compare individual party manifestos side-by-side on specific housing mechanisms, you can explore the independent election guide on Policy.nz. Weighing these up ultimately comes down to whether you prefer policies that attempt to lower house prices directly (risking rental market volatility) or policies that focus on boosting your immediate savings capacity and supply (which take longer to alter market values). [Policy.nz]

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What policies might leave a renting couple with more money to save, and what trade-offs would they involve?

AI Overview

Saving for a first home deposit as a renting couple in New Zealand means navigating competing economic visions in the 2026 General Election. Different political parties propose vastly different mechanisms to help you keep more money in your bank account, each carrying distinct financial trade-offs.

The primary policy pathways offered by the major parties are structured below by how they impact your ability to save:

1. Direct Rental Controls & Tenant Protections

These policies aim to immediately lower your cost of living by capping what landlords can charge you.

  • The Policy (Greens): The Green Party's "A Home for Everybody" policy proposes a Renters’ Rights Bill that legally caps annual rent increases at 2%. It would also introduce an independently certified Rental Warrant of Fitness (WoF) and ban no-cause evictions.

  • The Saving Mechanism: If your current rent is $600 a week, your landlord could legally only raise it by a maximum of $12 a year, providing high predictability for your savings budget.

  • The Trade-offs: Opponents like ACT argue that rent caps suppress housing supply by making residential property less attractive to investors. A lower supply of private rentals could make finding a flat much more competitive. Furthermore, a strict Rental WoF might prompt some landlords to sell their properties or pass remediation costs on through other means.

2. Tax Relief & Fiscal Restraint

This approach focuses on letting you keep more of your active income through tax cuts while suppressing rent inflation by reducing costs for property investors.

  • The Policy (National / ACT): The National Party focuses on targeted cost-of-living relief, spending restraint, and keeping landlord tax incentives—such as mortgage interest deductibility —fully intact. They point to Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) data showing that national weekly rent growth flattened in 2025–2026 after these investor tax rules were restored.

  • The Saving Mechanism: Keeping investor taxes low is intended to prevent landlords from raising rents to cover tax bills. Concurrently, broader income tax brackets or fuel-crisis support aim to increase your take-home pay.

  • The Trade-offs: Leaving investor tax breaks intact means property investors remain highly competitive in the buyers' market. This increased demand from investors can push up entry-level house prices, meaning your "moving target" deposit could grow faster. I Ranked Every Party's Property Policy [NZ Election 2026]Labour's tax plans & your NZ rental property (2026 election)

3. Lowering Everyday Living Costs & Targeting Speculation

This framework seeks to penalize property speculation to cool house prices while heavily subsidizing your non-housing monthly bills.

  • The Policy (Labour): The Labour Party is campaigning on a flat 28% Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on the profits of residential investment properties (excluding the family home), scheduled to start 1 July 2027. Crucially, Labour leader Chris Hipkins confirmed they will not reverse interest deductibility for landlords, explicitly to avoid giving landlords a reason to spike rents. To free up cash, they also pledge a $20 weekly public transport fare cap and free doctor visits via a "Medicard".

  • The Saving Mechanism: A CGT redirects investor focus away from quick property flipping, which can help cool house prices so your deposit goal stops moving. Subsidized transport and healthcare directly lower your monthly overheads.

  • The Trade-offs: Critics argue that introducing a CGT adds regulatory complexity and could depress overall construction if developers face lower profit margins. While it protects your immediate rental costs by maintaining interest deductibility, it does not legally stop a landlord from raising rent due to general market pressures. Election 2026: Labour confirms it will allow residential property investors to continue deducting interest as an expense when paying tax - NZ HeraldI Ranked Every Party's Property Policy [NZ Election 2026]Cost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 20265 things to know before renting in New Zealand

Strategic Financial Comparison

Policy Pillar Primary Benefit to Renters Major Financial Risk / Trade-off
Rent Caps (2%) Guarantees predictable, low housing cost increases. Can shrink the pool of available private rentals.
Investor Tax Breaks Curbs rapid rent inflation by lowering landlord overheads. Keeps investors active in the market, potentially driving up house prices.
Capital Gains Tax (28%) Cools property speculation to stabilize house prices. May reduce new housing build volumes over time.

Government Support Schemes

Beyond systemic policies, look out for tweaks to existing first-home tools. For instance, National has proposed raising the income threshold to less than $300,000 combined income so more couples can qualify for government low-deposit (5%) schemes.

If you want to look at how these dynamics fit your exact situation, let me know:

  • Your approximate combined annual income

  • What region of New Zealand you are looking to buy in

  • Your current estimated timeline for buying

I can provide a clearer picture of how these policies might change your specific savings trajectory.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account